The Fulfillment of 2 Corinthians 11:2-4 in the False Doctrine of Isa Bin Maryam

Title: The Fulfillment of 2 Corinthians 11:2-4 in the False Doctrine of Isa Bin Maryam

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba | Shimba Theological Institute

The Apostle Paul, under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, issued a timeless warning to the early church about deceivers who would introduce counterfeit gospels and a false Christ. In 2 Corinthians 11:2-4, Paul writes:

“For I am jealous for you with a godly jealousy. I promised you to one husband, to Christ, so that I might present you as a pure virgin to Him. But I am afraid that just as Eve was deceived by the serpent’s cunning, your minds may somehow be led astray from your sincere and pure devotion to Christ. For if someone comes and preaches a Jesus other than the Jesus we preached, or if you receive a different spirit from the one you received, or a different gospel from the one you accepted, you put up with it easily enough.”

Paul’s prophecy came to life centuries later through Muhammad, the founder of Islam. In the 7th century, Muhammad introduced a figure called Isa Bin Maryam in the Quran — a character carrying the name of Jesus but stripped of His divine nature, crucifixion, resurrection, and redemptive work.

This Isa denies being the Son of God, rejects the cross, and instead, points people to Muhammad as the final prophet. He proclaims a different gospel entirely — one based on works, law, and submission to a god foreign to the God of the Bible.

This is precisely the deception Paul warned about:

• A different Jesus — not the crucified, risen, and divine Savior, but a mortal prophet.

• A different spirit — not the Holy Spirit, but one denying the Sonship of Christ.

• A different gospel — not salvation by grace through faith, but by religious submission and works.

Millions have since followed this counterfeit Christ, believing in a message Paul foresaw would come to seduce hearts and minds away from the true Gospel.

The lesson remains urgent today. Christianity must continue to expose this false doctrine and reaffirm that salvation is found in no one else but Jesus Christ — the Son of God, crucified and risen for the salvation of mankind.

“For there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved.” (Acts 4:12)

May the Church stand firm against every counterfeit gospel, and may those trapped in deception find the true Savior, not Isa Bin Maryam, but Jesus Christ, the Lord of Glory.

---

The Warning of 2 Corinthians 11:2-4 Fulfilled in Muhammad’s Isa Bin Maryam

Title: The Warning of 2 Corinthians 11:2-4 Fulfilled in Muhammad’s Isa Bin Maryam

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba | Shimba Theological Institute

The Apostle Paul, through the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, issued a prophetic warning to the early Church about false teachers and counterfeit gospels that would arise to deceive many. In 2 Corinthians 11:2-4, Paul writes:

“For I am jealous for you with a godly jealousy. I promised you to one husband, to Christ, so that I might present you as a pure virgin to him. But I am afraid that just as Eve was deceived by the serpent’s cunning, your minds may somehow be led astray from your sincere and pure devotion to Christ. For if someone comes to you and preaches a Jesus other than the Jesus we preached, or if you receive a different spirit from the Spirit you received, or a different gospel from the one you accepted, you put up with it easily enough.” (2 Corinthians 11:2-4, NIV)

What a clear and timeless warning — and history has shown it to be true.

Centuries after this epistle was penned, Muhammad arose in 7th-century Arabia claiming to be a prophet. In the Quran, he introduced a figure called Isa Bin Maryam (Jesus son of Mary), who, though carrying the name of our Lord Jesus, is a completely different character from the true Son of God revealed in the Bible.

Isa Bin Maryam of the Quran is neither divine nor crucified. He denies his own deity, prophesies the coming of Muhammad, and offers a counterfeit gospel. This is precisely what Paul warned about — a different Jesus, a different spirit, and a different gospel.

Paul's prophecy finds its perfect fulfillment in the Islamic distortion of Jesus’ identity:

• The Biblical Jesus is God incarnate, crucified and risen.

• The Quran’s Isa is a mere human prophet, neither crucified nor divine, and subordinate to Muhammad’s message.

