Thursday, July 10, 2025

Did Prophet Muhammad Celebrate the Birth of Jesus Christ?

Did Prophet Muhammad Celebrate the Birth of Jesus Christ?

Historical Narration from Islamic Sources

According to a narration attributed to ʿĀʾisha, the wife of Prophet Muhammad, it is claimed:

“The Prophet of Allah used to celebrate the birthday of the Prophet Jesus, son of Mary, every year on the twenty-fifth day of the twelfth month by inviting the Abyssinians (Habesha) who would sing and perform in the mosque.”

Source:
ʿUmdat al-Akhwān, Volume 4, Page 299.

Arabic Text:
وروت زوجة عائشة محمد:
"كان نبي الله يحتفل بمولد النبي عيسى بن مريم كل يوم الخامس والعشرين من الشهر الثاني عشر بدعوة الأحباش الذين يغنون ويغنون في المسجد."
عمدة الأخان المجلد 4 ، صفحة 299

Transliteration:
Warawat zawjat ʿĀʾisha Muḥammad:
"Kan Nabī Allāh yaḥtafil bimawlid al-Nabī ʿĪsā ibn Maryam kulla yawm al-khamīs wal-ʿishrīn min al-shahr al-thānī ʿashar bidaʿwat al-Aḥbāsh alladhīna yughannūna wa yuʿriḍūna fī al-masjid."
ʿUmdat al-Akhwān, Volume 4, Page 299


Academic Commentary and Context

This narration, if authentic, presents an intriguing cultural and interfaith dimension in early Islamic tradition, wherein Prophet Muhammad is said to have acknowledged the birth of Jesus (ʿĪsā ibn Maryam) with a communal gathering, including performances by the Abyssinians (from modern-day Ethiopia/Eritrea) inside the mosque. The reported date—the 25th of the 12th month—coincides with December 25th, which is recognized in much of the Christian world as Christmas Day, the celebration of the birth of Jesus Christ.

Critical Analysis of the Source

While this text is attributed to ʿUmdat al-Akhwān, a reference not widely recognized or authenticated within mainstream Sunni or Shia canonical Hadith literature (like Sahih al-Bukhari, Sahih Muslim, Sunan Abu Dawood, etc.), its mention raises questions about early Muslim-Christian relations and mutual recognition of significant prophetic figures.

If this tradition holds any historical value, it may reflect a tolerant and inclusive practice in Medina's early Islamic community, where cultural expressions by minorities like the Abyssinians were incorporated into religious gatherings.

However, it should be noted:

  • Classical Muslim scholars do not generally record any sanctioned Islamic celebration of Jesus' birthday.

  • The mainstream Islamic position today does not recognize Christmas or Mawlid (Prophet's birthday celebrations) as religiously mandated practices.

  • The concept of celebrating birthdays, including those of prophets, has historically been a point of contention in Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh).

Possible Origins and Cultural Influence

It is possible that early Muslims, many of whom had close cultural and religious interactions with Christian communities—especially those from Abyssinia, which embraced Christianity long before Islam—might have informally acknowledged Christian feasts within a broader spirit of coexistence.

Modern Relevance

In contemporary interfaith dialogues, references like this can be valuable for promoting mutual respect and historical acknowledgment of shared figures like Jesus, who is honored in Islam as a mighty prophet and the Messiah (al-Masīḥ). It also invites reflection on how religious practices evolve and how early Islamic history was more culturally diverse than often portrayed.


Conclusion

While this narration remains outside the authenticated corpus of Hadith literature, it offers a fascinating lens into early Islamic communal life and possible interactions with Christian customs. It highlights the Prophet Muhammad’s reputed openness to cultural expressions within religious contexts and the potential for harmony between Abrahamic faiths.



Did Prophet Muhammad Celebrate Christmas?

Did Prophet Muhammad Celebrate Christmas? A Structured Apologetic Essay

Introduction

Within interfaith dialogues between Christianity and Islam, one of the most compelling areas of discussion is the historical and theological relationship between Prophet Muhammad and Jesus Christ. While Islam reveres Jesus (ʿĪsā ibn Maryam) as a mighty prophet and Messiah, it officially rejects the doctrines of His divinity and crucifixion. Yet, there exist lesser-known narratives within Islamic literature that suggest Prophet Muhammad might have acknowledged Jesus in ways not commonly recognized today. One such narration claims that Prophet Muhammad celebrated the birthday of Jesus every year on December 25th by inviting Abyssinians (Habesha) to perform in the mosque. This essay seeks to present this claim, analyze its authenticity, and discuss its implications for apologetics and interfaith understanding.


Historical Claim: The Celebration of Jesus’ Birth in Early Islam

A narration attributed to ʿĀʾisha, the wife of Prophet Muhammad, records:

“The Prophet of Allah used to celebrate the birthday of the Prophet Jesus, son of Mary, every year on the twenty-fifth day of the twelfth month by inviting the Abyssinians who would sing and perform in the mosque.”

Source:
ʿUmdat al-Akhwān, Volume 4, Page 299.

This account describes an annual event that appears strikingly similar to what Christians commemorate as Christmas. The participation of Abyssinians, known historically as one of the first Christian nations, adds weight to the possibility of cultural exchanges between early Muslims and neighboring Christian communities.


Textual and Historical Analysis

Authenticity of the Source
While this narration provides a fascinating glimpse into early Islamic social life, its authenticity remains questionable. ʿUmdat al-Akhwān is not among the six canonical Sunni Hadith collections (Sahih al-Bukhari, Sahih Muslim, Sunan Abu Dawood, Sunan al-Tirmidhi, Sunan al-Nasa’i, and Sunan Ibn Majah), nor is it recognized in the major Shiite Hadith compilations. Its chains of transmission (isnad) are not documented in prominent biographical dictionaries of Hadith narrators (rijāl literature), raising legitimate concerns about its reliability.

