VITUKO KWENYE UISLAM SEHEMU YA KWANZA

 

VITUKO KWENYE UISLAM

SEHEMU YA KWANZA

Mwenyezi Mungu anasema uwongo (Na’uzubillah). [Fatawa Rasheediyah cha Maulana Rasheed Ahmad Gangohi, ukurasa wa 237]

Mwenyezi Mungu analaghai na anakejeli (Na’uzubillah). [Sefat Allah cha Alawiy al-Saqaaf, ukurasa wa 89]

Mwenyezi Mungu ndiye chanzo cha maovu yote (Na’uzubillah). [Musnad Abu Hanifa, ukurasa wa 152]

Mguu wa Mwenyezi Mungu utakuwa motoni (Na’uzubillah). [Sahih Bukhari Kiarabu-Kiingereza Juzuu ya 6 hadith nambari 371 iliyotafsiriwa na Dk Muhsin Khan]

Mwenyezi Mungu ameketi juu ya kiti cha enzi katika hali ya mguu wa msalaba (Na’uzubillah). [Ebtal al-Tawilat, cha Imam Abu Y'ala al-Fara, Juzuu 1 ukurasa wa 189]

Mwenyezi Mungu anaweza kuwa na wivu (Na’uzubillah). [Sefat Allah cha Alawiy al-Saqaaf, ukurasa wa 160]

Mwenyezi Mungu ni sawa kabisa na mwanadamu isipokuwa sifa mbili (Na’uzubillah). [Al-Qawasim min al-Awasim cha Abu bakr ibn al-Arabi, ukurasa wa 209]

Mwenyezi Mungu amewaumba Malaika kutokana na mkono wake na kifua chake (Na’uzubillah). [Al-Sunnah cha Abdullah Ibn Ahmad bin Hanbal, ukurasa wa 190]

Mwenyezi Mungu angeweza kusafiri juu ya mbu (Na’uzubillah). [Aqa'id al-Salaf cha Imam Darami, ukurasa wa 443]

Mwenyezi Mungu anataabika kwa kuongezeka uzito (Na’uzubillah). [Al-Sunnah cha Abdullah Ibn Ahmad bin Hanbal, ukurasa wa 161]

USIKOSE SEHEMU YA PILI

Shalom

Dr. Max Shimba for Max Shimba Ministries

BACA IS NOT MECCA OF THE QURAN

 BACA IS NOT MECCA

It is sometimes claimed that the Bible mentions Mecca. This is obviously worth a little investigation, as I hope to do in this short paper.

Where Does the Claim Come From?

In Surah 3:96, Mecca is given the name Bakkah:

Verily, the first House (of worship) appointed for mankind was that at Bakkah (Makkah), full of blessing, and a guidance for Al-`Alamin (the mankind and jinns).
The Bible, in Psalm 84:5,6, mentions the valley of Baca:

Blessed are those whose strength is in you, who have set their hearts on pilgrimage. As they pass through the Valley of Baca, they make it a place of springs: the autumn rains also cover it with pools. (NIV)
These two quotes, taken together, have been seen to imply that Psalm 84 is talking about making the pilgrimage to Mecca. One notable example is an article by Dr. M S M Saifullah. But the argument is made by many Muslim speakers including Dr. Jamal Badawi.

Is the Claim Justified?

There are several reasons why this claim cannot be sustained. Even without reference to scholarly works, a brief look at the passage itself makes the situation clear.

The whole psalm focuses on God's sanctuary and how the writer loves to spend time there. The author is one of ‘the Sons of Korah’ and internal evidence points to it being written after the building of the temple in Jerusalem by Solomon. Because of the psalm's focus on the sanctuary, there are several phrases which describe features of it, enabling us to evaluate the claim that it is Mecca:

v.1 - ‘How lovely is your dwelling place, O Lord Almighty!’
v.3 - ‘... a place near your altar, O Lord Almighty ...’
v.4 - ‘Blessed are they who dwell in your house’
v.7 - ‘They go from strength to strength, till each appears before God in Zion.’
v.10 - ‘I would rather be a doorkeeper in the house of my God ...’
These five points count heavily against the claim outlined above. Firstly (I am open to correction on these points), I do not suppose that Muslims would accept the idea of Allah dwelling in the Ka'aba. I certainly am not aware of this way of thinking in Islam. On the other hand, the Bible repeatedly mentions the temple in Jerusalem as God's dwelling place, even though he is not limited to a building. In 1 Kings 8:27, Solomon, on the completion of his great temple, said this:

'But will God really dwell on earth? The heavens, even the highest heaven, cannot contain you. How much less this temple I have built!' (NIV)
This makes it clear that the idea of God dwelling in the temple is figurative and not that he is limited to one building. However, it shows clearly that this way of thinking is found in the Bible.

