Friday, May 9, 2025

The Dual Nature of Christ Jesus: Fully God and Fully Man

 The Dual Nature of Christ Jesus: Fully God and Fully Man

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba | Shimba Theological Institute

One of the foundational doctrines of biblical Christianity is the hypostatic union — the theological term describing the dual nature of Christ Jesus: fully divine and fully human in one person. This mystery is at the heart of the Christian faith and is powerfully revealed through Scripture, lexicographical analysis, and centuries of theological reflection.


I. The Divine Nature of Christ

The New Testament unmistakably affirms the deity of Jesus Christ.

John 1:1 (Strong’s G2316) states:
"In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God."

The Greek word Θεός (Theos, G2316) unequivocally refers to God Himself, showing that Jesus, the Logos, is fully divine from eternity past.

Colossians 2:9 (G4138) affirms:
"For in Him dwells all the fullness (πλήρωμα — plērōma, G4138) of the Godhead (θεότης — theotēs, G2320) bodily."

The term theotēs is used exclusively to denote the essential nature of God — indicating that Christ embodies undiminished deity in human form.

Old Testament Prophecy:
Isaiah 9:6 (H410) declares the coming Messiah as “Mighty God” (El Gibbor) — the same Hebrew word אֵל (El, H410) used elsewhere for Yahweh.

Jeremiah 23:6 names the Messiah as “YHWH our Righteousness”, applying the covenant name of God Himself to the promised King.


II. The Human Nature of Christ

Simultaneously, Scripture affirms Christ’s complete humanity.

John 1:14 (G4561) says:
"And the Word was made flesh (σάρξ — sarx, G4561) and dwelt among us."

This confirms that Jesus took on true human nature — not merely an appearance or a temporary form, but full humanity, subject to hunger (Matthew 4:2), fatigue (John 4:6), sorrow (John 11:35), and death (Luke 23:46).

Hebrews 2:17 (G3666) emphasizes this necessity:
"Wherefore in all things it behooved him to be made like unto his brethren."

The Greek ὁμοιόω (homioō, G3666) means “to become fully alike,” signifying Christ’s identification with human experience, yet without sin (Hebrews 4:15).


III. The Hypostatic Union — Scholarly Spectrum

The Council of Chalcedon (A.D. 451) provided the definitive creedal statement affirming Christ as “one person in two natures, without confusion, change, division, or separation.” This means:

  • Jesus’ divine nature did not diminish in His incarnation.

  • His human nature was not absorbed into His deity.

  • Both natures retain their own attributes, united in one person.

Gregory of Nazianzus wisely observed: “What He has not assumed, He has not healed.” In other words, for Christ’s atonement to be effective, He must be fully God (to offer infinite worth) and fully man (to represent humanity).


IV. Conclusion: The Eternal Mediator

1 Timothy 2:5 (G3316) declares:
"For there is one God, and one mediator (μεσίτης — mesitēs, G3316) between God and men, the man Christ Jesus."

Only one who is both God and man can mediate between the two.
As God, He reveals the Father; as man, He represents us before the throne.

This dual nature is not a contradiction but a divine mystery woven throughout Scripture — affirmed by prophetic witness, apostolic testimony, and historical orthodoxy.


Final Thought
To deny either the humanity or deity of Christ is to fall into ancient heresies like Arianism or Docetism. The biblical witness, lexicon evidence, and theological consensus together proclaim one glorious truth:
Jesus Christ is fully God and fully man — our perfect Redeemer and eternal Lord.


Dr. Maxwell Shimba | Shimba Theological Institute
“Rightly dividing the Word of Truth” — 2 Timothy 2:15



Thursday, May 8, 2025

Bible vs. Quran: The Pathways of Blessing and Bondage

Bible vs. Quran: The Pathways of Blessing and Bondage
By Dr. Maxwell Shimba | Shimba Theological Institute

When it comes to charting a path for life, the Bible and the Quran could not be further apart. The Bible is a divine blueprint for hope, prosperity, and victory, while the Quran presents a theology of hardship, fatalism, and deferred hope that traps its followers in cycles of suffering.

The Bible: God’s Blueprint for Success
The Word of God boldly declares in Jeremiah 29:11 that “I know the plans I have for you, says the Lord, plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future.” The Christian faith celebrates the dignity and destiny of each person, elevating them to be “the head and not the tail” (Deuteronomy 28:13).

The Scriptures teach that wisdom is not only spiritually enriching but practically rewarding: “Length of days is in her right hand, and in her left hand riches and honor” (Proverbs 3:16). In Matthew 5:3, the poor in spirit inherit the kingdom of heaven — not as a call to earthly poverty, but as a reminder of eternal worth beyond material status. And in Matthew 5:41, Christ encourages believers to go the extra mile, seizing opportunities for excellence rather than settling for mediocrity.

