رواه أبو هريرة: سمعت عن رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم أنه قال إنني رأيت ربي على شكل خنزير جالسًا على عرشه. السنة الكبرى المجلد 3 الحديث رقم 472.
rawah 'abu hurayrata: samiet ean rasul allah salaa allah ealayh wasalam 'anah qal 'iinani ra'ayt rabiy ealaa shakl khinzir jalsana ealaa earshihi. alsunat alkubraa almujalad 3 alhadith raqm 472.
Narrated by Abu Huraira: I heard from the Apostle of Allah (Peace and blessing be upon him) That He said I saw my Lord in the form of Swine sitting upon his throne. Sunna Al Kubra Volume 3 Hadith No 472.
5 comments:
Would you please give me a link to this because I cannot share something without proof and be accused of false defamation.
My email jpc.healing@gmail.co
m
Ex Muslim here, I have ended up on this site whilst trying to track down the origin of this image and it's claim. It seems that either the person who made this post was deliberately trying to spread disinformation, or they were misinformed by someone else on the subject. I don't like Islam, but trying to spread lies never does much good. Once such a single grave lie is found within one's tellings, both that person and all they preach or side with will be called into questioning by the person at the recieving end of the tellings.
Abu Huraira was a jewish man who commented fake Hadith. He was the Sy Peter and St Paul of Islam... How did St Paul finished Christianity, Abu Huraira finished Monotheism of Islam....
This is Not True and False Fitnah Cristianity Misionaris... Nothing Book hadist About This Post...
This claim is not historically accurate and it also mixes very different figures and traditions in a way that does not hold up to evidence.
Abu Hurairah (رضي الله عنه) was not Jewish. He was an Arab from the tribe of Daws in Yemen and became one of the most well-known companions of Prophet Muhammad ﷺ. Islamic historical sources consistently identify him as a Muslim companion who narrated a large number of hadiths due to his close companionship with the Prophet and his strong memory.
The accusation that he “invented fake hadith” is also a later critical claim, not a historical fact. In classical Islamic scholarship, Abu Hurairah’s narrations were carefully evaluated using the hadith sciences (ʿilm al-jarḥ wa al-taʿdīl, isnad verification, and cross-comparison with other companions’ reports). Many of his narrations are also transmitted through multiple independent chains, not solely through him.
Comparing him to “Paul” or “Peter” of Christianity is also not accurate:
Paul and Peter are foundational figures in Christian historical theology and early church development.
Abu Hurairah is a hadith narrator within Islam, not a founder of doctrine or a reformer of monotheism.
Islamic monotheism (tawḥīd) is based on the Qur’an and the teachings of Prophet Muhammad ﷺ, not on any single companion.
The idea that Abu Hurairah “finished monotheism” in Islam is also not supported by Islamic belief or scholarship. In Islam, monotheism is centered entirely on Allah as revealed in the Qur’an, and Abu Hurairah’s role was transmission of reports, not creation or alteration of theology.
So historically and academically, this comparison is a category error: it mixes different roles, different religions, and unsupported claims about identity and intent.
Post a Comment