Debate Outline: Was Muhammad a True Prophet of God?

Debate Outline: Was Muhammad a True Prophet of God?

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba | Shimba Theological Institute

---

I. Introduction

• Brief introduction of the topic: examining the prophetic claims of Muhammad.

• Establish the importance of testing prophetic claims against scripture, history, and logic.

• Declare the objective: to demonstrate through evidence that Muhammad was not a true prophet of the Most High God.

---

II. Historical Background of Muhammad’s “Call”

• A. Withdrawal to Mount Hira at age 38 due to hardship.

• B. The alleged first revelation at age 40 by a being called Jibril.

• C. Describe the experience (Sahih al-Bukhari, Book 1, Hadith 2 & Hadith 1505)

  • Bell-like sounds

  • Uncontrollable sweating even on cold days

  • Hallucinatory encounters

Debate Question:
Do these signs align with biblical prophetic experiences or demonic manifestations?

---

III. Theological and Scriptural Contradictions

• A. Quran 53:2–6 claims divine origin of Muhammad’s words.

• B. Compare with how biblical prophets received revelation — clarity, peace, no bizarre physical trauma.

Debate Challenge:
Can Islam produce a prophetic precedent in the Old or New Testament that mirrors Muhammad’s experiences?

---

IV. Contradictory Statements within Islam

• A. Surah Al-Kafirun (Quran 109)

  • Muhammad himself admits Muslims don’t worship the same God as Christians and Jews.

• B. Contrast with Surah Al-Baqarah 2:62

  • Claims Jews, Christians, and Sabians worship the same God.

Debate Question:
How can one faith claim both theological exclusivity and inclusivity without contradiction?

---

V. The Nature of Muhammad’s Revelations

• A. No verifiable witnesses to most of his revelations.

• B. Initial suicidal tendencies after early encounters (Hadith references).

• C. Revelations conveniently favoring Muhammad’s personal desires (e.g., marital privileges, war booty, etc.)

Debate Challenge:
Do these characteristics reflect a true servant of the holy, impartial God of Scripture?

---

VI. The Prophetic Test in the Bible

• A. Deuteronomy 18:20-22 — test of a prophet: accuracy and alignment with God’s character.

• B. Examine Muhammad’s failed prophecies and teachings contrary to biblical values.

Debate Point:
By biblical standards, Muhammad fails the test of a prophet.

---

VII. Conclusion

• Summarize evidence:

  • Historical inconsistencies

  • Theological contradictions

  • Unbiblical nature of revelations

  • Failed prophetic test

Final Challenge:
If Muhammad fails both biblical and logical standards of prophecy, how can he be accepted as a prophet of the Most High God? The only trustworthy revelation is through Jesus Christ, the final and complete Word of God (Hebrews 1:1-3).

---

MUHAMMAD: THE FALSE PROPHET

MUHAMMAD: THE FALSE PROPHET

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba | Shimba Theological Institute

Muslims will often defend the prophetic claims of Muhammad, but many of us, by the weight of historical and theological evidence, know without a doubt that Muhammad was never, and could never have been, a true prophet of the Most High God. His so-called "prophethood" was nothing more than a fabricated office — a concoction akin to folk poetry and ancient Arabian mysticism.

THE HISTORICAL ACCOUNT:
When we examine the history of Muhammad, we discover that at the age of 38, burdened by the difficulties of life, he abandoned his home and withdrew to the caves of Mount Hira near Mecca. There, when he turned 40, he claimed to have been visited by a being Muslims today call the angel Jibril (Gabriel).

According to Islamic tradition, specifically Sahih al-Bukhari (Book 1, Hadith 2, and Al-Lu’lu wal Marjan, Book 3, Page 874, Hadith 1505), Aisha (the mother of the believers) narrated:

"Al-Harith ibn Hisham asked the Messenger of Allah: 'O Messenger of Allah, how does the revelation come to you?' The Messenger of Allah replied, 'Sometimes it comes to me like the ringing of a bell — and that is the hardest upon me — then it departs, and I have grasped what is said. At other times, the angel comes to me in the form of a man, and speaks to me, and I grasp what he says.' Aisha said, 'Indeed, I saw it descend upon him on a very cold day, yet when the state left him, his forehead would be dripping with sweat.'”