The Bible shuns the culture of complaint. “Do all things without murmuring and disputing, that you may be blameless and harmless, shining as lights in the world” (Philippians 2:14-15). It celebrates diligence: “In all labor there is profit, but idle chatter leads only to poverty” (Proverbs 14:23). This is a divine call to productivity, vision, and progress.

The Quran: A Theology of Imprisonment
In stark contrast, the Quranic worldview binds its followers in a theology of hardship. Sahih Muslim 2956 proclaims “The world is a prison for the believer and a paradise for the unbeliever.” Instead of inspiring believers to rise, it confines them to endure.

Surah Al-Baqarah 2:286 resigns mankind to burdens dictated by fate, while Surah Al-Mulk 67:2 describes life as a test filled with suffering, where hope is perpetually deferred. While oil-rich lands flaunt wealth in gold-plated palaces, ordinary followers are taught to embrace hardship as a virtue rather than pursue progress and enterprise.

The Clear Contrast
The Bible offers a faith that empowers, uplifts, and transforms, while the Quranic message too often binds its adherents in spiritual and social stagnation. Where the Bible equips you to overcome, Islam calls you to endure. Where Christianity grants sonship and inheritance in Christ, Islam grants a lifetime of striving under the weight of rigid laws and fatalism.

The Choice is Yours
In the final analysis, the Bible hands you a life manual for success, prosperity, and hope, rooted in the grace of a living God. The Quran, however, offers a theology of deferred hope, legalistic burden, and earthly restraint.

Choose wisely. Choose Christ.

— Dr. Maxwell Shimba
President, Shimba Theological Institute



The Discrepancies Between Allah and Muhammad: A Doctrinal Dilemma

The Discrepancies Between Allah and Muhammad: A Doctrinal Dilemma

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba | Shimba Theological Institute

One of the most troubling aspects of Islamic theology, which rarely receives open scrutiny, is the glaring contradiction between what Allah supposedly decrees in the Qur’an and what Muhammad later commands through hadith literature. This theological discord reveals a disturbing inconsistency within Islam’s foundations — an inconsistency believers deserve to examine honestly.

The attached chart highlights some of these contradictions:

1. The Number of Daily Prayers

  • Allah’s command: Muslims are instructed to pray three times a day (Qur'an 24:58).

  • Muhammad’s command: Later, Muhammad increases it to five times a day (Sahih al-Bukhari 528).

If Allah’s word is perfect and eternal, why would Muhammad alter a direct divine command?


2. The Right of Intercession

  • Allah states: All intercession belongs to Him alone (Qur'an 39:44).

  • Muhammad claims: He has been granted the exclusive right of intercession on Judgment Day (Sahih al-Bukhari 335).

This is a bold contradiction. If no one can intercede but Allah, how does Muhammad assume a privilege denied to all creation?


3. Mut’a (Temporary Marriage)

  • Allah permits it: Qur'an 33:51 allows temporary marriages.

  • Muhammad cancels it: Later abrogated by Muhammad in Sahih al-Bukhari 5523.

Did God change His mind, or did Muhammad override divine permission?


4. Laws Regarding Slave Women

  • Allah decrees: Slave women must observe a waiting period after separation (Qur'an 4:24).

  • Muhammad contradicts: Declares no waiting period is necessary (Sahih al-Bukhari 2235).

This inconsistency highlights the moral and doctrinal confusion embedded in Islamic jurisprudence.


The Theological Implications

These contradictions suggest that Muhammad often revised, altered, or overruled Quranic declarations for situational convenience. This is not merely a matter of differing interpretations but direct conflicts between Allah’s supposedly eternal decrees and Muhammad’s evolving rulings.

For Christians, this underscores the reliability and consistency of the Gospel message. In contrast to Islam’s shifting commands, the New Testament reveals a Savior whose word is unchanging and whose authority is absolute.

As Hebrews 13:8 declares:

“Jesus Christ is the same yesterday and today and forever.”


Conclusion:
This doctrinal tug-of-war between Allah and Muhammad is a fatal flaw within Islamic theology — exposing it as a man-made system rather than a divine revelation. It’s time for seekers of truth to reevaluate Islam’s claims in light of these undeniable inconsistencies and consider the unchanging truth of Jesus Christ.