This deception has led over a billion souls astray, accepting a false Christ that can neither save nor redeem.

Paul foresaw this danger. His warning wasn’t only for the Corinthian church but for all generations. The Quran’s presentation of Isa is not a continuation of Biblical truth — it’s a calculated counterfeit, exactly what the apostle cautioned against.

As believers, we must remain vigilant. The true Gospel is found only in the Bible. Any other ‘Jesus’ or gospel must be rejected. Muhammad’s Isa Bin Maryam is a false doctrine — a prophetic fulfillment of Paul’s dire warning.

In conclusion, 2 Corinthians 11:2-4 isn’t merely an ancient caution. It’s a divine lens through which we see the cunning deception of Islam’s Isa. The counterfeit Christ cannot save — only the risen Jesus of the Scriptures can.

Stay grounded in the Word. Test every spirit. Defend the faith.

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba
Shimba Theological Institute

---

The Problem of Blood-Bought Paradise: A Biblical and Theological Critique of Quran 9:111

The Problem of Blood-Bought Paradise: A Biblical and Theological Critique of Quran 9:111

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba | Shimba Theological Institute

---

Introduction

One of the most controversial verses in the Quran is found in Surah At-Tawbah (9:111). It boldly declares that Allah has purchased the lives and wealth of the believers in exchange for Paradise, on the condition that they fight in His cause, kill, and be killed. What’s even more startling is the claim that this is a binding promise found in the Torah, the Gospel, and the Quran itself.

Today, we shall unpack this troubling verse, expose its theological implications, and compare it to the true message of peace, redemption, and grace revealed in the Bible through Jesus Christ.

---

The Verse in Question

Quran 9:111 (Sahih International):

"Indeed, Allah has purchased from the believers their lives and their properties [in exchange] for that they will have Paradise. They fight in the cause of Allah, so they kill and are killed. [It is] a true promise [binding] upon Him in the Torah and the Gospel and the Qur'an. And who is truer to his covenant than Allah? So rejoice in your transaction which you have contracted. And it is that which is the great attainment."

---

A Theology of Violence

This verse presents a transactional religion where Paradise is not a free gift of God’s grace — as proclaimed in the New Testament — but a reward purchased through bloodshed and martyrdom. It essentially monetizes faith through warfare:

• Kill in the cause of Allah

• Be killed in the cause of Allah

• Receive Paradise as payment

Is this truly the will of a holy, loving, and just God?

---

Did the Torah and Gospel Ever Teach This?

The Quran claims this doctrine of blood-for-paradise is a binding promise found in the Torah and the Gospel. But a careful examination of both proves otherwise:

• In the Torah (Old Testament), God instructed the Israelites to fight specific battles for the preservation of His covenant nation, not for personal Paradise.

• Nowhere does the Torah teach that individuals secure eternal life by killing others or being killed themselves.

• In the Gospels, Jesus Christ explicitly rebukes violence:

  “Put your sword back in its place,” Jesus said to him, “for all who draw the sword will die by the sword.” (Matthew 26:52)

The Gospel of Christ offers eternal life as a free, undeserved gift by faith (John 3:16, Ephesians 2:8-9). Nowhere does it link salvation to warfare, murder, or martyrdom for reward.

This Quranic claim is both historically and theologically false.

---

The Problem of a Transactional God

The idea of a god who buys the lives and wealth of people in exchange for blood-drenched Paradise reduces faith to a contract, not a covenant. The God of the Bible seeks relationship through love, repentance, and mercy — not through slaughter and death.

John 10:10 (Jesus speaking):

“The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy; I have come that they may have life, and have it to the full.”

It’s clear from this contrast who inspires violence and who brings peace.

---

Conclusion: Can This Be the Word of God?

A book that claims divine authority but promotes a doctrine so fundamentally at odds with the Torah and the Gospel cannot be trusted as the Word of God. Quran 9:111 reveals a theology foreign to the God of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and Jesus Christ.

Paradise is not a reward for the blood of others. It is a gift paid for by the blood of Christ alone.

