Reclaiming Dignity: A Theological and Biblical Response to Islamic Female Veiling Practices

Title: Reclaiming Dignity: A Theological and Biblical Response to Islamic Female Veiling Practices

Author: Dr. Maxwell Shimba
Shimba Theological Institute, Orlando, Florida

---

Abstract
This article critically evaluates the Islamic practice of female veiling, particularly the burqa and niqab, from a biblical and theological perspective. While proponents claim divine origin for such practices, a careful exegesis of both biblical and Islamic sources reveals cultural impositions rather than divine mandates. By examining the portrayal of women in the Bible—particularly Sarah, Ruth, Esther, and Mary—this paper argues that female visibility, dignity, and agency are inherent in God’s design. Furthermore, the Christian moral framework places the responsibility for lust and immorality not on women's visibility but on individual moral discipline. This paper challenges the notion that extreme veiling is a reflection of divine holiness, instead exposing it as a cultural mechanism of control rooted in patriarchal interpretation.

---

1. Introduction
In recent Islamic discourse, particularly within conservative jurisprudence, female veiling is presented as a divine requirement—a symbol of piety and social order. However, upon theological scrutiny, this practice appears more aligned with patriarchal cultural control than with divine ordinance. The Quranic justification is often vague, and the Hadith literature provides troubling implications about gender roles and public decency.

---

2. Biblical Portrayal of Women and Visibility
The Bible consistently presents women as visible, active participants in society and God’s redemptive narrative. In Genesis 12:11–13, Sarah’s beauty is acknowledged publicly. While Abraham expresses fear, the response is deception—not concealment—underscoring the cultural tension but not prescribing veiling. Ruth wins Boaz’s favor while gleaning publicly in the field (Ruth 2:2–12), and Esther enters a royal beauty contest with her appearance on full display (Esther 2:7–17). These examples demonstrate that women were neither expected to be hidden nor shamed for their beauty.

Even Mary, the mother of Jesus, wore traditional modest attire consistent with Jewish customs (Luke 1:27), but there is no scriptural or historical evidence that she wore a full face veil or lived in social seclusion. Her visibility and mobility are assumed throughout the Gospel narratives (Luke 1:39–56; John 2:1–5).

---

3. Islamic Veiling: Qur’anic and Hadith Foundations
While proponents of the burqa cite verses like Surah An-Nur (24:31) and Al-Ahzab (33:59), these passages mention modesty and covering the bosom but do not explicitly mandate full facial concealment or garments resembling isolation. The Quranic instruction is vague, and interpretations vary widely among Islamic scholars.

However, many Hadiths present more rigid expectations. For instance, Sunan Abu Dawood 641 states:

"Asma, daughter of Abu Bakr, entered upon the Messenger of Allah (peace be upon him) wearing thin clothes. The Messenger turned his face and said: ‘O Asma’, when a girl reaches menstruating age, it is not proper that anything should remain exposed except this and this.’ He pointed to his face and hands."

Ironically, even this Hadith contradicts the burqa, as it permits the visibility of the face and hands—undermining claims that the burqa is divinely mandated.

---

4. Apostolic Teaching on Head Coverings
Christian opponents of veiling often encounter Muslims citing 1 Corinthians 11:5–6, where Paul discusses head coverings for women. However, a contextual reading shows that Paul is addressing worship conduct within church gatherings—not public dress codes. Moreover, Paul refers only to covering the head, not the face, and makes no reference to bodily obscuration. His concern is theological symbolism within the Corinthian church, not a universal dress code (Keener, 2014).

---

5. Theological and Ethical Implications
Jesus Christ rebuked those who enforced human traditions as divine commands:

“They worship me in vain; their teachings are merely human rules. You have let go of the commands of God and are holding on to human traditions” (Mark 7:7–8, NIV).

The excessive veiling of women under Islamic law falls within the purview of man-made tradition rather than God-breathed commandment. In Christian theology, morality is grounded not in controlling others’ visibility but in cultivating internal holiness (Matthew 5:27–30). It is the lustful heart that is condemned, not the female presence.

---

6. Conclusion
Scripture does not support the erasure of women through full veiling practices. Rather, it affirms their dignity, presence, and purpose in society. The burden of moral conduct is not on a woman’s concealment but on every individual's discipline and submission to God. Christianity liberates women from cultural impositions masquerading as divine commands. Any religious practice that seeks to erase, hide, or diminish half of humanity must be evaluated not by its cultural defensibility but by its theological legitimacy.

---

Bibliography

• Al-Qur'an. Surah An-Nur 24:31; Surah Al-Ahzab 33:59.

• Bible. Genesis 12:11–13; Ruth 2; Esther 2; Luke 1; Mark 7:7–8; Matthew 5:27–30; 1 Corinthians 11.

• Abu Dawood, Sunan. Hadith No. 641.

• Keener, Craig S. The IVP Bible Background Commentary: New Testament. InterVarsity Press, 2014.

• Mernissi, Fatima. The Veil and the Male Elite: A Feminist Interpretation of Islam. Perseus Books, 1991.

• Stowasser, Barbara Freyer. Women in the Qur’an, Traditions, and Interpretation. Oxford University Press, 1994.

• Shimba, Maxwell. Biblical Womanhood and Cultural Oppression: A Theological Inquiry. Orlando: Shimba Theological Institute Press, 2022.

• Shimba, Maxwell. Islam and the Marginalization of Women: A Christian Theological Response. Orlando: Shimba Theological Institute, 2024.

---