Heaven in Christianity vs. Islamic Eschatology


Heaven in Christianity vs. Islamic Eschatology

Both Christianity and Islam cherish a vision of Paradise for the righteous, but their portraits differ sharply. In Islam, Paradise (Jannah) is often described in concrete, sensual terms: lush gardens, rivers of milk and honey, and even seventy-two houris (heavenly maidens) married to each believer. A controversial hadith in Sunan Ibn Majah (4337) puts it bluntly: “Allah will marry [the believer] to seventy-two wives – two of them houris and seventy from among the inhabitants of Hell – all of whom have alluring charms, and he will have a male organ that never becomes flaccid.”. This vivid reward-scene emphasizes God’s role as a bountiful Rewarder: believers are compensated with every imaginable delight for their earthly faithfulness. Even the houris – literally “wide-eyed maidens” in the Qur’an – are described as “purified wives” of spotless beauty. Classical sources elaborate that a believer may “cohabit” with these houris once for each day he fasted in Ramadan or performed other good works.

In contrast, Christian Scripture pictures heaven largely in spiritual, relational terms. Revelation 21:3–4 proclaims: “Behold, the dwelling place of God is with men… He will wipe away every tear… Death will be no more, neither shall there be mourning, nor crying, nor pain”. The emphasis is on the presence of God and the abolition of sorrow, not on carnal pleasures. Paul echoes this transcendence by quoting Isaiah: “No eye has seen, no ear has heard… the things which God has prepared for those who love Him”, signaling that heaven’s joys exceed human imagination and language. Indeed, Jesus taught that in the resurrection “they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like the angels in heaven”, indicating that earthly marital relations cease and believers simply “are like the angels,” focused on their union with God. Christian teaching consistently portrays God as holy, loving, and above all relational – the believer’s ultimate reward is intimate communion with Christ, the “Bridegroom,” rather than physical satisfactions.

Islamic Eschatology and the Hadith of Seventy-Two Wives

Islamic texts describe Paradise with many sensual delights, reflecting God’s generosity to the faithful. The Qur’an frequently mentions houris (ḥūr al-ʿayn) – enchanting companions with “wide and lovely eyes” – promised to righteous believers (e.g. Qur’an 44:54, 52:20, 55:70–72). The Sunan hadith above explicitly quantifies these rewards: 72 wives, including two from among the houris and seventy “inherited” from the people of Hell. (According to the narration, these Hell-born women are purified and redeemed as rewards.) Encyclopædia Britannica notes that Islamic tradition even specifies how often a believer can enjoy his houris: one for each day of Ramadan fast or good deed. In this vision, Paradise is very much a physical realm – with real (though perfected) bodies – where God delights to lavish carnal blessings on those who serve Him. The reward for piety is tangibly pleasurable.

This portrayal reflects a moral framework in which earthly faithfulness earns visible, even sensual recompense. Believers are motivated by certainty of reward, and the promise of houris and perpetual virility vividly underscores Allah’s power and generosity. Some Muslim scholars historically have interpreted such images metaphorically – suggesting that “houris” symbolize pure beauty and joy rather than fleshly mates – but the literal reading remains influential. Notably, the hadith’s framing (reward of Hell’s inhabitants) also carries a moral lesson: those who rejected faith on earth lose even their families as forfeited reward. Islamic eschatology thus combines God’s mercy (granting beauty) with His justice (giving each the full fruits of his choices).

Christian Vision of Heaven: God’s Presence and Holiness

Christian hope centers on being with God and Christ. Heaven is often depicted as a new creation where God’s kingdom comes fully: the “New Jerusalem” (Revelation 21–22) with golden streets and a crystal river, populated not by warring humans but by God’s own people. Importantly, this imagery is meant to convey spiritual realities. Revelation’s throne vision emphasizes that the tabernacle of God is with men; He will dwell with them, and they shall be His people. There is no mention of sexual rewards or harem-prizes – rather, God Himself is the treasure. The passage explicitly promises removal of all suffering: “He will wipe away every tear from their eyes”. Likewise, Paul insists that whatever joys await are beyond what we can conceive.

For Christians, then, heaven’s “luxuries” are fundamentally relational and transformative. The believer’s resurrected body will be imperishable (1 Corinthians 15), but God’s Word teaches that earthly marriage relationships do not persist (Matthew 22:30) – they are superseded by each person’s direct communion with Christ. In sum, Christian heaven is characterized by perfect holiness, love, and fellowship. The ultimate reward is seeing God face to face (1 Corinthians 13:12; 1 John 3:2), being fully sanctified and joyful in His presence. Sexuality and procreation belong to the earthly order; in eternity the believer is spiritually “like the angels” and married to Christ (the Church as bride), not accruing human wives or children. The New Testament consistently portrays the redeemed life as focused on worship and relationship with God, not on indulgent pleasures of the flesh.