---

Final Thought

Dear reader — if a scripture invites you to kill for Paradise, test its spirit.
The true God sent His Son to die for you, not to command you to die for Him. Choose life in Christ.

---

Stay tuned for more biblical apologetics and critical theological reflections right here at the Shimba Theological Institute.

– Dr. Maxwell Shimba

www.shimbatheologicalinstitute.org (hypothetical)

---

Who Were the Disciples of Isa Bin Maryam?

Who Were the Disciples of Isa Bin Maryam? Were Their Names Mentioned? Was Isa Baptized in the Quran? And Can the Quran Be Trusted?

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba | Shimba Theological Institute

---

Introduction: Questions Islam Won’t Answer Clearly

Dear reader,
When discussing Isa Bin Maryam (the Islamic reference to Jesus, son of Mary), Muslims love to claim that they believe in him as a prophet. Yet, the Quran’s portrayal of Isa is suspiciously vague and contradictory when compared to reliable historical records and the New Testament. Today, let’s confront some key questions:

• Who were the disciples of Isa Bin Maryam? Are their names recorded in the Quran?

• Was Isa baptized, as recorded in the Bible, anywhere in the Quran?

• And most importantly — can the Quran truly be trusted as a reliable revelation from God?

Let’s dissect these questions one by one.

---

1. Who Were the Disciples of Isa Bin Maryam? Are Their Names Mentioned in the Quran?

In the New Testament, the names of the twelve disciples of Jesus are clearly recorded: Peter, James, John, Andrew, Philip, Bartholomew, Matthew, Thomas, James (son of Alphaeus), Simon the Zealot, Judas (son of James), and Judas Iscariot (the betrayer).

But in the Quran? Not a single name.

The Quran mentions Hawariyyun (helpers/disciples) in Surah As-Saff 61:14:

“O you who have believed, be supporters of Allah, as when Jesus, the son of Mary, said to the disciples, ‘Who are my supporters for Allah?’ The disciples said, ‘We are supporters of Allah.’”

But it ends there — no names, no number, no identities. A book claiming to “confirm” what came before it (Surah 5:48) can’t even tell us who the disciples were.

Question:
If the Quran came from the same God who inspired the Bible, why leave out the names and details so plainly documented in the Gospels?

---

2. Was Isa Bin Maryam Baptized in the Quran?

In the Bible, Jesus was baptized by John the Baptist (Yahya bin Zakariya) in the Jordan River — a defining moment marking the start of his ministry.

But in the Quran? Silence.

Nowhere does the Quran record Isa bin Maryam being baptized. No Jordan River. No Holy Spirit descending like a dove. No voice from heaven saying, “This is my beloved Son in whom I am well pleased.” (Matthew 3:17)

Another Question:
If Islam claims Isa is a true prophet, why omit this critical, supernatural affirmation of his divine mission — a moment witnessed by the masses?

---

3. Can the Quran Be Trusted?

These gaps point to an uncomfortable conclusion for honest inquirers:

• A book claiming to confirm the Bible cannot contradict or omit its core, well-documented truths.

• A book that fails to name the disciples of Isa — while pretending to validate him — lacks historical credibility.

• A book that ignores Isa’s baptism, a universally attested event, is deliberately selective or uninformed.

Worse still, the Quran contains conflicting theological claims about Isa’s nature, mission, and fate. It denies his crucifixion (Surah 4:157), a fact established by both biblical, Roman, and extra-biblical historical records. How then can this book be trusted on matters of ultimate truth and salvation?

---

Final Thought: Truth Has Nothing to Hide

Christianity’s records are clear, specific, and consistent.
The Quran’s version of Isa is incomplete, contradictory, and devoid of vital historical detail.

So, can the Quran be trusted?
The evidence says — no.

At Shimba Theological Institute, we invite seekers to examine the facts boldly and embrace the true Jesus of history — the Son of God, crucified, risen, and coming again.

---

If you’d like us to write more comparisons between Isa of the Bible and Isa of the Quran, let us know in the comments below. Truth has nothing to fear from scrutiny.

