Monday, July 7, 2025

“Jesus the Son, Not a Slave: A Theological Refutation of Islamic Claims”

 Title: IF JESUS’ SUBMISSION TO HIS FATHER MAKES HIM A MUSLIM, THEN WHO IS ALLAH’S SON?

Author: Dr. Maxwell Shimba, Shimba Theological Institute


Introduction

Islamic apologists frequently argue that Jesus was a Muslim because He submitted to the will of God. They anchor this on the Arabic definition of "Islam" (submission) and "Muslim" (one who submits to God). However, this argument is not only linguistically shallow, but theologically incoherent when analyzed through the lenses of both Christian doctrine and Islamic theology. If submission alone defines a person as Muslim, then Abraham, Moses, David, and even Satan—who at times obeyed God's command—could qualify. Yet, the core of Islamic theology rejects the very foundation upon which Jesus operated: the intimate relationship with God as His Father.

Hence, we pose a question that penetrates the heart of Islamic theology and exposes its inherent contradictions: “Is Allah a Father in any sense?”


I. Submission in Context: Jesus and the Father

Christianity does not define Jesus merely by His submission to God, but by His unique Sonship and divine identity. Jesus' submission (e.g., Luke 22:42 – "Not my will, but yours be done") is a relational act within the Trinity—between the Son and the Father—not a servile obedience between a slave and master.

“I and the Father are one.” (John 10:30)

This declaration, to Christians, affirms not just submission but unity in essence, co-equality, and mutual love. Islam, on the other hand, categorically denies this relationship. According to the Quran:

“Say: He is Allah, the One and Only; Allah, the Eternal, Absolute; He begets not, nor is He begotten.” (Surah Al-Ikhlas 112:1–3)

This verse refutes any notion of divine Fatherhood or Sonship, making the Islamic God (Allah) completely non-relational.

So the question arises: If Jesus' submission makes Him a Muslim, then to whom did He submit? Clearly, not to the Allah of the Quran, who denies having any son. Jesus called God “Abba” (Father) (Mark 14:36), a term utterly alien and even blasphemous in Islamic theology.


II. Is Allah a Father in Any Sense?

In Christianity, God is revealed as a Father:

  • To Jesus uniquely (Matthew 3:17),

  • To believers spiritually (John 1:12),

  • And as Creator of all (Malachi 2:10).

Islam, however, denounces all three:

  1. Not the Father of Jesus – Surah 4:171: “Do not say ‘Three.’ Cease! It is better for you. Allah is only one God. Far be it from His glory to have a son.”

  2. Not a spiritual father – Allah has slaves (abd), not sons (ibn).

  3. Not a relational father even in metaphor – Surah 5:18 rebukes Jews and Christians: “The Jews and the Christians say, ‘We are the sons of Allah and His beloved.’ Say: Why then does He punish you for your sins?”

In effect, Allah is not a father in any relational, redemptive, or theological sense. This makes submission to Allah fundamentally different from submission to the Father of Jesus Christ. Jesus’ submission was an act of divine love, not merely obligation.


III. Jesus the Son vs. Muhammad the Servant

Christians believe that Jesus is:

  • The eternal Word made flesh (John 1:14),

  • The only begotten Son (John 3:16),

  • The radiance of God’s glory (Hebrews 1:3).

Muslims claim Muhammad is the servant and messenger of Allah (*‘abd’ and *‘rasul’), but reject any divine Sonship. Thus, Jesus stands in relational intimacy with the Father, while Muhammad stands as a distant slave to a master.

To equate Jesus' submission to Muslim submission is a category mistake. It ignores Christ's divine origin, eternal Sonship, and pre-incarnate glory:

“Before Abraham was, I am.” (John 8:58)

If Jesus' obedience to the Father makes Him a Muslim, then Abraham’s obedience to sacrifice his son should make him Christian—since the Bible says it was Isaac, not Ishmael (Genesis 22:2). Why the double standard?


IV. The Fatal Flaw in Muslim Apologetics

Muslim apologists rely on semantics—“Islam” meaning submission—to retroactively claim biblical figures. But that’s historical revisionism. Submission to God in general doesn’t define a person as Muslim in the Quranic sense unless it’s to Allah as defined by Muhammad. Yet none of the prophets ever mentioned in the Bible knew Allah, or affirmed the Shahada (declaration that Muhammad is Allah’s prophet).

Therefore, to say Jesus is a Muslim is to say:

  • Jesus believed Muhammad was a prophet (He didn’t).

  • Jesus denied being the Son of God (He didn’t).

  • Jesus never called God “Father” (He did constantly).

These are lies the Quran tells against the historical Jesus.


V. Crushing the Myth: Jesus Cannot Be a Muslim

  • Linguistic Submission ≠ Islamic Muslim: Submission is universal; Islam is specific to Muhammad’s theology.

  • Allah ≠ the Father: If Jesus’ Father is not Allah, then Jesus wasn’t submitting to Allah.

  • No Sonship in Islam: Without the Son, there is no Father. And without the Father, there is no true understanding of Jesus’ identity.

  • Jesus was crucified (historical fact) – Islam denies this (Surah 4:157), proving it preaches another Jesus (2 Corinthians 11:4).


Conclusion: Submission Alone Doesn’t Define Islam

The attempt to redefine Jesus as a Muslim on the grounds of submission is a theological deception. It erases the intimate divine relationship between the Son and the Father and tries to replace it with a master-slave dynamic foreign to Jesus’ mission and message.

So to every Muslim claiming Jesus was a Muslim because He submitted: Was Allah His Father? If not, then Jesus was not a Muslim—He is the Son of the Living God.

“And we have seen and testify that the Father has sent the Son to be the Savior of the world.” (1 John 4:14)

End of Debate.


Dr. Maxwell Shimba
Restorative Justice Practitioner, Bible Scholar, Founder of USA Theological University
President, Shimba Theological Institute



IF JESUS IS GOD, WHY DID HE DIE?

 Monday, September 26, 2016

DOES GOD DIE?

These are questions Muslims ask every day, and in this article, I will respond to them.

READ: 1 Peter 3:18–19
"For Christ also suffered once for sins, the righteous for the unrighteous, to bring you to God. He was put to death in the body but made alive in the spirit. 19 After being made alive, he went and made proclamation to the imprisoned spirits."

The Word of God says that His body was put to death, but His spirit was made alive. Therefore, we need not be surprised, because we understand that it was only His body that died, but His spirit did not die.

Scripture teaches us that GOD IS SPIRIT; hence, the one who was killed was only the body, but His spirit remained alive.

1 Timothy 6:15–16
"Which God will bring about in his own time—God, the blessed and only Ruler, the King of kings and Lord of lords, who alone is immortal and who lives in unapproachable light, whom no one has seen or can see. To him be honor and might forever. Amen."

The divine nature of God did not change when the “WORD” became flesh (John 1:1, 14). Instead, the Word united with humanity (Colossians 2:9). Therefore, the divinity of Jesus Christ was neither corrupted nor changed. Moreover, Jesus was not just a man who had God within him or merely someone doing the work of God—absolutely not. Jesus is God in the flesh and the second person of the Holy Trinity.

The Bible tells us in Hebrews 1:3:
"The Son is the radiance of God’s glory and the exact representation of his being, sustaining all things by his powerful word. After he had provided purification for sins, he sat down at the right hand of the Majesty in heaven."

Therefore, the two natures of Jesus Christ cannot be confused or mixed (Eutychianism), nor can they be merged into one single nature (Monophysitism). These two natures are distinct and independent, and yet at the same time, they are united in the person of Jesus. This union is known as the Hypostatic Union.


FURTHER EVIDENCE OF THE TWO NATURES OF JESUS

The doctrine of the Hypostatic Union involves what theologians call the communicatio idiomatum (Latin for "communication of properties"). This doctrine teaches that the divine and human attributes of Jesus are both fully present in the person of Jesus Christ. This means that the human Jesus had the right to say,

  • “He had glory with God the Father before the world began” (John 17:5),

  • He claimed to have come from Heaven (John 3:13),

  • And that He is present everywhere—omnipresent (Matthew 28:20).