Physical vs. Spiritual Interpretations

One key difference is how each tradition understands “the body” in the afterlife. Islam affirms bodily resurrection and speaks of real physical rewards (meat, wine, spouses). Christian doctrine also affirms a resurrection body (1 Corinthians 15:42–44), but emphasizes its glorified and spiritual nature. Paul declares that “flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God” (1 Cor 15:50, cf. 1 Cor 15:44–46), implying our new bodies will be suited for the divine environment. Thus, while Christians do not see heaven as “non-physical,” they stress that any physical comforts (whether clothing, food, or beauty) are wholly sanctified and secondary to communion with God.

Qur’anic descriptions sometimes blend literal and metaphorical language. The houris might be taken literally (as in the hadith) or spiritually (as some modern Muslims suggest). The ethical vision behind this matters: if taken literally, Paradise becomes a place of sensory recompense. Christianity, on the other hand, consistently interprets its paradise images as symbols of spiritual truths. For example, the blood of the lamb in Revelation is understood as the cleansing work of Christ, not a literal fountain. Likewise, the fact that “no eye has seen” the kingdom teaches humility – we cannot reduce heaven to anything our physical mind can imagine.

In practical terms, Christian teachers often caution against fixating on earthly pleasures. Jesus Himself rebuked greed and lust (e.g. Matthew 5:28), and promised treasure in heaven that “neither moth nor rust destroys” (Matthew 6:20). Thus, Christian hope encourages fidelity for God’s sake and promises reward, but that reward is God’s very presence and loving approval, far above any material or sensual gratification. The very paradox – that Christians die to self and gain everything in Christ – underscores that heaven is fundamentally about union with God’s holiness and love, not about human indulgence.

Moral Vision and the Character of God

These contrasting eschatologies reflect different emphases on God’s character and the moral life. In the Islamic hadith, God is portrayed as a sovereign King and just Benefactor: He rewards believers with abundant, tangible blessings. This underscores Allah’s justice (each gets precisely what he desires) and generosity (even inherited wives are granted). The moral vision is that righteous deeds will be richly recompensed. However, such a portrayal can raise questions from a Christian perspective: Does it reduce God’s promise to mere worldly enjoyment? What does it say about purity and holiness in the age to come, when believers are defined by sexual consummation rather than spiritual maturity?

Christianity’s vision paints God as infinitely holy and loving. God is not primarily a dispenser of physical goods, but the object of the believer’s ultimate delight. His character is revealed in Christ – a sacrificial lover, not a sensual provider. The moral impetus in Christianity is to become like Christ (Romans 8:29), reflecting His love and holiness. Heaven is the culmination of that process: believers have been cleansed and perfected, so that they can joyfully be with God Himself (Revelation 21:3) without any impurity or pain. The promise of “no more death or sorrow” shows God as comforter. In Christian theology, God’s justice was already satisfied on the Cross, so heaven is not about extra punishment or reward but about unbroken relationship – consistent with God’s nature as “merciful and gracious” (Exodus 34:6) and “God is love” (1 John 4:8).

Key contrasts in summary:

  • Focus of Reward: Christian Scripture highlights communion with God and Christ, not sensual pleasures. Jesus taught that believers will not marry in the resurrection but be like angels, emphasizing spiritual joy. By contrast, the quoted hadith centers on sexual rewards (72 virgins) as the believer’s chief delight.

  • Imagery: Biblical language uses holy imagery (God’s throne, New Jerusalem, paradise as God’s presence) with emphasis on comfort, whereas the hadith uses explicit, bodily imagery. The Bible says “no eye has seen… what God has prepared”, implying a mystery beyond sexual conquest.

  • God’s Character: Christianity portrays God as a loving Father and righteous Judge whose gift is Himself and moral transformation. Islam emphasizes God as Just and Beneficent, rewarding deeds – the hadith shows Allah as one who fulfills believers’ hopes in tangible ways.

In the end, Dr. Shimba notes, each tradition’s portrait of heaven mirrors its understanding of the Divine. Christianity’s heaven reflects a God whose ultimate gift is His own Presence and sanctifying grace (cf. Rev 21:3–4), while the hadith’s heaven reflects a God who rewards with every lawful good (including carnal reward). A Christian perspective holds that God’s perfect nature is best revealed in Christ’s love and holiness, so it uplifts the spiritual and moral vision above the carnal. Both views agree believers will be joyful forever – but they invite us to ask whether that joy is found in God Himself or in created delights.