Now — does this experience resemble a divine encounter with the Almighty God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob? Or does it sound like demonic possession or delirium?

THE QURANIC CONTRADICTION:
Qur'an 53:2–6 (Surat An-Najm) says:

"Your companion (Muhammad) has neither gone astray nor erred, nor does he speak from [his own] inclination. It is nothing but a revelation revealed, taught to him by one mighty in power — one of soundness, and he rose to [his] true form."

But when we compare this to the manner of true prophetic revelations in the Bible — where prophets received God's Word in clarity, holiness, and peace — it becomes obvious this was no divine encounter. Nowhere did Moses, Elijah, Isaiah, or the Lord Jesus Himself fall into seizures, hear bell-like noises, or sweat profusely under stress when receiving God’s Word.

THE SPIRITUAL ANALYSIS:
The conditions surrounding Muhammad’s so-called “revelations” parallel ancient accounts of spirit possession rather than divine prophecy. Even Muhammad himself once confessed he feared being possessed by an evil spirit when these episodes began.

Moreover, the inconsistencies between Qur'anic statements about God and the clear, consistent, holy nature of the God of the Bible reveal that Allah is not Jehovah (YHWH) — the eternal, unchanging God of Israel.

THE FINAL VERDICT:
Muhammad was not a prophet of the true God. His revelations came from questionable sources, inconsistent experiences, and contradicted both history and Scripture. Christianity stands firm on the unshakable foundation of God's revealed Word — in the Torah, the Prophets, and ultimately fulfilled in Jesus Christ, the Son of the Living God.

“For there is one God and one Mediator between God and men, the Man Christ Jesus.” (1 Timothy 2:5)

---

DEBATE CHALLENGE:
To any Muslim scholar, cleric, or apologist:
Explain how a man who feared demonic possession, received revelations through bell sounds and physical torment, contradicts biblical prophecy, and created a religion by force and fear, can be considered a true prophet of the Holy God.

If your religion is truth — face this question honestly.

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba
President & Founder, Shimba Theological Institute

---

MUHAMMAD CONFESSES THAT ALLAH IS NOT THE GOD OF THE GOSPEL AND THE TORAH, BUT A GOD OF PAGANS

Wednesday, August 10, 2016

MUHAMMAD CONFESSES THAT ALLAH IS NOT THE GOD OF THE GOSPEL AND THE TORAH, BUT A GOD OF PAGANS

Do Christians and Muslims worship the same God?
Is Allah a pagan deity?

Dear readers, once again, the Prophet of Allah himself confessed that Christians and Muslims do not worship the same God, and that Allah is a pagan god.

In this article, we will examine various evidences proving that Allah is not the God of Adam, Moses, and all the prophets mentioned in the Holy Bible.

From Surat Al-Kafirun, which was revealed in Mecca, Muhammad openly acknowledges with his own mouth that Christians and Jews do not worship the same God as the Muslims do.

Surah 109:

1. Say: O disbelievers!

2. I do not worship what you worship.

3. Nor do you worship what I worship.

4. And I will not worship what you worship.

5. Nor will you worship what I worship.

6. To you be your religion, and to me, mine.

This Surah presents many clear problems, revealing that the claim made by Muslims — that Christians and Muslims worship the same God — is false and lacks any sound evidence.

FIRST PROBLEM:
Who exactly is this Surah addressing?
(a) The People of the Book (Jews, Christians, and perhaps the Sabians)?
(b) The pagans of Mecca?

The Quran fails to clarify which group Muhammad was speaking to in this case.

SECOND PROBLEM:
Even if it were addressing either group (a) or (b) above, this Surah 109 is full of contradictions when compared to various other Quranic verses claiming that Christians, Jews, and others all worship the same God as the Muslims.

For example:

Surat Al-Baqara 2:62
“Indeed, those who believed and those who were Jews or Christians or Sabians — those who believe in Allah and the Last Day and do righteousness — will have their reward with their Lord, and no fear will there be concerning them, nor will they grieve.”