- Dr. Maxwell Shimba

Shimba Theological Institute

---

Why Doesn’t the Name of Allah Heal Diseases?

Why Doesn’t the Name of Allah Heal Diseases?

Why Is There No Healing Power in Islam While People Are Healed in the Name of Jesus?**

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba | Shimba Theological Institute
Originally written Friday, August 26, 2016

---

Introduction: What Is Healing?

Dear reader,
Healing is a divine act of restoring life and wholeness to the soul or body through faith. It happens when someone is prayed for, when hands are laid upon them, or when they hear the true, life-giving word of Jesus Christ. Spiritual healing often comes alongside physical healing — as seen in the Bible, where those healed in their bodies were also restored in their spirits.

But here lies a serious question for our Muslim friends:

• Why is there no healing power in the name of Allah?

• Why do Muslims never hold healing crusades or revivals like Christians do in the name of Jesus?

---

1. Why Doesn’t the Name of Allah Heal Diseases?

Despite being declared as "Most Merciful" and "Compassionate," we find no record in Islamic tradition of people being healed simply by invoking the name of Allah. Contrast this with Christianity, where countless testimonies exist of people miraculously healed through faith in the name of Jesus Christ.

The Bible says in Acts 3:6:

“In the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, rise up and walk!”

And the man, lame from birth, rose and walked. But why is such power absent in Islam?

---

2. Allah Failed to Heal Muhammad

Even more concerning is that when the Prophet Muhammad fell gravely ill after reportedly eating poisoned meat, Allah could not heal him.

According to Ibn Sa’d, p. 265,
Aisha, the wife of Muhammad, narrated:

“When the Prophet was sick, Jibril would pray for him, saying: ‘In the name of Allah, may He heal you from every disease, from every pain, and from the evil of every envious person.’”

Yet, despite these prayers, Muhammad did not recover.

---

3. The Ineffective Prayers of Jibril

If Jibril (the angel Gabriel in Islam) was sent by Allah to pray for Muhammad’s healing — and still failed — what does that imply about the healing power associated with the name of Allah? Why did these prayers “hit a wall,” unable to save Allah’s own prophet?

---

4. But the Name of Jesus Heals Every Disease

On the other hand, the name of Jesus (Yesu) continues to heal countless people to this day. Healing crusades and revivals in Christianity overflow with testimonies of the blind receiving sight, the lame walking, and diseases disappearing through prayer in Jesus’ name.

John 14:13-14 says:

“And I will do whatever you ask in my name, so that the Father may be glorified in the Son. You may ask me for anything in my name, and I will do it.”

This promise remains alive and effective.

---

5. Have You Ever Seen a Healing Crusade in Islam?

Let’s ask ourselves honestly:
Have you ever heard of a healing service in a mosque, or a Muslim gathering where people are healed instantly by invoking the name of Allah?

The answer is no. There’s a noticeable absence of divine healing ministries in Islam — and this absence points us to a vital spiritual truth:

Healing belongs to God alone, and it is manifest in the name of Jesus Christ, the true healer.

---

Conclusion

I challenge you today to reflect:

• Why could Allah not heal his prophet?

• Why do healing miracles only follow the name of Jesus Christ?

Perhaps, it’s time to reconsider where true power and divine authority reside.

And His name is Jesus.

---

For more scriptural studies and comparative theology insights, follow our teachings at Shimba Theological Institute.

---

Why Did Allah Send Down Surah Al-Hijr 15:6 Calling the Prophet of Islam Insane?

Why Did Allah Send Down Surah Al-Hijr 15:6 Calling the Prophet of Islam Insane?

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba | Shimba Theological Institute

Dear brothers and sisters,

The Bible teaches us that “you will know them by their fruits” — words directly from the Gospel of Matthew 7:16-17:

“By their fruit you will recognize them. Do people pick grapes from thornbushes, or figs from thistles? Likewise, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit.”