However, the context of Abyssinian performances in the mosque is corroborated in Sahih al-Bukhari and Sahih Muslim, where ʿĀʾisha recounts witnessing Abyssinians playing with spears in the mosque during Eid celebrations. This cultural openness suggests that early Islamic society did accommodate artistic and cultural expressions within religious settings, especially among minorities.

Possible Cultural Influence
Given Islam's emergence in a region surrounded by Christian and Jewish communities, and the Prophet's early interactions with Abyssinian Christians (notably the King of Axum who protected early Muslim refugees), it is conceivable that shared commemorations occurred informally, though not as religiously mandated observances.


Apologetic and Theological Implications

Affirming the Honor of Jesus in Islam
This narration, even if apocryphal, reinforces the significant position of Jesus in Islamic theology. The Qur’an refers to Jesus as al-Masīḥ (the Messiah) and speaks of His miraculous birth, signs, and ascension (Qur’an 3:45–55; 4:157–158; 5:110). Celebrating His birth within the early Islamic community would reflect continuity with the prophetic tradition and acknowledgment of Jesus' importance in salvation history.

Interfaith Harmony and Historical Openness
For Christian apologists, such a narration is a valuable resource in demonstrating points of convergence between Christianity and Islam. It presents a historical moment where religious boundaries were more fluid and cultural exchange was encouraged within religious spaces. This opens a constructive avenue for promoting modern interfaith understanding, anchored in shared reverence for prophetic figures.

Revisiting Contemporary Islamic Prohibitions
Today, many Islamic scholars condemn the celebration of birthdays, including the Prophet Muhammad’s (Mawlid an-Nabi) and other religious commemorations, labeling them as innovations (bidʿah). If such a practice as celebrating Jesus' birth under Muhammad's leadership were ever historically validated, it would challenge rigid contemporary positions and encourage a reevaluation of early Islamic cultural plurality.


Conclusion

Though the narration from ʿUmdat al-Akhwān lacks robust authentication by canonical Islamic standards, its content offers a fascinating lens through which to consider early Islamic attitudes toward Christianity and its prophetic figures. It suggests a society where interfaith coexistence and cultural exchange were possible and even encouraged under the Prophet’s leadership. For Christian and Muslim scholars alike, this narrative, whether historical or legendary, can serve as a meaningful touchpoint for dialogue about the shared legacies of Jesus Christ and Prophet Muhammad. It also invites deeper reflection on the evolution of religious practices and prohibitions within Islam, compared to its earliest expressions.


References

  • ʿUmdat al-Akhwān, Volume 4, Page 299.

  • Sahih al-Bukhari, Hadith No. 949.

  • Sahih Muslim, Book of the Two Eid Festivals.

  • The Qur'an: 3:45–55; 4:157–158; 5:110.



God Has No Religion

 Title: God Has No Religion: A Theological Exposition of the Christian Doctrine of Salvation through Jesus Christ

Author: Dr. Maxwell Shimba
Max Shimba Ministries Org
Shimba Theological Institute


Preface

This work seeks to address one of the most profound spiritual truths within Christian theology: the nature of the relationship between God and humanity, and the exclusive means through which reconciliation is made possible — Jesus Christ. It underscores the insufficiency of human-devised religious systems and highlights the necessity of divine intervention through the person and work of Jesus Christ. By exploring scriptural affirmations and doctrinal foundations, this document aims to present a clear and scholarly articulation of the Christian gospel.


God Has No Religion

God, in His holiness, has no association with sin. There exists a vast chasm of sin between God and humanity. Humanity has long attempted to bridge this separation through various means such as religion, good deeds, and prayers; yet none of these are sufficient to restore the broken relationship. Humanity remains inherently sinful (Romans 3:23).

Religion is humanity’s attempt to establish a relationship with God through personal effort. In contrast, the Christian faith is a relationship with God made possible through the crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus Christ (Ephesians 2:8-9).

There exists only one way to reconcile with God:

Jesus Christ is the only way to remove sin.

He died for us so that we might know God’s love and divine purpose for our lives.

Christ’s Purpose in Death

“For Christ also suffered once for sins, the righteous for the unrighteous, to bring you to God.” (1 Peter 3:18, NIV)

Christ’s suffering and death were to bridge the chasm between God and humanity and to manifest God’s redeeming love.

The Resurrection of Christ

“Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures.” (1 Corinthians 15:3-4, NIV)

The resurrection of Christ affirms His divine identity and the validity of His redemptive work.

Jesus: The Only Way

“Jesus answered, ‘I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.’” (John 14:6, NIV)

Human effort alone cannot facilitate communion with God. God, therefore, sent Jesus to die on the cross for our sins and to become the bridge between God and humanity.

Receiving Christ

One must personally receive Jesus Christ as both Savior and Lord to experience God’s love and purpose.

“Yet to all who did receive him, to those who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God.” (John 1:12, NIV)

“For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith—and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God—not by works, so that no one can boast.” (Ephesians 2:8-9, NIV)

Inviting Christ into One’s Life

“Here I am! I stand at the door and knock. If anyone hears my voice and opens the door, I will come in...” (Revelation 3:20, NIV)

To receive Christ is to:

  • Recognize oneself as a sinner.

  • Repent and turn away from self-governance.

  • Trust God for complete forgiveness.

  • Welcome Christ to reign in one’s life.

A Model Prayer for Receiving Christ

Lord Jesus Christ, I need You. I acknowledge that I am a sinner. I confess that I have governed my life independently and have been separated from You. Thank You for dying on the cross for my sins. I turn now and repent. Lord, I invite You into my life to rule and transform me into the person You desire. Amen.

Assurance of Salvation

If you have genuinely invited Christ into your life:

  • Christ now resides in you (Revelation 3:20).

  • Your sins are forgiven (Colossians 1:14).

  • You are a child of God (John 1:12).

  • You will increasingly understand God’s plan for your life (2 Corinthians 5:17).