All of these claims are divine attributes, and Jesus fully possessed them.

One of the greatest mistakes non-Christians make is failing to understand that Jesus had two natures. For instance, the Jehovah’s Witnesses view Jesus only as a human being, denying His divine attributes. They often focus only on the verses that describe the humanity of Jesus while rejecting those that testify to His deity.

On the other hand, Christian Scientists make the opposite mistake: they emphasize Jesus’ divinity and neglect His humanity.

There are many other verses that testify to the deity of Jesus, including:

  • John 10:30–33

  • John 20:28

  • Colossians 2:9

  • Philippians 2:5–8

  • Hebrews 1:6–8

  • 2 Peter 1:1

To understand Jesus properly, every teaching about Him must address both His divine and human natures. These two natures are essential to who He is.

That’s why in Luke 2:52, it says:
"And Jesus grew in wisdom and stature, and in favor with God and man."

Yet, at the same time, He was omniscient (all-knowing), as seen in John 21:17.
Jesus is the Word of God who became flesh/human (John 1:1, 14).

God bless you all.
It is I,
Dr. Maxwell Shimba,
Servant of Jesus Christ
For Max Shimba Ministries Org
MAX SHIMBA MINISTRIES ORG ©2016. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this license document, but changing it is not allowed.



IF JESUS IS GOD, WHY DID HE SLEEP? DOES GOD SLEEP?

Thursday, April 20, 2017This fundamental question will bring us to the end of our analysis on the topic of knowledge concerning the Trinity and the Divinity of the Lord Jesus. The main argument stems from the incident where Jesus was traveling with His disciples, and He was asleep in the stern. When His disciples became terrified by a great storm, they woke Him up for help, as we read:

Mark 4:37-38
“A great windstorm arose, and the waves beat into the boat, so that it was already filling. But He was in the stern, asleep on a pillow. And they awoke Him and said to Him, 'Teacher, do You not care that we are perishing?'”

This act of Jesus sleeping, as described here, is what generates the question, with those who ask it strengthening their case by also quoting the following Psalm:

Psalm 121:4-5
“Indeed, He who keeps Israel shall neither slumber nor sleep. The LORD is your keeper…”

This passage from Psalms states that the God who guards Israel neither slumbers nor sleeps, so those who argue this case claim that if Jesus is God, then His sleeping is a denial of His divinity.

The Main Answer to this Question
Basically, this is one of the easiest questions regarding the Trinity and the Divinity of the Lord Jesus. However, what seems to be a small oversight by those asking this question is their failure to conduct a comparative reading of the Scriptures and consult more passages to understand the context of Jesus sleeping and the Psalms’ declaration that God does not sleep.

To answer this question, let me just say that David's Psalm is entirely correct—God, in essence, does not sleep. However, the same book of Psalms also describes what God can do using the same concept of sleeping. Let us read another passage from Psalms to begin this important step in resolving this contentious question:

Let us read together from Psalms:

Psalm 78:65
“Then the Lord awoke as from sleep, as a mighty man who shouts because of wine.”

In this passage, again, the prophet David describes God as one who could be ‘like one sleeping’. Remember, the first verse says God does not sleep, implying literal sleep, but here, David uses the phrase ‘as from sleep’, a term that shows the sleeper was not in a state of total unconsciousness or inability.

Therefore, after this explanation, we can summarize this argument by saying: the type of sleep Jesus had seems similar to this ‘as from sleep’. In reality, you will see that Jesus was simply testing the faith of His disciples in that situation, just as the Scriptures in Isaiah describe the pattern of God's actions, where sometimes, intentionally, God may leave His people for a time to test them:

Isaiah 54:7
“For a brief moment I abandoned you, but with deep compassion I will bring you back.”

So, God can for a while turn His face from His people to see where their faith will turn, and in reality, that is what the Lord Jesus did in this event with His disciples, because after seeing that their faith was directed towards Him, the Scriptures say:

Mark 4:39-41
“Then He arose and rebuked the wind, and said to the sea, ‘Peace, be still!’ And the wind ceased and there was a great calm. But He said to them, ‘Why are you so fearful? How is it that you have no faith?’ And they feared exceedingly, and said to one another, ‘Who can this be, that even the wind and the sea obey Him!’”

Thus, Jesus concluded the incident by rebuking the wind and the sea after confirming that His disciples’ faith was placed in Him during the storm. But the important point that arises here is that this act of calming the sea is itself enough evidence of His divine authority, and perhaps those who ask this question would, if they examined the entire episode, realize that the event itself further proves Jesus’ Divinity rather than denying it.

Refer to the statement of His disciples after the event:

Mark 4:41
“And they feared exceedingly, and said to one another, ‘Who can this be, that even the wind and the sea obey Him!’”

Thus, even the disciples of Jesus themselves were astonished by this event and questioned His power and ability, wondering, “Who is this, that even the wind and the sea obey Him?” This question is clearly answered by David in Psalms:

Psalm 89:8-9
“O Lord God of hosts, who is mighty like You, O Lord? Your faithfulness also surrounds You. You rule the raging of the sea; when its waves rise, You still them.”

The prophet David clearly states that it is God alone who can rule over the pride of the sea, and when the waves arise, only God can still them. Therefore, this event of Jesus calming the sea clearly shows that Jesus is God.

Conclusion: Clear Statements About the Divinity of Jesus

First, let me thank you, my reader, for carefully following this analysis of this topic, and I urge you that, as you have had the opportunity to learn this truth, accept and receive Jesus to be Lord and Savior of your life, for the power, authority, and dominion over heaven and earth belong to Him alone.

After that call, let me conclude this topic by providing you with a few Bible quotes that summarize this analysis by clearly showing the exalted authority of the Lord Jesus:

Titus 2:13
“Looking for the blessed hope and glorious appearing of our great God and Savior Jesus Christ…”

The apostle Paul in this verse makes it absolutely clear about the Divinity of Jesus, as do Thomas and the Lord Jesus Himself in the following passage:

John 20:28-29
“And Thomas answered and said to Him, ‘My Lord and my God!’ Jesus said to him, ‘Thomas, because you have seen Me, you have believed. Blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed.’”

May God bless you as you reflect on this truth and take action.

Shalom,

Dr. Maxwell Shimba
Shimba Theological Institute



Is Jesus God? A Comparative Theological Study of the Bible and the Quran

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba | Shimba Theological Institute


Abstract

This article offers a critical and comparative theological examination of the divinity of Jesus Christ in both Christianity and Islam. While the Bible explicitly affirms Jesus as divine, eternal, and sovereign, the Quran presents a differing view, denying the deity of Christ and affirming strict monotheism through the person of Allah. This study seeks to explore, from a scholarly perspective, what each of these two Abrahamic faiths teaches concerning the identity of Jesus and the nature of God, using authoritative texts—the Bible and the Quran—as the primary sources of analysis.


Introduction

The question "Is Jesus God?" remains one of the most defining and debated theological inquiries in human history. The answer to this question divides the world's two largest religions—Christianity and Islam. Christianity holds that Jesus is the divine Son of God, the second Person of the Trinity, eternally existing with God the Father and the Holy Spirit. Islam, on the other hand, maintains that Jesus (Isa) is a revered prophet, but categorically denies His divinity, asserting that Allah alone is God.

This article explores how each faith constructs its understanding of divinity and attributes such as eternity, omnipotence, and finality, focusing especially on the titles given to God and Jesus in their respective scriptures.


The Eternity of God and Christ: A Comparative View

In the Quran, Allah is referred to by 99 beautiful names (Asma al-Husna) that describe His nature and attributes. Two of these names are especially relevant to our discussion:

  • Al-Awwal (ٱلْأَوَّلُ) – The First, found in Surah Al-Hadid (57:3):

    "He is the First and the Last, the Ascendant and the Intimate, and He is, of all things, Knowing."
    This name underscores the eternal pre-existence of Allah, an attribute central to Islamic theology.

