Jesus Christ Is God Manifest in the Flesh: A Theological Declaration

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba | Shimba Theological Institute

One of the most profound and foundational truths of Christian theology is the divinity of Jesus Christ. He was not merely a prophet, a teacher, or a moral leader — He is God incarnate, the visible image of the invisible God. The Bible does not leave this truth to speculation; it declares it plainly and unapologetically.

---

Jesus Demands Equal Honor with God

In John 5:23, Jesus makes a striking statement:

“That all should honor the Son just as they honor the Father. He who does not honor the Son does not honor the Father who sent Him.”

This is no trivial claim. Jesus demands the same honor due to God Himself. No mere prophet in biblical history ever dared to ask for the same reverence given to Yahweh. Isaiah, Moses, David — none spoke such words. This alone establishes Jesus as far more than a human messenger. He is worthy of divine honor because He is divine.

---

Jesus Reveals Himself as the Visible Image of God

In John 14:9, Jesus answers Philip’s request to see the Father with these profound words:

“Anyone who has seen Me has seen the Father.”

This declaration confirms the Christian doctrine of the Incarnation — that God took on human flesh and walked among His creation in the person of Jesus Christ. He is the exact representation of God's being (Hebrews 1:3), not a reflection or a symbol, but God Himself made manifest.

---

The Biblical Witness to Christ’s Divinity

The testimony of Scripture, from the Gospels to the Epistles, consistently proclaims the deity of Christ:

• John 1:1,14 — “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God… and the Word became flesh.”

• Colossians 2:9 — “For in Christ all the fullness of the Deity lives in bodily form.”

• Titus 2:13 — “Looking for the blessed hope and glorious appearing of our great God and Savior Jesus Christ.”

---

Conclusion: The Only Name That Saves

Recognizing Jesus as God is not optional for those seeking salvation. As Jesus declared in John 8:24:

“If you do not believe that I am He, you will die in your sins.”

At Shimba Theological Institute, we boldly affirm this eternal truth: Jesus Christ is the living God, the eternal Word, the sinless Savior, and the only hope for mankind.

To reject His divinity is to reject God Himself.

Believe in Him today — and you shall live.

---

Is Angel Gabriel the Same as Jibreel of Islam? A Theological Examination

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba

One of the most perplexing contradictions between the Christian Gospel and the Islamic Qur'an lies in the messages allegedly delivered by the angelic figure known as Gabriel. In the Bible, Gabriel is a trusted messenger of the Most High God, consistently proclaiming the truth of God’s eternal plan. However, in Islam, Jibreel — claimed to be the same angel — delivers conflicting revelations that deny foundational truths established centuries earlier. Can both be the same being? Theologically, the answer is a resounding no.

---

Gabriel’s Message to Mary: Jesus is the Son of God

In Luke 1:26-35, the angel Gabriel was sent by God to a virgin named Mary. His message was clear and unambiguous:

“The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you. Therefore the holy one to be born will be called the Son of God.” (Luke 1:35)

Here, Gabriel affirms the divinity of Christ before His birth. Not metaphorically, but ontologically — Jesus is the literal Son of God, conceived by the Holy Spirit, not through human means.

---

Jibreel’s Message to Muhammad: Jesus is Not the Son of God

Centuries later, Muhammad claimed that the same angel, now referred to as Jibreel, delivered the Qur'an to him. Yet in Surah Al-Ikhlas 112:3, this Jibreel vehemently denies God having a son:

“He neither begets nor is born.”

Further, in Surah Maryam 19:88-92, the Qur'an states that claiming God has a son is a monstrous blasphemy.

---

Can a True Messenger of God Contradict Himself?

This poses an irreconcilable theological problem. The God of the Bible is unchanging:

“God is not a man, that He should lie, nor a son of man, that He should change His mind.” (Numbers 23:19)

If Gabriel was truly sent by God in both instances, his message would remain consistent, as God does not contradict Himself. Therefore, either one message is false — or these are two entirely different spirits.

---

Testing the Spirits

The Bible warns against deception from masquerading spirits:

“Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God.” (1 John 4:1)

If one “Gabriel” proclaims Jesus as God’s Son, and another “Jibreel” denies this, only one can be the true messenger. The evidence suggests that the Jibreel of Islam is not the same as the Gabriel of the Bible, but a deceptive spirit aiming to corrupt the Gospel’s central truth.