Secondly, I am unaware of any altar which is given prominence at the Ka'aba, whereas the altar was an integral part of the tabernacle and then the Jerusalem temple, necessary for the sacrificial system instituted by God. (Exodus 27:1-8, 1 Kings 8:64).

Thirdly, the Ka'aba is empty and certainly no humans dwell in it. Yet Psalm 84 mentions those who dwell in God's house. This makes no sense unless it is the Jerusalem temple, which had rooms within its courts (1 Chronicles 28:11,12) for those who were responsible for its upkeep and ceremony.

Fourthly, the pilgrims in Psalm 84 are certainly not on their way to Mecca, as their destination is given as Zion. Mount Zion is one of the hills on which Jerusalem is founded. In the Bible Zion is often used synonymously with Jerusalem (Isaiah 2:2).

This point is made even stronger by examining the word used for ‘pilgrimage’ in Psalm 84:5. I don't claim to know much Hebrew or Arabic, so someone who does is welcome to correct me on this. However, I do know that both languages are Semitic and close in many ways, having the same or similar words for lots of things. That being the case, we might expect the Hebrew word translated here as ‘pilgrimage’ to be similar to the Arabic hajj. In fact, it is not. The only similar Hebrew word that I could find in my exhaustive concordance was hag, which is often translated as ‘festival’ and therefore seems to me to be in some way related to the Arabic hajj.

The Hebrew word used in Psalm 84:5 is from a completely different root to this and is usually translated as ‘road’ or ‘highway’. Thus it seems from a brief consideration that the phrase is literally like saying in English ‘those ... who have set their hearts on the highway’, meaning the way they must take to get to Jerusalem. So even the ideas of pilgrimage in the Bible and the Qur'an have a different emphasis. Just because the English translation of Psalm 84:5 says ‘pilgrimage’ we can't simply equate it with the Hajj.

Fifthly, there is no recognised function of doorkeeper for the Ka'aba, as far as I am aware. However, this was an official job at the Jerusalem Temple (2 Kings 25:18).

What Then is the Valley of Baca?

Baca has been translated either as ‘weeping’ or ‘balsam trees’ (which grow in dry places). It could be a real place, in which case it was a valley through which the pilgrims passed during their journey. Alternatively, it could be figurative. In this interpretation, even the dry, arid places through which the pilgrims pass are brought alive by their expectant joy as they near their destination. In either case, their pilgrimage is clearly to Jerusalem, as evidenced by the rest of the psalm. Why on earth would Jews, living in Israel and on their way to Jerusalem, take a huge detour through Mecca?

Whatever our conclusion as to the true identity of the valley of Baca, I think that I have made it fairly clear that the only link between it and the Bakkah of the Quran is a superficial similarity in name. The further details about the location point away from the two being identical. Since that is the case, why should we not link the Bakkah of surah 3:96 with any other place having a similar sounding name? Here is a quote from the article mentioned above:

...we often find this word in the names related to rivers and wadis, such as Wadi al-Baka in the Sinaitic district and Baca on the wadi in the central Galilee area, W of Meroth.
This shows that there are other places with similar names. Why then, do we not hear people claiming that the Quran is referring to these? It seems to me that it is because there is a prior commitment on the part of some to finding evidence for the Quran in the Bible. This, if found, would strengthen the claim that Islam is completely in line with all God's earlier revelations. However, in this case, it cannot be sustained.

I hope that this short paper has made it clear that the Baca of the Bible cannot be the Bakkah of the Qur'an. Rather than being a justifiable theory, it seems that some people, in their zeal to verify the Qur'an by using the Bible, have jumped all too quickly to a mistaken conclusion. A few superficial similarities are offset by several clear contradictions. It is often easy to bend the facts to fit our own theories, rather than forming our theories around the facts. This is never easier than in religion. Both Christians and Muslims are open to this temptation: I hope that fair-minded people will see this as a case in point. 

JE, BACA NDIO MAKKA?

Je, Baca ya kwenye Biblia ndio Makka akama wanavyo dai Waislam?

Nyakati fulani Waislam wanadai kwamba Biblia inataja Makka. Haya madai yanafaa uchunguzi kidogo. Haya tujiunge katika karatasi hii fupi.

Dai Linatoka Wapi?