Sources: The above draws on Islamic texts (Sunan Ibn Majah 4337, Qur’anic language) and Christian Scripture (Revelation 21:3–4; 1 Cor 2:9; Matt 22:30) and respected summaries (e.g. Britannica on houris) to contrast these eschatological portraits.

The Fulfillment of 2 Corinthians 11:2-4 in the False Doctrine of Isa Bin Maryam

Title: The Fulfillment of 2 Corinthians 11:2-4 in the False Doctrine of Isa Bin Maryam

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba | Shimba Theological Institute

The Apostle Paul, under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, issued a timeless warning to the early church about deceivers who would introduce counterfeit gospels and a false Christ. In 2 Corinthians 11:2-4, Paul writes:

“For I am jealous for you with a godly jealousy. I promised you to one husband, to Christ, so that I might present you as a pure virgin to Him. But I am afraid that just as Eve was deceived by the serpent’s cunning, your minds may somehow be led astray from your sincere and pure devotion to Christ. For if someone comes and preaches a Jesus other than the Jesus we preached, or if you receive a different spirit from the one you received, or a different gospel from the one you accepted, you put up with it easily enough.”

Paul’s prophecy came to life centuries later through Muhammad, the founder of Islam. In the 7th century, Muhammad introduced a figure called Isa Bin Maryam in the Quran — a character carrying the name of Jesus but stripped of His divine nature, crucifixion, resurrection, and redemptive work.

This Isa denies being the Son of God, rejects the cross, and instead, points people to Muhammad as the final prophet. He proclaims a different gospel entirely — one based on works, law, and submission to a god foreign to the God of the Bible.

This is precisely the deception Paul warned about:

  • A different Jesus — not the crucified, risen, and divine Savior, but a mortal prophet.

  • A different spirit — not the Holy Spirit, but one denying the Sonship of Christ.

  • A different gospel — not salvation by grace through faith, but by religious submission and works.

Millions have since followed this counterfeit Christ, believing in a message Paul foresaw would come to seduce hearts and minds away from the true Gospel.

The lesson remains urgent today. Christianity must continue to expose this false doctrine and reaffirm that salvation is found in no one else but Jesus Christ — the Son of God, crucified and risen for the salvation of mankind.

“For there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved.” (Acts 4:12)

May the Church stand firm against every counterfeit gospel, and may those trapped in deception find the true Savior, not Isa Bin Maryam, but Jesus Christ, the Lord of Glory.




The Warning of 2 Corinthians 11:2-4 Fulfilled in Muhammad’s Isa Bin Maryam

Title: The Warning of 2 Corinthians 11:2-4 Fulfilled in Muhammad’s Isa Bin Maryam

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba | Shimba Theological Institute

The Apostle Paul, through the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, issued a prophetic warning to the early Church about false teachers and counterfeit gospels that would arise to deceive many. In 2 Corinthians 11:2-4, Paul writes:

“For I am jealous for you with a godly jealousy. I promised you to one husband, to Christ, so that I might present you as a pure virgin to him. But I am afraid that just as Eve was deceived by the serpent’s cunning, your minds may somehow be led astray from your sincere and pure devotion to Christ. For if someone comes to you and preaches a Jesus other than the Jesus we preached, or if you receive a different spirit from the Spirit you received, or a different gospel from the one you accepted, you put up with it easily enough.” (2 Corinthians 11:2-4, NIV)

What a clear and timeless warning — and history has shown it to be true.

Centuries after this epistle was penned, Muhammad arose in 7th-century Arabia claiming to be a prophet. In the Quran, he introduced a figure called Isa Bin Maryam (Jesus son of Mary), who, though carrying the name of our Lord Jesus, is a completely different character from the true Son of God revealed in the Bible.

Isa Bin Maryam of the Quran is neither divine nor crucified. He denies his own deity, prophesies the coming of Muhammad, and offers a counterfeit gospel. This is precisely what Paul warned about — a different Jesus, a different spirit, and a different gospel.

Paul's prophecy finds its perfect fulfillment in the Islamic distortion of Jesus’ identity:

  • The Biblical Jesus is God incarnate, crucified and risen.

  • The Quran’s Isa is a mere human prophet, neither crucified nor divine, and subordinate to Muhammad’s message.

This deception has led over a billion souls astray, accepting a false Christ that can neither save nor redeem.

Paul foresaw this danger. His warning wasn’t only for the Corinthian church but for all generations. The Quran’s presentation of Isa is not a continuation of Biblical truth — it’s a calculated counterfeit, exactly what the apostle cautioned against.