---

Conclusion: A Call to Discernment

This glaring contradiction should stir the hearts of sincere seekers. The real Gabriel proclaimed the incarnation of the Son of God as the hope of humanity. The contradictory message of Jibreel opposes this eternal truth, and by biblical measure, is not from God.

I urge readers — test these claims, study the Scriptures, and recognize that Jesus is the eternal Son of God, the only way to salvation.

“I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.” (John 14:6)

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba

---

10 Clear Reasons Why Muhammad Was Never a True Prophet of God

10 Clear Reasons Why Muhammad Was Never a True Prophet of God

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba

Throughout history, God’s true prophets have demonstrated integrity, holiness, compassion, and unwavering obedience to divine moral standards. From Noah to Moses, David to Isaiah — none ever violated the sacred laws they proclaimed. However, when we examine the character and actions of Muhammad through Islamic sources themselves, it becomes evident that he could not have been a true prophet of the living God. Here are ten undeniable reasons:

1. A Prophet of God Never Orders the Stoning of Others for Rejecting Him — But Muhammad Did.

Evidence: Ibn Ishaq, page 764
No prophet of God ever commanded the execution of those who disbelieved in him. They preached repentance and left judgment to God. Muhammad, however, ordered executions for disbelief.

---

2. A Prophet of God Would Never Marry the Wife of His Adopted Son — But Muhammad Did.

When Zayd, Muhammad’s adopted son, divorced his wife Zaynab, Muhammad married her — something no prophet of God ever permitted for themselves.
Qur'anic Reference: Surah Al-Ahzab 33:37

---

3. A Prophet Would Never Give a Woman as a Gift to Satisfy Another Man’s Desires — But Muhammad Did.

Proof: Sahih Al-Bukhari Vol. 1, Hadith 371
This act dehumanizes women, treating them as property — a practice never endorsed by any true prophet.

---

4. No Prophet Ever Violated the Sanctity of Family, Let Alone His Own Aunt — But Muhammad Did.

Proof: Kanz Al-Ummal, Hadith Chapter 13, Page 274
This shameful act stands in stark contradiction to the purity expected of a prophet.

---

5. A Prophet of God Would Never Slaughter Hundreds for Disbelief — But Muhammad Did.

Proof: Sahih Muslim Hadith 4390
Ordering the massacre of 800 men in a single night for not accepting his claim disqualifies him as a prophet of mercy.

---

6. A Prophet Would Never Order the Killing of a Woman for a Trivial Offense — But Muhammad Did.

Evidence: Ibn Ishaq, Pages 819 & 995
The sanctity of life — especially women — is upheld by all true prophets, yet Muhammad transgressed this repeatedly.

---

7. No Prophet Would Stone a Pregnant Woman Begging for Mercy — But Muhammad Did.

Proof: Sahih Muslim, Book 17, Hadith 4206
True prophets lead with mercy and redemption, not cruelty.

---

8. A Prophet Would Never Command Forced Conversions or Kill Those Who Refuse — But Muhammad Did.

Proof: Surah At-Tawbah 9:5
This command alone exposes the violent expansionist nature of early Islam, a sharp contrast to Biblical prophets.

---

9. No Prophet Would Keep and Use Sex Slaves — But Muhammad Did.

Despite having numerous wives, Muhammad kept and used sex slaves, a violation of God’s moral laws regarding human dignity.

---

10. No Prophet Would Marry a Child and Consummate the Marriage at Nine — But Muhammad Did.

Proof: Sahih Muslim, Hadith 3309
This act alone invalidates any claim to divine moral authority.

---

Final Warning and Invitation

If you still believe in this man as God’s messenger after knowing these facts from Islamic sources themselves, understand that you are embracing what God condemns.
The God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob — and the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ — would never send such a man. The earlier you accept Jesus Christ, the true and sinless Son of God, the better. He alone lived without sin, gave His life as a ransom for all, and rose again for our justification.

Reject deception. Choose eternal life. Accept Jesus today.

---

The God Who Can Be a Mosquito But Refuses to Be a Man? A Challenge to Allah’s Character

The God Who Can Be a Mosquito But Refuses to Be a Man? A Challenge to Allah’s Character

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba

One of the most puzzling and revealing passages in the Qur'an comes from Surah Al-Baqarah 2:26, where it states:

“Indeed, Allah is not ashamed to set forth an example — even of a mosquito or something smaller…”

Now pause for a moment and reflect — the Qur'an claims that Allah is not ashamed to compare Himself to, or use as an example, the lowliest of insects. A mosquito. An insignificant, irritating, disease-carrying creature. Yet, this same Allah, according to Islamic theology, utterly refuses to incarnate or manifest Himself in human form, claiming it would be beneath Him.