Surat Al-Baqara 2:139
“Say, ‘Do you argue with us about Allah while He is our Lord and your Lord? For us are our deeds, and for you are your deeds.”

---

Wednesday, August 10, 2016
MUHAMMAD CONFESSES THAT ALLAH IS NOT THE GOD OF THE GOSPEL AND THE TORAH, BUT A GOD OF PAGANS
By Dr. Maxwell Shimba | Shimba Theological Institute

Do Christians and Muslims Worship the Same God?
Is Allah a Pagan God?

Dear readers, once again, the so-called Prophet of Islam, Muhammad, openly confessed that Christians and Muslims do not worship the same God — and that Allah is, in fact, a pagan deity.

In this brief article, we shall review evidence that Allah is not the God of Adam, Moses, and the prophets mentioned in the Holy Bible.

Evidence from the Quran itself:

In Surat Al-Kafirun — a chapter said to be revealed in Mecca — Muhammad personally declared that Jews and Christians do not worship the same deity as Muslims.

Surah 109 says:
1. Say: O disbelievers!
2. I do not worship what you worship.
3. Nor do you worship what I worship.
4. And I will not worship what you worship.
5. Nor will you worship what I worship.
6. To you be your religion, and to me, mine.

This passage alone brings forth significant contradictions and exposes the false Islamic claim that Christians, Jews, and Muslims worship the same God.

THE FIRST PROBLEM:
Who is this Surah addressing?
(a) The People of the Book (Jews, Christians, and perhaps Sabians)?
(b) The pagans of Mecca?

The Quran gives no clarification about which group Muhammad was speaking to here — whether to idol worshippers or to those recognized as monotheistic communities in Arabia.

THE SECOND PROBLEM:
Even if we assume it is directed at either group (a) or (b), this Surah 109 openly contradicts numerous Quranic verses claiming that Jews, Christians, and others worship the same God as Muslims.

For example:

Surat Al-Baqara 2:62
"Indeed, those who believed and those who were Jews or Christians or Sabians — those who believe in Allah and the Last Day and do righteousness — will have their reward with their Lord, and no fear will there be concerning them, nor will they grieve."

Surat Al-Baqara 2:139
"Say, 'Do you argue with us about Allah while He is our Lord and your Lord? For us are our deeds, and for you are your deeds.'"

These verses show that Muhammad at times claimed all these religious groups had one and the same God — while elsewhere he refutes and rejects their worship entirely. This exposes the inconsistency and theological confusion within the Quranic text.

CONCLUSION:
It is evident from both internal contradictions within the Quran and from biblical testimony that Allah is not the God of the Bible — not the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, nor the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ.

The God of the Bible is a God of truth, light, and righteousness — not a god of confusion, contradiction, or pagan origins. As Christians, we must be bold to declare this truth in love and call our Muslim brothers and sisters out of spiritual deception into the glorious light of the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

“For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints.”
— 1 Corinthians 14:33

And let it be known that no man can serve two masters. The God of the Holy Scriptures and the deity of Islam are not one and the same.

---

Great — let’s continue and complete it smoothly in English for your blog post:

---

...These verses show that Muhammad at times claimed all these religious groups had one and the same God.

THE CONTRADICTION:
If according to Surah 109 Muhammad states clearly: “I do not worship what you worship, nor do you worship what I worship,” then how can the same Quran later claim in Surah 2:62 and Surah 2:139 that Jews and Christians worship the same God as Muslims?

This blatant inconsistency reveals a deep theological confusion within the Quran itself — demonstrating that Allah, as presented by Muhammad, is not the God of the Bible.

THE HISTORICAL REALITY:
The term “Allah” was well known in pre-Islamic pagan Arabia. It was the name of the chief god of the Kaaba, worshipped alongside numerous other deities like Al-Lat, Al-Uzza, and Manat. Historical evidence confirms that Muhammad did not introduce the name Allah but simply adopted it from existing Arabian pagan practices.

THE BIBLICAL STANDPOINT:
The Holy Bible — both the Torah and the Gospel — reveals a living, personal, and holy God: Yahweh (Jehovah), who makes covenants with His people, manifests Himself through prophets, and ultimately in the person of Jesus Christ (John 1:1, 14). Nowhere in the Bible is God presented as a distant, unknowable being like Allah of the Quran, nor is there a record of Him ever commanding child marriages, sex slavery, or unjust killings as attributed to Muhammad’s Allah in Islamic texts.