  • Al-Akhir (ٱلْآخِرُ) – The Last, also in Quran 57:3, indicating God’s unending nature and absolute finality.

In Christian theology, similar attributes are used to describe Jesus Christ. In fact, Revelation 1:8 records Jesus saying:

“I am the Alpha and the Omega,” says the Lord God, “who is, and who was, and who is to come, the Almighty.” (Revelation 1:8, NIV)

Alpha and Omega are the first and last letters of the Greek alphabet, symbolizing the fullness of time and being. These titles echo the same eternal qualities attributed to God in the Old Testament (cf. Isaiah 44:6), but they are here used directly by Jesus, claiming the very nature and identity of God.

Moreover, Revelation 22:13 further affirms this:

“I am the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End.”

In this, Jesus not only parallels but directly claims the divine titles of Yahweh, indicating that He shares in the eternal nature of God.


The Biblical Evidence for the Deity of Christ

The New Testament is rich with Christological affirmations of Jesus’ divinity. For example:

  • John 1:1-3:

    “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God... Through Him all things were made.”

  • Colossians 1:16-17:

    “For in Him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth... all things have been created through Him and for Him.”

  • Hebrews 1:3:

    “The Son is the radiance of God’s glory and the exact representation of His being, sustaining all things by His powerful word.”

These passages affirm not only Jesus' eternal preexistence but also His role in creation, a function attributed only to God in Jewish monotheism.


The Quranic Rejection of Christ’s Divinity

While the Quran honors Jesus (Isa) as a prophet and the Messiah, it strictly denies that He is divine or that He is the Son of God.

  • Surah Al-Ikhlas (112:1-4):

    "Say: He is Allah, [who is] One, Allah, the Eternal Refuge. He neither begets nor is born, nor is there to Him any equivalent."

  • Surah An-Nisa (4:171):

    “...Say not ‘Three’; desist—it is better for you. Indeed, Allah is but one God. Exalted is He above having a son.”

  • Surah Al-Ma'idah (5:72):

    “They have certainly disbelieved who say, ‘Allah is the Messiah, the son of Mary’...”

From the Quranic perspective, associating Jesus with God (known as shirk) is a grave theological error. Islam's monotheism (tawhid) is uncompromising, and any claim of divine sonship is considered blasphemous.


Theological Implications

The tension between Christian Trinitarianism and Islamic Tawhid is unbridgeable on doctrinal grounds. Christianity's assertion that Jesus is both fully God and fully man—God incarnate—lies at the heart of the Gospel. The Quran's denial of this identity creates an irreconcilable divergence.

Yet, both scriptures ascribe eternal titles—The Beginning and The End—to the divine. The critical distinction is that the Bible attributes these titles directly to Jesus Christ, implying His full participation in the divine nature. In contrast, the Quran reserves these names for Allah alone and considers any sharing of these attributes a violation of monotheism.


Conclusion

This comparative theological study demonstrates that the Bible and the Quran offer fundamentally different views on the identity and nature of Jesus. In Christianity, Jesus is not merely a prophet but God incarnate—eternal, omnipotent, and worthy of worship. In Islam, Jesus is a revered messenger but strictly human, subordinate to Allah, and never divine.

Thus, the question, Is Jesus God? is not merely a matter of interpretation but of doctrinal allegiance. For the Christian, Jesus is "the image of the invisible God" (Colossians 1:15), the eternal Logos who "became flesh" (John 1:14). For the Muslim, such a belief is incompatible with the core tenets of Islamic monotheism.


About the Author
Dr. Maxwell Shimba is a theologian, apologist, and founder of the Shimba Theological Institute. He specializes in comparative religion, Christian apologetics, and biblical studies. He is a leading voice in promoting theological clarity and defending the divinity of Christ through Scripture and reasoned scholarship.



Allah and Muhammad Do Not Favor African Muslim Women

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba | Shimba Ministries International

Originally Published: Sunday, May 22, 2016


Abstract

This essay presents a theological critique of gender inequality in the Islamic vision of paradise as depicted in the Qur'an. The author contrasts the Christian vision of salvation through Jesus Christ—characterized by equality, dignity, and spiritual unity across genders—with the Qur'anic depiction of paradise, which appears to favor men and marginalize women, especially those of African descent. The central argument is posed in the form of three theological questions directed at African Muslim women, aiming to stimulate scripturally grounded dialogue and invite reconsideration of the claims made in Islamic eschatology regarding gender.


Introduction: The Promise of Christ vs. the Rewards of Islam

Before presenting my theological inquiry, I wish to share the promises of Jesus Christ—who lived over 570 years before the Prophet Muhammad—as they relate to gender equality and the afterlife. Jesus Christ spoke of a kingdom not built upon earthly desires or human hierarchies, but one where men and women are equal inheritors of divine glory:

Luke 20:34-36
Jesus replied, “The people of this age marry and are given in marriage. But those who are considered worthy of taking part in the age to come and in the resurrection from the dead will neither marry nor be given in marriage, and they can no longer die; for they are like the angels. They are God’s children, since they are children of the resurrection.”

The teaching of Jesus emphasizes a genderless equality in the Kingdom of God, where marital status is irrelevant and all are like angels. Jesus offers a future where both men and women are considered co-heirs of the divine promise, regardless of race or status.

Galatians 3:27-29
For all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ. There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus. If you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.

In this Kingdom—one of righteousness and justice—none are prioritized based on gender. Even the patriarchs of the faith, such as Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, await the company of both men and women who have trusted in Christ:

Matthew 8:11
“I say to you that many will come from the east and the west, and will take their places at the feast with Abraham, Isaac and Jacob in the kingdom of heaven.”

Those who practiced unrighteousness, regardless of status or religious affiliation, will be cast out, for Christ demands holiness:

Luke 13:27-29
“I don’t know you or where you come from. Away from me, all you evildoers!” There will be weeping there, and gnashing of teeth, when you see Abraham, Isaac and Jacob and all the prophets in the kingdom of God, but you yourselves thrown out. People will come from east and west and north and south, and will take their places at the feast in the kingdom of God.


The Qur’anic Description of Paradise: A Male-Centric Vision

Let us now consider the Islamic depiction of paradise, as revealed by Muhammad in the Qur’an. Below are selected passages from the Qur’an that outline the rewards promised primarily to male believers.

Surah Ar-Rahman 55:56
“In them (Gardens) will be maidens with restrained glances, whom no man or jinn has ever touched.”

Here, paradise offers virginal women—never touched by man or jinn—as companions to male believers. These women are not earthly women, not those who have lived, suffered, or borne children. This implicitly excludes the average African Muslim woman who may have been married, widowed, or abused.

Surah At-Tur 52:20
“Reclining on thrones lined up, We will marry them to fair women with wide, lovely eyes.”

Surah As-Saffat 37:48–49
“And with them will be companions with beautiful, big, and lustrous eyes, like preserved pearls.”

These descriptions suggest that:

  • Only specific types of women—fair-skinned and with large eyes—will populate paradise.

  • These women have not been touched by men or jinn.

  • These women are created for men; there is no reciprocal promise to believing women.

In these verses, there is no mention of African women—especially not women with African features—or any promise that women themselves will receive partners created for their pleasure.


Three Theological Questions for African Muslim Women

Based on these Qur’anic promises, I pose three scripturally focused questions to my Muslim sisters, especially those of African heritage:

  1. Is there any verse in the Qur’an that specifically promises that you—as African Muslim women—will be married in paradise?

  2. Is there any verse that promises that you will receive male partners who have never touched women or jinn?

  3. Is there any verse that promises that you will be transformed to have large eyes like goblets or resemble preserved eggs, so that you may be equally glorified like the fair maidens promised to men?

If the answer to all these questions is “No,” then I humbly and without hostility invite you to examine the teachings of Jesus Christ, who offers an eternal kingdom without gender bias, without racial discrimination, and without favoritism. In His kingdom, men and women are co-heirs, and all who believe in Him—regardless of background—shall be saved.