As believers, we must remain vigilant. The true Gospel is found only in the Bible. Any other ‘Jesus’ or gospel must be rejected. Muhammad’s Isa Bin Maryam is a false doctrine — a prophetic fulfillment of Paul’s dire warning.

In conclusion, 2 Corinthians 11:2-4 isn’t merely an ancient caution. It’s a divine lens through which we see the cunning deception of Islam’s Isa. The counterfeit Christ cannot save — only the risen Jesus of the Scriptures can.

Stay grounded in the Word. Test every spirit. Defend the faith.

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba
Shimba Theological Institute



The Problem of Blood-Bought Paradise: A Biblical and Theological Critique of Quran 9:111

The Problem of Blood-Bought Paradise: A Biblical and Theological Critique of Quran 9:111

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba | Shimba Theological Institute


Introduction

One of the most controversial verses in the Quran is found in Surah At-Tawbah (9:111). It boldly declares that Allah has purchased the lives and wealth of the believers in exchange for Paradise, on the condition that they fight in His cause, kill, and be killed. What’s even more startling is the claim that this is a binding promise found in the Torah, the Gospel, and the Quran itself.

Today, we shall unpack this troubling verse, expose its theological implications, and compare it to the true message of peace, redemption, and grace revealed in the Bible through Jesus Christ.


The Verse in Question

Quran 9:111 (Sahih International):

"Indeed, Allah has purchased from the believers their lives and their properties [in exchange] for that they will have Paradise. They fight in the cause of Allah, so they kill and are killed. [It is] a true promise [binding] upon Him in the Torah and the Gospel and the Qur'an. And who is truer to his covenant than Allah? So rejoice in your transaction which you have contracted. And it is that which is the great attainment."


A Theology of Violence

This verse presents a transactional religion where Paradise is not a free gift of God’s grace — as proclaimed in the New Testament — but a reward purchased through bloodshed and martyrdom. It essentially monetizes faith through warfare:

  • Kill in the cause of Allah

  • Be killed in the cause of Allah

  • Receive Paradise as payment

Is this truly the will of a holy, loving, and just God?


Did the Torah and Gospel Ever Teach This?

The Quran claims this doctrine of blood-for-paradise is a binding promise found in the Torah and the Gospel. But a careful examination of both proves otherwise:

  • In the Torah (Old Testament), God instructed the Israelites to fight specific battles for the preservation of His covenant nation, not for personal Paradise.

  • Nowhere does the Torah teach that individuals secure eternal life by killing others or being killed themselves.

  • In the Gospels, Jesus Christ explicitly rebukes violence:

    “Put your sword back in its place,” Jesus said to him, “for all who draw the sword will die by the sword.” (Matthew 26:52)

The Gospel of Christ offers eternal life as a free, undeserved gift by faith (John 3:16, Ephesians 2:8-9). Nowhere does it link salvation to warfare, murder, or martyrdom for reward.

This Quranic claim is both historically and theologically false.


The Problem of a Transactional God

The idea of a god who buys the lives and wealth of people in exchange for blood-drenched Paradise reduces faith to a contract, not a covenant. The God of the Bible seeks relationship through love, repentance, and mercy — not through slaughter and death.

John 10:10 (Jesus speaking):

“The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy; I have come that they may have life, and have it to the full.”

It’s clear from this contrast who inspires violence and who brings peace.


Conclusion: Can This Be the Word of God?

A book that claims divine authority but promotes a doctrine so fundamentally at odds with the Torah and the Gospel cannot be trusted as the Word of God. Quran 9:111 reveals a theology foreign to the God of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and Jesus Christ.

Paradise is not a reward for the blood of others. It is a gift paid for by the blood of Christ alone.


Final Thought

Dear reader — if a scripture invites you to kill for Paradise, test its spirit.
The true God sent His Son to die for you, not to command you to die for Him. Choose life in Christ.


Stay tuned for more biblical apologetics and critical theological reflections right here at the Shimba Theological Institute.

– Dr. Maxwell Shimba

www.shimbatheologicalinstitute.org (hypothetical)



Who Were the Disciples of Isa Bin Maryam?

Who Were the Disciples of Isa Bin Maryam? Were Their Names Mentioned? Was Isa Baptized in the Quran? And Can the Quran Be Trusted?

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba | Shimba Theological Institute


Introduction: Questions Islam Won’t Answer Clearly

Dear reader,
When discussing Isa Bin Maryam (the Islamic reference to Jesus, son of Mary), Muslims love to claim that they believe in him as a prophet. Yet, the Quran’s portrayal of Isa is suspiciously vague and contradictory when compared to reliable historical records and the New Testament. Today, let’s confront some key questions:

  • Who were the disciples of Isa Bin Maryam? Are their names recorded in the Quran?