Katika Sura 3:96, Makka inapewa jina la Bakkah:

Hakika Nyumba ya kwanza (ya ibada) iliyowekewa watu ni ile iliyoko Bakkah, yenye baraka na uwongofu kwa Al-‘Alamin (watu na majini).

Biblia katika Zaburi 84:5,6 inataja bonde la Baka:

Wamebarikiwa wale ambao nguvu zao ziko kwako, ambao wameweka mioyo yao kuhiji. Wanapopita katika Bonde la Baka, wanalifanya mahali pa chemchemi: mvua ya vuli pia huifunika kwa madimbwi. (NIV)

Nukuu hizi mbili, zikichukuliwa pamoja, zimeonekana kuashiria kwamba Zaburi ya 84 inazungumza juu ya kuhiji Makka. Mfano mmoja mashuhuri ni makala ya Dk. M S M Saifullah. Lakini hoja hiyo inatolewa na wazungumzaji wengi wa Kiislamu akiwemo Dk Jamal Badawi.

Je, Dai Hilo Linahesabiwa Haki?

Kuna sababu kadhaa kwa nini dai hili haliwezi kudumu. Hata bila kurejelea kazi za kitaalamu, kutazama kwa ufupi kifungu chenyewe hufanya hali iwe wazi.

Zaburi nzima inazingatia patakatifu pa Mungu na jinsi mwandishi anapenda kutumia wakati huko. Mwandishi ni mmoja wa ‘Wana wa Kora’ na uthibitisho wa ndani unaonyesha kwamba iliandikwa baada ya kujengwa kwa hekalu huko Yerusalemu na Sulemani. Kwa sababu ya mtazamo wa zaburi kwenye patakatifu, kuna misemo kadhaa inayoelezea sifa zake, ikituwezesha kutathmini madai kwamba ni Makka:

Mst.1 - ‘Jinsi ya kupendeza makao yako, Ee Bwana Mwenye Nguvu Zote!

mst.3 - ‘... mahali karibu na madhabahu yako, Ee Bwana Mwenyezi ...’

Mst.4 - "Heri wakaao nyumbani mwako"

Mst.7 - ‘Wanaenda kutoka nguvu hata nguvu, hata kila mmoja aonekane mbele za Mungu katika Sayuni.

Mst.10 - ‘Ni afadhali niwe bawabu katika nyumba ya Mungu wangu ...’

Alama hizi tano zinahesabiwa pakubwa dhidi ya dai lililoainishwa hapo juu. Kwanza (niko tayari kusahihishwa juu ya nukta hizi), sidhani kama Waislamu wangekubali wazo la Mwenyezi Mungu kukaa katika Al-Ka'aba. Hakika sifahamu namna hii ya kufikiri katika Uislamu. Kwa upande mwingine, Biblia hutaja tena na tena hekalu la Yerusalemu kuwa makao ya Mungu, ingawa yeye si jengo tu. Katika 1 Wafalme 8:27, Sulemani, kwenye kukamilika kwa hekalu lake kuu, alisema hivi:

'Lakini je, kweli Mungu atakaa duniani? Mbingu, hata zile mbingu za juu kabisa, haziwezi kukutosha. Sembuse hekalu hili nililolijenga! (NIV)

Hii inaweka wazi kwamba wazo la Mungu kukaa katika hekalu ni mfano na si kwamba yeye ni mdogo kwa jengo moja. Hata hivyo, inaonyesha wazi kwamba njia hiyo ya kufikiri inapatikana katika Biblia.

Pili, sifahamu madhabahu yoyote ambayo inapewa umashuhuri katika Ka'aba, ambapo madhabahu ilikuwa sehemu muhimu ya hema la kukutania na kisha hekalu la Yerusalemu, muhimu kwa mfumo wa dhabihu ulioanzishwa na Mungu. (Kutoka 27:1-8, 1 Wafalme 8:64).

Tatu, Ka'aba ni tupu na kwa hakika hakuna binadamu anayeishi humo. Hata hivyo Zaburi ya 84 inawataja wale wakaao katika nyumba ya Mungu. Hili halina maana isipokuwa ni hekalu la Yerusalemu, ambalo lilikuwa na vyumba ndani ya nyua zake (1 Mambo ya Nyakati 28:11,12) kwa ajili ya wale waliohusika na utunzaji na sherehe zake.

Nne, mahujaji katika Zaburi ya 84 kwa hakika hawako njiani kuelekea Makka, kwani marudio yao yametolewa kama Sayuni. Mlima Sayuni ni mojawapo ya vilima ambavyo Yerusalemu limewekwa juu yake. Katika Biblia Sayuni mara nyingi hutumiwa sawa na Yerusalemu (Isaya 2:2).