Conclusion: The Invitation to Christ's Egalitarian Kingdom

The vision of paradise in the Christian gospel is not rooted in carnal desire, nor does it elevate one gender over another. It is a Kingdom based on faith, love, and holiness—a Kingdom where neither African women nor any other people group is forgotten or marginalized.

“Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God.”
Matthew 5:8

This message is not shared out of antagonism, but out of sincere love for truth and justice. Therefore, I kindly ask Muslim scholars and believers alike: please respond not with emotion, but with evidence from the Qur’an—if it exists.

Until then, I affirm with peace:
Come to Jesus, who welcomes all.


Dr. Maxwell Shimba
Shimba Ministries International
May 22, 2016
Watakabahu.



WAS JESUS SENT ONLY TO ISRAEL? (MATTHEW 15:26)

Thursday, April 7, 2016 

Dear reader,

Muslims “preach” that Jesus did not come for the whole world but only for the Jews. They then claim that Muhammad is the true messenger because he came for the whole world. The verse they use to reject Jesus’ universal mission is the one He spoke when conversing with the Canaanite woman (i.e., a non-Jew), who was pleading with Jesus to heal her daughter.

It is written:
He answered, “I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.” (Matthew 15:26).

God is a God of order and perfect timing. That is why He did not create everyone at once. He started with one man, and from that man, we all came. Likewise, He began by revealing Himself to only one nation on earth. From there, salvation would spread to all nations. It is an evident truth that, apart from Israel, all other societies in the world were originally idol worshippers (i.e., worshippers of demons). Only Israel began with the true God.

That is why the Lord Jesus, when speaking with the Samaritan woman at the well, told her:
“You worship what you do not know; we worship what we know, for salvation is from the Jews.” (John 4:22).

Salvation is from the Jews because no other nation on earth knew the true God—all had pagan religions—whether Europeans, Africans, Indians, Arabs, etc. That is the truth.

To say that Jesus did not come for all nations is no different than saying, “Since God only created Adam and Eve, He is not the God of my family because He did not create me the same way He created Adam.”

Jesus once spoke to His disciples and said:
“This is what is written: The Christ will suffer and rise from the dead on the third day, and repentance for the forgiveness of sins will be preached in his name to all nations, beginning at Jerusalem.” (Luke 24:46-47).

Do you see that the Gospel was to begin in Jerusalem? And do you also see that He says all nations will be preached to in His name? Are all nations limited to Israel only?

The Canaanite woman came at the wrong time. That was the time for preaching the Gospel to Israel first before it could go to the rest of the world.

Below is further evidence from the words of the Lord Jesus Himself confirming that He was sent to all nations of the world and that He is the Messiah of God—meaning, the one anointed with the Holy Spirit to redeem the whole world:

“But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you; and you will be my witnesses in Jerusalem, and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the ends of the earth.” (Acts 1:8).

“Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.” (Matthew 28:19).

“For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.” (John 3:17).

“If anyone hears my words and does not keep them, I do not judge him; for I did not come to judge the world, but to save the world.” (John 12:47).

“I lay down my life for the sheep. I have other sheep that are not of this sheep pen. I must bring them also. They too will listen to my voice, and there shall be one flock and one shepherd.” (John 10:15-16).

“And this gospel of the kingdom will be preached in the whole world as a testimony to all nations, and then the end will come.” (Matthew 24:14).

Let me conclude by revisiting some points I have mentioned. God has always had a pattern of beginning with one person.

He created one human being, and we all came from him.
He revealed Himself to one nation, and we all came to know Him through that.
He started with one Son (Jesus), and we are all born again through faith in Him.

In the same way, He brought salvation first to one nation—Israel—then it spread outward. That’s why He said to the Samaritan woman at the well: “Salvation is from the Jews.” (John 4:22).

This pattern of beginning with one person or place is evidence that those who comfort themselves by saying “all religions are just different paths that all lead to God” are deceiving themselves and wasting both their time and their eternal lives! “Salvation is from the Jews”—meaning FROM JESUS ALONE!

Now, because the time for the spread of that salvation had not yet come (since God operates according to seasons and appointed times), He told that Canaanite woman (a non-Jew) that He was sent only to Israel.

But when the fullness of time had come—after His death and resurrection—we see Him now sending His apostles to the entire world.

And the Bible clearly states:

“Therefore, remember that formerly you who are Gentiles by birth and called ‘uncircumcised’ by those who call themselves ‘the circumcision’ (which is done in the body by human hands)—remember that at that time you were separate from Christ, excluded from citizenship in Israel and foreigners to the covenants of the promise, without hope and without God in the world. But now in Christ Jesus you who once were far away have been brought near by the blood of Christ.

For he himself is our peace, who has made the two groups one and has destroyed the barrier, the dividing wall of hostility,
by setting aside in his flesh the law with its commands and regulations. His purpose was to create in himself one new humanity out of the two, thus making peace,
and in one body to reconcile both of them to God through the cross, by which he put to death their hostility.” (Ephesians 2:11–16).

Meditate
Question things
Ask yourself
Take action

God bless you greatly.
It is I,
Dr. Maxwell Shimba, servant of Jesus Christ,
For Max Shimba Ministries Org
MAX SHIMBA MINISTRIES ORG ©2016. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this license document, but changing it is not allowed.
April 6, 2016



If Jesus Was God, Then Who Was He Praying To?

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba

Shimba Theological Institute | Max Shimba Ministries Org.
April 10, 2016


Abstract

One of the most common objections raised against the divinity of Jesus Christ—especially by Muslim apologists and groups such as Jehovah's Witnesses—is the question: "If Jesus was truly God, then to whom was He praying?" This inquiry, often posed during interfaith discussions, is grounded in a misunderstanding of the dual nature of Christ and the eternal relationship within the Trinity. This scholarly article aims to address this theological question by exploring the scriptural, historical, and doctrinal foundation of Christ’s divine and human nature and His relationship to the Father.


Introduction

In various religious debates, a recurrent question is raised: When Jesus prayed in the Garden of Gethsemane, who was He praying to? The underlying presumption is that if Jesus is God, then it seems paradoxical for Him to pray. More provocatively, critics ask, Since when does God pray or ask for help? These questions merit a robust, biblically grounded response. To understand why Jesus prayed and to whom, one must first comprehend the Christian doctrine of the Trinity and the dual nature of Jesus Christ.


The Eternal Relationship Between the Father and the Son

Before the incarnation—before the Word became flesh—Jesus existed eternally as the Son of God in perfect communion with the Father and the Holy Spirit. The Gospel of John affirms this pre-existence and unity:

"The Son can do nothing of himself, but what he seeth the Father do... For as the Father raiseth up the dead, and quickeneth them; even so the Son quickeneth whom he will." (John 5:19–21)
"...that all men should honour the Son, even as they honour the Father." (John 5:23)

Moreover, Isaiah 9:6 prophetically declares:

“For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given... and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace.”

This passage affirms both the humanity ("a child is born") and the divinity ("a son is given") of the Messiah. From eternity past, Jesus existed as the Son in the Godhead—coequal and coeternal with the Father and the Holy Spirit.


The Doctrine of the Trinity

Christian orthodoxy holds that God is one in essence and three in person: God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit. These are not three gods (tritheism), but one God in three distinct persons. Jesus Himself declared,

"I and the Father are one." (John 10:30)

This statement does not negate personal distinction within the Godhead but affirms ontological unity. Thus, the Son praying to the Father does not signify inferiority but reflects the eternal relationship of love and purpose within the Trinity.


The Dual Nature of Jesus Christ (Hypostatic Union)

At the incarnation, the eternal Son took upon Himself full humanity while retaining full divinity. This is known as the Hypostatic Union—two natures, divine and human, in one person. As Philippians 2:5–11 explains:

"Christ Jesus... being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God: But made himself of no reputation... and was made in the likeness of men..."