CONCLUSION:
Based on both the internal contradictions of the Quran and historical facts, it is evident that Allah is not the God of Adam, Abraham, Moses, and Jesus. Allah is a god of pagan origins, rebranded by Muhammad for his own religious movement.

Final Thought:
Christianity offers a God who is relational, holy, and consistent. Jesus Christ, God manifest in the flesh, came not to enslave but to set us free. He invites all to know Him personally and truthfully.

“For there is one God and one mediator between God and mankind, the man Christ Jesus.” (1 Timothy 2:5)

I urge all my Muslim brothers and sisters to open their hearts and test these truths. The God of the Bible calls you into relationship, not rigid rituals and contradictions.

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba
Founder & President, Shimba Theological Institute

---

Are All Babies Born Muslim? A Theological and Logical Refutation

Are All Babies Born Muslim? A Theological and Logical Refutation

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba | Shimba Theological Institute

---

Introduction

In the realm of religious claims, few are as puzzling and logically inconsistent as Islam’s assertion that every human being is born a Muslim. According to Sahih Muslim, Book 33, Hadith 6426, “Every child is born upon the fitrah (Islamic natural disposition), and it is his parents who make him a Jew, a Christian, or a Magian.”

This assertion claims that belief in Islam is the natural state of humanity from birth — a convenient yet absurd claim designed to promote indoctrination rather than reasoned faith. As a theologian and defender of Biblical truth, I, Dr. Maxwell Shimba, feel compelled to dissect this claim theologically, scientifically, and logically.

---

Debate Point 1: Where Is the Evidence?

If, as Islam claims, every child is born a Muslim:

• Why does no child possess any innate awareness or understanding of Allah, the Qur’an, or Islamic doctrine?

• Why do children of Christian, Jewish, Hindu, or secular families not naturally gravitate toward Islamic belief?

Biblical Response:
The Bible makes it clear that while mankind is made in God’s image (Genesis 1:27), we are born with a fallen nature (Psalm 51:5) — not with a pre-programmed religious identity. Furthermore, Ecclesiastes 7:29 states, “God made mankind upright, but men have gone in search of many schemes.” This places moral agency in the hands of each person, not some fabricated natural disposition to Islam.

---

Debate Point 2: The Absurdity of “Muslim Sperm”

Some Islamic scholars and preachers have gone so far as to claim that even sperm is Muslim. This statement not only contradicts elementary biology but makes a mockery of logic and reason.

Logical Challenge:
How can a microscopic cell, incapable of consciousness, emotion, morality, or decision-making, hold any religious belief? Cells do not practice religion, pray, or contemplate eternity. To suggest otherwise is to abandon the very intellect with which God endowed humanity.

---

Debate Point 3: The Danger of Indoctrination

This flawed doctrine serves a strategic purpose: it frames Islam as the default, thereby making apostasy appear as rebellion against one's own "natural" state. It is a theological tactic to guilt and shame adherents into submission.

Contrast with Christianity:
Christianity respects the sanctity of free will. Jesus calls people to choose Him freely (John 3:16, Revelation 3:20). Faith in Christ is not coerced by birth, but invited by grace.

---

Debate Point 4: Divine Consistency and Fairness

If God, in His wisdom, made all children Muslim by birth — yet allows them to be raised in other faiths and then punishes them for leaving Islam later — how is that just?

Biblical Principle:
God is perfectly just (Deuteronomy 32:4). The Bible teaches that judgment is based on personal choice, willful rejection of truth, and moral responsibility — not on circumstances of birth.

---

Conclusion: A Call to Reason and Truth

The Islamic claim that “every baby is born Muslim” lacks biblical, logical, and scientific foundation. It is a relic of religious indoctrination aimed at controlling thought and identity from infancy.

The True Biblical Position:
God created mankind with the freedom to seek, reason, and believe. Every human being is called to discover the truth of the Gospel — that salvation comes through faith in Jesus Christ alone (Acts 4:12). The offer of eternal life is open to all who choose to accept it.

