Monday, July 7, 2025

JESUS AS GOD IN ISRAEL’S WISDOM LITERATURE:

The Revelation of Christ in Proverbs, Song of Songs, and Ecclesiastes

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba, Shimba Theological Institute


ABSTRACT

This chapter investigates the ways in which the Books of Proverbs, Song of Songs, and Ecclesiastes—central to the Old Testament’s Wisdom tradition—prefigure and reveal the deity of Jesus Christ. Far from being merely collections of ancient maxims, poems, or philosophical musings, these books contain profound insights into the nature of divine Wisdom, the mystery of the Bridegroom’s love, and the quest for ultimate meaning. Through typology, personification, and prophetic anticipation, Christian theology has long seen in these texts the foreshadowing of Christ as the eternal Wisdom (Logos) of God, the Divine Lover, and the true Source of meaning “under the sun.” This article offers an exhaustive scriptural, historical, and theological analysis, arguing that the Wisdom books not only prepare the ground for New Testament Christology but provide indispensable testimony to the full deity and redemptive mission of Jesus. Key passages are boxed and icon-marked for clarity and emphasis.


INTRODUCTION

The Wisdom Books—Proverbs, Song of Songs, and Ecclesiastes—hold a distinctive place in both Jewish and Christian Scripture. Traditionally attributed to King Solomon, these writings speak not through prophetic oracle or historical narrative, but through the reflective voice of the sage, lover, and philosopher. Their concern is practical living, divine intimacy, and the riddle of existence. Yet, according to Christian theological tradition, these books are not Christless. On the contrary, the New Testament and the early church saw them as whispering profound truths about Jesus: as the incarnate Wisdom of God, the divine Bridegroom, and the only one who brings “eternity into the heart” (Ecclesiastes 3:11).

This Christocentric reading has deep roots. Jesus himself declared that “something greater than Solomon is here” (Matthew 12:42), inviting his listeners to recognize in him the true embodiment of wisdom’s voice. The Apostle Paul, echoing Proverbs and Wisdom traditions, proclaims Christ as “the power of God and the wisdom of God” (1 Corinthians 1:24), “in whom are hidden all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge” (Colossians 2:3). The fourth Gospel identifies the pre-existent Christ as the creative Word (Logos), a notion saturated with wisdom motifs (John 1:1-3).

This chapter embarks on a close academic, theological reading of Proverbs, Song of Songs, and Ecclesiastes. It demonstrates that these books, when read canonically and in the light of the New Testament, provide a multi-layered witness to the deity of Christ. Whether as personified Wisdom, passionate Bridegroom, or the answer to existential longing, Jesus is foreshadowed, proclaimed, and glorified in Israel’s sapiential literature.


SCRIPTURAL ANALYSIS: CHRIST IN THE WISDOM BOOKS

JESUS AS DIVINE WISDOM IN THE BOOK OF PROVERBS

The Book of Proverbs is the Bible’s classic manual for wise living. Yet beneath its practical surface lies a profound theological structure in which Wisdom is not only an attribute but is personified, portrayed as a living being who creates, orders, and invites humanity into relationship. This personification reaches its pinnacle in Proverbs 8, which has been central to both Jewish and Christian interpretation.

In Proverbs 8:22-31, Wisdom speaks:

📜🌟 Proverbs 8:22-23
“The LORD possessed me at the beginning of his work, the first of his acts of old.
Ages ago I was set up, at the first, before the beginning of the earth.”

Proverbs 8:27-30
“When he established the heavens, I was there…
then I was beside him, like a master workman, and I was daily his delight, rejoicing before him always.”

This vivid speech of Wisdom presents her as God’s eternal companion, agent of creation, and the delight of the LORD. The description goes beyond personification; it gestures toward hypostasis—a distinct yet divine subsistence within the Godhead.

Christian theologians, from the early Fathers onward, recognized in this “Wisdom” not merely a poetic device, but a pre-incarnate anticipation of the Son, the Logos, through whom all things were made. Athanasius, for instance, cited Proverbs 8 to defend the eternal generation of the Son: “For the Son is called Wisdom and Power by the Apostle Paul (1 Cor. 1:24), and this Wisdom is said in Proverbs to have been with God in the beginning, coeternal and coexistent with the Father” (Athanasius, Orations against the Arians II.18) .

The New Testament is saturated with this identification. Paul, writing to the Corinthians, says:

📜🌟 1 Corinthians 1:24
“Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.”

📜🌟 Colossians 2:2-3
“Christ, in whom are hidden all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge.”

The Gospel of John echoes Proverbs 8’s language in its prologue, describing the Word who “was with God in the beginning” and “through whom all things were made” (John 1:1-3). This deliberate allusion signals to the reader that Jesus, as Logos and Wisdom, is the eternal, personal, creative principle of God. The prologue’s language—“in the beginning,” “was with God,” “became flesh”—unites the voices of John and Proverbs in their testimony to Christ’s divinity .

The church’s trinitarian doctrine finds important footing here. For if Wisdom is eternal, with God, and the agent of creation, then she cannot be a creature. This conclusion was central to the Nicene Creed’s insistence that the Son is “begotten, not made, being of one substance with the Father.” The church’s battles with Arianism often revolved around the interpretation of Proverbs 8: “The LORD created me” (LXX). The orthodox response clarified that Wisdom in Proverbs is not created in time, but is eternally begotten—a distinction made explicit in the Hebrew and Greek wording and confirmed by the broader biblical witness .

The personification of Wisdom as one who calls, guides, and even disciplines is repeatedly paralleled with the ministry of Christ. In Proverbs 1:20-23, Wisdom “cries aloud in the streets,” calling the simple to repentance and offering her spirit. Jesus, in his public ministry, likewise calls, invites, warns, and bestows the Spirit (cf. Matthew 11:19; John 7:37-39). In both cases, the response to Wisdom/Jesus is decisive for salvation or judgment (see Proverbs 1:24-33; Matthew 23:37-39).

🟦 Boxed Highlight:
🌟 The figure of Wisdom in Proverbs is not simply abstract or impersonal, but is the prefiguration of the Word made flesh. Jesus is the Wisdom who “was with God in the beginning” and “became for us wisdom from God, righteousness, sanctification, and redemption” (1 Cor. 1:30).

The attributes of Wisdom—righteousness, truth, justice, and the fear of the Lord—find their embodiment in Jesus. He is the truly wise one, the Son who listens to and perfectly obeys the Father (cf. Proverbs 2:1-6; John 8:29). The promise that those who seek Wisdom find life, favor, and security (Proverbs 8:35; 3:13-18) is realized supremely in relationship with Christ, who offers eternal life to those who come to Him (John 5:24; 10:28). The portrait of Lady Wisdom preparing a banquet and inviting the nations (Proverbs 9:1-6) is fulfilled in Jesus’ invitation to the messianic feast (Matthew 22:2-14; Revelation 19:9).

Even the language of discipline and sonship in Proverbs 3:11-12—“My son, do not despise the Lord’s discipline… for the Lord disciplines the one he loves, as a father the son in whom he delights”—is quoted in Hebrews 12:5-6 as a direct reference to Christian sanctification in Christ. The experience of the children of God in Christ is thus rooted in the experience of Wisdom’s sons and daughters in Proverbs.

Patristic and medieval interpreters went further, reading the famous “excellent wife” or “woman of valor” in Proverbs 31 as, on a higher level, an allegory of the church (the bride of Christ) or even of Christ’s own faithful wisdom. In Christ, the wisdom tradition is brought to its fullness; in Him, all the wisdom of Proverbs is personified, accomplished, and made available to the people of God .


JESUS AS THE DIVINE BRIDEGROOM IN THE SONG OF SONGS

The Song of Songs, or Song of Solomon, is the most enigmatic book in the Hebrew canon—a collection of passionate love poetry whose inclusion in the Bible has always been a subject of debate and wonder. Jewish and Christian tradition alike have seen in its lyrics a meaning beyond the literal: an allegory of the love between God and Israel, or Christ and the Church.

The language of mutual desire, longing, pursuit, and union is the very heartbeat of the Song. In Christian interpretation, Jesus is the divine Bridegroom, the Lover whose desire for His beloved (the Church) is a picture of God’s redemptive love.

📜💍 Song of Songs 2:16
“My beloved is mine, and I am his…”

📜💍 Song of Songs 6:3
“I am my beloved’s and my beloved is mine…”

The use of bridal imagery for God’s relationship with His people is common in the Hebrew prophets (Hosea 2:16-20; Isaiah 54:5). The New Testament explicitly applies this motif to Jesus. He calls Himself the Bridegroom (Matthew 9:15), and the Kingdom is described as a wedding feast (Matthew 22:1-14; 25:1-13). Paul writes that Christ loves the Church “as a husband loves his wife” (Ephesians 5:25-32), directly invoking Genesis and the Song of Songs to describe the union of Christ and believers. John the Baptist refers to Jesus as the “Bridegroom” whose friend (John himself) rejoices at his voice (John 3:29). The Apocalypse climaxes with the “marriage supper of the Lamb” (Revelation 19:7-9), in which Christ, the Lamb, is wed to His bride, the Church.

This theme is not mere metaphor. The Song’s depiction of an unbreakable, longing love—tested by separation, temptation, and eventual union—mirrors the drama of salvation history: Christ’s pursuit of fallen humanity, the suffering of the cross, and the ultimate union in glory.

🟦 Boxed Highlight:
💍 The Song of Songs is the canonical hymn of divine love, fulfilled in Jesus the Bridegroom. The mutual desire, delight, and devotion between the Lover and the beloved foreshadow the love of Christ for His Church—a love “stronger than death” (Song 8:6; cf. Romans 8:35-39).

Early Christian theologians, notably Origen, Gregory of Nyssa, Bernard of Clairvaux, and the medieval mystics, saw in the Song a rich wellspring of Christological and Trinitarian spirituality. Origen’s Commentary on the Song is the earliest full-length Christian exposition, in which every pursuit, embrace, and delight is interpreted as Christ’s love for the soul and the Church . The “banqueting house” (Song 2:4), “fragrant oils” (1:3), “garden” (4:12-16), and “awakening” (8:5) all become types and anticipations of the joys of Christ’s presence, the sacraments, and the resurrection.

The Song’s language of absence and longing, “I sought him, but found him not; I called him, but he gave no answer” (5:6), resonates deeply with the passion and resurrection narratives, as well as with Christian mystical theology—the soul’s longing for Christ and the joy of his appearing. The strong affirmation of mutual possession—“I am my beloved’s and my beloved is mine”—becomes, in the New Testament, the language of union with Christ: “Who shall separate us from the love of Christ?” (Romans 8:35).