Eternal Life in Christ

“And this is the testimony: God has given us eternal life, and this life is in his Son. Whoever has the Son has life; whoever does not have the Son of God does not have life.” (1 John 5:11-13, NIV)

Thank God daily for His indwelling presence. Christ promises never to forsake you (Matthew 28:20).

Do Not Rely on Feelings

Human emotions fluctuate. Regardless of feelings, Jesus Christ remains constant (Hebrews 13:8). We rely not on subjective emotions but on the unchanging truth of God’s Word.

“If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just and will forgive us our sins.” (1 John 1:9, NIV)

Growing Spiritually

As a newborn Christian, one must cultivate spiritual maturity:

  • Pray daily (John 15:7).

  • Read the Bible regularly (Acts 17:11).

  • Obey God consistently (John 14:21).

  • Testify about Christ in word and deed (Matthew 4:19; John 15:8).

  • Trust God in all matters (1 Peter 5:7).

  • Be filled with the Holy Spirit (Galatians 5:16-18; Acts 1:8).

The Importance of Fellowship

“Let us not give up meeting together, as some are in the habit of doing, but encouraging one another.” (Hebrews 10:25, NIV)

Just as a single coal removed from a fire cools quickly, a solitary Christian will falter spiritually. Engage actively with a Bible-believing church community.


Bibliography

  • The Holy Bible, New International Version (NIV).

  • Bruce, F.F. The New Testament Documents: Are They Reliable? Eerdmans, 2003.

  • Stott, John. Basic Christianity. InterVarsity Press, 2008.

  • Lewis, C.S. Mere Christianity. HarperOne, 2001.

  • Packer, J.I. Knowing God. InterVarsity Press, 1993.


Max Shimba Ministries Org
Dr. Maxwell Shimba
Shimba Theological Institute

(2025 Edition)

Is the Heaven of Jehovah the Same as the Paradise of Allah?

 Title: Is the Heaven of Jehovah the Same as the Paradise of Allah?

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba
Shimba Theological Institute
August 3, 2015

Abstract:
This article presents a comparative theological analysis of the Christian biblical concept of heaven as taught by Jehovah, and the Islamic depiction of paradise as promised by Allah. The study draws from canonical Christian Scriptures and Islamic primary sources—the Qur’an and Hadith literature—to demonstrate the fundamental doctrinal differences in eschatological beliefs concerning the afterlife in Christianity and Islam.

Introduction:
The nature of the afterlife has long been a central theme in both Christian and Islamic theology. While both faiths affirm the existence of an afterlife, their descriptions of its nature, rewards, and experiences differ considerably. This paper examines the biblical vision of heaven and contrasts it with the Qur’anic and Hadith descriptions of paradise, raising critical theological reflections.

1. The Christian Concept of Heaven:
According to Luke 20:34–36 (New International Version):

"Jesus replied, 'The people of this age marry and are given in marriage. But those who are considered worthy of taking part in the age to come and in the resurrection from the dead will neither marry nor be given in marriage, and they can no longer die; for they are like the angels. They are God’s children, since they are children of the resurrection.'"

This passage confirms that in the Christian heaven, there is no marriage, for the redeemed will possess spiritual bodies (1 Corinthians 15:43–54). Additionally, Romans 14:17 affirms:

"For the kingdom of God is not a matter of eating and drinking, but of righteousness, peace and joy in the Holy Spirit."

Further, Revelation 7:16–17 states:

"Never again will they hunger; never again will they thirst. The sun will not beat down on them, nor any scorching heat. For the Lamb at the center of the throne will be their shepherd; ‘he will lead them to springs of living water.’ ‘And God will wipe away every tear from their eyes.’"

This biblical portrayal focuses on spiritual fulfillment, communion with God, and eternal peace without physical indulgences.

2. The Islamic Concept of Paradise (Jannah):
In contrast, the Islamic depiction of paradise includes tangible and sensual rewards:

i) Palatial Mansions:
Qur’an 39:20 (Surat Az-Zumar):

"But those who feared their Lord will have lofty dwellings, one above another, beneath which rivers flow. [That is] the promise of Allah. Never does Allah fail in His promise."

ii) Rivers of various drinks and fruits:
Qur’an 47:15 (Surat Muhammad):

"A description of the Paradise which the righteous are promised: In it are rivers of unpolluted water, rivers of milk the taste of which never changes, rivers of wine delicious to those who drink, and rivers of purified honey, in which they will have all kinds of fruits, and forgiveness from their Lord."

Qur’an 2:25 (Surat Al-Baqarah):

"And give good tidings to those who believe and do righteous deeds that they will have gardens [in Paradise] beneath which rivers flow. Whenever they are provided with a provision of fruit therefrom, they will say, ‘This is what we were provided with before.’ And it is given to them in likeness. And they will have therein purified spouses, and they will abide therein eternally."

iii) Provision of Women and Sexual Rewards:
Qur’an 56:21–23 (Surat Al-Waqi‘ah):

"And the flesh of fowls, any that they may desire. And [there will be] fair ones with wide, lovely eyes, like unto hidden pearls."

Qur’an 37:48–49 (Surat As-Saffat):

"And with them will be women limiting [their] glances, with large, [beautiful] eyes, as if they were [delicate] eggs, well protected."

Qur’an 37:44–46:

"They will be on thrones facing each other. There will be circulated among them a cup [of wine] from a flowing spring, white and delicious to the drinkers."

iv) Hadith Description of Sexual Rewards:
Hadith literature further elaborates on these sensual aspects. In Sunan Ibn Majah, Vol. 5, Hadith No. 4337:

"It was narrated from Abu Umamah that the Messenger of Allah (peace be upon him) said: 'Allah will not admit anyone into Paradise except Allah, the Mighty and Glorious, will marry him to seventy-two wives, two from the women of Paradise (Hur al-‘Ayn) and seventy from his inheritance of the people of Hell. Every one of them will have a pleasant vagina, and the male’s sexual organ will never become flaccid.'"