---

Proverbs 12:22 boldly declares:
"The Lord detests lying lips, but He delights in people who are trustworthy."

Let us abandon myths and return to the truth of God’s Word. Islam’s desperate claim of universal Muslim birth is yet another example of religious propaganda masquerading as theology.

To my Muslim friends: the invitation remains — come to Jesus Christ, the Way, the Truth, and the Life (John 14:6). Reject deception, and embrace the eternal truth found only in Him.

Dr. Maxwell Shimba
President, Shimba Theological Institute

---

Are All Babies Born Muslim?

Are All Babies Born Muslim? A Theological and Logical Refutation

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba | Shimba Theological Institute

Introduction:
In the ever-baffling world of Islamic theology, there exists a claim so irrational, so detached from both logic and divine revelation, that it demands public scrutiny. According to Sahih Muslim, Book 33, Hadith 6426, Islam teaches that every child is born a Muslim. Yes, without understanding, choice, or knowledge — supposedly born reciting the Shahada in their hearts, ready to embrace the ummah.

But is this claim credible? Is it consistent with divine revelation, reason, or human experience? As a theologian committed to Biblical truth and intellectual honesty, I, Dr. Maxwell Shimba, intend to dissect and expose this fallacy.

---

Islamic Claim: Every Baby Is Born a Muslim

Sahih Muslim 6426 states:

“Every child is born upon the fitrah (Islamic natural disposition), and it is his parents who make him a Jew, a Christian, or a Magian.”

The implication is clear: humans are created predisposed to Islam, and any deviation is external corruption.
But this proposition fails on several levels.

---

Debate Point 1: Where’s the Evidence?

If every child is born Muslim:

• Why can’t a newborn profess or understand Islam?

• Why does Islamic theology conveniently blame parents for religious diversity?

• Why did God give humans free will if belief is pre-programmed?

Biblical Refutation:
Ecclesiastes 7:29 — “God made mankind upright, but men have gone in search of many schemes.”
Nowhere in Scripture does it teach that humanity is born into a preloaded religious identity. Rather, mankind is created with the ability to choose, reason, and seek after God (Acts 17:27).

---

Debate Point 2: The Absurdity of “Muslim Sperm”

Some Islamic preachers have further exaggerated this claim by stating that “even sperm is Muslim”. This notion not only contradicts established biology but mocks the very intelligence God endowed humanity with.

Logical Challenge:
How can a microscopic cell — devoid of consciousness, morality, or belief — possess religious affiliation? It’s religious mythology masquerading as theology.

---

Debate Point 3: The Danger of Indoctrination

This claim facilitates one of Islam’s gravest tactics: indoctrination through fear and shame.
By insisting that Islam is the natural state, anyone who leaves it is branded an apostate worthy of punishment — a doctrine completely foreign to the teachings of Jesus Christ.

John 8:32 — “Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.”

Christianity exalts free will, not forced conformity.

---

Final Challenge to Muslims

If you genuinely believe in logic, conscience, and divine justice:

• Why perpetuate a doctrine that no infant can verify?

• Why silence dissent with threats rather than reasoned debate?

• Why not test these claims by the light of Scripture and reason?

Proverbs 12:22 says: “The Lord detests lying lips, but He delights in people who are trustworthy.”

The claim that all babies are born Muslim is a spiritual con job designed to bind souls in chains of fear. Reject it. Embrace the liberating truth of Jesus Christ — the only sinless Savior and the Son of the living God.

---

Conclusion:

Islam’s assertion that every baby is born a Muslim is not only unbiblical and unscientific, but an affront to human dignity and divine truth.
At Shimba Theological Institute, we boldly declare:
There is no revert, only converts. Truth is not inherited — it is discovered. And only in Christ is true salvation found.

Dr. Maxwell Shimba
Founder, Shimba Theological Institute

---

Jesus Christ Is God: A Divine Truth That Cannot Be Denied

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba | Shimba Theological Institute

One of the most vital declarations in Christian theology is this: Jesus Christ is God manifested in human flesh. He is not merely a prophet or a moral teacher — He is the visible image of the invisible God, as Scripture powerfully affirms.