Jambo hili linafanywa kuwa na nguvu zaidi kwa kuchunguza neno linalotumiwa kwa ‘kusafiri’ katika Zaburi 84:5 . Sidai najua sana Kiebrania au Kiarabu, kwa hivyo mtu anayejua anakaribishwa anisahihishe kuhusu hili. Walakini, najua kuwa lugha zote mbili ni za Kisemiti na zinakaribiana kwa njia nyingi, zikiwa na maneno sawa au yanayofanana kwa vitu vingi. Kwa hali hiyo, tunaweza kutarajia neno la Kiebrania lililotafsiriwa hapa kama ‘kuhiji’ kuwa sawa na hajj ya Kiarabu. Kwa kweli, sivyo. Neno pekee kama hilo la Kiebrania ambalo ningeweza kupata katika konkodansi yangu kamili lilikuwa hag, ambalo mara nyingi hutafsiriwa kama ‘sherehe’ na kwa hiyo inaonekana kwangu kuwa kwa namna fulani linahusiana na hajj ya Kiarabu.

Neno la Kiebrania lililotumiwa katika Zaburi 84:5 linatokana na mzizi tofauti kabisa na hili na kwa kawaida hutafsiriwa kama ‘barabara’ au ‘barabara kuu’. Hivyo inaonekana kutokana na kuzingatia kwa ufupi kwamba kifungu hicho kihalisi ni kama kusema kwa Kiingereza ‘wale ... Kwa hiyo hata mawazo ya kuhiji katika Biblia na Kurani yana msisitizo tofauti. Kwa sababu tu tafsiri ya Kiingereza ya Zaburi 84:5 inasema ‘hiji’ hatuwezi kwa urahisi tu kuilinganisha na Hajj.

Tano, hakuna kazi inayotambulika ya mlinda mlango kwa Ka'aba, ninavyofahamu. Hata hivyo, hii ilikuwa kazi rasmi katika Hekalu la Yerusalemu (2 Wafalme 25:18).

Bonde la Baca ni nini basi?

Baca imetafsiriwa kama ‘kulia’ au ‘miti ya zeri’ (ambayo hukua mahali pakavu). Inaweza kuwa mahali halisi, ambapo ilikuwa ni bonde ambalo mahujaji walipitia wakati wa safari yao. Vinginevyo, inaweza kuwa ya mfano. Katika tafsiri hii, hata sehemu kavu, kame ambamo mahujaji hupita huletwa hai na furaha yao inayowatarajia wanapokaribia kule wanakoenda. Vyovyote vile, safari yao ya kuhiji ni ya Yerusalemu kwa wazi, kama inavyothibitishwa na sehemu nyingine ya zaburi. Kwa nini hapa duniani Wayahudi, wanaoishi Israeli na wakiwa njiani kuelekea Yerusalemu, wangepitia njia kubwa ya kupita Meka?

Vyovyote hitimisho letu kuhusu utambulisho wa kweli wa bonde la Baka, nadhani kwamba nimeliweka wazi kabisa kwamba kiungo pekee kati yake na Bakkah ya Quran ni kufanana kwa juujuu tu kwa jina. Maelezo zaidi kuhusu eneo yanaelekeza mbali na hizo mbili kuwa sawa. Kwa kuwa hivyo ndivyo hivyo, kwa nini tusiunganishe Bakkah ya surah 3:96 na sehemu nyingine yoyote yenye jina linalofanana la sauti? Hapa kuna nukuu kutoka kwa kifungu kilichotajwa hapo juu:

...mara nyingi tunapata neno hili katika majina yanayohusiana na mito na wadis, kama vile Wadi al-Baka katika wilaya ya Sinaitic na Baca kwenye wadi katika eneo la kati la Galilaya, W huko Meroth.

Hii inaonyesha kuwa kuna maeneo mengine yenye majina yanayofanana. Kwa nini basi hatusikii watu wakidai kuwa Quran inawazungumzia hawa? Inaonekana kwangu kwamba ni kwa sababu kuna ahadi ya awali kwa baadhi ya watu kutafuta ushahidi wa Quran katika Biblia. Hili, likipatikana, lingetia nguvu dai la kwamba Uislamu unaendana kikamilifu na Aya zote za awali za Mwenyezi Mungu. Hata hivyo, katika kesi hii, haiwezi kudumu.

