By Dr. Maxwell Shimba, Shimba Theological Institute
Opening Statement
Islamic tradition, as preserved in various hadith collections, raises significant questions about the theological standing and spiritual agency of women in Islam. One such hadith, found in Sunan Ibn Majah 950, asserts:
"Muhammad said the prayer is annulled by the passing of a dog, a donkey, or a woman."
This statement not only equates a woman’s presence with animals considered impure in Islamic law but also implies that her very presence can invalidate a man’s communication with Allah. This foundational assumption brings forth deep theological dilemmas regarding the spiritual equality and ultimate fate of Muslim women. This article, structured as a debate, challenges Muslim scholars and believers to offer coherent answers to the following pressing questions.
Point 1: The Contradiction in Worship – Are Women’s Prayers Heard?
Challenge:
If the mere presence of a woman can annul a man’s prayer, as indicated by the hadith, what does this imply about the efficacy and validity of a woman’s own prayer? Can a woman, whose existence is said to disrupt the worship of men, be assured that her own acts of worship are accepted by Allah? How can Muslim women maintain faith that their prayers will be heard, if the Prophet of Islam declared their presence inherently problematic to the act of prayer?
Scholarly Counterpoint:
Islamic orthodoxy claims both men and women are obligated to pray, and the Quran commands all believers—male and female—to engage in worship and obedience to Allah (Quran 33:35). However, the hadith presents a contradiction. If a woman can nullify a prayer simply by being present, does her prayer not risk nullification from her own existence or the presence of other women? How does Islamic theology reconcile this inconsistency?
Point 2: Islam—A Religion for Men Alone?
Challenge:
Is Islam, at its core, a religion that centers men and marginalizes women? The testimony of the hadith above, along with many others, seems to relegate women to a spiritual status inferior to men—where her presence, voice, or even body is regarded as a source of fitnah (temptation) or spiritual pollution. Is this the egalitarian vision claimed by many apologists, or does Islam fundamentally prioritize men’s access to the divine?
Scholarly Counterpoint:
Proponents may argue that Islam honors women and affords them spiritual rights. Yet, the ritual exclusion in mosques, the secondary status in public prayers, and the legal disadvantages in matters of testimony, inheritance, and divorce paint a different picture. How does Islamic tradition justify these practices while claiming to uphold equality before God?
Point 3: Promises of the Akhirah—What Awaits Muslim Women?
Challenge:
According to popular hadith and the broader Islamic eschatological imagination, righteous men in Paradise are promised 72 virgins (houris) as part of their reward (Sunan al-Tirmidhi 2562). But what is the reward for Muslim women in the afterlife? Is there a comparable promise, or does the vision of paradise cater exclusively to male desires? Does the Quran or authentic hadith literature ever promise believing women any concrete, individual reward that parallels what is described for men?
Scholarly Counterpoint:
Islamic scholars often claim that women will "be satisfied" in paradise and receive what their "hearts desire" (Quran 41:31). However, the texts are strikingly silent on details or specific promises for women, while being explicit for men. Does this not reveal a patriarchal conception of salvation and bliss, in which women are largely invisible or, at best, accessories to male pleasure?
Point 4: The Double Standard of Ritual Purity
Challenge:
If women annul men’s prayers by their mere passage, does this principle apply in reverse? Can a man’s presence annul a woman’s prayer? If not, what is the theological rationale for this double standard? Does the presence of a man carry intrinsic spiritual purity denied to women? Does this not contradict the claim of universal spiritual equality before Allah?
Scholarly Counterpoint:
There is no parallel tradition where men’s presence is said to invalidate women’s prayers. This asymmetry points to a theological anthropology in Islam where men are normative and spiritually authoritative, while women are sources of ritual defect and pollution. How can this be reconciled with the Quranic assertion that "the most honored of you in the sight of Allah is the most righteous" (Quran 49:13), regardless of gender?
Conclusion: The Challenge for Muslim Apologists
The foregoing questions present a profound challenge for Islamic theology:
-
How can Muslim women have confidence in their prayers if their very presence is considered an impediment to men’s prayers?
-
Why does Islamic eschatology privilege men with explicit sensual rewards, while offering women vague promises of satisfaction?
-
What justification is there for the double standard of ritual purity and prayer validity?
Call for Response:
We call upon Muslim theologians, scholars, and apologists to respond with clear, textually grounded answers. Let them demonstrate, using the Quran and authentic hadith, that Islam provides true spiritual equality for women, both in this life and in the life to come. Until such answers are offered, the questions of spiritual agency, ritual participation, and the destiny of women in Islam remain unresolved and deeply problematic.
By Dr. Maxwell Shimba
Shimba Theological Institute