Jesus Demands the Same Honor as God

In John 5:23, Jesus made a bold, divine claim:

“That all may honor the Son just as they honor the Father. Whoever does not honor the Son does not honor the Father who sent Him.”

No prophet, no teacher, no angel has ever demanded such honor — only God Himself is worthy of it. Jesus, therefore, unmistakably placed Himself as equal with God.

---

When You See Jesus, You See God

In John 14:9, Jesus declared:

“Whoever has seen Me has seen the Father.”

This is a staggering statement. The incarnate Jesus is the full revelation of the invisible God. Not a reflection or mere representative — but God Himself clothed in humanity.

---

The Entire Bible Confirms His Divinity

Scripture consistently testifies to this truth:

• John 1:1,14 — “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God… and the Word became flesh.”

• Colossians 2:9 — “For in Christ all the fullness of the Deity lives in bodily form.”

• Titus 2:13 — “…our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ.”

---

Rejecting Jesus' Divinity Is Rejecting God

Jesus Himself warned in John 8:24:

“If you do not believe that I am He, you will die in your sins.”

Believing in the divinity of Christ is not optional — it is the very foundation of saving faith.

---

Final Word

At Shimba Theological Institute, we boldly proclaim this eternal truth:
Jesus Christ is God, the sinless Savior, the eternal Word, and the Lord of all creation. He alone offers salvation, and to deny His deity is to reject the living God.

Embrace Him today, for He is the only way, the truth, and the life.

Dr. Maxwell Shimba
Founder, Shimba Theological Institute

---

Jesus Christ Is God Manifest in the Flesh: A Theological Declaration

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba | Shimba Theological Institute

One of the most profound and foundational truths of Christian theology is the divinity of Jesus Christ. He was not merely a prophet, a teacher, or a moral leader — He is God incarnate, the visible image of the invisible God. The Bible does not leave this truth to speculation; it declares it plainly and unapologetically.

---

Jesus Demands Equal Honor with God

In John 5:23, Jesus makes a striking statement:

“That all should honor the Son just as they honor the Father. He who does not honor the Son does not honor the Father who sent Him.”

This is no trivial claim. Jesus demands the same honor due to God Himself. No mere prophet in biblical history ever dared to ask for the same reverence given to Yahweh. Isaiah, Moses, David — none spoke such words. This alone establishes Jesus as far more than a human messenger. He is worthy of divine honor because He is divine.

---

Jesus Reveals Himself as the Visible Image of God

In John 14:9, Jesus answers Philip’s request to see the Father with these profound words:

“Anyone who has seen Me has seen the Father.”

This declaration confirms the Christian doctrine of the Incarnation — that God took on human flesh and walked among His creation in the person of Jesus Christ. He is the exact representation of God's being (Hebrews 1:3), not a reflection or a symbol, but God Himself made manifest.

---

The Biblical Witness to Christ’s Divinity

The testimony of Scripture, from the Gospels to the Epistles, consistently proclaims the deity of Christ:

• John 1:1,14 — “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God… and the Word became flesh.”

• Colossians 2:9 — “For in Christ all the fullness of the Deity lives in bodily form.”

• Titus 2:13 — “Looking for the blessed hope and glorious appearing of our great God and Savior Jesus Christ.”

---

Conclusion: The Only Name That Saves

Recognizing Jesus as God is not optional for those seeking salvation. As Jesus declared in John 8:24:

“If you do not believe that I am He, you will die in your sins.”

At Shimba Theological Institute, we boldly affirm this eternal truth: Jesus Christ is the living God, the eternal Word, the sinless Savior, and the only hope for mankind.

To reject His divinity is to reject God Himself.

Believe in Him today — and you shall live.

---

Is Angel Gabriel the Same as Jibreel of Islam? A Theological Examination

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba

One of the most perplexing contradictions between the Christian Gospel and the Islamic Qur'an lies in the messages allegedly delivered by the angelic figure known as Gabriel. In the Bible, Gabriel is a trusted messenger of the Most High God, consistently proclaiming the truth of God’s eternal plan. However, in Islam, Jibreel — claimed to be the same angel — delivers conflicting revelations that deny foundational truths established centuries earlier. Can both be the same being? Theologically, the answer is a resounding no.