Natumai karatasi hii fupi imeweka wazi kwamba Baca ya Biblia haiwezi kuwa Makkah ya Kurani. Badala ya kuwa nadharia inayokubalika, inaonekana kwamba baadhi ya watu, katika bidii yao ya kuhakiki Kurani kwa kutumia Biblia, wameruka haraka hadi kufikia mkataa usio sahihi. Mifanano michache ya juujuu inakabiliwa na mikanganyiko kadhaa ya wazi. Mara nyingi ni rahisi kupindisha ukweli ili kupatana na nadharia zetu wenyewe, badala ya kuunda nadharia zetu kulingana na ukweli. Hili kamwe si rahisi kuliko katika dini. Wakristo na Waislamu wote wako wazi kwa majaribu haya: Ninatumai kwamba watu wenye nia ya haki wataliona hili kama mfano halisi.

Shalom

Dr. Max Shimba for Max Shimba Ministries

YESU KRISTO HAJAWAHI KUWA MUISLAMU NA KAMWE HATOKUJA KUWA MUISLAMU

 

Pengine unaweza kujiuliza ni kitu gani ambacho kimenipelekea niseme jambo hilo wakati Waislamu wanaamini hivyo? Ni kwa sababu Wakristo wengi wamekuwa wakisilimishwa, kwa kuamimishwa kwamba, Yesu Kristo alikuwa muislamu! na vigezo ambavyo waislamu huvitumia kumnasibisha Yesu na Uislamu ni vingi, ila leo nitachambua viwili.

(1) Yesu kusema yeye ni mnyenyekevu.

(2) Yesu Kuingia kwenye Sinagogi

Hivyo ndo vigezo vikubwa kabisa ambavyo waislamu huvitumia, katika kumtangaza kwamba Yesu alikuwa muislamu yaani Kiarabu wanasema:- كان يسوع مسلم

(1) Nikianza na hoja yao ya kwanza, kwamba Yesu alikuwa Mnyenyekevu! nitanukuu andiko hilo walitumialo, nitaeleza hoja zao na majibu ya hoja, kwa mtu asiye mvivu wa kusoma, basi atapata kitu cha kujifuza kupitia somo hili:

Mathayo 11:29 Jitieni nira yangu, mjifunze kwangu; kwa kuwa mimi ni mpole na mnyenyekevu wa moyo; nanyi mtapata raha nafsini mwenu;

Hapo wanakuambia kwamba, Yesu amesema, mimi ni mnyenyekevu, hiyo ni lugha ya Kiswahili, ingekuwa ni Kiarabu angesema, "Ana'a Muslima" (انا مسلم) Kwani wanakuunganishia na moja wapo la andiko ndani ya Quran ambalo limetaja Kusilimu ni kunyenyekea.

Quran 2 Suratul Baqrah

ﺇِﺫْ ﻗَﺎﻝَ ﻟَﻪُ ﺭَﺑُّﻪُ

ﺃَﺳْﻠِﻢْ ﻗَﺎﻝَ ﺃَﺳْﻠَﻤْﺖُ ﻟِﺮَﺏِّ

ﺍﻟْﻌَﺎﻟَﻤِﻴﻦَ

131. (Kumbukeni) Mola

wake alipomwambia:

Nyenyekea! Akasema:

Nimenyenyekea kwa Mola wa

viumbe wote.

Hapo kwenye neno Nyenyekea, katika lugha ya kiarabu imesemwa, ﺃَﺳْﻠَﻤْﺖُ (Aslmatu) Kuonyesha kwamba Uislamu ni kunyenyekea, hivyo husemwa Yesu aliposema Mnyenyekevu, alisema Yesu ni muislamu, wakimaanisha kwamba, kila Mnyenyekevu ni muislamu, ukitaka kujua kwamba, ni wazugaji, walaghai na waongo wakubwa! Waulize kuhusu Mtu huyu.

2 Korintho 10:1 Basi, mimi Paulo mwenyewe nawasihi kwa upole na utaratibu wa Kristo; mimi niliye mnyenyekevu nikiwapo pamoja nanyi, bali nisipokuwapo ni mwenye ujasiri kwenu;

Waulizeni, "Ikiwa Mtu akiitwa Mnyenyekevu ni muislamu, Je! Paulo kusema yeye ni Mnyenyekevu, nae muislamu?" Utawasikia "Huyo ni kafiri mkubwa kabisa"

Hapo ndo unajiuliza Inakuwaje neno hilo moja, limfanye mwingine kuwa muislamu (Yesu) Na mwingine kuwa kafiri (Paulo) wakati wote ni wanyenyekevu? hapo ndo utagundua kuwa ni wababaishaji, Sasa ngoja nikupe darasa kuhusu Unyenyekevu wa Yesu, Je! ni sawa na Unyenyekevu unaokusudiwa na Waislamu yaani Uislamu? Nanukuu Biblia ya Kiarabu.