3. Critical Reflection:
From a Christian theological perspective, such physical and sensual indulgences in the afterlife appear incongruent with the biblical portrayal of heaven. Christianity teaches that worldly pleasures such as alcohol, sexual relations, and material opulence belong to earthly life, while the eternal kingdom of God transcends physical needs and is characterized by righteousness, peace, and the beatific vision of God.

Conclusion:
The comparison above highlights substantial theological divergences between Christian and Islamic eschatologies. While Christianity envisages heaven as a realm of spiritual glorification, eternal communion with God, and freedom from earthly desires, Islam offers a paradise of physical pleasures and sensual rewards. This raises important questions about the theological nature of each religion’s ultimate hope and conception of divine-human fellowship in eternity.

References:

  • The Holy Bible, New International Version (NIV)

  • The Holy Qur’an, translations by Abdullah Yusuf Ali and Saheeh International

  • Sunan Ibn Majah, Vol. 5, Hadith No. 4337

Bibliography:

Ali, Abdullah Yusuf. The Meaning of the Holy Qur'an. Amana Publications, 2004.

Saeed, Abdullah. Interpreting the Qur'an: Towards a Contemporary Approach. Routledge, 2006.

Al-Bukhari, Muhammad ibn Ismail. Sahih al-Bukhari. Various translations.

Ibn Majah, Muhammad. Sunan Ibn Majah. Darussalam Publishers, 2007.

Holy Bible, New International Version. Biblica, 2011.

Dr. Maxwell Shimba
Shimba Theological Institute
August 3, 2015

Is the City Chosen by Allah the Same as That Chosen by Jehovah?

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba

Shimba Theological Institute | Max Shimba Ministries Org.

Introduction

The concept of sacred cities is central to both Islam and the Judeo-Christian tradition. However, an examination of Islamic and Biblical scriptures reveals a distinct difference between the city chosen by Allah in the Qur'an and the city chosen by Jehovah in the Bible. This paper investigates the cities designated as sacred by these two faiths and provides scriptural evidence for each, concluding with a theological analysis of the implications of these differences.


The City Chosen by Allah

According to the Qur'an, Allah chose the city of Mecca (Makkah) as his sacred city. Several verses explicitly affirm this:

  1. Surah An-Naml (The Ants) 27:91 states:

    “For me, I have been commanded to serve the Lord of this city (Makkah), Him Who has sanctified it and to Whom belongs all things…”
    (Qur'an 27:91, Yusuf Ali Translation)

  2. Surah Aal-Imran (The Family of Imran) 3:96 reads:

    “The first House (of worship) appointed for men was that at Bakka (another name for Mecca), full of blessing and of guidance for all kinds of beings.”
    (Qur'an 3:96, Yusuf Ali Translation)

  3. Surah Quraysh 106:3-4 affirms:

    “So let them worship the Lord of this House, Who provides them with food against hunger, and with security against fear.”
    (Qur'an 106:3-4, Yusuf Ali Translation)

From these passages, it is evident that Allah, the deity worshipped by Muslims, chose Mecca as his holy city and the site of his sacred house, the Ka’ba. The Prophet Muhammad was also commanded to worship the Lord of this city (Qur'an 27:91). This forms a central pillar of Islamic belief and practice.


The City Chosen by Jehovah

In contrast, the Bible clearly identifies Jerusalem as the city chosen by Jehovah (YHWH), the God of Israel. This is confirmed in multiple passages:

  1. 2 Chronicles 6:4-6:

    “And he said: Blessed be the Lord, the God of Israel, who with his hands has fulfilled what he promised with his mouth to my father David, saying: Since the day that I brought my people out of the land of Egypt, I have chosen no city in all the tribes of Israel to build a house in, that my name might be there; neither chose I any man to be a ruler over my people Israel; but I have chosen Jerusalem, that my name might be there, and have chosen David to be over my people Israel.”
    (2 Chronicles 6:4-6, KJV)

Other Biblical references affirm this divine choice:

  • 2 Chronicles 12:13

  • Ezra 6:12

  • Ezra 7:15, 27

  • Psalm 26:8

  • Zechariah 2:12

The Hebrew name Yerushalayim (Jerusalem) means “foundation of peace.” Even during their exile, the Israelites would kneel and pray facing Jerusalem, as recorded in Daniel 6:10:

“Now when Daniel knew that the writing was signed, he went into his house; and his windows being open in his chamber toward Jerusalem, he kneeled upon his knees three times a day, and prayed, and gave thanks before his God, as he did aforetime.”
(Daniel 6:10, KJV)


Theological Implication

Through these texts, it is evident that the city chosen by Jehovah is Jerusalem, while the city chosen by Allah is Mecca. This is a significant distinction between the two faiths. While both religions recognize sacred spaces, their choice of cities reflects divergent theological narratives and historical identities. In the Biblical tradition, Jerusalem stands as the eternal city of God (Psalm 132:13-14), whereas in Islam, Mecca holds this esteemed position.

This distinction also serves as an indicator that the deity of the Qur'an is not the same as the God of the Bible. The different sacred cities and theological frameworks suggest that Allah is not Jehovah but represents a distinct religious construct introduced through Islamic revelation.


Conclusion

In summary:

  • The Qur'an designates Mecca as the holy city of Allah, the location of the Ka'ba, and the birthplace of Islam's central religious rites.

  • The Bible identifies Jerusalem as the city of Jehovah, where His name dwells and where the Temple was established for His worship.

Therefore, from a scriptural and theological standpoint, it is clear that Allah of the Qur'an is not the God of the Bible.


References

  • Holy Bible, King James Version.

  • The Qur'an, translated by Abdullah Yusuf Ali.