---

Gabriel’s Message to Mary: Jesus is the Son of God

In Luke 1:26-35, the angel Gabriel was sent by God to a virgin named Mary. His message was clear and unambiguous:

“The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you. Therefore the holy one to be born will be called the Son of God.” (Luke 1:35)

Here, Gabriel affirms the divinity of Christ before His birth. Not metaphorically, but ontologically — Jesus is the literal Son of God, conceived by the Holy Spirit, not through human means.

---

Jibreel’s Message to Muhammad: Jesus is Not the Son of God

Centuries later, Muhammad claimed that the same angel, now referred to as Jibreel, delivered the Qur'an to him. Yet in Surah Al-Ikhlas 112:3, this Jibreel vehemently denies God having a son:

“He neither begets nor is born.”

Further, in Surah Maryam 19:88-92, the Qur'an states that claiming God has a son is a monstrous blasphemy.

---

Can a True Messenger of God Contradict Himself?

This poses an irreconcilable theological problem. The God of the Bible is unchanging:

“God is not a man, that He should lie, nor a son of man, that He should change His mind.” (Numbers 23:19)

If Gabriel was truly sent by God in both instances, his message would remain consistent, as God does not contradict Himself. Therefore, either one message is false — or these are two entirely different spirits.

---

Testing the Spirits

The Bible warns against deception from masquerading spirits:

“Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God.” (1 John 4:1)

If one “Gabriel” proclaims Jesus as God’s Son, and another “Jibreel” denies this, only one can be the true messenger. The evidence suggests that the Jibreel of Islam is not the same as the Gabriel of the Bible, but a deceptive spirit aiming to corrupt the Gospel’s central truth.

---

Conclusion: A Call to Discernment

This glaring contradiction should stir the hearts of sincere seekers. The real Gabriel proclaimed the incarnation of the Son of God as the hope of humanity. The contradictory message of Jibreel opposes this eternal truth, and by biblical measure, is not from God.

I urge readers — test these claims, study the Scriptures, and recognize that Jesus is the eternal Son of God, the only way to salvation.

“I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.” (John 14:6)

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba

---

10 Clear Reasons Why Muhammad Was Never a True Prophet of God

10 Clear Reasons Why Muhammad Was Never a True Prophet of God

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba

Throughout history, God’s true prophets have demonstrated integrity, holiness, compassion, and unwavering obedience to divine moral standards. From Noah to Moses, David to Isaiah — none ever violated the sacred laws they proclaimed. However, when we examine the character and actions of Muhammad through Islamic sources themselves, it becomes evident that he could not have been a true prophet of the living God. Here are ten undeniable reasons:

1. A Prophet of God Never Orders the Stoning of Others for Rejecting Him — But Muhammad Did.

Evidence: Ibn Ishaq, page 764
No prophet of God ever commanded the execution of those who disbelieved in him. They preached repentance and left judgment to God. Muhammad, however, ordered executions for disbelief.

---

2. A Prophet of God Would Never Marry the Wife of His Adopted Son — But Muhammad Did.

When Zayd, Muhammad’s adopted son, divorced his wife Zaynab, Muhammad married her — something no prophet of God ever permitted for themselves.
Qur'anic Reference: Surah Al-Ahzab 33:37

---

3. A Prophet Would Never Give a Woman as a Gift to Satisfy Another Man’s Desires — But Muhammad Did.

Proof: Sahih Al-Bukhari Vol. 1, Hadith 371
This act dehumanizes women, treating them as property — a practice never endorsed by any true prophet.

---

4. No Prophet Ever Violated the Sanctity of Family, Let Alone His Own Aunt — But Muhammad Did.

Proof: Kanz Al-Ummal, Hadith Chapter 13, Page 274
This shameful act stands in stark contradiction to the purity expected of a prophet.

---

5. A Prophet of God Would Never Slaughter Hundreds for Disbelief — But Muhammad Did.

Proof: Sahih Muslim Hadith 4390
Ordering the massacre of 800 men in a single night for not accepting his claim disqualifies him as a prophet of mercy.