متس 11: 29 احملوا نيري عليكم و تعلموا مني لاني وديع و متواضع القلب فتجدوا راحة لنفوسكم

Hiyo ni Biblia ya kiarabu Mathayo 11:29 Ambapo Yesu, katika matamshi ya Kiarabu amesema.

وديع

(Wadiuun (Mpole)

و متواضع

Wamutawadhwiu (Na mnyenyekevu)

القلب

Al-qalbi (Wa Moyo)

Yesu Unyenyekevu wake umeitwa, Mutawadhwiu (متواضع)

Na siyo Muslimani (مسلم) Kama wanavyodai waislamu, hutumia ubabaishaji huo kwa kuwa wanajua kuwa, Wakristo wengi hawajui Lugha kiarabu, kwani katika Biblia ya Kiarabu, hakuna sehemu hata moja ambayo Yesu, amewahi kusema,

وديع و مسلم القلب

(Wadiuuni, Wamuslimul qalbi)

Kwa sababu neno Uislamu, limeanza kutajwa ndani ya Quran, baada ya Muhammad.

Unaposema Muislamu, Kiarabu huitwa, مسلم

Na pia Unyenyekevu pia ndani ya Quran umegawanyika, kuna unyenyekevu katika Swala, ambao huitwa ﺧَﺎﺷِﻌُﻮﻥَ (Khaashiuun)

Quran 23: Suratul Muumin

ﺑِﺴْﻢِ ﺍﻟﻠﻪِ ﺍﻟﺮَّﺣْﻤﻦِ

ﺍﻟﺮَّﺣِﻴﻢِ

Kwa jina la Mwenyeezi

Mungu, Mwingi wa rehema,

Mwenye kurehemu.

ﻗَﺪْ ﺃَﻓْﻠَﺢَ

ﺍﻟْﻤُﺆْﻣِﻨُﻮﻥَ

1. Hakika wamefuzu

wenye kuamini.

ﺍﻟَّﺬِﻳﻦَ ﻫُﻢْ ﻓِﻲ

ﺻَﻠَﺎﺗِﻬِﻢْ ﺧَﺎﺷِﻌُﻮﻥَ

2. Ambao ni

wanyenyekevu katika swala

zao.

Kama ingelikuwa kila kunyenyekea ni Uislamu, basi ingesemwa mwamba.

ﻓِﻲ

ﺻَﻠَﺎﺗِﻬِﻢْ ﻣُﺴْﻠِﻤُﻮﻥَ

(Fii Swalaatihim Muslimuuna)

Bali imesemwa, fii swalaatihim Khaashiun yaani katika swala zao ni Wanyenyekevu

Hata Majambazi wawapo Chini ya Ulinzi wa Polisi, huwa wanyenyekevu, wenye kujisalimisha, sijawahi kuwasikia Waislamu wakisema, huo ni Uislamu, kwa sababu Wameyenyekea, Unyenyekevu, Kwa hivyo Yesu hajawahi kuwa muislamu, (مسلم)

(2) KUINGIA KWENYE SINAGOGI

Hoja hii ndo kubwa zaidi kwao, kuliko hata ile ya Unyenyekevu, kwa sababu hata muislamu asiyejua kiarabu, hutumia sinagogi kama fimbo kuonyesha kwamba Yesu ni Muislamu! Wakitumia.

Luka 4:16 Akaenda Nazareti, hapo alipolelewa; na siku ya sabato akaingia katika sinagogi kama ilivyokuwa desturi yake, akasimama ili asome.

Wakitoa andiko hilo, husema kwamba, Yesu aliingia kwenye Sinagogi, na kwa mujibu wa maelezo ya maneno magumu katika Biblia tafsiri ya mwaka 1952 Imesema, Sinagogi ni msikiti wa Wayahudi, kwa hivyo watakuuliza, "Wanaoingia msikitini ni watu wa dini gani? Ukijibu "Waislamu" Watakuuliza, "Yesu kuingia mle atakuwa nani?" Lazima utasema "Alikuwa muislamu" utaambiwa njoo msikitini uungane na Yesu. Wengine husilimia hapo,

Ila Waislamu hao hao waulize kuhusu mtu huyu.

Matendo 17:1 Wakiisha kupita kati ya Amfipoli na Apolonia wakafika Thesalonike, ambapo palikuwa na sinagogi la Wayahudi.