  • 2 Chronicles 6:4-6; 12:13

  • Ezra 6:12; 7:15, 27

  • Psalm 26:8; 132:13-14

  • Daniel 6:10

  • Zechariah 2:12

  • Qur'an 27:91 (Surah An-Naml)

  • Qur'an 3:96 (Surah Aal-Imran)

  • Qur'an 106:3-4 (Surah Quraysh)


Bibliography

  1. Ali, Abdullah Yusuf. The Holy Qur'an: Text, Translation, and Commentary. Tahrike Tarsile Qur'an, 2001.

  2. Barker, Kenneth L. The NIV Study Bible. Zondervan, 2011.

  3. Bruce, F. F. Israel and the Nations: The History of Israel from the Exodus to the Fall of the Second Temple. InterVarsity Press, 1963.

  4. Smith, William. Smith's Bible Dictionary. Hendrickson Publishers, 1999.

  5. Shimba, Maxwell. Comparative Theology: The Biblical God vs. the Quranic Allah. Shimba Theological Institute, 2025.



Allah Wears Clothes Like His Creatures

Allah Wears Clothes Like His Creatures: A Theological Inquiry

By Max Shimba Ministries Org.
Monday, August 3, 2015


Introduction

Dear brethren,

This matter presents yet another theological dilemma concerning the Islamic concept of Allah. The Allah of Islam, who has claimed in various Qur'anic verses that He has no likeness and cannot be compared to anything in existence, surprisingly contradicts Himself in certain hadith literature by implying that He wears garments, possesses physical attributes such as hands, eyes, and ears — essentially, attributes analogous to His creation.

In this paper, we shall examine this issue critically, drawing upon authoritative Islamic sources to demonstrate how such descriptions contradict the fundamental Islamic claim of Allah’s absolute incomparability (tanzīh) and transcendence.


Textual Evidence from Islamic Sources

Let us proceed directly to the evidences drawn from the hadith collections revered in Islam:

1. Allah Wears Clothes

In an authentic Hadith Qudsi, Allah is quoted as saying:

"Al-Kibriyā’ ridā’ī, wa al-‘aẓamah izārī."
"Pride is My upper garment and greatness is My lower garment."1

This statement presents a profound theological problem. If Allah is said to wear an upper and lower garment — metaphorically or literally — it implies a physical form upon which these garments rest. This raises critical philosophical and theological concerns about the supposed incorporeal nature of Allah. If Allah has garments, does He then have a body to adorn them? And if He has a body, is He not then comparable to created beings, contradicting His own claim in the Qur'an:

لَيْسَ كَمِثْلِهِ شَيْءٌ
"There is nothing like unto Him." (Qur'an 42:11)

Thus, the claim of Allah’s transcendence is undermined by this hadith.


2. Allah Has Eyes, Hands, Ears, and Feet

In another well-known Hadith Qudsi recorded in Sahih al-Bukhari, Allah says:

“…And My servant does not draw near to Me with anything more beloved to Me than the religious duties I have obligated upon him; and My servant continues to draw near to Me with supererogatory works so that I shall love him. And when I love him, I become his hearing with which he hears, his sight with which he sees, his hand with which he strikes, and his foot with which he walks.”2

In this passage, Allah claims to possess ears, eyes, hands, and feet, once again implying anthropomorphic attributes. While Islamic scholars have classically attempted to interpret such narrations metaphorically (ta’wīl) or consign their meaning to Allah (tafwīḍ), the explicit wording of these narrations leaves significant ambiguity.

If one upholds the literal reading, as many traditionalists (Ahl al-Hadith) have, it would imply that Allah possesses bodily attributes akin to His creation, directly violating the Qur'anic proclamation of uniqueness and incomparability.


The Theological Dilemma

Dear readers, it is now evident that according to Islamic hadith literature, Allah is described in terms familiar to human beings — wearing garments, possessing sensory organs, and bodily limbs. This undermines the claim that Allah is utterly unlike His creation and exposes a serious doctrinal contradiction within Islamic theology.

If Allah is attributed with garments and physical traits, how then can He be fundamentally different from created beings? This conundrum raises difficult questions for the doctrine of divine transcendence in Islam and warrants deeper examination.


Conclusion

This analysis reveals profound inconsistencies within Islamic theology regarding the nature of Allah. While the Qur'an categorically denies that anything resembles Allah, several authentic hadith narrations attribute to Him anthropomorphic characteristics. These contradictions cannot be dismissed lightly, as they touch upon the very essence of divinity and the nature of God as understood within Islam.


References


Bibliography

  1. Al-Bukhari, Muhammad ibn Ismail. Sahih al-Bukhari. Translated by Muhammad Muhsin Khan. Riyadh: Darussalam, 1997.

  2. Abu Dawud, Sulaiman ibn al-Ash‘ath. Sunan Abu Dawud. Translated by Nasiruddin al-Khattab. Riyadh: Darussalam, 2008.

  3. Muslim ibn al-Hajjaj. Sahih Muslim. Translated by Abdul Hamid Siddiqui. Lahore: Sh. Muhammad Ashraf, 1976.

  4. The Qur'an. Translated by M.A.S. Abdel Haleem. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.

  5. Watt, W. Montgomery. Islamic Philosophy and Theology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1985.


Max Shimba Ministries Org © 2015. All Rights Reserved.
Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this license document, but changing it is not allowed.


Would you like me to prepare a PDF layout or a clean formatted DOCX version as well? I can assist with that too.

Footnotes

  1. Abu Dawud, Sunan Abu Dawud, Book of Sunnah, Hadith no. 4090; also reported in Sahih Muslim, Kitab al-Birr wa al-Silah, Hadith no. 2620.

  2. Al-Bukhari, Sahih al-Bukhari, Book 76: Book of Softening the Hearts, Hadith no. 6502; also in Kitab al-Riqaq.

Does Allah Have Hands Like Created Beings?

 Title: Does Allah Have Hands Like Created Beings? An Analytical Examination of Islamic Texts

Author: Dr. Maxwell Shimba

Published by: Max Shimba Ministries Org.