Thus, while on earth, Jesus operated fully as man, experiencing human needs, suffering, and dependence, all while remaining truly God. His prayers were a demonstration of His genuine humanity and His relationship with the Father.


Jesus' Prayers as a Human Being

In His earthly life, Jesus prayed frequently—seeking strength, wisdom, and communion with the Father:

  • Mark 1:35 – He rose early to pray in solitude.

  • John 11:41–42 – He prayed before raising Lazarus, to glorify the Father.

  • John 17 – He interceded for His disciples and all future believers in what is often called the High Priestly Prayer.

These were not the prayers of a lesser deity but the heartfelt cries of the perfect man, perfectly submitted to the will of the Father.

As Hebrews 5:8 states:

“Though he were a Son, yet learned he obedience by the things which he suffered.”


Gethsemane and the Cross: Obedience to the Father's Will

The Garden of Gethsemane (Matthew 26:36–46) vividly portrays Jesus’ agony before the crucifixion. He prayed:

“My Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from me: nevertheless not as I will, but as thou wilt.” (v. 39)

This was not a denial of divinity but a deep expression of His human anguish. His obedience in prayer revealed His full submission to the Father’s redemptive plan. It was God the Son, in human form, fully obedient even unto death, carrying out the will of God the Father.


Jesus Is Both the One Who Prays and the One to Whom We Pray

Jesus prayed to the Father while on earth. At the same time, He is worshiped and prayed to, as seen in:

  • Acts 7:59“Lord Jesus, receive my spirit,” prayed Stephen.

  • John 20:28 – Thomas called Jesus, “My Lord and my God!”

These texts confirm the early church’s recognition of Jesus’ divinity. He is both the intercessor and the object of faith and worship.


Conclusion: No Contradiction in Christ’s Prayers

There is no theological contradiction in Jesus praying to the Father. His prayers reveal:

  1. The eternal communion within the Trinity.

  2. His full assumption of human nature, including dependence and suffering.

  3. The exemplary model of submission and prayer for all believers.

Jesus Christ—fully God and fully man—demonstrated in His life of prayer the essential posture of obedience to God. His prayers were not evidence against His divinity but rather proof of the incarnate Word living in total alignment with the divine plan.


For Further Study


Contact for Questions or Dialogue

Email: maxshimbaministries@gmail.com
Presented by: Dr. Maxwell Shimba
For: Max Shimba Ministries Org.

© 2015–2016, All Rights Reserved



 


JESUS AS GOD IN ISRAEL’S WISDOM LITERATURE:

The Revelation of Christ in Proverbs, Song of Songs, and Ecclesiastes

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba, Shimba Theological Institute


ABSTRACT

This chapter investigates the ways in which the Books of Proverbs, Song of Songs, and Ecclesiastes—central to the Old Testament’s Wisdom tradition—prefigure and reveal the deity of Jesus Christ. Far from being merely collections of ancient maxims, poems, or philosophical musings, these books contain profound insights into the nature of divine Wisdom, the mystery of the Bridegroom’s love, and the quest for ultimate meaning. Through typology, personification, and prophetic anticipation, Christian theology has long seen in these texts the foreshadowing of Christ as the eternal Wisdom (Logos) of God, the Divine Lover, and the true Source of meaning “under the sun.” This article offers an exhaustive scriptural, historical, and theological analysis, arguing that the Wisdom books not only prepare the ground for New Testament Christology but provide indispensable testimony to the full deity and redemptive mission of Jesus. Key passages are boxed and icon-marked for clarity and emphasis.


INTRODUCTION

The Wisdom Books—Proverbs, Song of Songs, and Ecclesiastes—hold a distinctive place in both Jewish and Christian Scripture. Traditionally attributed to King Solomon, these writings speak not through prophetic oracle or historical narrative, but through the reflective voice of the sage, lover, and philosopher. Their concern is practical living, divine intimacy, and the riddle of existence. Yet, according to Christian theological tradition, these books are not Christless. On the contrary, the New Testament and the early church saw them as whispering profound truths about Jesus: as the incarnate Wisdom of God, the divine Bridegroom, and the only one who brings “eternity into the heart” (Ecclesiastes 3:11).

This Christocentric reading has deep roots. Jesus himself declared that “something greater than Solomon is here” (Matthew 12:42), inviting his listeners to recognize in him the true embodiment of wisdom’s voice. The Apostle Paul, echoing Proverbs and Wisdom traditions, proclaims Christ as “the power of God and the wisdom of God” (1 Corinthians 1:24), “in whom are hidden all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge” (Colossians 2:3). The fourth Gospel identifies the pre-existent Christ as the creative Word (Logos), a notion saturated with wisdom motifs (John 1:1-3).

This chapter embarks on a close academic, theological reading of Proverbs, Song of Songs, and Ecclesiastes. It demonstrates that these books, when read canonically and in the light of the New Testament, provide a multi-layered witness to the deity of Christ. Whether as personified Wisdom, passionate Bridegroom, or the answer to existential longing, Jesus is foreshadowed, proclaimed, and glorified in Israel’s sapiential literature.


SCRIPTURAL ANALYSIS: CHRIST IN THE WISDOM BOOKS

JESUS AS DIVINE WISDOM IN THE BOOK OF PROVERBS

The Book of Proverbs is the Bible’s classic manual for wise living. Yet beneath its practical surface lies a profound theological structure in which Wisdom is not only an attribute but is personified, portrayed as a living being who creates, orders, and invites humanity into relationship. This personification reaches its pinnacle in Proverbs 8, which has been central to both Jewish and Christian interpretation.

In Proverbs 8:22-31, Wisdom speaks:

📜🌟 Proverbs 8:22-23
“The LORD possessed me at the beginning of his work, the first of his acts of old.
Ages ago I was set up, at the first, before the beginning of the earth.”

Proverbs 8:27-30
“When he established the heavens, I was there…
then I was beside him, like a master workman, and I was daily his delight, rejoicing before him always.”

This vivid speech of Wisdom presents her as God’s eternal companion, agent of creation, and the delight of the LORD. The description goes beyond personification; it gestures toward hypostasis—a distinct yet divine subsistence within the Godhead.

Christian theologians, from the early Fathers onward, recognized in this “Wisdom” not merely a poetic device, but a pre-incarnate anticipation of the Son, the Logos, through whom all things were made. Athanasius, for instance, cited Proverbs 8 to defend the eternal generation of the Son: “For the Son is called Wisdom and Power by the Apostle Paul (1 Cor. 1:24), and this Wisdom is said in Proverbs to have been with God in the beginning, coeternal and coexistent with the Father” (Athanasius, Orations against the Arians II.18) .

The New Testament is saturated with this identification. Paul, writing to the Corinthians, says:

📜🌟 1 Corinthians 1:24
“Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.”

📜🌟 Colossians 2:2-3
“Christ, in whom are hidden all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge.”

The Gospel of John echoes Proverbs 8’s language in its prologue, describing the Word who “was with God in the beginning” and “through whom all things were made” (John 1:1-3). This deliberate allusion signals to the reader that Jesus, as Logos and Wisdom, is the eternal, personal, creative principle of God. The prologue’s language—“in the beginning,” “was with God,” “became flesh”—unites the voices of John and Proverbs in their testimony to Christ’s divinity .

The church’s trinitarian doctrine finds important footing here. For if Wisdom is eternal, with God, and the agent of creation, then she cannot be a creature. This conclusion was central to the Nicene Creed’s insistence that the Son is “begotten, not made, being of one substance with the Father.” The church’s battles with Arianism often revolved around the interpretation of Proverbs 8: “The LORD created me” (LXX). The orthodox response clarified that Wisdom in Proverbs is not created in time, but is eternally begotten—a distinction made explicit in the Hebrew and Greek wording and confirmed by the broader biblical witness .