Today, I invite you to critically reflect with me: what fruit did Muhammad, the prophet of Islam, bear during his lifetime?

His conduct raised serious questions. One of the most troubling acts was his marriage to a six-year-old girl — an act no prophet before him ever committed. This, along with other actions, led his contemporaries to openly call him “insane” (MuwendaWazimu in Swahili).

And here’s the astonishing part: even the Quran itself records this accusation.

Surah Al-Hijr 15:6 says:

“And they say, ‘O you upon whom the message has been sent down, indeed you are mad (possessed/insane).’”

[Source: http://www.quranitukufu.net/015.html]

Notice — Muhammad did not deny this claim. He remained silent, which in itself speaks volumes.

---

Did Muhammad Himself Admit to Madness?

Historical Islamic sources further confirm these concerns. In Kitab al-Tabaqat al-Kabir by Ibn Sa’d, translated by S. Moinal Haq (vol. 1, p. 225), Muhammad is recorded confessing to his wife Khadija:

“O Khadija, I see lights and I hear voices, and I fear that I am mad.”

This is Muhammad’s own admission — raising a critical debate:

• If Muhammad feared he was mad, what assurance do we have that his revelations were divine and not delusions?

• Why would Allah send down a verse publicizing that his own prophet was being called insane?

• Does God mock his prophets? Or is this evidence of an underlying problem with Muhammad’s claim to prophethood?

---

A Debate for Every Honest Seeker

If we’re to compare the fruits of true prophets — like Moses, David, and Jesus — none were ever accused of madness, nor did they fear for their own sanity. None married children. None doubted the origin of their revelations.

So, the debate stands:

• Is Muhammad’s own confession and public accusations of madness consistent with genuine prophethood?

• Why does the Quran preserve such a damaging claim, rather than refuting it outright?

• Can a man fearing madness be trusted as the sole conveyor of God’s final message?

---

Conclusion

As people of faith and reason, we must question these matters openly. As Jesus taught, “you will know them by their fruits.” And by the fruit of Muhammad’s life — and by the words of his own book — troubling questions arise.

This is not to insult, but to invite honest debate, inquiry, and a search for truth.

The God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob is not a God of confusion.

Stay tuned for more theological reflections and debates from Shimba Theological Institute.

Dr. Maxwell Shimba
Founder & Director, Shimba Theological Institute

---

The Quran Is Not the Word of Allah or God Almighty

The Quran Is Not the Word of Allah or God Almighty

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba | Shimba Theological Institute

Dear reader,

This is a serious matter for every Muslim around the world. Muslims have long insisted that the entire Quran is the word of Allah. But when you ask them, how exactly did Allah speak to Muhammad? — they go silent or resort to insults.

Today, I want to present clear evidence showing that the Quran is not the word of Allah. Join me as we carefully examine this together.

---

Proof Within the Quran Itself: Who Is Really Speaking?

Let’s look at what the Quran actually says — and you’ll realize it’s not solely Allah speaking.

1. Satan Speaks in the Quran
In Surah Al-Hijr 15:39, Satan himself says:

“My Lord, because You have put me in error, I will surely make disobedience attractive to them on earth, and I will mislead them all.”

So here, Satan is speaking within the Quran. How then can one claim the Quran is entirely Allah’s words, when even the devil has a voice in it?

---

2. Zakariya (Zechariah) Speaks in the Quran
In Surah Maryam 19:4, Zakariya says:

“My Lord, indeed my bones have weakened, and my head has filled with white, and never have I been in my supplication to You, my Lord, unhappy.”

Again — it’s not Allah speaking here, but Zakariya.

---

3. Mary (Maryam) Speaks in the Quran
In Surah Maryam 19:18, Mary says:

“Indeed, I seek refuge in the Most Merciful from you, [so leave me], if you should be fearing of Allah.”

If Muslims claim the Quran is purely Allah’s word — then how is Mary speaking here? Has Mary become Allah? Of course not. This is a serious theological contradiction.