But Why?

If Allah has no shame in associating His message or signs with a mosquito, how then is it shameful to enter into His own creation as a man?
Would it not be more honorable for God to reveal Himself in the dignity of human form — as Christians believe He did in Jesus Christ, the Son of God — than to liken Himself to the basest of creatures?

The Problem of Consistency

Islamic scholars often argue that God cannot take human form because it would limit His majesty. Yet the Qur'an itself shows Allah setting examples even with insects and lesser things. Is the form of a man not higher than a mosquito?
If Allah has no issue using the lowest creatures for parables, why deny humanity the honor of beholding the Almighty in flesh?

This reveals a troubling inconsistency in Islamic theology:

• A God who can lower Himself to the level of insects, yet denies human incarnation.

• A deity concerned with appearances before men, but unconcerned with coherence in divine character.

Contrast with the God of the Bible

The Bible boldly declares:
“The Word became flesh and made His dwelling among us.” (John 1:14)
“He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.” (Colossians 1:15)

The Christian God is not afraid of condescension — He is the God who humbles Himself to be born as a man, to walk among His creation, to suffer, and to redeem. That is power. That is majesty. That is love.

A Challenge to Islamic Thought

If Allah truly is sovereign, limitless, and merciful — what stops him from taking human form? And if he fears ‘shame’ in doing so, why does he claim to have no shame in being likened to a mosquito?

The inconsistency exposes a limitation in Islamic theology’s understanding of God’s nature. A God who can be a mosquito should certainly be able to become a man — and indeed, the true and living God did just that in Jesus Christ.

I leave you with this: Which image reveals greater love and power — the God who might be likened to an insect, or the God who humbled Himself to walk among us and give His life for our salvation?

Choose wisely. Eternity depends on it.

---

Jesus Christ: The Son of God — A Divine Truth Beyond Debate

Jesus Christ: The Son of God — A Divine Truth Beyond Debate

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba

Throughout history, one of the most profound and debated declarations in religious thought is this: Jesus Christ is the Son of God. This isn’t a title born of human speculation, nor a later invention of Christian theology. It is a divine identity, established by the testimony of Scripture, affirmed by the prophets, and revealed by God Himself.

The Biblical Witness

The Holy Bible consistently affirms the divine sonship of Jesus. At His baptism, God audibly declared:
“This is My beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.” (Matthew 3:17)

At the transfiguration, God spoke again from heaven:
“This is My beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased. Listen to Him.” (Matthew 17:5)

Furthermore, the apostle John confirmed the eternal nature of the Son:
“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.” (John 1:1)
“And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we beheld His glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth.” (John 1:14)

What Does 'Son of God' Mean?

Many critics, particularly in Islamic thought, misunderstand the term ‘Son of God’, assuming it implies a biological relationship. However, in biblical theology, ‘Son of God’ denotes divine nature and eternal relationship within the Trinity — Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.

It signifies:

• Pre-existence before creation (John 17:5)

• Divine authority over all things (Matthew 28:18)

• Unique relationship with the Father (John 5:18-23)

• Participation in creation itself (Colossians 1:16-17)

The Testimony of Prophecy

Long before His earthly birth, the prophets spoke of a divine Son:
“For unto us a Child is born, unto us a Son is given… and His name will be called Wonderful, Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.” (Isaiah 9:6)

This Son would not be a mere mortal prophet but Mighty God Himself incarnate.

Why It Matters

The Sonship of Jesus is not a side issue — it is the cornerstone of salvation. If Jesus were only a man, His death could not atone for the sins of the world. Only the sinless, divine Son could bridge the chasm between a holy God and fallen humanity.

“Whoever denies the Son does not have the Father either; he who acknowledges the Son has the Father also.” (1 John 2:23)

The Sonship of Christ is the dividing line between eternal life and eternal loss.

Conclusion

Jesus is not merely a prophet or a teacher. He is the Son of the living God, the Savior of the world, and the King of kings. Any doctrine that denies His Sonship denies God’s revelation and strips the Gospel of its power.

As Jesus Himself asked:
“Who do you say that I am?” (Matthew 16:15)

The only correct answer, like Peter’s, must be:
“You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.” (Matthew 16:16)

I, Dr. Maxwell Shimba, affirm this eternal truth and invite you to encounter the Son of God who alone offers eternal life.