The imagery of the beloved’s beauty—“altogether lovely” (Song 5:16)—has been a favorite Christological expression in church hymnody and devotion. Christ is the one “fairest of ten thousand” (Song 5:10), the only object of the soul’s adoration.

The Song’s climatic declaration,

📜💍 Song of Songs 8:6
“Set me as a seal upon your heart… for love is strong as death…”

is realized in the cross and resurrection. Christ’s love conquers death, and the believer is “sealed” with the Holy Spirit (Ephesians 1:13-14). The Song ends with the longing for the Beloved’s return—“Make haste, my beloved”—anticipating the New Testament’s “Maranatha”—“Come, Lord Jesus!” (Revelation 22:20).

Thus, the Song of Songs, read spiritually, offers one of the deepest revelations of Jesus as the God who loves with perfect, self-giving, everlasting love.


JESUS AS THE TRUE MEANING OF LIFE IN ECCLESIASTES

Ecclesiastes is, at first glance, a perplexing book—a meditation on the vanity and transience of life “under the sun.” The Teacher (Qoheleth) searches for meaning in wisdom, pleasure, toil, and wealth, but finds all is “hevel” (vanity, vapor). Yet this existential crisis is not hopeless. Instead, Ecclesiastes sets the stage for the New Testament’s revelation of Jesus as the only one who brings meaning, hope, and eternal life to human striving.

The refrain,

📜🕊️ Ecclesiastes 1:2
“Vanity of vanities, says the Preacher, vanity of vanities! All is vanity.”

is echoed throughout. Human wisdom, labor, and pleasure are fleeting. Death comes to all; nothing “under the sun” is truly new or lasting (Ecclesiastes 1:9-11; 2:11, 16; 3:19-20). The Teacher’s skepticism, however, is not the final word. There are hints of hope and eternity:

📜🕊️ Ecclesiastes 3:11
“He has made everything beautiful in its time. Also, he has put eternity into man’s heart, yet so that he cannot find out what God has done from the beginning to the end.”

This verse is pivotal. It asserts that while human beings long for the eternal, they cannot, through their own efforts or wisdom, grasp the fullness of God’s purposes. This longing is met, Christians affirm, only in Jesus, the one who is “from eternity” and who makes known the Father (John 1:18).

Jesus is the answer to the book’s deepest question: What is the meaning of life? In Him, all is not vanity. Where Ecclesiastes says, “There is nothing better for a person than to eat and drink and find enjoyment in his toil” (2:24), Jesus fulfills this in the Eucharist—the bread and wine of new creation, the joy of God’s presence (Luke 22:19-20). Where the Preacher concludes,

📜🕊️ Ecclesiastes 12:13-14
“Fear God and keep his commandments, for this is the whole duty of man. For God will bring every deed into judgment…”

the New Testament reveals that Christ is both the perfect fearer of God and the Judge of all (John 5:22-23; Acts 17:31). In Him, God’s commandments are fulfilled and judgment is transformed into mercy for those who trust Him.

Patristic interpreters often saw Ecclesiastes as a preparation for the Gospel—a “wilderness” in which human attempts at meaning are exhausted, leaving the soul hungry for the Bread of Life. Gregory of Nyssa, for example, wrote that Ecclesiastes “makes us despair of all that is not Christ, so that we might turn to Him alone as the fullness of wisdom and joy” . Augustine, reflecting on Ecclesiastes, described human restlessness and found peace only in God made known in Christ: “You have made us for Yourself, O Lord, and our heart is restless until it rests in You” (Confessions I.1).

Ecclesiastes’ sober realism about death—“the dust returns to the earth as it was, and the spirit returns to God who gave it” (12:7)—points beyond Sheol to resurrection hope. Jesus, as the “Resurrection and the Life” (John 11:25), overturns the verdict of death and answers the Teacher’s longing for a life that is “more than vanity.”

Ecclesiastes’ imagery of the fleeting “breath” (hevel) of life is countered by Jesus’ gift of the Holy Spirit, the divine Breath (pneuma), who brings eternal life and wisdom (John 20:22; Acts 2:4). The Teacher’s confession that “no one can comprehend what goes on under the sun” (8:17) is

ultimately answered by the One who “descended from heaven” (John 3:13) to reveal the mysteries of God.

🟦 Boxed Highlight:
🕊️ Ecclesiastes is the Old Testament’s most profound questioning of meaning, answered fully in Jesus—the eternal Wisdom, the Judge and Savior, the Giver of the Spirit and the one who alone gives purpose to every moment “under the sun.”


HISTORICAL AND THEOLOGICAL CONTEXT

The Christian tradition’s reading of Wisdom literature as Christological is rooted in both the Hebrew Bible and early Christian exegesis. Jewish wisdom theology had already personified Wisdom as God’s companion in creation (Proverbs 8; Wisdom of Solomon 7-9; Sirach 24) and associated her with Torah and the Spirit. Philo of Alexandria (1st century AD) linked Wisdom, Logos, and the “second power in heaven,” anticipating later Christian formulations .

Early Christian writers—from Justin Martyr to Origen, Athanasius, and Augustine—seized on this groundwork to interpret Proverbs’ Wisdom, the Song’s Bridegroom, and Ecclesiastes’ longing as anticipations of Jesus. Athanasius, combating Arianism, insisted that “the Lord created me” (Prov. 8:22, LXX) must be understood as referring to the Son’s eternal relationship to the Father, not temporal creation . Origen and Gregory of Nyssa’s allegorical commentaries on Song of Songs made Christ the center and goal of the soul’s longing. The reformers and Puritans, like Luther and Edwards, continued this tradition, finding Christ in the spiritual depths of the Wisdom books.

Modern scholarship acknowledges the deep connections between Wisdom literature and New Testament Christology. Scholars such as Richard Bauckham, N. T. Wright, and C. H. Dodd have traced how the Gospel of John’s Logos theology, Pauline Wisdom Christology, and the Epistle to the Hebrews’ high view of the Son all rely on the sapiential tradition of Proverbs and related texts .

The Song of Songs’ nuptial imagery was formative for Christian mysticism and liturgy, culminating in the nuptial union celebrated in Revelation. Ecclesiastes’ voice of existential questioning prepared both Judaism and Christianity for the advent of a Savior who answers human longing not with futility, but with eternal life.


CONCLUSION

The Books of Proverbs, Song of Songs, and Ecclesiastes, when read within the canon and illuminated by the Spirit, are far more than collections of wise sayings, erotic poetry, or skeptical reflection. They are, in Christian reading, a threefold witness to the mystery of Christ:

In Proverbs, Jesus is the eternal Wisdom—God’s Son, the agent of creation, the one in whom all the treasures of wisdom dwell. In Song of Songs, He is the divine Bridegroom, whose love for the Church is passionate, personal, and victorious over death. In Ecclesiastes, He is the only answer to the riddle of existence—the One who brings eternity to the human heart, judges with perfect wisdom, and transforms all vanity into eternal significance.

The attributes, actions, and invitations of Wisdom in Proverbs find their embodiment in the Incarnate Christ. The yearning and union of the Song of Songs are fulfilled in the self-giving love of Jesus for His redeemed. The searching, questioning, and hope of Ecclesiastes are satisfied in Him who is “the way, the truth, and the life.”

🟦 Boxed Theological Summary:
🌟💍🕊️ In the Wisdom literature, Jesus is not absent, but profoundly present—as the Wisdom who calls, the Bridegroom who loves, and the Meaning who satisfies the heart. The fullness of God dwells in Him, and in Him all things hold together (Colossians 1:17-19).

Thus, the Wisdom books do not stand apart from the Gospel, but lay the foundation for it. They call every reader to seek, love, and trust the one who is “greater than Solomon”—the Lord Jesus Christ, eternal God and Savior.


REFERENCES & SOURCES

Athanasius. Orations Against the Arians.
Augustine. Confessions.
Origen. Commentary on the Song of Songs.
Gregory of Nyssa. Homilies on the Song of Songs.
Richard Bauckham. Jesus and the God of Israel.
N. T. Wright. Jesus and the Victory of God.
C. H. Dodd. The Interpretation of the Fourth Gospel.
Philo of Alexandria. On the Creation, Who is the Heir?, etc.
The Holy Bible (ESV, NASB, RSV, Septuagint, etc.)
Wisdom of Solomon, Sirach (for background)
Michael V. Fox, Proverbs 1–9: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary
Tremper Longman III, Song of Songs
Robert Alter, The Wisdom Books: Job, Proverbs, and Ecclesiastes
Nicolas Wyatt, Wisdom and the Psalms
(Additional citations available upon request.)




JESUS AS GOD WHO CANNOT COMPROMISE: An Exegetical and Theological Analysis

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba, Shimba Theological Institute


Abstract

The doctrine of the immutability and holiness of God stands at the core of classical Christian theology. This article critically examines the uncompromising nature of Jesus Christ as the incarnate God, focusing on biblical texts and systematic theology. Through a robust exegetical, historical, and doctrinal approach, this study underscores that Jesus shares in the absolute perfections of the Godhead—He is unchanging, just, and incapable of compromise regarding truth, holiness, and mercy.


1. Introduction

Contemporary culture often dilutes moral absolutes, yet the Christian faith asserts that God is not subject to change, error, or compromise. Central to this claim is the person of Jesus Christ, who, according to orthodox Christian confession, is "God of God, Light of Light, very God of very God" (Nicene Creed). This paper explores the biblical and theological evidence for Jesus' uncompromising nature, demonstrating how His divinity guarantees the constancy of God’s character and the efficacy of redemption.


2. The Unchanging Nature of God in Scripture

2.1. Immutability and Divine Consistency

Scripture unequivocally testifies that God does not change (Malachi 3:6; James 1:17). Divine immutability ensures that God's nature, promises, and decrees are eternally reliable (Numbers 23:19). Hebrews 13:8 applies this attribute directly to Christ: "Jesus Christ is the same yesterday, today, and forever." Thus, any consideration of Christ’s ministry or teachings must reckon with His absolute consistency and inability to compromise moral or spiritual standards.


3. Jesus and the Holiness of God

3.1. The Sinlessness of Christ

The New Testament presents Jesus as sinless (1 John 3:5; Hebrews 4:15; 1 Peter 2:22). His incapacity to sin is not merely the result of moral effort, but is rooted in His divine ontology. Jesus, as the Logos made flesh (John 1:14), embodies the holiness of God—He cannot lie (Titus 1:2), cannot sin (Hebrews 7:26), and cannot ignore evil (Romans 6:23). His encounters with sin always result in either righteous judgment or redemptive mercy, but never compromise.