The personification of Wisdom as one who calls, guides, and even disciplines is repeatedly paralleled with the ministry of Christ. In Proverbs 1:20-23, Wisdom “cries aloud in the streets,” calling the simple to repentance and offering her spirit. Jesus, in his public ministry, likewise calls, invites, warns, and bestows the Spirit (cf. Matthew 11:19; John 7:37-39). In both cases, the response to Wisdom/Jesus is decisive for salvation or judgment (see Proverbs 1:24-33; Matthew 23:37-39).

🟦 Boxed Highlight:
🌟 The figure of Wisdom in Proverbs is not simply abstract or impersonal, but is the prefiguration of the Word made flesh. Jesus is the Wisdom who “was with God in the beginning” and “became for us wisdom from God, righteousness, sanctification, and redemption” (1 Cor. 1:30).

The attributes of Wisdom—righteousness, truth, justice, and the fear of the Lord—find their embodiment in Jesus. He is the truly wise one, the Son who listens to and perfectly obeys the Father (cf. Proverbs 2:1-6; John 8:29). The promise that those who seek Wisdom find life, favor, and security (Proverbs 8:35; 3:13-18) is realized supremely in relationship with Christ, who offers eternal life to those who come to Him (John 5:24; 10:28). The portrait of Lady Wisdom preparing a banquet and inviting the nations (Proverbs 9:1-6) is fulfilled in Jesus’ invitation to the messianic feast (Matthew 22:2-14; Revelation 19:9).

Even the language of discipline and sonship in Proverbs 3:11-12—“My son, do not despise the Lord’s discipline… for the Lord disciplines the one he loves, as a father the son in whom he delights”—is quoted in Hebrews 12:5-6 as a direct reference to Christian sanctification in Christ. The experience of the children of God in Christ is thus rooted in the experience of Wisdom’s sons and daughters in Proverbs.

Patristic and medieval interpreters went further, reading the famous “excellent wife” or “woman of valor” in Proverbs 31 as, on a higher level, an allegory of the church (the bride of Christ) or even of Christ’s own faithful wisdom. In Christ, the wisdom tradition is brought to its fullness; in Him, all the wisdom of Proverbs is personified, accomplished, and made available to the people of God .


JESUS AS THE DIVINE BRIDEGROOM IN THE SONG OF SONGS

The Song of Songs, or Song of Solomon, is the most enigmatic book in the Hebrew canon—a collection of passionate love poetry whose inclusion in the Bible has always been a subject of debate and wonder. Jewish and Christian tradition alike have seen in its lyrics a meaning beyond the literal: an allegory of the love between God and Israel, or Christ and the Church.

The language of mutual desire, longing, pursuit, and union is the very heartbeat of the Song. In Christian interpretation, Jesus is the divine Bridegroom, the Lover whose desire for His beloved (the Church) is a picture of God’s redemptive love.

📜💍 Song of Songs 2:16
“My beloved is mine, and I am his…”

📜💍 Song of Songs 6:3
“I am my beloved’s and my beloved is mine…”

The use of bridal imagery for God’s relationship with His people is common in the Hebrew prophets (Hosea 2:16-20; Isaiah 54:5). The New Testament explicitly applies this motif to Jesus. He calls Himself the Bridegroom (Matthew 9:15), and the Kingdom is described as a wedding feast (Matthew 22:1-14; 25:1-13). Paul writes that Christ loves the Church “as a husband loves his wife” (Ephesians 5:25-32), directly invoking Genesis and the Song of Songs to describe the union of Christ and believers. John the Baptist refers to Jesus as the “Bridegroom” whose friend (John himself) rejoices at his voice (John 3:29). The Apocalypse climaxes with the “marriage supper of the Lamb” (Revelation 19:7-9), in which Christ, the Lamb, is wed to His bride, the Church.

This theme is not mere metaphor. The Song’s depiction of an unbreakable, longing love—tested by separation, temptation, and eventual union—mirrors the drama of salvation history: Christ’s pursuit of fallen humanity, the suffering of the cross, and the ultimate union in glory.

🟦 Boxed Highlight:
💍 The Song of Songs is the canonical hymn of divine love, fulfilled in Jesus the Bridegroom. The mutual desire, delight, and devotion between the Lover and the beloved foreshadow the love of Christ for His Church—a love “stronger than death” (Song 8:6; cf. Romans 8:35-39).

Early Christian theologians, notably Origen, Gregory of Nyssa, Bernard of Clairvaux, and the medieval mystics, saw in the Song a rich wellspring of Christological and Trinitarian spirituality. Origen’s Commentary on the Song is the earliest full-length Christian exposition, in which every pursuit, embrace, and delight is interpreted as Christ’s love for the soul and the Church . The “banqueting house” (Song 2:4), “fragrant oils” (1:3), “garden” (4:12-16), and “awakening” (8:5) all become types and anticipations of the joys of Christ’s presence, the sacraments, and the resurrection.

The Song’s language of absence and longing, “I sought him, but found him not; I called him, but he gave no answer” (5:6), resonates deeply with the passion and resurrection narratives, as well as with Christian mystical theology—the soul’s longing for Christ and the joy of his appearing. The strong affirmation of mutual possession—“I am my beloved’s and my beloved is mine”—becomes, in the New Testament, the language of union with Christ: “Who shall separate us from the love of Christ?” (Romans 8:35).

The imagery of the beloved’s beauty—“altogether lovely” (Song 5:16)—has been a favorite Christological expression in church hymnody and devotion. Christ is the one “fairest of ten thousand” (Song 5:10), the only object of the soul’s adoration.

The Song’s climatic declaration,

📜💍 Song of Songs 8:6
“Set me as a seal upon your heart… for love is strong as death…”

is realized in the cross and resurrection. Christ’s love conquers death, and the believer is “sealed” with the Holy Spirit (Ephesians 1:13-14). The Song ends with the longing for the Beloved’s return—“Make haste, my beloved”—anticipating the New Testament’s “Maranatha”—“Come, Lord Jesus!” (Revelation 22:20).

Thus, the Song of Songs, read spiritually, offers one of the deepest revelations of Jesus as the God who loves with perfect, self-giving, everlasting love.


JESUS AS THE TRUE MEANING OF LIFE IN ECCLESIASTES

Ecclesiastes is, at first glance, a perplexing book—a meditation on the vanity and transience of life “under the sun.” The Teacher (Qoheleth) searches for meaning in wisdom, pleasure, toil, and wealth, but finds all is “hevel” (vanity, vapor). Yet this existential crisis is not hopeless. Instead, Ecclesiastes sets the stage for the New Testament’s revelation of Jesus as the only one who brings meaning, hope, and eternal life to human striving.

The refrain,

📜🕊️ Ecclesiastes 1:2
“Vanity of vanities, says the Preacher, vanity of vanities! All is vanity.”

is echoed throughout. Human wisdom, labor, and pleasure are fleeting. Death comes to all; nothing “under the sun” is truly new or lasting (Ecclesiastes 1:9-11; 2:11, 16; 3:19-20). The Teacher’s skepticism, however, is not the final word. There are hints of hope and eternity:

📜🕊️ Ecclesiastes 3:11
“He has made everything beautiful in its time. Also, he has put eternity into man’s heart, yet so that he cannot find out what God has done from the beginning to the end.”

This verse is pivotal. It asserts that while human beings long for the eternal, they cannot, through their own efforts or wisdom, grasp the fullness of God’s purposes. This longing is met, Christians affirm, only in Jesus, the one who is “from eternity” and who makes known the Father (John 1:18).

Jesus is the answer to the book’s deepest question: What is the meaning of life? In Him, all is not vanity. Where Ecclesiastes says, “There is nothing better for a person than to eat and drink and find enjoyment in his toil” (2:24), Jesus fulfills this in the Eucharist—the bread and wine of new creation, the joy of God’s presence (Luke 22:19-20). Where the Preacher concludes,

📜🕊️ Ecclesiastes 12:13-14
“Fear God and keep his commandments, for this is the whole duty of man. For God will bring every deed into judgment…”

the New Testament reveals that Christ is both the perfect fearer of God and the Judge of all (John 5:22-23; Acts 17:31). In Him, God’s commandments are fulfilled and judgment is transformed into mercy for those who trust Him.