---

Scientific & Theological Debate: Refuting Sahih Muslim 2643b

Claim from Sahih Muslim 2643b:

"The creation of any one of you is like this: that semen is collected in the womb of the mother for forty nights…"

Scientific Fact:
Modern embryology has thoroughly mapped out human conception and fetal development. Here’s what real biology tells us:

• Semen does not remain ‘collected in the womb for forty days’.
  Semen’s job is to deliver sperm to fertilize an egg. This happens typically within 24 hours after intercourse — sperm cells reach the fallopian tubes within minutes and fertilization occurs there, not in the womb (uterus).

• Once an egg is fertilized, it becomes a zygote, travels down the fallopian tube, and implants into the uterine wall within 6-12 days — not 40 days of “semen collection.”

• There’s no scientific or biological process where semen remains ‘collected’ for 40 nights as suggested by this hadith. It’s a demonstrably false pre-modern belief.

Theological Question:
If Allah is truly Al-‘Alīm (The All-Knowing), why would He reveal scientifically flawed biological claims through Muhammad?
And if Muhammad was indeed a true prophet of the one true God, how could he preach something so biologically inaccurate and inconsistent with observable human development?

In contrast, the Bible is scientifically neutral on embryology. It acknowledges life’s mystery in the womb without making faulty biological claims:
“For you formed my inward parts; you knitted me together in my mother's womb.” — Psalm 139:13 (ESV)

It poetically speaks of God’s sovereign work in the womb without detailing flawed stages.

Final Thought:
If Muhammad made such provably false statements about human creation, should his prophethood not be questioned?
And if Allah’s supposed revelation contradicts established science, is this truly from an all-knowing, all-wise deity — or a man’s guesswork in a pre-scientific era?

Truth is not afraid of scrutiny. Test every claim. The evidence points to Christ as the flawless, sinless, miracle-working Lord — not Muhammad.

#ScienceVsHadith #TruthMatters #JesusIsLord

---

Would you like a short social media version of this too?

A Scientific and Rational Challenge to Sahih Muslim 2643b

In Sahih Muslim 2643b, it is narrated that the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) said:

"There is no disease that Allah has created, except that He also has created its treatment."

At first glance, this sounds optimistic — but let's test it against modern medical science and observable reality.

Scientific Refutation:

If every disease truly had a cure created by Allah, why do countless diseases remain incurable even in the 21st century?
What about:

• HIV/AIDS — no definitive cure, only management therapies.

• Cancers — many types remain terminal and uncurable.

• Neurodegenerative diseases — like Alzheimer’s and ALS, with no known cure.

• Genetic disorders — like Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy or Huntington's Disease, irreversible and fatal.

If Allah created cures for these, where are they?
Humanity has been relentlessly searching through science, yet millions still die painfully each year.

Theological Question:

If Allah, as per Islamic belief, is All-Knowing and All-Merciful, why withhold those cures for millennia while millions suffer?
What kind of divine justice or mercy is this?
And what does it say about Muhammad's prophethood if such claims, stated as divine truths, collapse under empirical scrutiny?

In contrast, Jesus Christ didn’t make medical claims — He healed supernaturally, instantly curing the blind, the paralyzed, and even raising the dead, as verified in multiple eyewitness accounts (Mark 5:41-43, John 11:43-44).

Moreover, the Bible never pretends that every disease has an earthly cure — it acknowledges the fallen nature of humanity and offers eternal life in a perfect, healed world through Christ.

So, dear reader: who truly speaks with divine authority?

• A prophet whose sayings fail under modern evidence?

• Or the sinless, miracle-working Jesus Christ, whose words and power transcend time and science?

The choice is yours.

#TruthTested #ScienceVsHadith #JesusIsLord

---

For Christ’s sake — what kind of teaching is this?

Sahih al-Bukhari 6807 says:

“Whoever guarantees what is between their legs (private parts) and jaws (tongue), I (Muhammad) will guarantee them Paradise.”

Really? Is that what paradise is built on — controlling private parts? What a tragic misuse of religion to police women and reduce salvation to bodily control.

Meanwhile, Jesus Christ — the sinless Son of God — never promised heaven for fleshly restraint but called us to purity of heart and a transformed life.
He valued women, honored them, spoke to them, and revealed His resurrection to them first!

Jesus was sinless.
He is the only true hope for eternity.