3.2. The Righteous Judge

In John 8:46, Jesus publicly challenges His opponents: "Which of you convicts me of sin?" His flawless life and absolute integrity confirm His suitability as the Judge of all (John 5:22, 27). Divine justice is not malleable; Jesus does not accommodate evil, nor does He negotiate with sin (Matthew 5:17-20). Instead, He fulfills the law perfectly and judges impartially.


4. The Mercy That Does Not Compromise

4.1. Divine Mercy and Human Repentance

While God cannot tolerate or overlook sin, He also cannot reject a truly repentant heart (Psalm 51:17; Luke 15:7). The incarnation is the supreme demonstration of uncompromising mercy—Jesus absorbs the penalty for sin without ever diluting divine justice (Romans 3:25-26). In Christ, the holiness and mercy of God meet without conflict.

4.2. The Cross: Holiness and Grace Intersect

The cross is the ultimate manifestation of God’s unwillingness to compromise. God does not ignore sin; He confronts it at the highest cost to Himself (2 Corinthians 5:21). Jesus' atoning death does not lower the bar of righteousness but satisfies it, fulfilling both the demands of justice and the offer of grace.


5. The Exclusive Lordship of Christ

Jesus, as God incarnate, will not share His glory with another (Isaiah 42:8; John 14:6). He cannot accept idols or competitors (Exodus 20:3; Matthew 4:10). The exclusivity of Christ is not arrogance, but the natural outworking of divine uniqueness—there is no compromise regarding the throne of God.


6. Implications for Christian Living

6.1. A Call to Holiness

Believers are summoned to reflect God’s uncompromising character: "Be holy, for I am holy" (1 Peter 1:16). Christian ethics is not a negotiation with the world’s shifting values, but a call to imitate Christ’s unwavering righteousness and compassion.

6.2. Assurance in a Changing World

In a world of moral relativism, Jesus remains the fixed point of truth and justice. The believer’s security rests not on societal trends but on the unchanging, uncompromising character of Christ.


7. Conclusion

The doctrine of Jesus as the God who cannot compromise is not an abstract theological point—it is the bedrock of the Christian gospel. Only an unchanging, holy, and merciful Savior can secure eternal redemption and demand ultimate allegiance. As Hebrews 12:2 exhorts, let us fix our eyes on Jesus, "the author and perfecter of our faith," whose holiness, love, and justice remain forever uncompromised.


References:

  • Holy Bible (ESV, KJV, NIV)

  • Barth, K. Church Dogmatics.

  • Grudem, W. Systematic Theology.

  • Stott, J. The Cross of Christ.

  • Nicene Creed, 325 AD.


Dr. Maxwell Shimba
Shimba Theological Institute




RESPONSE TO "5 QUESTIONS THAT CHRISTIANS CAN’T ANSWER"

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba, Shimba Theological Institute

1. If Jesus is God, why did He pray to God?

(Matthew 26:39 – Who was He talking to?)

Scholarly Response:
The doctrine of the Incarnation (John 1:1, 14; Philippians 2:6-8) teaches that Jesus is both fully God and fully man. As the eternal Son of God, He existed with the Father from eternity, but in the fullness of time, He took on human nature (Galatians 4:4). As a true man, Jesus prayed to the Father, modeling perfect dependence and obedience (Hebrews 5:7-9). His prayers do not deny His divinity; rather, they reveal the relationship within the Trinity: the Son communicating with the Father. This is not a contradiction but a profound mystery—God the Son, in His humanity, prays to God the Father. The early Church Fathers, like Athanasius and Augustine, affirmed this: “He prays as man, but hears prayer as God” (Athanasius, On the Incarnation).

Summary: Jesus' prayers reveal the Trinity and the reality of His Incarnation, not a denial of His deity.


2. Why did Jesus say, “The Father is greater than I”?

(John 14:28 – Can God be less than God?)

Scholarly Response:
When Jesus says, "The Father is greater than I," He is speaking from the vantage point of His incarnate mission. In His divine nature, the Son is equal with the Father (John 1:1; John 10:30; Philippians 2:6). But as a man, He voluntarily accepted a position of submission and humility (Philippians 2:7). Early Christian creeds (e.g., the Nicene Creed, AD 325) clarify: Jesus is "of one substance with the Father," but in His humanity, He could say the Father was "greater" in role, not in nature or essence. This is an example of the “functional subordination” of the Son during His earthly ministry, not an ontological (essential) inferiority.

Summary: The “greater” refers to position or function during the Incarnation, not to Jesus' divine nature.


3. Why did Jesus never say “I am God” or “Worship me”?

Scholarly Response:
The claim that Jesus never said “I am God” ignores the historical and cultural context. In 1st-century Jewish monotheism, explicit self-identification as God would have been misunderstood and provocative. Instead, Jesus repeatedly made implicit, unmistakable claims to divinity:

  • John 8:58: “Before Abraham was, I AM” (echoing Exodus 3:14, God’s name).

  • John 10:30: “I and the Father are one.”

  • John 20:28: Thomas calls Jesus “My Lord and my God,” and Jesus affirms it.

  • Mark 2:5-12: Jesus forgives sins—something only God can do.
    Jesus also accepted worship (Matthew 14:33; 28:17; John 9:38) and rebuked those who refused to honor the Son as they honor the Father (John 5:23). For a Jewish rabbi to accept worship or claim the Divine Name was, to His hearers, an unmistakable claim to deity.

Summary: Jesus spoke and acted as only God could, and His followers rightly worshipped Him.


4. Why did Jesus admit He doesn’t know everything?

(Mark 13:32 – “Not even the Son knows…")

Scholarly Response:
Mark 13:32 refers to Jesus’ voluntary acceptance of human limitations in His Incarnation. Philippians 2:6-8 states that the Son “emptied Himself” (Greek: kenosis), not of deity, but of the independent exercise of His divine attributes. As the God-man, Jesus lived in full dependence on the Father and the Spirit. The Church Fathers explained that in His divine nature, the Son knows all things, but in His human experience, He did not always exercise that divine prerogative. This demonstrates the reality of His humanity, not the denial of His divinity.

Summary: The “not knowing” is a reflection of the Incarnation’s mystery, not a denial of His divine nature.


5. If Jesus died, who ran the universe for 3 days? Can God die?

Scholarly Response:
God, in His divine nature, is immortal and cannot die (1 Timothy 6:16). But in the Incarnation, the eternal Word took on mortal flesh (John 1:14; Hebrews 2:14). On the cross, Jesus experienced death in His human nature, not His divine nature. The Church has always taught the doctrine of the communicatio idiomatum: the attributes of both natures are ascribed to the one Person of Christ. The universe was never out of God’s sovereign control—Jesus’ divine nature remained fully alive and upholding all things (Colossians 1:17; Hebrews 1:3). His human body died, but His divine person did not cease to exist.

Summary: Jesus died as a man, but as God He continued to sustain the universe. Death touched His humanity, not His deity.


CONCLUSION:

These questions do not undermine the divinity of Christ; they highlight the profound mystery of the Christian doctrine of the Incarnation and the Trinity. Jesus is the God-Man: fully God, fully human, united in one person. The consistent witness of the New Testament, the Early Church, and Christian theology is that Jesus is God in the flesh—worthy of worship, trust, and adoration.

Muslims and others are invited to examine the depth of these mysteries not as contradictions, but as revelations of God's unique way of saving humanity—by becoming one of us, dying for our sins, and rising in glory.


References:

  • The Holy Bible (John 1:1-18; Philippians 2:5-11; Hebrews 1:1-3; Colossians 1:15-20)

  • Nicene Creed (325 AD)

  • Athanasius, On the Incarnation

  • Augustine, De Trinitate

  • Millard J. Erickson, Christian Theology

  • Wayne Grudem, Systematic Theology


Dr. Maxwell Shimba
Shimba Theological Institute




The New Covenant and Restoration in Jeremiah 31:31–38: An Exegetical and Theological Appraisal

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba, Shimba Theological Institute

Introduction

Jeremiah 31:31–38 stands among the most theologically significant prophetic oracles within the Hebrew Bible, not only for its immediate promise to exilic Israel but for its far-reaching implications in the Christian doctrine of the New Covenant. This passage encapsulates the divine initiative in covenant renewal and eschatological restoration, forming a nexus between Israel’s historical experiences and the theological horizons realized in the New Testament. This analysis seeks to elucidate the literary structure, historical context, and enduring theological meaning of this passage.

Verses 31–34: The Oracle of the New Covenant

“Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah:” (v.31, KJV)

These verses introduce the berit chadashah (Heb. “new covenant”), which is distinctly contrasted with the Mosaic covenant ratified at Sinai (cf. Exodus 19–24). The novelty of this covenant is not merely chronological but qualitative:

  • Internalization of the Law: “I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts” (v.33). The covenantal stipulations will no longer be externalized on tablets of stone but inscribed upon the moral and spiritual fabric of the people (cf. Ezekiel 36:26–27).

  • Universal Knowledge of God: “They shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the Lord” (v.34). The knowledge of Yahweh becomes democratized, no longer mediated exclusively through priestly or prophetic intermediaries.

  • Definitive Forgiveness: “I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more” (v.34). This marks a radical departure from the cyclical pattern of sin and atonement under the former covenant (cf. Hebrews 10:1–4).

The theological weight of this passage is underscored by its explicit citation in the Epistle to the Hebrews (8:8–12; 10:16–17), where it is interpreted as fulfilled in the person and work of Jesus Christ. Thus, Jeremiah’s New Covenant prophecy forms a cornerstone of Christian soteriology and ecclesiology.

Verses 35–37: The Immutability of God’s Covenant

These verses employ cosmological language to underscore the irrevocability of God’s promises:

“Thus saith the Lord, which giveth the sun for a light by day, and the ordinances of the moon and of the stars for a light by night... If those ordinances depart from before me... then the seed of Israel also shall cease from being a nation before me for ever” (vv.35–36).

By invoking the permanence of the created order, Jeremiah asserts that the covenantal bond between Yahweh and Israel is as unbreakable as the fixed laws governing the cosmos. This rhetorical device amplifies both the faithfulness of God and the futility of doubting His commitment to His people (cf. Genesis 8:22; Psalm 89:35–37).