Patristic interpreters often saw Ecclesiastes as a preparation for the Gospel—a “wilderness” in which human attempts at meaning are exhausted, leaving the soul hungry for the Bread of Life. Gregory of Nyssa, for example, wrote that Ecclesiastes “makes us despair of all that is not Christ, so that we might turn to Him alone as the fullness of wisdom and joy” . Augustine, reflecting on Ecclesiastes, described human restlessness and found peace only in God made known in Christ: “You have made us for Yourself, O Lord, and our heart is restless until it rests in You” (Confessions I.1).

Ecclesiastes’ sober realism about death—“the dust returns to the earth as it was, and the spirit returns to God who gave it” (12:7)—points beyond Sheol to resurrection hope. Jesus, as the “Resurrection and the Life” (John 11:25), overturns the verdict of death and answers the Teacher’s longing for a life that is “more than vanity.”

Ecclesiastes’ imagery of the fleeting “breath” (hevel) of life is countered by Jesus’ gift of the Holy Spirit, the divine Breath (pneuma), who brings eternal life and wisdom (John 20:22; Acts 2:4). The Teacher’s confession that “no one can comprehend what goes on under the sun” (8:17) is

ultimately answered by the One who “descended from heaven” (John 3:13) to reveal the mysteries of God.

🟦 Boxed Highlight:
🕊️ Ecclesiastes is the Old Testament’s most profound questioning of meaning, answered fully in Jesus—the eternal Wisdom, the Judge and Savior, the Giver of the Spirit and the one who alone gives purpose to every moment “under the sun.”


HISTORICAL AND THEOLOGICAL CONTEXT

The Christian tradition’s reading of Wisdom literature as Christological is rooted in both the Hebrew Bible and early Christian exegesis. Jewish wisdom theology had already personified Wisdom as God’s companion in creation (Proverbs 8; Wisdom of Solomon 7-9; Sirach 24) and associated her with Torah and the Spirit. Philo of Alexandria (1st century AD) linked Wisdom, Logos, and the “second power in heaven,” anticipating later Christian formulations .

Early Christian writers—from Justin Martyr to Origen, Athanasius, and Augustine—seized on this groundwork to interpret Proverbs’ Wisdom, the Song’s Bridegroom, and Ecclesiastes’ longing as anticipations of Jesus. Athanasius, combating Arianism, insisted that “the Lord created me” (Prov. 8:22, LXX) must be understood as referring to the Son’s eternal relationship to the Father, not temporal creation . Origen and Gregory of Nyssa’s allegorical commentaries on Song of Songs made Christ the center and goal of the soul’s longing. The reformers and Puritans, like Luther and Edwards, continued this tradition, finding Christ in the spiritual depths of the Wisdom books.

Modern scholarship acknowledges the deep connections between Wisdom literature and New Testament Christology. Scholars such as Richard Bauckham, N. T. Wright, and C. H. Dodd have traced how the Gospel of John’s Logos theology, Pauline Wisdom Christology, and the Epistle to the Hebrews’ high view of the Son all rely on the sapiential tradition of Proverbs and related texts .

The Song of Songs’ nuptial imagery was formative for Christian mysticism and liturgy, culminating in the nuptial union celebrated in Revelation. Ecclesiastes’ voice of existential questioning prepared both Judaism and Christianity for the advent of a Savior who answers human longing not with futility, but with eternal life.


CONCLUSION

The Books of Proverbs, Song of Songs, and Ecclesiastes, when read within the canon and illuminated by the Spirit, are far more than collections of wise sayings, erotic poetry, or skeptical reflection. They are, in Christian reading, a threefold witness to the mystery of Christ:

In Proverbs, Jesus is the eternal Wisdom—God’s Son, the agent of creation, the one in whom all the treasures of wisdom dwell. In Song of Songs, He is the divine Bridegroom, whose love for the Church is passionate, personal, and victorious over death. In Ecclesiastes, He is the only answer to the riddle of existence—the One who brings eternity to the human heart, judges with perfect wisdom, and transforms all vanity into eternal significance.

The attributes, actions, and invitations of Wisdom in Proverbs find their embodiment in the Incarnate Christ. The yearning and union of the Song of Songs are fulfilled in the self-giving love of Jesus for His redeemed. The searching, questioning, and hope of Ecclesiastes are satisfied in Him who is “the way, the truth, and the life.”

🟦 Boxed Theological Summary:
🌟💍🕊️ In the Wisdom literature, Jesus is not absent, but profoundly present—as the Wisdom who calls, the Bridegroom who loves, and the Meaning who satisfies the heart. The fullness of God dwells in Him, and in Him all things hold together (Colossians 1:17-19).

Thus, the Wisdom books do not stand apart from the Gospel, but lay the foundation for it. They call every reader to seek, love, and trust the one who is “greater than Solomon”—the Lord Jesus Christ, eternal God and Savior.


REFERENCES & SOURCES

Athanasius. Orations Against the Arians.
Augustine. Confessions.
Origen. Commentary on the Song of Songs.
Gregory of Nyssa. Homilies on the Song of Songs.
Richard Bauckham. Jesus and the God of Israel.
N. T. Wright. Jesus and the Victory of God.
C. H. Dodd. The Interpretation of the Fourth Gospel.
Philo of Alexandria. On the Creation, Who is the Heir?, etc.
The Holy Bible (ESV, NASB, RSV, Septuagint, etc.)
Wisdom of Solomon, Sirach (for background)
Michael V. Fox, Proverbs 1–9: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary
Tremper Longman III, Song of Songs
Robert Alter, The Wisdom Books: Job, Proverbs, and Ecclesiastes
Nicolas Wyatt, Wisdom and the Psalms
(Additional citations available upon request.)




JESUS AS GOD WHO CANNOT COMPROMISE: An Exegetical and Theological Analysis

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba, Shimba Theological Institute


Abstract

The doctrine of the immutability and holiness of God stands at the core of classical Christian theology. This article critically examines the uncompromising nature of Jesus Christ as the incarnate God, focusing on biblical texts and systematic theology. Through a robust exegetical, historical, and doctrinal approach, this study underscores that Jesus shares in the absolute perfections of the Godhead—He is unchanging, just, and incapable of compromise regarding truth, holiness, and mercy.


1. Introduction

Contemporary culture often dilutes moral absolutes, yet the Christian faith asserts that God is not subject to change, error, or compromise. Central to this claim is the person of Jesus Christ, who, according to orthodox Christian confession, is "God of God, Light of Light, very God of very God" (Nicene Creed). This paper explores the biblical and theological evidence for Jesus' uncompromising nature, demonstrating how His divinity guarantees the constancy of God’s character and the efficacy of redemption.


2. The Unchanging Nature of God in Scripture

2.1. Immutability and Divine Consistency

Scripture unequivocally testifies that God does not change (Malachi 3:6; James 1:17). Divine immutability ensures that God's nature, promises, and decrees are eternally reliable (Numbers 23:19). Hebrews 13:8 applies this attribute directly to Christ: "Jesus Christ is the same yesterday, today, and forever." Thus, any consideration of Christ’s ministry or teachings must reckon with His absolute consistency and inability to compromise moral or spiritual standards.


3. Jesus and the Holiness of God

3.1. The Sinlessness of Christ

The New Testament presents Jesus as sinless (1 John 3:5; Hebrews 4:15; 1 Peter 2:22). His incapacity to sin is not merely the result of moral effort, but is rooted in His divine ontology. Jesus, as the Logos made flesh (John 1:14), embodies the holiness of God—He cannot lie (Titus 1:2), cannot sin (Hebrews 7:26), and cannot ignore evil (Romans 6:23). His encounters with sin always result in either righteous judgment or redemptive mercy, but never compromise.