  • Was Isa baptized, as recorded in the Bible, anywhere in the Quran?

  • And most importantly — can the Quran truly be trusted as a reliable revelation from God?

Let’s dissect these questions one by one.


1. Who Were the Disciples of Isa Bin Maryam? Are Their Names Mentioned in the Quran?

In the New Testament, the names of the twelve disciples of Jesus are clearly recorded: Peter, James, John, Andrew, Philip, Bartholomew, Matthew, Thomas, James (son of Alphaeus), Simon the Zealot, Judas (son of James), and Judas Iscariot (the betrayer).

But in the Quran? Not a single name.

The Quran mentions Hawariyyun (helpers/disciples) in Surah As-Saff 61:14:

“O you who have believed, be supporters of Allah, as when Jesus, the son of Mary, said to the disciples, ‘Who are my supporters for Allah?’ The disciples said, ‘We are supporters of Allah.’”

But it ends there — no names, no number, no identities. A book claiming to “confirm” what came before it (Surah 5:48) can’t even tell us who the disciples were.

Question:
If the Quran came from the same God who inspired the Bible, why leave out the names and details so plainly documented in the Gospels?


2. Was Isa Bin Maryam Baptized in the Quran?

In the Bible, Jesus was baptized by John the Baptist (Yahya bin Zakariya) in the Jordan River — a defining moment marking the start of his ministry.

But in the Quran? Silence.

Nowhere does the Quran record Isa bin Maryam being baptized. No Jordan River. No Holy Spirit descending like a dove. No voice from heaven saying, “This is my beloved Son in whom I am well pleased.” (Matthew 3:17)

Another Question:
If Islam claims Isa is a true prophet, why omit this critical, supernatural affirmation of his divine mission — a moment witnessed by the masses?


3. Can the Quran Be Trusted?

These gaps point to an uncomfortable conclusion for honest inquirers:

  • A book claiming to confirm the Bible cannot contradict or omit its core, well-documented truths.

  • A book that fails to name the disciples of Isa — while pretending to validate him — lacks historical credibility.

  • A book that ignores Isa’s baptism, a universally attested event, is deliberately selective or uninformed.

Worse still, the Quran contains conflicting theological claims about Isa’s nature, mission, and fate. It denies his crucifixion (Surah 4:157), a fact established by both biblical, Roman, and extra-biblical historical records. How then can this book be trusted on matters of ultimate truth and salvation?


Final Thought: Truth Has Nothing to Hide

Christianity’s records are clear, specific, and consistent.
The Quran’s version of Isa is incomplete, contradictory, and devoid of vital historical detail.

So, can the Quran be trusted?
The evidence says — no.

At Shimba Theological Institute, we invite seekers to examine the facts boldly and embrace the true Jesus of history — the Son of God, crucified, risen, and coming again.


If you’d like us to write more comparisons between Isa of the Bible and Isa of the Quran, let us know in the comments below. Truth has nothing to fear from scrutiny.

- Dr. Maxwell Shimba

Shimba Theological Institute



Why Doesn’t the Name of Allah Heal Diseases?

Why Doesn’t the Name of Allah Heal Diseases?

Why Is There No Healing Power in Islam While People Are Healed in the Name of Jesus?**

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba | Shimba Theological Institute
Originally written Friday, August 26, 2016


Introduction: What Is Healing?

Dear reader,
Healing is a divine act of restoring life and wholeness to the soul or body through faith. It happens when someone is prayed for, when hands are laid upon them, or when they hear the true, life-giving word of Jesus Christ. Spiritual healing often comes alongside physical healing — as seen in the Bible, where those healed in their bodies were also restored in their spirits.

But here lies a serious question for our Muslim friends:

  • Why is there no healing power in the name of Allah?

  • Why do Muslims never hold healing crusades or revivals like Christians do in the name of Jesus?


1. Why Doesn’t the Name of Allah Heal Diseases?

Despite being declared as "Most Merciful" and "Compassionate," we find no record in Islamic tradition of people being healed simply by invoking the name of Allah. Contrast this with Christianity, where countless testimonies exist of people miraculously healed through faith in the name of Jesus Christ.

The Bible says in Acts 3:6:

“In the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, rise up and walk!”

And the man, lame from birth, rose and walked. But why is such power absent in Islam?


2. Allah Failed to Heal Muhammad

Even more concerning is that when the Prophet Muhammad fell gravely ill after reportedly eating poisoned meat, Allah could not heal him.