Verses 38–40: The Eschatological Restoration of Jerusalem

“Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, that the city shall be built to the Lord from the tower of Hananeel unto the gate of the corner.” (v.38)

The pericope concludes with a detailed topographical description of Jerusalem’s restoration. The city’s boundaries, stretching from the Tower of Hananeel to the Corner Gate and encompassing sacred and profane spaces alike, symbolize a comprehensive and sanctified renewal. While there are post-exilic parallels (cf. Nehemiah 3:1; Zechariah 14:10), the scope and definitiveness of the restoration point to an eschatological fulfillment—what many Christian interpreters understand as the Messianic Kingdom (cf. Revelation 21:2).

Theological and Canonical Implications

Jeremiah 31:31–38 thus occupies a pivotal place within both Jewish and Christian canonical frameworks. For Judaism, it is a promise of national and spiritual restoration; for Christianity, it is a prophecy realized in the inauguration of the New Covenant by Christ, whose death and resurrection secures the internalization of God’s law, universal knowledge of Him, and total forgiveness of sin.

Furthermore, the passage resists any notion of supersessionism by grounding God’s faithfulness to Israel in the very structure of creation itself, ensuring the enduring validity of the covenantal relationship.

Conclusion

Jeremiah’s vision of a New Covenant stands as a monumental theological innovation that shapes subsequent Jewish and Christian understandings of divine-human relationship, forgiveness, and eschatological hope. The restoration of Jerusalem functions both as a symbol and a reality of God’s ultimate intention to dwell among a renewed people, whose hearts are aligned with His will.


References:

  • Brueggemann, Walter. A Commentary on Jeremiah: Exile and Homecoming.

  • Wright, Christopher J.H. The Message of Jeremiah.

  • Hebrews 8:8–13; 10:15–18; Ezekiel 36:25–27; Revelation 21:1–4.

Dr. Maxwell Shimba, Shimba Theological Institute

THE GOSPEL AFFIRMS THAT JESUS IS GOD

Dr. Maxwell Shimba, Shimba Theological Institute


Abstract

This article systematically explores the biblical and theological foundations affirming the divinity of Jesus Christ within Christian doctrine. Drawing from the Torah, Psalms (Zabur), and the Gospel (Injil), it presents scriptural evidence for Jesus’ virgin birth, sinlessness, heavenly origin, and authority over nature. Through comparative theological analysis, it demonstrates that Jesus is not merely a prophet or moral teacher, but the unique Son of God, fully divine and the only mediator between God and humanity. The article concludes with an invitation to embrace the truth of Jesus’ identity as presented in the Christian Scriptures.


Keywords

Jesus Christ, Divinity, Son of God, Gospel, Christian Theology, Resurrection, Biblical Evidence, Soteriology


Introduction

The Christian claim that Jesus is God stands at the core of the New Testament message and is foundational to the faith. The Gospel affirms that Jesus was born of a virgin, was sinless, ascended into heaven, and will return. According to biblical testimony, Jesus is more than a prophet or moral exemplar—He is the unique Son of God, embodying both human and divine natures. His significance for humanity surpasses that of a great healer or teacher, as He is the source of salvation, revelation, and eternal life.


Scriptural Evidence for the Divinity of Jesus

1. Jesus as the Son of God

Jesus is repeatedly called the “Son of God” in the Gospel, a title which in its original context denotes divinity, unique relationship, and authority.

“You search the Scriptures because you think that in them you have eternal life; and it is they that bear witness about me.” (John 5:39, ESV)

The Gospel's central subject is not a philosophy but the person of Jesus Christ. He forms the essential link between humanity and God, granting assurance and courage to believers. When Jesus is called the “Son of God,” the Gospel does not imply any physical or biological relationship between God and Mary; rather, it asserts His eternal, spiritual sonship (Matthew 1:18; Luke 1:34-35; John 10:36).

“All things have been committed to me by my Father. No one knows who the Son is except the Father, and no one knows who the Father is except the Son and those to whom the Son chooses to reveal him.” (Luke 10:22, NIV)

2. Pre-existence and Divine Nature

Jesus testifies to his pre-existence with the Father:

“I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.” (John 16:28)

Jesus’ claims to pre-existence and his descent from heaven underscore his divine nature. He did not come into existence at birth, but entered human history from a prior state of eternal fellowship with the Father (John 1:18; John 3:31–32).

3. The Transfiguration

The Transfiguration event provides a direct revelation of Jesus’ divinity:

“There he was transfigured before them. His face shone like the sun, and his clothes became as white as the light… a voice from the cloud said, ‘This is my Son, whom I love; with him I am well pleased. Listen to him!’” (Matthew 17:2–8, NIV)

Here, the divine glory of Jesus is revealed above even the greatest Old Testament prophets, Moses and Elijah. The Father’s affirmation establishes Jesus as the authoritative Son of God.


Jesus as the Only Way to the Father

Jesus claims exclusive and absolute authority as the only mediator between God and man:

“Jesus answered, ‘I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.’” (John 14:6, NIV)

This assertion sets Christianity apart from all other religious claims and places Jesus at the center of God’s salvific plan. Jesus is the sole means to all of God’s blessings and eternal life.


The Resurrection: Christ as the Living Savior

Christianity’s foundation rests on the historical reality of the resurrection:

“It is true! The Lord has risen and has appeared to Simon.” (Luke 24:34, NIV)

Unlike Muhammad and other prophets, Jesus rose from the dead, vindicating His divine identity and saving power. Through the resurrection, believers are assured of new and abundant life (John 10:9–10).


Miracles and Divine Authority

Jesus’ miracles, particularly his authority over nature, further demonstrate His divinity:

“He got up, rebuked the wind and said to the waves, ‘Quiet! Be still!’ Then the wind died down and it was completely calm… Who is this? Even the wind and the waves obey him!” (Mark 4:37–41, NIV; cf. Psalm 89:8–9, Psalm 107:27–30)

No human being or prophet in Scripture commands creation with such authority; only God Himself has this power.


Soteriological Implications

“For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.” (John 3:16, NIV)

Salvation in Christianity is not earned through good works but is received by faith in Jesus Christ. God’s justice and mercy meet at the cross, where Jesus, the sinless Son, dies in place of humanity.


Conclusion

The biblical witness, from the Torah through the Psalms and Gospel, converges on the affirmation of Jesus’ unique divinity. The evidence of His virgin birth, pre-existence, miracles, resurrection, and exclusive authority over salvation compels the conclusion that Jesus is truly God incarnate.

“Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.” (John 8:32, NIV)

Come to Jesus, that we may rejoice with you.


References

  • The Holy Bible, English Standard Version (ESV) and New International Version (NIV)

  • Bauckham, R. (2008). Jesus and the God of Israel: God Crucified and Other Studies on the New Testament’s Christology of Divine Identity. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.

  • Hurtado, L. W. (2005). Lord Jesus Christ: Devotion to Jesus in Earliest Christianity. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.

  • Wright, N. T. (2012). How God Became King: The Forgotten Story of the Gospels. New York: HarperOne.


Dr. Maxwell Shimba
Shimba Theological Institute




JESUS IS EVERYWHERE, IN ALL PLACES AROUND THE WORLD

Wednesday, November 16, 2016

JESUS IS EVERYWHERE, IN ALL PLACES AROUND THE WORLD Biblical Foundation:

In the Gospel of Matthew 18:20, Jesus proclaims,

“For where two or three are gathered together in My name, there am I in the midst of them.”

This statement asserts that Jesus is present wherever His followers assemble in His name, regardless of geographical boundaries. The capacity to be present everywhere at all times is a unique attribute traditionally ascribed only to God—namely, omnipresence.

Theological Reflection:
The doctrine of omnipresence refers to the divine attribute of being present everywhere simultaneously. In Christian theology, this attribute is exclusively reserved for God. Thus, when Jesus declares His presence among believers wherever they gather, He is making an implicit claim to divinity.

Christological Implications:
The omnipresence of Jesus Christ is further attested in other New Testament passages, such as Matthew 28:20, where Jesus affirms,

“And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age.”

This promise underscores the unbounded, ever-present nature of Christ’s presence with His followers. Such declarations reinforce the Christian belief in the divinity of Jesus, aligning Him with the very nature of God, who alone is omnipresent (see Psalm 139:7–10).

Scholarly Commentary:
The affirmation that “Jesus is omnipresent” is not merely a theological assertion but is deeply rooted in the scriptural testimony of Christ’s own words. The context of Matthew 18:20 reveals that the presence of Jesus among believers is not symbolic but a real and dynamic reality. As noted by various biblical scholars, the omnipresence of Christ ensures that the Church, regardless of its physical location, is always under His immediate supervision, guidance, and fellowship.

Furthermore, this claim distinguishes Jesus from all other human figures and prophets, establishing His unique role within the Christian faith as both fully God and fully man. The capacity to be present everywhere at all times is, according to orthodox Christian doctrine, definitive proof of Christ’s divine nature.

Conclusion:
In summary, the teaching of Matthew 18:20 affirms the omnipresence of Jesus Christ, a prerogative of divinity. Wherever two or three are gathered in His name, Christ is genuinely present among them. This truth forms a foundational pillar of Christian worship, ecclesiology, and Christology.


Dr. Maxwell Shimba
Shimba Theological Institute
November 16, 2016




IS THE GOD OF ISLAM (ALLAH S.W) THE SAME AS THE GOD OF CHRISTIANS (JEHOVAH)?

INTRODUCTION

For more than twenty years now, it has become common to hear in lectures conducted by Islamic scholars, which have spread in various parts of the world, especially in East and Central African countries. These scholars teach communities through the Quran and the Bible by saying that there is only one God. They say that God in Hebrew is called Jehovah, in Arabic Allah, in English God, and in Swahili Mungu. Therefore, they claim that the God Allah as taught in the Quran is the same as Jehovah as taught in the Bible. These lectures conducted by Muslims have become widespread, for example, in Tanzania there are many groups, one of which is called Al-Marid International Propagation Center. They have written on their banner quoting from the Bible, words written by the Apostle Paul in Ephesians 4:4-6. The words they quoted say, "There is one Lord, one faith... one God and Father of all, who is over all and through all and in all." When I visited Morogoro town, at the airport area, I saw a mosque with these words from Ephesians 4:4-6 written on it. When I visited Nairobi in Kenya, I also saw many groups conducting lectures, and one of them is called Kibera Islamic Propagation Centre. They have written a message on their banner saying, "Let the Bible speak for itself," quoting this verse from the Gospel of John 8:32, "And you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free."

