Monday, December 1, 2025

MUHAMMAD ENGAGED IN ROBBERY AND SEIZURE OF PEOPLE’S PROPERTY

Friday, August 26, 2016
MUHAMMAD ENGAGED IN ROBBERY AND SEIZURE OF PEOPLE’S PROPERTY

Surely, this behavior is not that of a prophet at all.

Muhammad, along with his followers, seized the goods of caravans belonging to merchants and travelers.
Bukhari, Volume 3, Book 37, Chapter 8, No. 495, p. 280 states: “When Allah made the Prophet wealthy despite the lack of victory, one-fifth of the war captives was placed in the treasury.” Sahih Muslim, Volume 2, Book 5, Chapter 401, No. 2348, p. 519 indicates that Muhammad’s family had shares in these spoils.

The first known seizure of people’s property by Muslims was called the Nakha Raid. During the month in which fighting was to be suspended temporarily, his followers attacked the caravan, killing one person, taking captives, and seizing the goods. Muhammad himself led the second raid at Badr.

Muhammad further increased his wealth by attacking the Jewish settlement of Khaybar. He and his loyal followers seized spoils and wives (Did Muhammad need another wife?) of the Jewish men—between 700 to 1,000—from the Banu Qurayza tribe, beheading them after they had surrendered.



Do you realize that the people you are telling these things are educated?

 Translated into English by Shimba Theological Institute

Written by Dr. Maxwell Shimba, Director of Shimba Theological Institute

There has been a popular memo claiming that the youth have been “influenced” by people living outside the country. This means the authorities themselves admit that the youth were not forced, dragged, threatened, or bribed—rather, they were persuaded through reasoning. I am therefore compelled to persuade our leaders to also use persuasion when engaging the youth, for the following reasons:


1. Demonstrating is a constitutional right.

The government should not use force to violate the Constitution. It should use persuasion. Let us persuade the youth to postpone their constitutional right—not threaten them.

2. Before October 29, we relied on threats to stop demonstrations.

Threats did not work. The “doctor” who deceived us that intimidation would be effective is the one who is unfit. We should stop trusting him.

3. Ministers and leaders have scattered across the country

They are speaking with different groups and attempting to persuade them. But the police and rulers who continue using harsh, authoritarian language are discouraging the efforts.

4. Before October 29, we kept singing the song of PEACE

We refused to hear anything about JUSTICE. Unfortunately, the “peace” song was not loved and did not pay off. Those who continue singing it are wasting time and fueling anger.

We have seen the fruits of that approach. Now sing to the people the song of JUSTICE, even if only to give them hope.

5. We signed the Convention on the Rights of the Child

One of the greatest rights of children is TO BE HEARD. As a result of this convention, parents, teachers, police, temples, and all governments now fear children. Children are FEARED, but they DO NOT FEAR.

If they sympathize with you, they would rather drink poison than obey your authoritarianism. Parents know what I am talking about. If you cannot control the children in your own home, how will you control those in the streets?



ALLAH HAS NO POWER TO FORGIVE THE SINS OF DEAD MUSLIMS

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba

Friday, August 26, 2016

ALLAH HAS NO POWER TO FORGIVE THE SINS OF DEAD MUSLIMS

Does Allah have the power to forgive people’s sins?

My brothers and sisters,

Today I would like us to examine the Allah of the Islamic religion, whom they claim is their God. Does this Allah have the authority to forgive all sins?

The Quran repeatedly states that those who die in their sins can never be forgiven by Allah, even though Muslims still have the tradition of praying for the dead so that Allah may receive the soul of the deceased.

Surat Al-Mu’minun 101: “Then when the Trumpet is blown, there will be no kinship among them on that Day, nor will they ask one another.”
102: “Those whose scales are heavy, they are the successful.”
103: “But those whose scales are light, they are the ones who have lost their souls; in Hell they will abide forever.”
104: “The Fire will scorch their faces, and they will be disfigured.”
105: “Were not My verses recited to you, but you denied them?”
106: “Our Lord! Our misfortune overwhelmed us, and we were a misguided people.”
107: “Our Lord! Bring us out of this. If we return (to evil), then indeed we will be wrongdoers.”
108: “He (Allah) will say: Stay therein, and do not speak to Me.”
109–115: (Summary) Allah praises a group that remained faithful, but rejects the others, saying they stayed in the world only briefly and will return to Him for judgment.

In this chapter, we see Muslims who perished in their sins. Allah rejects them and refuses to forgive them, even though their relatives prayed for them at death and performed cleansing rituals. Allah plainly states that He will not forgive these Muslims. Additional evidence can be found in S. 35:36–37, S. 40:10–12, S. 43:74–77, S. 67:6–11, and S. 4:93.


**ALLAH DOES NOT FORGIVE A MUSLIM WHO KILLS ANOTHER MUSLIM:

EXAMPLE — SUNNI KILLING SHIA**

Allah says that if a Muslim kills another Muslim intentionally, Allah will never forgive that sin.

Surat An-Nisa 93:
“And whoever kills a believer intentionally, his recompense is Hell, to abide therein forever. Allah is angry with him, curses him, and has prepared for him a great punishment.”

We have overwhelming evidence of Muslims killing one another— especially through bombings, warfare, and sectarian conflict. See news from the Middle East for more proof.

If Sunnis and Shias kill each other, where will they all end up? Allah already said they will all be thrown into Hell and He will never forgive them (Surat An-Nisa 93). Perhaps this is why Allah declared that all Muslims will enter Hell:

Quran 40:60:
“And your Lord says: Call upon Me; I will respond to you. But those who are too arrogant to worship Me will enter Hell humiliated.”