Date: August 3, 2015

Introduction
This paper explores a provocative theological inquiry: Does Allah, as depicted in Islamic scripture and tradition, possess hands and eyes similar to those of created beings? By examining select Qur'anic verses and Hadith narrations, and juxtaposing them with Islamic theological positions, this study seeks to critically analyze whether the anthropomorphic descriptions in Islamic texts imply a corporeal deity.

Qur'anic Passages Referencing the Hands of Allah
One of the primary passages frequently cited is:

Az-Zumar (39:67):
"They did not appraise Allah with true appraisal, while the earth entirely will be within His grip on the Day of Resurrection, and the heavens will be folded in His right hand. Exalted is He and high above what they associate with Him."

Additionally, Al-Ma'idah (5:64) states:
"The Jews say, 'Allah's hand is chained.' Chained are their hands, and cursed are they for what they say. Rather, both His hands are extended; He spends however He wills."

Other relevant verses include:

Yasin (36:83): "So exalted is He in whose hand is the realm of all things, and to Him you will be returned."

Ali 'Imran (3:26): "Say, 'O Allah, Owner of Sovereignty, You give sovereignty to whom You will and You take sovereignty away from whom You will. You honor whom You will and You humble whom You will. In Your hand is [all] good. Indeed, You are over all things competent.'"

Sad (38:75): "[Allah] said, 'O Iblis, what prevented you from prostrating to that which I created with My hands? Are you arrogant, or are you among the exalted?'"

Hadith Evidence
According to narrations in Sunni compilations, Abu Huraira reported that the Prophet Muhammad said:

"Allah created Adam with His own hands and wrote the Torah for Moses with His own hands."

Another hadith states:
"Allah descends to the nearest heaven and stretches out His two hands, saying…"

Theological Commentary
Islamic theologians from various schools—Ash'ari, Maturidi, Hanbali, and others—have engaged extensively with these anthropomorphic expressions. The traditional Sunni creed acknowledges Allah’s 'hands' and 'face' as mentioned in the Qur’an and Sunnah but asserts that these attributes are unique to Allah and bear no resemblance to human characteristics.

A popular theological analogy explains: A table and a person both have 'legs,' but the nature of these legs differs. Similarly, Allah's 'hands' are befitting His majesty and beyond human comprehension.

Additional Qur'anic Descriptions: Eyes of Allah
The Qur'an also references Allah's 'eyes':

Hud (11:37): "And construct the ship under Our eyes and Our revelation…"

Another hadith states:
"The Dajjal is one-eyed, and your Lord is not one-eyed."

These descriptions, like those of Allah's 'hands,' are interpreted by theologians within the framework of bilā kayf (without asking how) and tanzīh (declaring Allah's incomparability).

Do These Attributes Imply Corporeality?
Max Shimba Ministries contends that anthropomorphic language, if taken literally, challenges Islamic claims of Allah's absolute transcendence. If Allah possesses 'hands' and 'eyes' in any form comparable to creation, this could imply corporeality.

Conclusion
This analysis reveals significant anthropomorphic language within the Qur’an and Hadith. Traditional Islamic theology resolves this tension through principles of tanzīh and bilā kayf, affirming the attributes without likening them to human attributes. However, literalist interpretations risk portraying Allah as a corporeal being, conflicting with Islamic assertions of divine incomparability.

References

  1. The Qur'an: Az-Zumar (39:67), Al-Ma'idah (5:64), Yasin (36:83), Ali 'Imran (3:26), Sad (38:75), Hud (11:37)

  2. Sahih al-Bukhari and Sahih Muslim compilations of hadith via Abu Huraira

  3. Al-Ash'ari, Kitab al-Luma' (The Book of Flashes)

  4. Ibn Taymiyyah, Majmu' al-Fatawa

  5. Al-Ghazali, Ihya Ulum al-Din

About the Author
Dr. Maxwell Shimba is the founder of Max Shimba Ministries Org., a theologian and religious commentator focusing on comparative religion, biblical theology, and critical Islamic studies.

© 2015 Max Shimba Ministries Org. All rights reserved.
Permission is granted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this document for non-commercial use only.

Anthropomorphic Descriptions of Allah in Islamic Texts

 Title: Anthropomorphic Descriptions of Allah in Islamic Texts: A Critical Examination

Author: Dr. Maxwell Shimba
Max Shimba Ministries Org ©2015


Introduction

Dear brothers and sisters,

I begin by addressing what I consider a significant theological dilemma for our Muslim friends, particularly those who, through the lineage of Adam, assert that Allah has no likeness. Today, I intend to provide several examples as evidence that Allah, as portrayed in Islamic texts, possesses anthropomorphic attributes akin to those of human beings. Let us embark on this inquiry together, examining this matter through the Quran, Hadith, and classical Islamic literature.


1. Allah Acknowledges Having a Face (Wajh)

The Quran explicitly refers to the 'face' of Allah:

"To Allah belong the East and the West. So wherever you turn, there is the Face of Allah. Indeed, Allah is all-Encompassing and Knowing." (Surah Al-Baqarah 2:115)

In this verse, Allah is said to possess a 'face' (Arabic: wajh), which implies an anthropomorphic feature. Is having a 'face' not a characteristic of created beings?

Additionally:

"Everything will perish except His Face." (Surah Al-Qasas 28:88)

Again, Allah claims that only His 'face' will remain after the annihilation of all else. This explicit claim implies that Allah has a literal face.


2. Allah’s Eyes and Tears

Classical Islamic literature also attributes eyes and tears to Allah. In Al-Milal wa al-Nihal, it is reported:

"At one time, the Eyes of Allah ached, and the angels went to visit Him. Allah shed tears over the Flood of Prophet Nuh (Noah) until His Eyes became red." (Al-Milal wa al-Nihal, Volume 1, p. 141)

Although some Muslims may dismiss this narration as weak (da’if) and not found within the Quran, it still represents a documented claim in classical Islamic theology.