Thus, you will see that these Islamic scholars teach the community using the Quran and the Bible, saying that Allah Subhanahu Wa Ta'ala is Jehovah. They spread this teaching through Radio, Pamphlets, Lectures, books, and Video and Audio tapes. This has caused some Christians to leave their faith and convert to Islam. Some other Christians, although they have not changed their religion, believe this. The important question for every Christian to ask is, is it true that the God Allah as narrated in the Quran is the same as Jehovah as taught in the Bible? I urge you to follow this lesson carefully to know the truth...

MAIN PARTS OF THIS LESSON ARE AS FOLLOWS...

  1. The arguments of Muslims saying Allah is Jehovah.

  2. Is the name of God according to the Quran and the Bible the same?

  3. Is the chief angel of Allah the same as Jehovah's?

  4. Who is the creator, Allah or Jehovah?

  5. The city chosen by Allah, is it the same as Jehovah's?

  6. How does Allah teach about purifying the soul, is it the same as Jehovah?

  7. Is Jehovah's heaven the same as Allah's?

  8. What is the end of those who worship Allah?

1. The Arguments of Muslims Saying Allah is Jehovah

Islamic scholars say that the God Allah is Jehovah because the prophets of God according to the Bible and the Quran taught by saying that there is only one God. And they read these verses...

What Prophet Moses said:

Deuteronomy 6:4
"Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God, the LORD is one."

What Prophet Isaiah said:

Isaiah 45:18,21
"For thus says the LORD, who created the heavens (He is God!), who formed the earth and made it... I am the LORD, and there is no other. A righteous God and a Savior; there is none besides Me."

What Prophet David said:

Psalms 86:10
"For You are great and do wondrous things; You alone are God."

What Jesus said:

John 17:3
"And this is eternal life, that they know You, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom You have sent."

What Paul said:

1 Corinthians 8:4
"Therefore, as to the eating of food offered to idols, we know that an idol has no real existence, and that there is no God but one."

Here, Islamic scholars say that all prophets according to the Bible teach that there is only one God. What did Muhammad (s.a.w.) teach about God? They read these verses from the Quran...

Quran 41:6 Surah Ha-Mim Sajdah (The Prostration)
"Say, 'I am only a man like you, to whom has been revealed that your God is one God...’"

Here, the scholars say that just as all prophets taught about one God, so did Muhammad.

Quran 29:46-47 Surah Al-Ankabut (The Spider)
"And do not argue with the People of the Scripture except in a way that is best, except for those who commit injustice among them, and say, 'We believe in that which has been revealed to us and revealed to you. And our God and your God is one; and we are Muslims [in submission] to Him.' And thus We have sent down to you the Book. And those to whom We [previously] gave the Scripture believe in it. And among these [people of Makkah] are those who believe in it. And none reject Our verses except the disbelievers."

Here, Islamic scholars say that the books of the Torah and the Gospel do not contradict the Quran, and these books were given to the Jews and Christians, and the God of Muslims and Christians is one.

Is this argument true? I will answer this later.

Responses about One God

If you quickly look at how these Islamic scholars compare the verses of the Quran and the Bible, you might be convinced to believe what they teach, but it is good to study in depth according to the Quran and the Bible and then see if there is any truth in their teachings that Allah Subhanahu Wa Ta'ala is Jehovah. Remember, the God we worship warned us Christians by saying...

Exodus 20:1-3
"And God spoke all these words, saying, 'I am the LORD your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of slavery. You shall have no other gods before Me.'"

This warning from our God about having no other gods implies that there are other gods worshipped by people. Because in the Bible the word "God" in Hebrew "Elohim" and in Greek "Theos" is mentioned 3979 times, but false gods are mentioned 271 times. Some of these false gods are:

  • Dagon (Judges 16:23)

  • Baal (1 Kings 18:21)

  • Artemis of the Ephesians (Acts 19:24-28)

Additionally, when we read the Quran, it also mentions various gods that were worshipped in Mecca, such as:

Quran 53:19-20,23 Surah An-Najm (The Star)
"19. So have you considered al-Lat and al-'Uzza? 20. And Manat, the third - the other one? 23. They are not but [mere] names you have named them - you and your forefathers - for which Allah has sent down no authority. They follow not except assumption and what their souls desire, and there has already come to them from their Lord guidance."

Therefore, we see that there are many gods that are worshipped, and everyone who worships relies on that god and says there is one. For example, those who worshipped Dagon said he was one god, those who worshipped Baal said he was one god, those who worshipped Artemis said she was the great goddess. Likewise, the prophets served one God named Jehovah, and Muhammad worshipped one god named Allah. What I want to teach the community to know is whether Allah is Jehovah.

2. Is the Name of God According to the Quran and the Bible the Same?

One fundamental thing that identifies anything or anyone, be it a person, animal, or anything, is a name. Therefore, to know if the God worshipped by Muslims is the same as the one we Christians worship, we must look at the name. Is it the same?

Quran 17:110 Surah Bani Israil (The Children of Israel)
"Say, 'Call upon Allah or call upon the Most Merciful. Whichever [name] you call - to Him belong the best names.'..."

Here we see that Allah teaches Muslims to call upon Him by the name Allah or the Most Merciful. Reading the Quran, we see the name Allah mentioned 2866 times. Remember, the Quran has 30 Juzus and 114 Surahs. So the God worshipped by Muslims according to the Quran is named Allah.

The name of the God worshipped by Christians is this:

Exodus 6:2-3
"God spoke to Moses and said to him, 'I am Jehovah. I appeared to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob as God Almighty, but by my name Jehovah I did not make myself known to them.'"

Here we see that the God we Christians worship identifies His name as Jehovah. In the Bible, the word or name "LORD" in English translates to Jehovah, indicating a very holy name of God. This name is mentioned 6751 times in the Bible. Remember, the Bible has a total of 66 books, 1189 chapters, and 31,102 verses.

3. Is the Chief Angel of Allah the Same as Jehovah's?

If Allah is Jehovah, then it is clear that the chief angel would also be the same. If not the same, then the chief angels are different. Let's first look at how Allah narrates in the Quran, and he says...

**Quran 81:19-21 Surah At-Takwir (The Over

throwing/The Folding Up)**
"Indeed, the Quran is a word conveyed by a noble messenger (Gabriel), Who is possessed of power and with the Owner of the Throne, secure [in position], Obeyed there [in the heavens] and trustworthy."

The explanation of these verses inside the Quran teaches that the noble messenger and the one obeyed in the heavens is Gabriel, who is the chief of all angels.

The chief angel of the God Jehovah is this:

Jude 1:9
"But Michael the archangel, when he disputed with the devil and argued about the body of Moses, did not dare pronounce against him a railing judgment, but said, 'The Lord rebuke you!'"

Here we see the verses clearly teaching that the chief angel of the God named Allah is called Gabriel, while the chief angel of our God Jehovah is called Michael. The question is: Since these angels are different, is Allah the same as Jehovah? To know more about the differences between the angels, get a copy of the lesson: "Is Gabriel the Same as Jibril?" We have that lesson; get a copy.

4. Who is the Creator, Allah or Jehovah?

Everyone who follows religion believes that God is the creator who created humans, animals, and all we see and do not see. So it is appropriate to look at what is said by Jehovah about creation and what Allah says. Do their statements agree or differ?

Who Was Man Created in the Image of?

Allah says this:

Quran 112:1-4 Surah Al-Ikhlas (The Purity/The Sincerity)
"Say, 'He is Allah, [who is] One, Allah, the Eternal Refuge. He neither begets nor is born, Nor is there to Him any equivalent.'"

According to this verse, Allah says that God neither begets nor is born and that there is no one comparable to Him. Jehovah says this about man...

Genesis 1:26-27
"Then God said, 'Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness; and let them rule over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the sky and over the cattle and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.' God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them."

Here we see that our God Jehovah created man in His own image, but Allah says there is no one comparable to Him. The question for you, the follower: Is Allah Jehovah? Please read these verses to know more (Genesis 5:1-2, 9:6, 1 Corinthians 11:7, Colossians 1:15, 3:10, Acts 17:28-29, James 3:9). You might ask, "In what way does God resemble me?" Know that God is Spirit (John 4:24) and He gave us the breath (spirit of life) (Genesis 2:7). Moreover, God is the Father of our spirits (Hebrews 12:9), and He says our spirits belong to Him (Ezekiel 18:4, Numbers 16:22).

Swearing by God about Creation

Quran 91:1-7 Surah Ash-Shams (The Sun)
"By the sun and its brightness, And by the moon when it follows it, And by the day when it displays it, And by the night when it covers it, And by the sky and He who constructed it, And by the earth and He who spread it, And by the soul and He who proportioned it."

Quran 92:1-3 Surah Al-Lail (The Night)
"By the night when it covers, And by the day when it appears, And by [the One] who created the male and the female."

Here we see that Allah swears by the sky and He who constructed it, by the earth and He who spread it. Who is this spreader of the earth and the builder of the sky? The Quran continues to narrate...

Quran 45:22 Surah Al-Jathiyah (The Kneeling)
"And Allah created the heavens and the earth in truth..."

Quran 44:7-8 Surah Ad-Dukhan (The Smoke)
"[He is] the Lord of the heavens and the earth and whatever is between them, if you should be certain. There is no deity except Him; He gives life and causes death. [He is] your Lord and the Lord of your forefathers."

Here we see that Allah, through the Quran, says that Allah created the heavens and the earth, and again he says there is no deity except Him. The builder of the sky and the spreader of the earth says this...

Isaiah 44:24
"Thus says the LORD, your Redeemer, and the one who formed you from the womb, 'I, the LORD, am the maker of all things, stretching out the heavens by Myself and spreading out the earth all alone.'"

Our God Jehovah says, "I make all things." (Read Isaiah 45:6-7, 11-12, Jeremiah 27:5). Surely Jehovah is the creator of all things.

Did God Jehovah Swear by the Things He Created like Allah?

Isaiah 45:22-23
"Turn to Me and be saved, all the ends of the earth; For I am God, and there is no other. I have sworn by Myself; The word has gone forth from My mouth in righteousness And will not turn back, That to Me every knee will bow, every tongue will swear allegiance."

Hebrews 6:13-16
"For when God made the promise to Abraham, since He could swear by no one greater, He swore by Himself, saying, 'I will surely bless you and I will surely multiply you.' And so, having patiently waited, he obtained the promise. For men swear by one greater than themselves, and with them an oath given as confirmation is an end of every dispute."

Here we see that our God Jehovah does not swear by any person or the things He created, like Allah swears, but Jehovah says, "I swear by Myself." You can also read how Jehovah swore by Himself in these verses: (Isaiah 14:24 and Genesis 22:16).