---

6. A Prophet Would Never Order the Killing of a Woman for a Trivial Offense — But Muhammad Did.

Evidence: Ibn Ishaq, Pages 819 & 995
The sanctity of life — especially women — is upheld by all true prophets, yet Muhammad transgressed this repeatedly.

---

7. No Prophet Would Stone a Pregnant Woman Begging for Mercy — But Muhammad Did.

Proof: Sahih Muslim, Book 17, Hadith 4206
True prophets lead with mercy and redemption, not cruelty.

---

8. A Prophet Would Never Command Forced Conversions or Kill Those Who Refuse — But Muhammad Did.

Proof: Surah At-Tawbah 9:5
This command alone exposes the violent expansionist nature of early Islam, a sharp contrast to Biblical prophets.

---

9. No Prophet Would Keep and Use Sex Slaves — But Muhammad Did.

Despite having numerous wives, Muhammad kept and used sex slaves, a violation of God’s moral laws regarding human dignity.

---

10. No Prophet Would Marry a Child and Consummate the Marriage at Nine — But Muhammad Did.

Proof: Sahih Muslim, Hadith 3309
This act alone invalidates any claim to divine moral authority.

---

Final Warning and Invitation

If you still believe in this man as God’s messenger after knowing these facts from Islamic sources themselves, understand that you are embracing what God condemns.
The God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob — and the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ — would never send such a man. The earlier you accept Jesus Christ, the true and sinless Son of God, the better. He alone lived without sin, gave His life as a ransom for all, and rose again for our justification.

Reject deception. Choose eternal life. Accept Jesus today.

---

The God Who Can Be a Mosquito But Refuses to Be a Man? A Challenge to Allah’s Character

The God Who Can Be a Mosquito But Refuses to Be a Man? A Challenge to Allah’s Character

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba

One of the most puzzling and revealing passages in the Qur'an comes from Surah Al-Baqarah 2:26, where it states:

“Indeed, Allah is not ashamed to set forth an example — even of a mosquito or something smaller…”

Now pause for a moment and reflect — the Qur'an claims that Allah is not ashamed to compare Himself to, or use as an example, the lowliest of insects. A mosquito. An insignificant, irritating, disease-carrying creature. Yet, this same Allah, according to Islamic theology, utterly refuses to incarnate or manifest Himself in human form, claiming it would be beneath Him.

But Why?

If Allah has no shame in associating His message or signs with a mosquito, how then is it shameful to enter into His own creation as a man?
Would it not be more honorable for God to reveal Himself in the dignity of human form — as Christians believe He did in Jesus Christ, the Son of God — than to liken Himself to the basest of creatures?

The Problem of Consistency

Islamic scholars often argue that God cannot take human form because it would limit His majesty. Yet the Qur'an itself shows Allah setting examples even with insects and lesser things. Is the form of a man not higher than a mosquito?
If Allah has no issue using the lowest creatures for parables, why deny humanity the honor of beholding the Almighty in flesh?

This reveals a troubling inconsistency in Islamic theology:

• A God who can lower Himself to the level of insects, yet denies human incarnation.

• A deity concerned with appearances before men, but unconcerned with coherence in divine character.

Contrast with the God of the Bible

The Bible boldly declares:
“The Word became flesh and made His dwelling among us.” (John 1:14)
“He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.” (Colossians 1:15)

The Christian God is not afraid of condescension — He is the God who humbles Himself to be born as a man, to walk among His creation, to suffer, and to redeem. That is power. That is majesty. That is love.

A Challenge to Islamic Thought

If Allah truly is sovereign, limitless, and merciful — what stops him from taking human form? And if he fears ‘shame’ in doing so, why does he claim to have no shame in being likened to a mosquito?

The inconsistency exposes a limitation in Islamic theology’s understanding of God’s nature. A God who can be a mosquito should certainly be able to become a man — and indeed, the true and living God did just that in Jesus Christ.

I leave you with this: Which image reveals greater love and power — the God who might be likened to an insect, or the God who humbled Himself to walk among us and give His life for our salvation?

Choose wisely. Eternity depends on it.

---