3.2. The Righteous Judge

In John 8:46, Jesus publicly challenges His opponents: "Which of you convicts me of sin?" His flawless life and absolute integrity confirm His suitability as the Judge of all (John 5:22, 27). Divine justice is not malleable; Jesus does not accommodate evil, nor does He negotiate with sin (Matthew 5:17-20). Instead, He fulfills the law perfectly and judges impartially.


4. The Mercy That Does Not Compromise

4.1. Divine Mercy and Human Repentance

While God cannot tolerate or overlook sin, He also cannot reject a truly repentant heart (Psalm 51:17; Luke 15:7). The incarnation is the supreme demonstration of uncompromising mercy—Jesus absorbs the penalty for sin without ever diluting divine justice (Romans 3:25-26). In Christ, the holiness and mercy of God meet without conflict.

4.2. The Cross: Holiness and Grace Intersect

The cross is the ultimate manifestation of God’s unwillingness to compromise. God does not ignore sin; He confronts it at the highest cost to Himself (2 Corinthians 5:21). Jesus' atoning death does not lower the bar of righteousness but satisfies it, fulfilling both the demands of justice and the offer of grace.


5. The Exclusive Lordship of Christ

Jesus, as God incarnate, will not share His glory with another (Isaiah 42:8; John 14:6). He cannot accept idols or competitors (Exodus 20:3; Matthew 4:10). The exclusivity of Christ is not arrogance, but the natural outworking of divine uniqueness—there is no compromise regarding the throne of God.


6. Implications for Christian Living

6.1. A Call to Holiness

Believers are summoned to reflect God’s uncompromising character: "Be holy, for I am holy" (1 Peter 1:16). Christian ethics is not a negotiation with the world’s shifting values, but a call to imitate Christ’s unwavering righteousness and compassion.

6.2. Assurance in a Changing World

In a world of moral relativism, Jesus remains the fixed point of truth and justice. The believer’s security rests not on societal trends but on the unchanging, uncompromising character of Christ.


7. Conclusion

The doctrine of Jesus as the God who cannot compromise is not an abstract theological point—it is the bedrock of the Christian gospel. Only an unchanging, holy, and merciful Savior can secure eternal redemption and demand ultimate allegiance. As Hebrews 12:2 exhorts, let us fix our eyes on Jesus, "the author and perfecter of our faith," whose holiness, love, and justice remain forever uncompromised.


References:

  • Holy Bible (ESV, KJV, NIV)

  • Barth, K. Church Dogmatics.

  • Grudem, W. Systematic Theology.

  • Stott, J. The Cross of Christ.

  • Nicene Creed, 325 AD.


Dr. Maxwell Shimba
Shimba Theological Institute




RESPONSE TO "5 QUESTIONS THAT CHRISTIANS CAN’T ANSWER"

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba, Shimba Theological Institute

1. If Jesus is God, why did He pray to God?

(Matthew 26:39 – Who was He talking to?)

Scholarly Response:
The doctrine of the Incarnation (John 1:1, 14; Philippians 2:6-8) teaches that Jesus is both fully God and fully man. As the eternal Son of God, He existed with the Father from eternity, but in the fullness of time, He took on human nature (Galatians 4:4). As a true man, Jesus prayed to the Father, modeling perfect dependence and obedience (Hebrews 5:7-9). His prayers do not deny His divinity; rather, they reveal the relationship within the Trinity: the Son communicating with the Father. This is not a contradiction but a profound mystery—God the Son, in His humanity, prays to God the Father. The early Church Fathers, like Athanasius and Augustine, affirmed this: “He prays as man, but hears prayer as God” (Athanasius, On the Incarnation).

Summary: Jesus' prayers reveal the Trinity and the reality of His Incarnation, not a denial of His deity.


2. Why did Jesus say, “The Father is greater than I”?

(John 14:28 – Can God be less than God?)

Scholarly Response:
When Jesus says, "The Father is greater than I," He is speaking from the vantage point of His incarnate mission. In His divine nature, the Son is equal with the Father (John 1:1; John 10:30; Philippians 2:6). But as a man, He voluntarily accepted a position of submission and humility (Philippians 2:7). Early Christian creeds (e.g., the Nicene Creed, AD 325) clarify: Jesus is "of one substance with the Father," but in His humanity, He could say the Father was "greater" in role, not in nature or essence. This is an example of the “functional subordination” of the Son during His earthly ministry, not an ontological (essential) inferiority.

Summary: The “greater” refers to position or function during the Incarnation, not to Jesus' divine nature.


3. Why did Jesus never say “I am God” or “Worship me”?

Scholarly Response:
The claim that Jesus never said “I am God” ignores the historical and cultural context. In 1st-century Jewish monotheism, explicit self-identification as God would have been misunderstood and provocative. Instead, Jesus repeatedly made implicit, unmistakable claims to divinity:

  • John 8:58: “Before Abraham was, I AM” (echoing Exodus 3:14, God’s name).

  • John 10:30: “I and the Father are one.”

  • John 20:28: Thomas calls Jesus “My Lord and my God,” and Jesus affirms it.

  • Mark 2:5-12: Jesus forgives sins—something only God can do.
    Jesus also accepted worship (Matthew 14:33; 28:17; John 9:38) and rebuked those who refused to honor the Son as they honor the Father (John 5:23). For a Jewish rabbi to accept worship or claim the Divine Name was, to His hearers, an unmistakable claim to deity.

Summary: Jesus spoke and acted as only God could, and His followers rightly worshipped Him.


4. Why did Jesus admit He doesn’t know everything?

(Mark 13:32 – “Not even the Son knows…")

Scholarly Response:
Mark 13:32 refers to Jesus’ voluntary acceptance of human limitations in His Incarnation. Philippians 2:6-8 states that the Son “emptied Himself” (Greek: kenosis), not of deity, but of the independent exercise of His divine attributes. As the God-man, Jesus lived in full dependence on the Father and the Spirit. The Church Fathers explained that in His divine nature, the Son knows all things, but in His human experience, He did not always exercise that divine prerogative. This demonstrates the reality of His humanity, not the denial of His divinity.

Summary: The “not knowing” is a reflection of the Incarnation’s mystery, not a denial of His divine nature.


5. If Jesus died, who ran the universe for 3 days? Can God die?

Scholarly Response:
God, in His divine nature, is immortal and cannot die (1 Timothy 6:16). But in the Incarnation, the eternal Word took on mortal flesh (John 1:14; Hebrews 2:14). On the cross, Jesus experienced death in His human nature, not His divine nature. The Church has always taught the doctrine of the communicatio idiomatum: the attributes of both natures are ascribed to the one Person of Christ. The universe was never out of God’s sovereign control—Jesus’ divine nature remained fully alive and upholding all things (Colossians 1:17; Hebrews 1:3). His human body died, but His divine person did not cease to exist.

Summary: Jesus died as a man, but as God He continued to sustain the universe. Death touched His humanity, not His deity.


CONCLUSION:

These questions do not undermine the divinity of Christ; they highlight the profound mystery of the Christian doctrine of the Incarnation and the Trinity. Jesus is the God-Man: fully God, fully human, united in one person. The consistent witness of the New Testament, the Early Church, and Christian theology is that Jesus is God in the flesh—worthy of worship, trust, and adoration.

Muslims and others are invited to examine the depth of these mysteries not as contradictions, but as revelations of God's unique way of saving humanity—by becoming one of us, dying for our sins, and rising in glory.


References:

  • The Holy Bible (John 1:1-18; Philippians 2:5-11; Hebrews 1:1-3; Colossians 1:15-20)

  • Nicene Creed (325 AD)

  • Athanasius, On the Incarnation

  • Augustine, De Trinitate

  • Millard J. Erickson, Christian Theology

  • Wayne Grudem, Systematic Theology


Dr. Maxwell Shimba
Shimba Theological Institute




BREAKING VIDEO: IDF pounding Hezbollah training compounds

  BREAKING VIDEO: IDF pounding Hezbollah training compounds. The targets included a Radwan Force training facility used for weapons drills ...

TRENDING NOW