5. The City Chosen by Allah, Is It the Same as Jehovah's?

The City of Allah:

Quran 27:91 Surah An-Naml (The Ants)
"I have only been commanded to worship the Lord of this city (Makkah), who made it sacred and to whom belongs all things..."

Quran 3:96 Surah Aal-Imran (The Family of Imran)
"Indeed, the first House [of worship] established for mankind was that at Makkah - blessed and a guidance for the worlds."

Quran 106:3-4 Surah Quraysh (The Quraysh)
"So let them worship the Lord of this House (the Kaaba), Who has fed them, [saving them] from hunger and made them safe, [saving them] from fear."

Thus, we see that Allah is the Lord of the Kaaba according to these verses, and the Kaaba is in Makkah. Through these verses, we see that Allah, the god worshipped by Muslims, has chosen the city of Makkah as his holy city, and Muhammad (s.a.w) was commanded to worship the Lord of this city of Makkah, who is Allah.

What city did our God Jehovah choose? Continue reading...

The City Chosen by Our God Jehovah Is This...

2 Chronicles 6:4-6
"He said, 'Blessed be the LORD, the God of Israel, who spoke with His mouth to my father David and has fulfilled it with His hands, saying, ‘Since the day that I brought My people out of the land of Egypt, I did not choose a city out of all the tribes of Israel in which to build a house that My name might be there, nor did I choose any man for a leader over My people Israel; but I have chosen Jerusalem that My name might be there, and I have chosen David to be over My people Israel.’"

The Scriptures do not mention any other city chosen by our God here on earth except the city of Jerusalem. (See 2 Chronicles 12:13, Ezra 6:12; 7:15,27; Psalms 26:8; Zechariah 2:12)

Through these verses, we see that our God Jehovah, His chosen city is Jerusalem. The name Jerusalem is in Hebrew and means "foundation of peace." Even when the Israelites were far from the city of Jerusalem, they knelt and faced Jerusalem. (See Daniel 6:10). The city chosen by Jehovah is Jerusalem, and the city chosen by Allah is Makkah. And this is the difference between the city of Allah and Jehovah.

6. How Does Allah Teach about Purifying the Soul, Is It the Same as Jehovah?

Allah teaches this...

Quran 53:32 Surah An-Najm (The Star)
"Those who avoid the major sins and immoralities, only [committing] slight ones - indeed, your Lord is vast in forgiveness. He was most knowing of you when He produced you from the earth and when you were fetuses in the wombs of your mothers. So do not claim yourselves to be pure..."

Quran 12:53 Surah Yusuf (Joseph)
"And I do not acquit myself. Indeed, the soul is a persistent enjoiner of evil,

except those upon which my Lord has mercy. Indeed, my Lord is Forgiving and Merciful."

According to the Quran, Allah instructs people not to purify themselves and again says, "I do not purify myself." This is very surprising!

Our God Jehovah says this about purifying the soul, i.e., holiness:

Isaiah 43:3
"For I am the LORD your God, The Holy One of Israel, your Savior; I have given Egypt as your ransom, Cush and Seba in your place."

Here we see that God says, "I am the Holy One." This is also a descriptive name for our God Jehovah. In Hebrew, it is called "Kadosh." The Prophet Isaiah has written that God is Holy 32 times. For a quick reference, read Isaiah 40:25, 48:17, and 57:15. Moreover, because our God Jehovah is holy, He instructed us thus...

Leviticus 11:44
"For I am the LORD your God. Consecrate yourselves therefore, and be holy, for I am holy. And you shall not make yourselves unclean with any of the swarming things that swarm on the earth."

The Apostle Peter instructs us thus:

1 Peter 1:15-16
"But like the Holy One who called you, be holy yourselves also in all your behavior; because it is written, 'You shall be holy, for I am holy.'"

The Apostle Paul also instructed to purify the soul and be holy (2 Corinthians 7:1). You can also read this instruction to be holy in Leviticus 19:2, 20:26.

Therefore, we see that Jehovah commands us to purify our souls to be holy, but Allah commands Muslims not to purify their souls.

Question for you, the follower: Is Allah Jehovah?

7. Is Jehovah's Heaven the Same as Allah's Paradise (Heaven)?

Jehovah's Heaven:

Luke 20:34-36
"Jesus said to them, 'The sons of this age marry and are given in marriage, but those who are considered worthy to attain to that age and the resurrection from the dead, neither marry nor are given in marriage; for they cannot even die anymore, because they are like angels, and are sons of God, being sons of the resurrection.'"

These Scriptures assure Christians that when we are resurrected and enter heaven, there will be no marriage because we will have spiritual bodies (1 Corinthians 15:43-54). Additionally, the Scriptures teach us that the kingdom of God is not eating and drinking, but righteousness, peace, and joy in the Holy Spirit (Romans 14:17). Our God teaches clearly that in heaven in His kingdom, there is no hunger or thirst or sun to beat down on us (Revelation 7:16-17).

Allah's Paradise or Heaven will be like this:

i. Mansions

Quran 39:20 Surah Az-Zumar (The Groups)
"But those who have feared their Lord will have chambers, above them chambers built high, beneath which rivers flow. [This is] the promise of Allah. Allah does not fail in [His] promise."

ii. Rivers of water, milk, wine, honey, and fruits

Quran 47:15 Surah Muhammad
"The description of Paradise, which the righteous are promised, is that in it are rivers of water unaltered, rivers of milk the taste of which never changes, rivers of wine delicious to those who drink, and rivers of purified honey, in which they will have from all kinds of fruits and forgiveness from their Lord. [Are they] like those who abide eternally in the Fire and are given to drink scalding water that will sever their intestines?"

iii. They will have women of certain kinds and bird meat

Quran 56:15-23 Surah Al-Waqi'ah (The Inevitable) - I quote verses 21-23 only
"And meat of fowl, from whatever they desire. And [for them are] fair women with large, [beautiful] eyes, The likenesses of pearls well-protected."

Quran 37:48-49 Surah As-Saffat (Those who set the Ranks)
"And with them will be women limiting [their] glances, with large, [beautiful] eyes, As if they were [delicate] eggs, well-protected."

Quran 37:44-46 Surah As-Saffat (Those who set the Ranks)
"They will be on thrones facing each other. Circulated among them will be a cup [of wine] from a flowing spring, White and delicious to the drinkers."

Through these verses, we have seen that Allah Subhanahu Wa Ta'ala, the god worshipped by Muslims, has promised to admit Muslims into paradise (heaven) where they will have rivers of water, rivers of milk, wine, and honey. They will also have fruits, bird meat, and will be married off to women with large eyes like ostrich eggs and others with large eyes like cups.

The surprising thing is when we read the book of Hadith, because the faith of Islam is also built on the books of Hadith. Read...

Quran 42:10 Surah Ash-Shura (The Consultation)
"And in anything over which you disagree - its ruling is [to be referred] to Allah. [Say], 'That is Allah, my Lord; upon Him I have relied, and to Him I turn back.'"

When we read the book of Hadith of the Prophet called Sunan Ibn Majah vol 5 page 546 Hadith No: 4337, there are these explanations:

Narrated Abu Umama: The Prophet of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) said Allah will not allow anyone to enter paradise but Allah the Mighty and Glorious will marry him with seventy-two wives. Two will be virgins (Huris) with big eyes, and seventy will be his inheritance from the people (husbands) who were thrown into Hellfire. Each one of them (the women) will have a pleasant vagina, and the man’s sexual organ will not bend down (during intercourse) but will last long.

In English, this Hadith reads:

Abu Umama (Allah be pleased with him) reported that Allah's messenger (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said Allah will not admit anyone into Paradise but Allah the Mighty and Glorious, will marry him with seventy-two wives. Two will be from virgins (Huris) with big eyes, and seventy will be his inheritance from the people of Hellfire. Each one of them will have a pleasant vagina, and the man’s sexual organ will not bend down (during sexual intercourse) but will last long.

This is what Allah, the God of Muslims, has promised. This is something that surprises a Christian greatly because what is taught by Allah is not found at all with our God Jehovah. Here on earth is where there is wine, fruits, bird meat, marrying, mansions, cars, rivers, seas, and other things.

Consider, who is this Allah?

8. What Is the End of Those Who Worship Allah?

We know that Christians will live with our God Jehovah forever (see 1 Thessalonians 4:13-17 and Revelation 21:3-7). Thus, our God is eternal. But when we read the Quran and the Hadith of Muhammad, the Prophet of the Muslims, we see these teachings...

Quran 51:56 Surah Adh-Dhariyat (The Winnowing Winds)
"And I did not create the jinn and mankind except to worship Me."

Quran 6:128 Surah Al-An'am (The Cattle)
"And [mention, O Muhammad], the Day when He will gather them all and say, 'O company of jinn, you have misled many of mankind.' And their allies among mankind will say, 'Our Lord, we benefited from each other, and we have reached our term which You appointed for us.' He will say, 'The Fire is your residence, wherein you will abide eternally, except for what Allah wills. Indeed, your Lord is Wise and Knowing.'"

In these verses, we see that the jinn along with all people will be thrown into the fire. How about Allah? When we read the book of Hadith of the Prophet (s.a.w) called Sahih al-Bukhari Vol: VI Hadith No: 371. Page 353, there are these words:

Quran 50:30 Surah Qaf (The Letter Qaf)
"On the Day We will say to Hell, 'Have you been filled?' and it will say, 'Are there any more?'"

Narrated Anas: The Prophet said, "People will be thrown into the (Hell) Fire and it will say, 'Are there any more (to come)?' until Allah puts His Foot over it and it will say, 'Qat! Qat!' (Enough! Enough!)"

In English, this Hadith reads:

Allah's statement: It (Hell) will say, "Are there any more (to come)?" (50:30). Narrated Anas: The Prophet said, "People will be thrown into the (Hell) Fire and it will say, 'Are there any more (to come)?' (50:30) till Allah puts His Foot over it and it will say, 'Qat! Qat!' (Enough! Enough!)"

In this verse, we see that Allah, the god of Muslims, asks Hell if it is full, and Hell will ask Allah, "Are there any more?" This question implies that

Hell was not yet full.

The explanation of this Hadith confirms that Allah will place His foot in Hell, and then Hell will say, "Enough! Enough!" meaning it is full with the act of Allah putting His foot there. This is completely different from our God Jehovah, who has prepared Hell specifically for the wicked, the devil, and his angels. Please read these verses: Matthew 25:41, 46, Revelation 20:10, 21:8.

All these verses show that the end of the wicked, the devil, and his angels is in the lake of fire. Question for you, dear friend, who is Allah?