No paradise is worth a life of oppression. No faith should enslave half its people.
Come to the One who said: “If the Son sets you free, you will be free indeed.” (John 8:36)

#TruthMatters #JesusIsLord #WomenMatter #FreedomInChrist

---

A Debate of Dignity: Islam’s Controversial Hadith vs. the Sinless Christ

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba

For heaven’s sake — what kind of teaching is this?

Let’s look closely at a shocking narration from Sahih al-Bukhari 6807, one of Islam’s most authoritative hadith collections. It reads:

Narrated Sahl bin Sa'd:
The Prophet (Muhammad) said, “Whoever can guarantee (the chastity of) what is between his jaws (i.e. his tongue) and what is between his legs (i.e. his private parts), I guarantee him Paradise.”
(Sahih al-Bukhari 6807)

Now, pause and reflect: is this the foundation for eternal life — control over tongue and private parts? How tragic that an entire religious promise of Paradise can be reduced to carnal restraint and silence. Worse, this has historically been used to suppress, shame, and control women’s bodies within strict, male-dominated systems.

Why should women’s dignity be a transactional key to a man’s paradise? Is this religion or control in disguise? While the Islamic tradition has continually placed undue emphasis on female modesty as a measure of male piety, this narration reveals a concerning mindset — one deeply rooted in legalistic, performance-based religion.

Meanwhile, Jesus Christ stands in total contrast.

The Bible teaches that salvation isn’t earned by physical restraint or legalistic rituals but is a gift of grace through faith (Ephesians 2:8-9). Jesus, the only sinless man to walk the earth (1 Peter 2:22), never spoke of paradise as a reward for restraining private parts. Instead, He called people to purity of heart, compassion, and spiritual rebirth.

Why is this important? Because if Jesus were not sinless, there would be no hope of salvation for humanity. Adam and Eve’s disobedience in Eden (Genesis 3) brought sin into the world, but it was the sinless Jesus who offered Himself as the perfect sacrifice for sin (2 Corinthians 5:21).

The Bible records:

“For we do not have a high priest who is unable to sympathize with our weaknesses, but one who in every respect has been tempted as we are, yet without sin.”
(Hebrews 4:15)

While some religious systems promise paradise based on controlling desires, Jesus offers eternal life based on a transformed heart and a living relationship with God.

Final Word

No faith should ever diminish a woman’s worth or reduce divine reward to control over fleshly impulses. Christ uplifted women, valued them, healed them, spoke to them publicly, and first revealed His resurrection to them (John 20:16-18). In His kingdom, there is neither male nor female — all are one in Christ Jesus (Galatians 3:28).

This is the eternal dignity and purity of the Gospel, which no hadith or human tradition can replace.

I weep for those still enslaved by doctrines of fleshly control and invite them to know the liberating, sinless Savior: Jesus Christ.

Dr. Maxwell Shimba
Shimba Theological Institute

---

Response to Muhammad Amin Alhassan

Response to Muhammad Amin Alhassan

By Max Shimba

Brother Muhammad Amin, with all due respect — it seems you’ve misunderstood my point. I did not ignore Qur’an 20:10. In fact, I clearly stated that you cannot fully grasp the entire account of Moses’ calling if you isolate one verse, which is precisely what you attempted when quoting Qur’an 20:11-12 while overlooking the context in Qur’an 20:10.

You accused me of disregarding the mention of the fire, yet ironically, it was your own citation that left out Q 20:10 — the very verse that references Moses seeing a fire. I merely pointed out that if your claim is that the Qur'an omits the burning bush narrative found in the Bible, you need to be consistent in presenting the whole context when quoting from your own scripture.

Let’s be clear:

Qur’an 20:10
“When he saw a fire, he said to his family, ‘Wait here; indeed, I have perceived a fire. Perhaps I can bring you a torch or find guidance at the fire.’”

This corresponds to the biblical account in Exodus 3:2, where Moses encounters a bush that burns without being consumed. The difference, however, is that the Qur’an omits the miraculous detail of the bush not being consumed, which is central to the biblical narrative — a detail that powerfully signified God’s holy presence.

So my argument was never that the Qur'an didn’t mention fire — it was that the Qur'an presents a different, less detailed, and theologically less significant account compared to the Torah. That was my point, and it remains valid.

If we are to engage in honest comparison, both scriptures should be read in full context — and when we do so, the Bible offers a clearer, richer, and historically attested account of Moses’ encounter with God at the burning bush.

Respectfully,
Max Shimba
Shimba Theological Institute

---