---

4. Angels Speak in the Quran
In Surah Maryam 19:21, the angels say:

“So it will be; your Lord says, ‘It is easy for Me, and We will make him a sign to the people and a mercy from Us. And it is a matter [already] decreed.’”

Now angels too are speaking in the Quran. Again — if it’s Allah’s word alone, why do we hear from angels directly?

---

5. Jesus (Isa ibn Maryam) Speaks in the Quran
In Surah Maryam 19:36, Jesus says:

“Indeed, Allah is my Lord and your Lord, so worship Him. That is a straight path.”

So even Jesus speaks in the Quran — but what’s striking is that Muhammad himself never speaks directly in the Quran, nor is his birth mentioned clearly in it. Isn’t this a serious inconsistency for Muslims to explain?

---

The Big Questions Muslims Must Answer

So I leave my Muslim friends with two simple questions:

1. Who exactly is the speaker in the Quran?

2. Whose words are really recorded in the Quran?

If you can answer these questions, with clear verses and without dodging, I am ready today to become a Muslim.

But the truth is evident: the Quran is a collection of speeches from different characters — Satan, prophets, Mary, angels, Jesus — making it impossible for Muslims to honestly claim it’s entirely the word of Allah.

---

Final Reflection

Muslims often challenge: “If you don’t believe the Quran is from God, then produce a verse like it.”
But when many voices other than Allah appear in the Quran — does this not weaken the claim that it’s purely divine revelation?

I leave this contradiction for Muslims to wrestle with, and I invite you instead to follow Jesus Christ, the Living Word of God, the Word of Life.

Come to the One who speaks eternal truth. His name is Jesus.

In His service,
Maxwell Shimba
Servant of Jesus Christ
Max Shimba Ministries Org. ©2025

---

Did Muhammad Swear by Jesus and Confess That Jesus Will Judge with Justice?

Did Muhammad Swear by Jesus and Confess That Jesus Will Judge with Justice?

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba | Shimba Theological Institute

Dear reader,
Today, let’s engage in a thought-provoking debate about a surprising claim found within Islamic hadith literature: Muhammad swearing by Jesus and acknowledging His role as the final judge.

What Do the Islamic Hadith Say?

In the authentic hadith collection of Sahih Bukhari (Hadith No. 425, Volume 3), narrated by Abu Huraira, the Prophet of Islam Muhammad is reported to have said:

“I swear by Him in Whose hand my soul is, surely the Son of Mary will soon descend among you and will judge mankind with justice.”

Now, this raises an important theological question: if, as Islam teaches, one should only swear by God (Allah), why would Muhammad swear by Jesus?

---

Islamic Teaching on Swearing Oaths

In another hadith narrated by Abdallah bin ‘Umar and recorded in Sahih Bukhari, it is stated:

“Indeed, Allah forbids you from swearing by your fathers. Whoever must swear, let him swear by Allah or remain silent.”

This clearly commands Muslims to swear only by Allah — swearing by anyone or anything else is strictly forbidden.

---

The Debate

If Muhammad, the central figure of Islam, swore by Jesus, what does this signify?

Question:
If Muhammad truly believed Allah to be supreme, why did he swear by Jesus and declare that it is Jesus who will descend and judge the world with justice?

Follow-up Question:
If swearing must be done only by God (as the hadith commands), why would Muhammad swear by Jesus — unless he recognized the divinity of Jesus?

Implication:
This suggests a theological contradiction within the Islamic sources. Either:

1. Muhammad committed an error against his own teachings (which would undermine the Islamic claim of his infallibility),
   or

2. Muhammad acknowledged a divine status in Jesus Christ, consistent with Christian belief in Jesus as the Living God and final Judge.

---

Conclusion: Is Jesus Lord Even in Islamic Tradition?

This hadith opens an important window for dialogue. Even within Islamic tradition, Jesus is uniquely honored — not merely as a prophet, but as the one who will return and judge the world with justice. This is a role that, biblically and theologically, belongs to God alone.

So why follow Allah — who is not Yahweh — if even Muhammad points to Jesus as the ultimate judge?