I hope that through the Quran, the Bible, and the Hadith of the Prophet Muhammad, you have been able to learn in depth that Allah Subhanahu Wa Ta'ala, the god worshipped by Muslims, is not Jehovah, the God we Christians worship.

Shalom

Dr. Max Shimba for Max Shimba Ministries Org

Islam’s Attitude Toward Africans: A Critical Analysis

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba | Shimba Theological Institute

Introduction

In recent decades, questions surrounding Islam’s attitude toward Black Africans have become increasingly relevant, particularly as some Islamic proponents seek to recruit African Americans by claiming that Islam is a “Black religion,” that its origins are African, or even that Muhammad himself was Black. This narrative is carefully constructed to appeal to Black audiences, while a different approach is used for non-Black groups. As such, it is crucial to scrutinize these claims, not through the lens of race or origin, but on the merits and actual teachings of Islam itself. This article draws primarily from Islamic sacred texts—the Qur’an and Hadith (specifically, Sahih al-Bukhari and Sahih Muslim)—to objectively evaluate Islam’s historical and scriptural relationship with Black Africans.


1. Africa Was Not the Cradle of Islam

Islam originated in the 7th century CE on the Arabian Peninsula, a region geographically situated in Asia, separated from Africa by the Red Sea. The claim that Islam is inherently African is historically inaccurate. The spread of Islam into Africa occurred after its birth in Arabia, and while Islam has a significant presence in Africa today, it did not originate there.
By contrast, Christianity’s presence in Africa dates back to the first century. Saint Mark, the author of the Gospel of Mark, was a North African Jew who preached Christianity in Egypt. From there, Christianity spread throughout North and sub-Saharan Africa. The early church recognized Black saints, such as Saint Moses the Black and Saint Tekla Haimanot (Ethiopia). Notably, one of the early church prophets and teachers was “Simeon Niger” (Acts 13:1), where “Niger” is Latin for “Black.” The first recorded African Christian was the Ethiopian official baptized by Philip (Acts 8:26–40).


2. Muhammad Was Not Black

Muhammad was an Arab from the Quraysh tribe, ethnically and phenotypically distinct from Black Africans. Multiple Islamic sources describe Muhammad as having a fair or white complexion:

  • Sahih al-Bukhari, Vol. 1, Hadith 63:
    “While we were sitting with the Prophet, a man came and asked, ‘Who among you is Muhammad?’ We replied, ‘This white man reclining on his arm…’”

  • Sahih al-Bukhari, Vol. 2, Hadith 122:
    Refers to Muhammad as a “white man.”

  • Sahih al-Bukhari, Vol. 2, Hadith 141:
    “The whiteness of his armpits became visible when he raised his arms.”

It is therefore a historical and textual error to portray Muhammad as a Black African.


3. Muhammad and the Issue of Black Slaves

Muhammad owned Black slaves. Notable among them were Bilal, Abu Huraira, Usama ibn Zayd, and a young slave named Rabbah. Even today, in Saudi Arabia—the birthplace of Islam—the common word for “Black person” is “Abd”, meaning “slave.” This reflects a deeply ingrained social hierarchy based on race.

Example from Hadith:

  • On one occasion, a man freed a female slave who was his concubine. Upon hearing this, Muhammad auctioned the boy she bore, selling him for 800 dirhams (Sahih Muslim, Vol. 7, p. 83).

  • The penalty for adultery varied based on status:
    A free man received 100 lashes and exile; a free woman was stoned to death; a slave woman received 100 lashes, but neither exile nor execution, because she was property and could be resold if she repeated the offense (Sahih al-Bukhari, Vol. 8:821, 822).


4. Islam’s Disparaging Attitude Toward Blacks

Islamic scriptures contain language and references that are derogatory toward Black people.

  • Muhammad referred to Black people as “raisins-heads” (Sahih al-Bukhari, Vol. 1, No. 662; Vol. 9, No. 256).

  • In another authentic hadith, Muhammad is quoted as saying, “Black people steal when they are hungry, and when they are full, they commit adultery” (Sahih Muslim).

  • Muhammad reportedly said, “You must obey your leader even if he is an Ethiopian slave with a flat nose”—a reference that reinforces both racial and class prejudice (Sahih Muslim, Vol. 9, pp. 46–47).


5. Islam and the Question of Freedom and Equality

Even if one were to erroneously claim that Islam began in Africa or that Muhammad was Black, these would not justify embracing Islam, particularly given its stance on human rights and freedom.

Islamic law and scripture do not champion religious freedom.
The Qur’an states:
“If anyone desires a religion other than Islam, never will it be accepted of him; and in the Hereafter he will be among the losers.” (Qur’an 3:85)

Islamic teachings include:

  • Men are superior to women: Qur’an 2:228

  • Women’s rights are half those of men:

    • In testimony: Qur’an 2:282

    • In inheritance: Qur’an 4:11

  • A man may beat his wife: Qur’an 4:34

  • A man may marry up to four wives: Qur’an 4:3

  • Muslims must fight until all opponents submit: Qur’an 9:5

  • A Muslim may not befriend Jews or Christians: Qur’an 5:54

  • Apostates must be killed: Qur’an 9:12

  • Theft punished by hand amputation: Qur’an 5:41

  • Adultery punished by flogging in public: Qur’an 24:2

  • No separation between religion and state: Qur’an 2:193

  • No dissent tolerated: Qur’an 4:59

These positions are in direct conflict with the ideals of civil and human rights.


6. Islam’s Contemporary Treatment of Black Africans

Claims that Islam cares about Black people are contradicted by ongoing abuses. For instance, Black Muslim communities in Sudan have been enslaved, persecuted, and massacred by Arab Muslims. Reports by the U.S. State Department have documented cases where Black Christians were captured and sold as slaves (U.S. State Dept., May 26, 1993).


7. The Christian Alternative

In contrast, Jesus Christ offers eternal life and true equality:
“There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.” (Galatians 3:28)
“You will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.” (John 8:32)
“Stand firm, then, and do not let yourselves be burdened again by a yoke of slavery.” (Galatians 5:1–2)

Christian teaching makes no racial, gender, or social distinctions before God.


Conclusion

The claims that Islam is a religion for Black people, or that it is African in origin, are both unfounded and manipulative. True religious commitment must be based on the content of faith, not race or geography.
Know the truth. Follow the truth. Spread the truth.


References

  1. The Qur’an, various translations (e.g., Abdullah Yusuf Ali, Sahih International).

  2. Sahih al-Bukhari, English translation, available from Darussalam Publishers.

  3. Sahih Muslim, English translation, available from Darussalam Publishers.

  4. The Holy Bible, New International Version (NIV).

  5. U.S. Department of State, Sudan Human Rights Reports (May 26, 1993).

  6. “Saint Moses the Black,” Orthodox Church in America, oca.org.

  7. “Acts of the Apostles,” Holy Bible, New Testament.

  8. John L. Esposito, Islam: The Straight Path. Oxford University Press, 2016.

  9. Bernard Lewis, Race and Slavery in the Middle East. Oxford University Press, 1992.


Bibliography

  • Esposito, John L. Islam: The Straight Path. Oxford University Press, 2016.

  • Lewis, Bernard. Race and Slavery in the Middle East: An Historical Enquiry. Oxford University Press, 1992.

  • Peters, F. E. Islam: A Guide for Jews and Christians. Princeton University Press, 2003.

  • “Saint Moses the Black.” Orthodox Church in America. https://www.oca.org/saints/lives

  • U.S. Department of State. “Sudan Human Rights Reports,” 1993.

  • The Holy Qur’an. Trans. Abdullah Yusuf Ali.

  • Sahih al-Bukhari and Sahih Muslim, Darussalam Publishers, various volumes.

  • The Holy Bible, New International Version.


Feel free to duplicate and distribute this tract for the purpose of education and truth.




Similarities Between Non-theism and Islam: A Critical Academic Analysis

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba, Shimba Theological Institute

Abstract

This article explores the purported similarities between non-theism and Islam, critically examining claims regarding the denial of God, beliefs about evolution, attitudes toward race and Christianity, and the concept of prophetic authority. Each exhibit is examined through theological, historical, and scholarly lenses, with relevant references to primary and secondary sources.


Introduction

The intersection of religious belief, or lack thereof, and the worldviews they engender, has long been a subject of theological debate. This article examines points of perceived similarity between non-theism (often associated with atheism and secular humanism) and Islam (as represented in classical Islamic doctrine and selected interpretations). The intent is to foster rigorous academic dialogue, rather than to incite polemic, by carefully interrogating claims and providing a balanced perspective informed by both religious texts and scholarly analysis.


Exhibit 1: Denial of the Existence of God

Claim:
Both non-theists and Muslims deny the existence of the true God.

Islam

Islam asserts strict monotheism (tawhid), expressed in the Shahada: “There is no god but Allah, and Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah” (Qur’an 3:18). However, from a Christian theological perspective, the Islamic concept of God (Allah) is considered distinct from the biblical Triune God (cf. Deuteronomy 6:4; Matthew 28:19).

Reference:

  • The Qur’an 3:18, 112:1–4

  • Partridge, C. (2013). Introduction to World Religions. Fortress Press.

Non-theism

Non-theism, particularly in its atheistic form, explicitly denies the existence of any deity (cf. Dawkins, The God Delusion, 2006).

Reference:

  • Dawkins, R. (2006). The God Delusion. Bantam.

Scholarly Note:
While Islam affirms the existence of Allah, non-theism categorically denies any deity. The claim of “denying the existence of God” requires clarification: Islam rejects the Christian concept of God but is not atheistic. Theological debates hinge on definitions of "God" (cf. Plantinga, God and Other Minds, 1967).


Exhibit 2: Beliefs About Evolution

Claim:
Both non-theists and Muslims support a form of evolution linking humans to primates.

Islam

Some interpretations of the Qur’an reference transformations as divine punishments, e.g., “those who transgressed were turned into apes and pigs” (Qur’an 2:65, 5:60, 7:166). Classical exegesis treats these as miraculous punishments, not evolutionary claims.

Reference:

  • The Qur’an 2:65, 5:60, 7:166

  • Ibn Kathir, Tafsir al-Qur’an al-Azim.

Non-theism

Modern non-theism often accepts Darwinian evolution, which posits humans and primates share common ancestry (cf. Darwin, On the Origin of Species, 1859).

Reference:

  • Darwin, C. (1859). On the Origin of Species. John Murray.

Scholarly Note:
The “transformation” in Islamic scripture is a supernatural event, distinct from scientific evolution. Non-theism grounds its belief in materialistic evolution, while traditional Islam neither affirms nor denies Darwinism as doctrine.