3. Allah’s Eyes and the 'Kafir' Inscription

Anas ibn Malik (may Allah be pleased with him) narrated that the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) said:

"There was no Prophet sent but that he warned his people about the one-eyed liar (Dajjal). Behold! He is one-eyed, and your Lord is not one-eyed. And between his eyes is written 'Kafir' (disbeliever)." (Sahih al-Bukhari, Hadith No. 245, Volume 9)

Here, Muhammad distinguishes between the Dajjal, who has one eye, and Allah, who does not have one eye, implying Allah has two.


4. Allah Hears and Sees

The Quran attributes hearing and sight to Allah:

"Indeed, Allah commands you to render trusts to whom they are due and when you judge between people to judge with justice. Excellent is that which Allah instructs you. Indeed, Allah is Ever-Hearing and Ever-Seeing." (Surah An-Nisa 4:58)

Having faculties such as hearing and sight are attributes of sentient beings, further indicating anthropomorphic qualities ascribed to Allah.


Conclusion

It is evident from the foregoing scriptural and classical citations that Allah is consistently described with anthropomorphic features — a face, eyes, the capacity to weep, and sensory faculties such as hearing and sight. This presentation poses a serious theological issue for those who deny any resemblance or likeness between Allah and His creation.

May the Lord bless you all abundantly.

In His Service,

Dr. Maxwell Shimba
Max Shimba Ministries Org ©2015


References:

  1. Quran 2:115 (Surah Al-Baqarah)

  2. Quran 28:88 (Surah Al-Qasas)

  3. Al-Milal wa al-Nihal, Volume 1, p. 141

  4. Sahih al-Bukhari, Hadith No. 245, Volume 9

  5. Quran 4:58 (Surah An-Nisa)

Bibliography:

  • Al-Shahrastani, Muhammad ibn Abd al-Karim. Al-Milal wa al-Nihal. Beirut: Dar al-Ma'arif.

  • Al-Bukhari, Muhammad ibn Ismail. Sahih al-Bukhari. Cairo: Dar al-Turath.

  • The Quran. Translations by Sahih International.

Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this document, but altering it is not allowed.

Contradictions within the Qur'an

Contradictions within the Qur'an: Do Qur'anic Verses Contradict Each Other?

Maxwell Shimba Ministries Org
Monday, August 3, 2015

Introduction

The Qur'an, revered by Muslims as the literal word of God (Allah), claims consistency and perfection in its message. However, a careful comparative reading of its various surahs (chapters) reveals statements that appear contradictory, particularly concerning how Muslims are instructed to treat non-Muslims, especially the "People of the Book" (Christians and Jews). This article seeks to examine a series of Qur'anic verses and analyze the apparent inconsistencies in their directives, questioning the reliability of the text as a divine revelation.


Textual Analysis

In Surah Al-Baqara (2:109), the Qur'an states:

"Many of the People of the Book wish, through envy, to lead you back to unbelief, now that you have embraced the faith and the truth has been made plain to them. Forgive them and bear with them until Allah makes known His will. He has power over all things."
(Qur'an 2:109, Abdel Haleem Translation)

This verse addresses Christians and Jews, referred to as "People of the Book," suggesting that some of them envy Muslims and wish to turn them away from Islam. However, it counsels Muslims to forgive and be patient with them until Allah reveals His final judgment.

Similarly, in Surah Al-Imran (3:20):

"If they turn away, your duty is only to convey the message."
(Qur'an 3:20, Yusuf Ali Translation)

This verse instructs Muslims to merely warn non-believers, indicating that it is not the responsibility of Muslims to force others into belief.

From these two verses, one can deduce:

  1. It is the duty of Muslims to preach their religion but not to compel people to believe.

  2. Allah, in His own time, will reveal His will to those who disbelieve.

  3. Muslims are only responsible for conveying warnings to non-believers.

However, other Qur'anic verses present a starkly different message:

  • In Surah An-Nisa (4:101):

    "The disbelievers are your sworn enemies."
    (Qur'an 4:101, Pickthall Translation)

  • In Surah At-Tawba (9:3):

    "Announce to those who disbelieve a painful punishment."
    (Qur'an 9:3, Sahih International Translation)

  • In Surah Al-Anfal (8:39):

    "Fight them until there is no [more] persecution, and religion is for Allah [alone]."
    (Qur'an 8:39, Sahih International Translation)

These verses appear to transition from patient tolerance to active hostility, including the declaration of enmity, threats of severe punishment, and commands for armed conflict until Islam reigns supreme.


Critical Questions

This textual divergence raises several crucial theological and logical questions:

  1. Was it the same entity who gave Muhammad the words in 2:109, 3:20, and those in 4:101, 9:3, and 8:39 — or were there multiple sources?

  2. Why would one verse command tolerance and mere warning, while another instructs hostility and warfare?

  3. Is this not indicative of forgetfulness — a human trait — which should not be attributed to an omniscient and omnipotent God?

  4. If it is indeed the same deity, are these verses compatible or contradictory?

  5. If they are compatible, how can such opposing commands be reconciled logically and theologically?

  6. If they contradict one another, does this not serve as evidence that the Qur'an is not from the true God, especially since the Qur'an itself establishes consistency as a criterion for divine authenticity?
    (cf. Qur'an 4:82: "Do they not then consider the Qur'an carefully? Had it been from other than Allah, they would surely have found therein much contradiction.")

An infallible God cannot issue conflicting instructions, forget His prior declarations, or contradict Himself. Contradictions are a characteristic of human imperfection, not divine revelation.


Conclusion

These apparent contradictions within the Qur'an pose a significant theological problem. The God of the Bible, by contrast, is consistent in character and purpose. He sent His Son, Jesus Christ, into the world to offer redemption for humanity’s sins, not through coercion but through love, grace, and truth.