I invite you, dear reader, to consider the person of Jesus Christ — the Living God, the Righteous Judge, and the Savior of the world.

---

In His service,
Dr. Maxwell Shimba
Shimba Theological Institute

Max Shimba Ministries Org ©2025. All rights reserved.
Permission is granted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this document for educational and discussion purposes.

---

MUHAMMAD, MAGIC, AND THE PRACTICE OF DIVINATION

MUHAMMAD, MAGIC, AND THE PRACTICE OF DIVINATION

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba
Shimba Theological Institute

Dear Reader,

Today, let’s carefully examine an important subject: Muhammad’s involvement in magic and the use of charms within Islam.

Did Prophet Muhammad Use Magic?

According to Islamic hadith sources, Prophet Muhammad is recorded to have used magic (known as ndumba in Swahili) against the evil eye and venomous creatures such as lizards. This is documented in Ibn Majah, Volume 5, Hadith No. 3525, p. 48.

Now, the question for us is — where in the Bible do we ever see God’s prophets and apostles using magic or charms for healing or protection? Did God lack the power to heal an evil eye or venom without resorting to magic?

Muhammad Gave Magic Charms to His Wife Aisha

Shockingly, Muhammad is said to have given his beloved wife Aisha a charm to protect her from the evil eye. This is recorded in Sahih Muslim, Volume 3, Book 24, Hadith Numbers 5445, 5447-5450, p. 1196.

At this point, one might ask — how different is this from witchcraft? The very fact that Muhammad would prepare and hand over charms reveals a reliance on practices foreign to biblical prophets.

Again — where in the Bible do we see prophets of God using magic or charms? The answer is nowhere.

Muhammad Believed in the Evil Eye and Used Amulets

Muhammad openly believed in the evil eye and even encouraged the use of protective amulets. Al-Tabari, Volume 39, p. 134 confirms this. Furthermore, two chapters of the Quran (Surahs 113 and 114) deal with protection from the evil eye according to Ibn Majah, Volume 5, Hadith 3517, p. 41.

Interestingly, these two chapters were not included in the Quranic collection of Ibn Mas’ud, a close companion and personal scribe of Muhammad. Ibn Mas’ud is reported to have said, “The two charms [Surah 113 and 114] are not part of the Book of God.” (See: The Fihrist, p. 57) — raising serious concerns about the authenticity of the current Quran.

Muhammad even encouraged his followers to learn the Quran from Ibn Mas’ud and three others. (Bukhari, Volume 6, Book 60, Hadith 521, p. 486-487)

Muhammad Taught That Magic Cures the Evil Eye

Several hadiths in Ibn Majah, Volume 5, Hadith 3510-3512, p. 41-42 confirm Muhammad’s teaching that charms could cure the evil eye.

Another practice called ‘al-badiri’ was also permitted by Muhammad as protection against the evil eye. (Ibn Majah, Volume 5, Hadith 3513-3518, p. 42-44)

Furthermore, Muhammad declared that the evil eye is a real phenomenon (Bukhari, Volume 7, Book 71, Hadith 636, p. 427; Hadith 827, p. 538; and Volume 4, Book 55, Hadith 590, p. 386) — and that it could be counteracted using magic.

Even more peculiar, Muhammad’s own hair was believed to have healing power for the evil eye. (Bukhari, Volume 7, Book 72, Hadith 784, p. 518.) After shaving his head, his followers scrambled to collect his hair, which Muhammad distributed generously. (Sahih Muslim, Volume 2, Book 7, Hadith 2991-2994, p. 656-657.)

Muhammad’s Odd Recommendation: Specific Dates for Healing

Muhammad also taught that if people were to perform certain acts on the 17th, 19th, or 21st day of the lunar month, it would heal every disease. (Abu Dawud, Volume 3, Hadith 3852, p. 1084.)

If Muhammad was truly a prophet of the one true God, why did he rely on magic?
If Allah is God, why did he permit such practices?
If Islam is from God, why does it allow and promote charms and magic?