Exhibit 3: Racial Attitudes Toward Black Africans

Claim:
Both non-theists and Muslims harbor negative attitudes toward Black Africans.

Islam

Some controversial hadiths attribute pejorative descriptions to Black Africans (see al-Tabari, History vol. 1), but many Islamic scholars contest the authenticity or interpretation of such traditions. The Qur’an states, “O mankind! We created you from a single (pair) … and made you into nations and tribes, that you may know each other. Verily the most honored of you in the sight of Allah is he who is the most righteous” (Qur’an 49:13).

Reference:

  • The Qur’an 49:13

  • Lewis, B. (1990). Race and Slavery in the Middle East. Oxford University Press.

Non-theism

Historical non-theists, such as certain proponents of Social Darwinism, have at times propagated racist ideologies (cf. Spencer, The Principles of Biology, 1864). However, contemporary non-theism (e.g., secular humanism) formally rejects racism.

Reference:

  • Spencer, H. (1864). The Principles of Biology

  • Shermer, M. (2006). Why Darwin Matters. Holt.

Scholarly Note:
Sweeping generalizations risk misrepresentation. Both traditions contain diverse perspectives, and modern adherents often repudiate historical prejudices.


Exhibit 4: Attitudes Toward Christians

Claim:
Both non-theists and Muslims are hostile to Christianity.

Islam

Some Qur’anic verses warn against intimate alliances with non-Muslims (Qur’an 5:51). Other verses uphold peaceful coexistence and tolerance (Qur’an 2:256). Historical and political contexts greatly influence interpretation.

Reference:

  • The Qur’an 5:51, 2:256

  • Firestone, R. (1999). Jihad: The Origin of Holy War in Islam. Oxford.

Non-theism

Atheist regimes (e.g., Soviet Union) at times persecuted Christians, but non-theism as a philosophical stance varies widely regarding religion.

Reference:

  • Froese, P. (2008). The Plot to Kill God. University of California Press.

Scholarly Note:
Attributing hostility to entire worldviews requires careful qualification. Religious persecution has complex political, historical, and social causes.


Exhibit 5: Authority of Dead Prophets/Founders

Claim:
Both non-theists and Muslims revere the teachings of deceased leaders.

Islam

Muslims regard Muhammad as the final prophet, but not as divine; their ultimate authority is the Qur’an, believed to be God’s revelation (Qur’an 33:40).

Reference:

  • The Qur’an 33:40

  • Watt, W.M. (1953). Muhammad at Medina. Oxford.

Non-theism

Non-theists may draw inspiration from figures such as Charles Darwin, but do not attribute prophetic status or authority akin to religious veneration.

Reference:

  • Ruse, M. (2006). Darwinism and Its Discontents. Cambridge.

Scholarly Note:
The analogy between prophetic authority and scientific influence is tenuous; religious authority is rooted in revelation, while scientific legacy is subject to revision.


Conclusion

While the article identifies select parallels between non-theism and Islam, rigorous academic and theological analysis demonstrates substantial differences in foundational beliefs, historical contexts, and internal diversity. Scholarship urges caution against broad generalizations, emphasizing critical inquiry and contextual understanding.


References

  1. The Qur’an (various translations).

  2. Dawkins, R. (2006). The God Delusion. Bantam.

  3. Darwin, C. (1859). On the Origin of Species. John Murray.

  4. Ibn Kathir, Tafsir al-Qur’an al-Azim.

  5. Lewis, B. (1990). Race and Slavery in the Middle East. Oxford.

  6. Spencer, H. (1864). The Principles of Biology.

  7. Shermer, M. (2006). Why Darwin Matters. Holt.

  8. Firestone, R. (1999). Jihad: The Origin of Holy War in Islam. Oxford.

  9. Froese, P. (2008). The Plot to Kill God. University of California Press.

  10. Watt, W.M. (1953). Muhammad at Medina. Oxford.

  11. Ruse, M. (2006). Darwinism and Its Discontents. Cambridge.

  12. Partridge, C. (2013). Introduction to World Religions. Fortress Press.

  13. Plantinga, A. (1967). God and Other Minds. Cornell University Press.


Dr. Maxwell Shimba
Shimba Theological Institute


For further study or dialogue, please contact the Shimba Theological Institute, or consult the works listed in the bibliography.



Jesus is God Blessed Forever: An Exegetical and Theological Exposition

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba

Shimba Theological Institute


Abstract

This article presents a robust academic and theological case for the deity of Jesus Christ, focusing on two of the most explicit New Testament affirmations: Romans 9:5 and John 20:28. Through critical exegesis, historical contextualization, and doctrinal reflection, it demonstrates that the New Testament, in continuity with Old Testament monotheism yet in surprising fulfillment, identifies Jesus as “God blessed forever.” The implications for Christology, worship, and Christian identity are profound, challenging both historical and contemporary reductions of Christ’s divinity.


Introduction

The question of the identity of Jesus of Nazareth remains at the center of Christian theology. Among the manifold titles and descriptions ascribed to Him in the New Testament, none is more controversial or significant than the explicit identification of Jesus as God. Nowhere is this more pronounced than in Paul’s doxological exclamation in Romans 9:5 and in Thomas’s confession in John 20:28. This article investigates these texts, engaging exegetical scholarship, Greek syntax, patristic testimony, and the broader biblical-theological context.


I. Romans 9:5 – “Christ, who is God over all, blessed forever”

A. Text and Translation

Greek Text:
ὧν οἱ πατέρες, καὶ ἐξ ὧν ὁ Χριστός τὸ κατὰ σάρκα· ὁ ὢν ἐπὶ πάντων θεὸς εὐλογητὸς εἰς τοὺς αἰῶνας· ἀμήν.

English (ESV):
“To them belong the patriarchs, and from their race, according to the flesh, is the Christ, who is God over all, blessed forever. Amen.”

B. Exegetical Considerations

1. Grammatical Structure

  • The relative pronoun ὁ ὢν (“who is”) naturally connects to ὁ Χριστός (“the Christ”), making Christ the subject of the doxological statement.

  • The phrase ἐπὶ πάντων θεὸς (“God over all”) is best understood as an appositive to Christ, not as a separate benediction to God the Father.

  • The participial construction and word order in the Greek favor the interpretation that attributes deity directly to Christ.

2. Historical Interpretation

  • The early Church Fathers (e.g., Irenaeus, Tertullian, Athanasius) universally recognized Romans 9:5 as a direct affirmation of Christ’s deity.

  • Modern critical scholarship (cf. Cranfield, Moo, Wright) overwhelmingly supports the Christological reading.

3. Contextual Analysis

  • Romans 9:5 functions as the climax of Paul’s list of Israel’s privileges, culminating in the astonishing claim that the Messiah, from Israel according to the flesh, is none other than God over all.

C. Theological Significance

This text, in one unambiguous sentence, ascribes to Jesus both messianic and divine status, placing Him as the eternal object of blessing (“blessed forever”). Such language, reserved in Second Temple Judaism for YHWH alone (cf. Psalm 41:13; 72:19; 106:48), here applied to Christ, demonstrates the apostolic confession of His full deity.


II. John 20:28 – “My Lord and My God!”

A. Text and Translation

Greek Text:
ἀπεκρίθη Θωμᾶς καὶ εἶπεν αὐτῷ· Ὁ Κύριός μου καὶ ὁ Θεός μου.

English (ESV):
“Thomas answered him, ‘My Lord and my God!’”

B. Exegetical Considerations

1. Direct Address

  • Thomas responds directly to the risen Jesus, addressing Him as both “Lord” (κύριος) and “God” (θεός).

  • There is no syntactical or contextual warrant to understand this as a mere exclamation; it is a confession.

2. Johannine Christology

  • The Gospel of John opens with a high Christology (“the Word was God,” John 1:1) and climaxes with Thomas’s confession.

  • Jesus does not rebuke Thomas but affirms his faith, contrasting it with the seeing-not-believing motif for later disciples (John 20:29).

3. Intertextual Connections

  • “Lord and God” echoes Old Testament descriptions of YHWH (e.g., Psalm 35:23).

  • The structure anticipates post-resurrection worship directed toward Christ (cf. Revelation 5:13-14).

C. Theological Significance

John 20:28 serves as the Gospel’s ultimate Christological affirmation: Jesus, having conquered death, is worshiped not merely as a messianic figure, but as God incarnate. This confession becomes the foundational faith of the early church (cf. Philippians 2:10-11).


III. Patristic and Historical Witness

From the earliest centuries, Christian theologians have interpreted these passages as explicit affirmations of Christ’s deity. The Nicene Creed (“God from God, Light from Light, true God from true God”) codified this confession against Arian and subordinationist heresies.

  • Athanasius argued: “Paul calls Christ ‘God over all, blessed forever’…thus affirming that the Son is by nature true God.”

  • Augustine and Chrysostom echo similar interpretations.


IV. Contemporary Challenges and Responses

Skeptical or Unitarian readings often attempt to retranslate or recontextualize these passages. However, rigorous exegesis and historical theology refute such revisions:

  • The grammatical construction of Romans 9:5 does not permit a doxology to the Father distinct from Christ.

  • Contextual and narrative analysis of John 20:28 demands a high Christology, not a symbolic or honorific title.


V. Conclusion

Romans 9:5 and John 20:28 stand as monumental pillars in the New Testament witness to the full and unqualified deity of Jesus Christ. In identifying Christ as “God over all, blessed forever” and receiving worship as “Lord and God,” the early church did not depart from Jewish monotheism, but rather confessed its fulfillment in the incarnate Son. This conviction undergirds Christian worship, soteriology, and ecclesiology, compelling believers of every generation to echo Thomas’s confession and Paul’s doxology—Jesus Christ is God blessed forever.


References

  • Cranfield, C. E. B. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans. T&T Clark, 1975.

  • Dunn, James D. G. Romans 9–16. Word Biblical Commentary, 1988.

  • Hurtado, Larry W. Lord Jesus Christ: Devotion to Jesus in Earliest Christianity. Eerdmans, 2003.

  • Wright, N. T. Paul and the Faithfulness of God. Fortress Press, 2013.

  • Bauckham, Richard. Jesus and the God of Israel. Eerdmans, 2008.

  • Athanasius, Against the Arians.

  • Augustine, On the Trinity.


Dr. Maxwell Shimba
Shimba Theological Institute



BREAKING VIDEO: IDF pounding Hezbollah training compounds

  BREAKING VIDEO: IDF pounding Hezbollah training compounds. The targets included a Radwan Force training facility used for weapons drills ...

TRENDING NOW