According to Ibn Sa’d, p. 265,
Aisha, the wife of Muhammad, narrated:

“When the Prophet was sick, Jibril would pray for him, saying: ‘In the name of Allah, may He heal you from every disease, from every pain, and from the evil of every envious person.’”

Yet, despite these prayers, Muhammad did not recover.


3. The Ineffective Prayers of Jibril

If Jibril (the angel Gabriel in Islam) was sent by Allah to pray for Muhammad’s healing — and still failed — what does that imply about the healing power associated with the name of Allah? Why did these prayers “hit a wall,” unable to save Allah’s own prophet?


4. But the Name of Jesus Heals Every Disease

On the other hand, the name of Jesus (Yesu) continues to heal countless people to this day. Healing crusades and revivals in Christianity overflow with testimonies of the blind receiving sight, the lame walking, and diseases disappearing through prayer in Jesus’ name.

John 14:13-14 says:

“And I will do whatever you ask in my name, so that the Father may be glorified in the Son. You may ask me for anything in my name, and I will do it.”

This promise remains alive and effective.


5. Have You Ever Seen a Healing Crusade in Islam?

Let’s ask ourselves honestly:
Have you ever heard of a healing service in a mosque, or a Muslim gathering where people are healed instantly by invoking the name of Allah?

The answer is no. There’s a noticeable absence of divine healing ministries in Islam — and this absence points us to a vital spiritual truth:

Healing belongs to God alone, and it is manifest in the name of Jesus Christ, the true healer.


Conclusion

I challenge you today to reflect:

  • Why could Allah not heal his prophet?

  • Why do healing miracles only follow the name of Jesus Christ?

Perhaps, it’s time to reconsider where true power and divine authority reside.

And His name is Jesus.


For more scriptural studies and comparative theology insights, follow our teachings at Shimba Theological Institute.



Why Did Allah Send Down Surah Al-Hijr 15:6 Calling the Prophet of Islam Insane?

Why Did Allah Send Down Surah Al-Hijr 15:6 Calling the Prophet of Islam Insane?

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba | Shimba Theological Institute

Dear brothers and sisters,

The Bible teaches us that “you will know them by their fruits” — words directly from the Gospel of Matthew 7:16-17:

“By their fruit you will recognize them. Do people pick grapes from thornbushes, or figs from thistles? Likewise, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit.”

Today, I invite you to critically reflect with me: what fruit did Muhammad, the prophet of Islam, bear during his lifetime?

His conduct raised serious questions. One of the most troubling acts was his marriage to a six-year-old girl — an act no prophet before him ever committed. This, along with other actions, led his contemporaries to openly call him “insane” (MuwendaWazimu in Swahili).

And here’s the astonishing part: even the Quran itself records this accusation.

Surah Al-Hijr 15:6 says:

“And they say, ‘O you upon whom the message has been sent down, indeed you are mad (possessed/insane).’”

[Source: http://www.quranitukufu.net/015.html]

Notice — Muhammad did not deny this claim. He remained silent, which in itself speaks volumes.


Did Muhammad Himself Admit to Madness?

Historical Islamic sources further confirm these concerns. In Kitab al-Tabaqat al-Kabir by Ibn Sa’d, translated by S. Moinal Haq (vol. 1, p. 225), Muhammad is recorded confessing to his wife Khadija:

“O Khadija, I see lights and I hear voices, and I fear that I am mad.”

This is Muhammad’s own admission — raising a critical debate:

  • If Muhammad feared he was mad, what assurance do we have that his revelations were divine and not delusions?

  • Why would Allah send down a verse publicizing that his own prophet was being called insane?

  • Does God mock his prophets? Or is this evidence of an underlying problem with Muhammad’s claim to prophethood?


A Debate for Every Honest Seeker

If we’re to compare the fruits of true prophets — like Moses, David, and Jesus — none were ever accused of madness, nor did they fear for their own sanity. None married children. None doubted the origin of their revelations.

So, the debate stands:

  • Is Muhammad’s own confession and public accusations of madness consistent with genuine prophethood?

  • Why does the Quran preserve such a damaging claim, rather than refuting it outright?

  • Can a man fearing madness be trusted as the sole conveyor of God’s final message?


Conclusion

As people of faith and reason, we must question these matters openly. As Jesus taught, “you will know them by their fruits.” And by the fruit of Muhammad’s life — and by the words of his own book — troubling questions arise.

This is not to insult, but to invite honest debate, inquiry, and a search for truth.

The God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob is not a God of confusion.

Stay tuned for more theological reflections and debates from Shimba Theological Institute.

Dr. Maxwell Shimba
Founder & Director, Shimba Theological Institute



TRENDING NOW