An Invitation to the Living God

Dear reader — it is clear from both Islamic sources and the Bible that Jesus Christ alone heals, protects, and saves without the use of charms or sorcery. He is alive today and calls you to receive Him as your Savior and Lord.

Come to Jesus, the Living God.

May the Lord bless you richly.

In His Service,
Dr. Maxwell Shimba
Shimba Theological Institute

© Max Shimba Ministries Org. 2015. All Rights Reserved.
Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this document, but altering it is not permitted.

---

The Two Deadliest Killers in Muslim Lands: Mosquitoes and the Quran

The Two Deadliest Killers in Muslim Lands: Mosquitoes and the Quran

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba | Shimba Theological Institute

In the great tragedy of human suffering, two unlikely culprits stand out as relentless executioners in the Muslim world: the unassuming mosquito and the Quran itself. One kills silently by instinct; the other stirs men to violence under the guise of sacred duty. Together, they leave trails of blood across history and geography.

The Mosquito: Nature’s Indifferent Killer

Every year, over 600,000 people fall victim to mosquito-borne diseases such as malaria, dengue fever, yellow fever, and chikungunya. Out of those deaths, an estimated 350,000 to 420,000 occur within Muslim-majority nations. Why so many? Because mosquitoes, blind to race and creed, thrive in warm climates plagued by poor infrastructure and neglected healthcare systems. They care nothing for your faith, your five daily prayers, or your fasting. They seek blood — and they find it where poverty, corruption, and ignorance keep modern medicine at bay.

The Quran: Death by Doctrine

But if mosquitoes kill by nature, the Quran has inspired death by ideology for over 1,400 years. Chief among its blood-soaked instructions is Surah 9:5, infamously known as the Sword Verse:

"Then when the sacred months have passed, slay the pagans wherever you find them, and seize them, besiege them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem of war…”

This single verse, among others, has served as divine license for relentless wars of conquest, forced conversions, sectarian killings, and indiscriminate bloodshed. From the earliest Islamic expansions into Arabia, Persia, and the Levant to today’s modern terror groups and civil conflicts, Muslims have slaughtered one another — and others — invoking Allah’s name and these same ancient verses.

It’s a cruel irony that Muslims die in greater numbers from these Quran-sanctioned wars than from any external enemy. Estimates suggest 200,000 to 500,000 Muslims perish each year in conflicts where both sides shout “Allahu Akbar” before detonating bombs, firing bullets, or beheading captives. Sunni versus Shia, extremist versus moderate — all claiming scriptural authority while contributing to a mounting death toll.

The Contrast of Instinct and Indoctrination

A mosquito injects a parasite. The Quran injects dogma. The former acts on primal instinct, the latter on learned zealotry. Yet the results are the same: funerals, grief, and shattered communities.

The mosquito, a simple insect, neither hates nor reasons. The Quran, revered as divine by over a billion, embeds doctrines of violence against dissenters, apostates, and rival sects. And while the world mounts scientific campaigns against malaria and dengue, the spiritual infection of militant Islamism remains largely unchallenged in many religious institutions, often justified under claims of preserving sacred tradition.

In Conclusion: Time to Break the Cycle

If the Grim Reaper had two tools custom-made for trimming Muslim populations, it wouldn’t be rifles or pandemics. It would be the buzzing mosquito and a bloodstained Quran, flapping in the hands of the devout and the fanatical alike.

The God of the Bible, the God of peace and justice, commands His followers to choose life, love their enemies, and pursue peace with all men (Hebrews 12:14; Matthew 5:9). Meanwhile, the Quran preserves verses that champion endless struggle against non-Muslims and even fellow Muslims of differing interpretations.

It’s time for Muslims everywhere to stop, reflect, and consider the spiritual chains they bear. The Creator of Heaven and Earth does not delight in death and destruction but in repentance and reconciliation through His Son, Jesus Christ — the Prince of Peace.

As Proverbs 14:12 warns:
“There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way to death.”

Choose life. Choose truth. Choose Jesus.

---