2 Na Paulo, kama ilivyokuwa desturi yake, akaingia mle walimo, akahojiana nao kwa maneno ya maandiko sabato tatu.

Waulize, Ikiwa Yesu ameingia kwenye Sinagogi, mnasema ni muislamu, Je! Paulo nae kuingia kwenye sinagogi kama ilivyokuwa Desturi yake, nae ni muislamu?

Utawasikia, "Aaah huyo Paulo ni kafiri mkubwa kabisa"

Hapo ndo unajiuliza, inakuwaje Yesu kuingia, kwenye sinagogi awe muislamu, halafu Paulo awe Kafiri, wakati wote desturi yao ni moja kuingia kwenye sinagogi? Hapo ndo utajua kuwa hao ni wababaishaji.

Sinagogi siyo msikiti kwa maana halisi:-

Wakati wa kutafsiri Biblia, wakati ule kiswahili kilikuwa bado hajikakua, wafasiri walikosa neno hasa la kuweka ili liwe na maana katika kiswahili, wakaona Waweke Msikiti wa Wayahudi, kwa sababu Mashariki ya kati, majengo yao ya ibada, yalikuwa katika mfanano, Muhammad alipoanzisha Ujenzi wa Misikiti, aliiga majengo ya masinagogi yalivyo, ndo maana wakaweka msikiti wa Wayahudi, na siyo Msikiti tu katika mfanano wa majengo, maana Masinagogi yalijengwa baada ya Waisraeli kitoka utumwani, yakitumika kama madarasa ya kufundishia Torati, na hata Ibada kwa sababu Hekalu lilikuwa moja, wasingewza kukusanyika wote

Ila kwa sasa, Lugha imepanuka! Ndiyo maana sasa huoni tena uwepo wa maneno magumu! Kufasiri Sinagogi ni msikiti wa Wayahudi kwa sababu lugha imekuwa pana, na hata ukisoma Biblia ya Kiarabu, Sinagogi, halijaitwa Masjid (مسجد) Ambapo katika Lugha ya kingereza, Mosque, bali Limeitwa hivi.

4: 16 و جاء الى الناصرة حيث كان قد تربى و دخل المجمع حسب عادته يوم السبت و قام ليقرا

Kumeandikwa

و دخل Wadakhara

المجمع

Ilal Maj'maa

Maj'maa مخمع Ndivyo Sinagogi linavyoitwa, Wakati Msikiti kiarabu huitwa, مسجد (Masjid)

Hata ukisoma katika Biblia ya kingereza, Sinagogi huitwa, Synagogue, na msikiti ni Mosque, Huwezi kwenda kusoma English Bible ukakuta sehemu ye yote imeandikwa, Synagogue ni Mosque, kwani hata Quran yenyewe inakiri wazi kuwa kuna tofauti baina ya sinagogi na Msikiti.