Therefore, I warmly invite Muslims to turn to the God of the Bible, who alone offers eternal salvation through Jesus Christ.

May God bless you abundantly.


References

  • Abdel Haleem, M. A. S. (2005). The Qur'an: A New Translation. Oxford University Press.

  • Yusuf Ali, A. (1934). The Holy Qur'an: Text, Translation and Commentary. Tahrike Tarsile Qur'an.

  • Pickthall, M. M. (1930). The Meaning of the Glorious Koran. Alfred A. Knopf.

  • Sahih International (1997). The Qur'an: Arabic Text with English Translation.

  • The Holy Bible, New International Version (NIV). (2011). Zondervan.

  • Qur'an 4:82 — on the principle of consistency as evidence of divine origin.



The Eschatological Destiny of Muhammad and His Followers in Islamic and Biblical Perspective

 

The Eschatological Destiny of Muhammad and His Followers in Islamic and Biblical Perspective: A Comparative Analysis

Dr. Maxwell Shimba
Shimba Theological Institute


Abstract

This article offers a scholarly and theological analysis of Islamic eschatology regarding the destiny of Muhammad and his followers, juxtaposed with the Christian promise of eternal life through Jesus Christ. Utilizing primary Islamic sources, notably the Hadith literature, and biblical texts, this study explores the doctrinal implications of the afterlife in both traditions. The article concludes by highlighting the divergent eschatological promises of Allah and Elohim (Yahweh) and discusses their theological and soteriological consequences.


Introduction

The concept of life after death is central to both Islamic and Christian theology. However, the respective eschatological promises presented by the Qur’anic Allah and the Biblical Elohim exhibit significant doctrinal divergences. While Christian theology affirms immediate assurance of salvation and eternal life upon faith in Jesus Christ (John 5:24; 1 John 5:11-13), Islamic traditions, particularly Hadith literature, depict a complex and uncertain postmortem journey even for devout Muslims, including Muhammad himself.

This study examines key Hadith narratives to evaluate Muhammad’s eschatological expectations and contrasts them with the Biblical assurance of eternal life, drawing a theological distinction between Allah and Elohim.


Islamic Eschatology in Hadith Literature

One of the most revealing Hadiths concerning the eschatological destiny of Muhammad is found in Sahih al-Bukhari (Vol. 1, Book 12, Hadith 770):

“Then Allah will come to them again and say, ‘I am your Lord.’ They will say, ‘You are our Lord.’ Allah will call them, and As-Sirat (a bridge) will be laid across Hell and I (Muhammad) shall be the first amongst the Apostles to cross it with my followers... and some of them will fall and stay in Hell forever.” (Al-Bukhari, 1997)

This Hadith explicitly states that Muhammad himself awaits the Day of Judgment to cross As-Sirat into Paradise, a fate that contrasts sharply with Biblical prophets who, according to Scripture, secured their eternal destinies during their earthly lives (Psalm 23:6; Isaiah 38:17-18).

Furthermore, Sahih al-Bukhari (Vol. 1, Book 8, Hadith 345) narrates Muhammad’s claim of a visionary ascent into heaven where he allegedly encountered Adam, Moses, Jesus, and Abraham while still alive. Yet, paradoxically, Islamic eschatology postpones his final admission into Paradise until the Day of Judgment.


Biblical Theology of Salvation and Eternal Life

In contrast, the Bible emphasizes the immediacy and certainty of salvation for believers. Isaiah 38:17-18 and Psalm 51:12 articulate Old Testament assurances of forgiveness and eternal life within one’s earthly existence. The New Testament expands on this doctrine:

"Most assuredly, I say to you, he who hears My word and believes in Him who sent Me has everlasting life and shall not come into judgment but has passed from death into life." (John 5:24, NKJV)

Jesus' declaration underscores the immediacy of eternal life for believers without the intermediary of hellfire or a postmortem bridge. Moreover, in John 4:10 and John 7:38, Jesus promises the 'living water' (Holy Spirit) to believers in their earthly lives, affirming salvation as a present reality.


Doctrinal Contradictions and Theological Implications

The cited Hadiths suggest that even monotheistic Muslims are consigned to Hell temporarily, to be identified and rescued by angels based on the marks of prostration (sujud). Sahih al-Bukhari states:

"He will order the angels to take out of Hell those who worshipped none but Him alone… So they will come out of the Fire as mere skeletons. The Water of Life will be poured on them." (Al-Bukhari, 1997)

This conditional posthumous mercy starkly contrasts with Christian soteriology, which offers the assurance of immediate postmortem communion with God (Luke 23:43). The theological implication is clear: the Qur’anic Allah provides no definitive assurance of eternal life before death, unlike the Biblical Elohim.


Conclusion

This comparative analysis reveals a profound theological and eschatological divergence between Islamic and Christian doctrines of the afterlife. The Hadith literature portrays a precarious postmortem future for even the most devout Muslims, including Muhammad. In contrast, the Bible guarantees eternal life and salvation in the present life for those who accept Jesus Christ. This doctrinal contrast necessitates a critical reflection on the nature of divine promises and their implications for believers.


References

  • Al-Bukhari, M. I. (1997). Sahih al-Bukhari (Vol. 1). Beirut: Dar Ibn Kathir.

  • Holy Bible, New King James Version (NKJV). (1982). Nashville: Thomas Nelson.

  • Holy Bible, New International Version (NIV). (2011). Grand Rapids: Zondervan.

  • Cragg, K. (1999). The Call of the Minaret. Oxford University Press.

  • Watt, W. M. (1979). Islamic Revelation in the Modern World. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.


Note: The theological claims made in this article are based on an academic analysis of canonical texts and should be understood within the context of interreligious dialogue and theological inquiry.

BREAKING VIDEO: IDF pounding Hezbollah training compounds

  BREAKING VIDEO: IDF pounding Hezbollah training compounds. The targets included a Radwan Force training facility used for weapons drills ...

TRENDING NOW