Quran 22: SUURATUL HAJJ

ﺍﻟَّﺬِﻳﻦَ ﺃُﺧْﺮِﺟُﻮﺍ ﻣِﻦ

ﺩِﻳَﺎﺭِﻫِﻢْ ﺑِﻐَﻴْﺮِ ﺣَﻖٍّ ﺇِﻟَّﺎ ﺃَﻥ

ﻳَﻘُﻮﻟُﻮﺍ ﺭَﺑُّﻨَﺎ ﺍﻟﻠَّﻪُ ﻭَﻟَﻮْﻟَﺎ

ﺩَﻓْﻊُ ﺍﻟﻠَّﻪِ ﺍﻟﻨَّﺎﺱَ ﺑَﻌْﻀَﻬُﻢ

ﺑِﺒَﻌْﺾٍ ﻟَّﻬُﺪِّﻣَﺖْ ﺻَﻮَﺍﻣِﻊُ

ﻭَﺑِﻴَﻊٌ ﻭَﺻَﻠَﻮَﺍﺕٌ

ﻭَﻣَﺴَﺎﺟِﺪُ ﻳُﺬْﻛَﺮُ ﻓِﻴﻬَﺎ

ﺍﺳْﻢُ ﺍﻟﻠَّﻪِ ﻛَﺜِﻴﺮﺍً

ﻭَﻟَﻴَﻨﺼُﺮَﻥَّ ﺍﻟﻠَّﻪُ ﻣَﻦ

ﻳَﻨﺼُﺮُﻩُ ﺇِﻥَّ ﺍﻟﻠَّﻪَ ﻟَﻘَﻮِﻱٌّ

ﻋَﺰِﻳﺰٌ

40. Ambao wametolewa

majumbani mwao pasipo haki

ila kwa sababu wanasema Mola

wetu ni Mwenyeezi Mungu. Na

kama Mwenyeezi Mungu

asingeliwakinga watu baadhi

yao kwa wengine, bila shaka

yangelivunjwa mahekalu na

makanisa, na masinagogi, na

misikiti ambamo jina la

Mwenyeezi Mungu hutajwa kwa

wingi. Na bila shaka Mwenyeezi

Mungu humsaidia yule

anayemsaidia Yeye. Hakika

Mwenyeezi Mungu ni Mwenye

nguvu Mtukufu.

Hapo Quran Imetaja kwa uwingi kila Jengo.

ﺻَﻮَﺍﻣِﻊُ

(1) Mahekalalu (Swawaamiu)

َﺑِﻴَﻊٌ

(2) Makanisani (biyaaun)

َﺻَﻠَﻮَﺍﺕٌ

(3) Masinagogi (Swalawaatun)

َﻣَﺴَﺎﺟِﺪُ

(4) Msikikiti (masaa jidu)

huo ni utofauti wa kuonyesha kwamba, Kuna tofauti kati ya sinagogi na msikiti, katika Somo hili sitafundisha Yesu alilitazamaje Sinagogi, lipo somo lake, ila tu nimeeleza utofauti wa Sinagogi na msikiti ambao unatumiwa na waislamu...

Hii sehemu ya kwanza sehemu ya Pili nitafafanua, Je! Yesu anaweza kuwa muislamu, kwa.

(1) Kuvaa Kanzu

(2) Kuwatawadha wanafunzi wake

(3) Kusema amani iwe kwenu.?

Imetayarishwa na Na Mtumishi Abel Suleiman Shiliwa.

Shalom,

Max Shimba Ministries Org 

A Deliverance Ministry for the Body of Christ

 

I offer free help to guide Christians needing help with fear, depression, anxiety, worry, doubt, unbelief, demon oppression and casting out demons. Also I offer: How to receive Divine healing, How to receive answers to your prayers, How to receive wisdom and guidance from God, How to receive the Baptism of the Holy Spirit, Why speak in tongues, Spiritual Warfare principles, How to receive Salvation and all God’s promises, Occult deliverance and renunciation prayers, Deeper deliverance, How to get free from sins that allow Satanic attacks.

Helping people have a relationship with God; to receive Salvation in Jesus, Healing, Deliverance & Set Free From Demons.
Deliverance and healing is the result of true repentance and salvation.
If you're walking in truth and righteousness then you can believe God for healing and deliverance. Deliverance is no shortcut to living a separated life. A separated life is necessary to receiving the promises of God and all He has for you.

2 Corinthians 6:17-18
17) Therefore “Come out from among them and be separate,
says the Lord. Do not touch what is unclean, And I will receive you.” 18) “I will be a Father to you, And you shall be My sons and daughters, Says the Lord Almighty.”

2 Corinthians 7:1
Therefore, having these promises, beloved, let us cleanse ourselves from all filthiness of the flesh and spirit, perfecting holiness in the fear of God.

Take the time to read and get the Biblical teaching and instruction so you understand and can believe God for your deliverance, healing and answers to prayer etc. All the promises of God are to be received by Faith. I specialize in helping people that have tried others and are not yet set free. You will learn to resist the devil, walk in faith, and walk out your deliverance and experience total freedom often comes gradually over time. Almost all the work and reading is going to be done by you as it is your responsibility and no one else’s. You will learn how to keep your deliverance when you get it and not lose it.

All this help is free if you want to meet the conditions set forth in God’s Word to believe on Jesus, repent, and a willing heart to obey God’s will for your life. Repent means turn from your sinful lifestyle and disobedience to God’s Word to a lifestyle fully pleasing to God obeying God’s Word in all the New Testament. This means a real change of heart and direction in your life free from habitual sin. If you want to join the Facebook deliverance group for FREE HELP you can by clicking taping this link here as follows


All glory to Jesus alone. It's all by God's grace. Jesus alone gives Salvation, Healing, Deliverance. Please share to help others thank you and God bless you. Also note we are not a charity, a business, or a church. We only have a Facebook ministry to preach the Bible / encouragement and offer a Bible Study group and deliverance group for free. We do not charge.

Also we invite you to join our Bible Teaching group and study a long with us. Discussing theology in the Bible in terms anyone can understand. This will help the Christian equip himself with sound doctrine in Biblical truth.