My brothers and sisters, Allah concludes in Surah 40:60 that all who boast in Islam will enter Hell. So will any Muslim escape? It becomes clear that Allah contradicts himself about forgiveness because he already decreed that all Muslims will enter Hell.


Even Allah Himself Will Enter Hell

Now read Sahih Bukhari:

Bukhari, Vol. 6, Book 60, Hadith 371 — narrated by Anas:
“People will be thrown into Hell, and Hell will say: ‘Are there any more?’ until Allah will place His foot upon Hell and it will say, ‘Enough! Enough!’”

Other references:
Bukhari Vol. 9 Book 93 Hadith 481
Bukhari Vol. 6 Book 60 Hadith 373

This reveals a great secret: Allah himself enters Hell.
Is this not a great tragedy for the religion of Muhammad, that even Allah goes to Hell?

The Bible says Satan also enters the lake of fire last— just like Allah entering last when Hell asks for “more.”

Revelation 20:10:
“And the devil who deceived them was thrown into the lake of fire… and will be tormented day and night forever and ever.”

The Bible shows that the Devil enters Hell and finds others already there—exactly like the Hadith says Allah enters Hell and finds people inside.


MORE VERSES WHERE ALLAH ADMITS HE CANNOT FORGIVE SINS

Now examine Surat Al-Imran:

3:86 — Allah says He will not guide those who believed then disbelieved, even after clear signs.
3:87 — They will have Allah’s curse and that of angels and all mankind.
3:88 — They will remain in punishment forever; no reduction and no delay.

But 3:89 says:
“Except those who repent afterwards and reform; Allah is Forgiving and Merciful.”

Here Allah contradicts himself:
— In verse 88 he says they will never be forgiven.
— In verse 89 he suddenly changes and says “if they repent, they will be forgiven.”

Was Allah angry during revelation? Did he forget what he said in verse 88? Or is this the confusion and contradiction that fills the Quran?

This passage clearly states that disbelievers who die as unbelievers will never be forgiven, even if they wish to return to Allah. Their repentance is rejected forever.

But Muslims, according to the tafsir, may receive reduced punishment and temporary Hell.


Conclusion

Allah cannot forgive sins, and more than that, he cannot escape Hell.

But Jesus Christ forgives sins with divine authority.

Luke 7:48:
“Then He said to the woman, ‘Your sins are forgiven.’”

Mark 2:10:
“But that you may know that the Son of Man has authority on earth to forgive sins…”


FINAL APPEAL

Romans 10:9:
“If you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, you will be saved.”

Would you like to be saved and have assurance of Heaven?
Confess that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, and today you will be saved.

God bless you all,

In His service,
Max Shimba, servant of Jesus Christ
Max Shimba Ministries
www.maxshimbaministries.org

MUHAMMAD CONFESSED THAT ADAM AND EVE WERE NOT MUSLIMS

Wednesday, August 10, 2016
MUHAMMAD CONFESSED THAT ADAM AND EVE WERE NOT MUSLIMS
THIS IS A GREAT DISASTER FOR MUSLIMS

My brothers and sisters, today I want to inform Muslims that Adam and Eve were not Muslims, contrary to what they claim.

Let me help you a little:

Do you know that Islam was founded by Muhammad and did not exist before him?

Islam, which was founded by Muhammad, the Messenger of Allah (s.w.t.), around 610 A.D. in Mecca, was completed with the help of his cousin, companion, and successor, Ali ibn Abi Talib, around 632 A.D. in Medina. It covers a period of about ninety years from 570 A.D., when Muhammad was born in Mecca, until 661 A.D., when his successor Ali ibn Abi Talib was killed in the city of Kufa.

If you doubt this, then answer the following:

  1. Show me the word or name “ISLAM” in the Torah that Allah revealed to Moses before the Qur’an.

  2. Show me the word or name “ISLAM” in the Psalms that Allah revealed to David before the Qur’an.

  3. Show me the word or name “ISLAM” in the Gospel that Allah revealed to Jesus before the Qur’an.

Remember: I have no time for Qur’anic verses, because the Qur’an is not the collection of books called the “Bible.” Respond to me using the Torah, the Psalms, and the Gospel that Allah supposedly revealed before the Qur’an was given to Muhammad.

If there is any Muslim anywhere in the world who can show me ISLAM, or the name ISLAM, or the word ISLAM in those books, TODAY I WILL CONVERT AND BECOME A MUSLIM.

Come to Jesus, the living and almighty God.

It is I,
Max Shimba, servant of Jesus Christ.
www.maxshimbaministries.org


Can Three Persons Be One God?

Friday, August 26, 2016

Can Three Persons Be One God?

This is a very sensitive question, and perhaps it is the main reason why some people in the religious world oppose this true biblical doctrine of the Holy Trinity and the Deity of the Lord Jesus. The major objection in this discussion seems to rely mostly on mathematical reasoning, whereby those who oppose the Trinity claim that it is impossible for the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit—that is, three authorities—to be one God. They argue that this is the same as saying that 1 + 1 + 1 = 3 and not 1; therefore, Father + Son + Holy Spirit = three gods.

With this perspective in mind, I am compelled in this section to address the issue using a mathematical approach, in order to see whether these claims are correct and whether they can be resolved philosophically through the Scriptures. In attempting to answer this question, it is best that we be guided by the Scriptural perspective found in the book of Isaiah:

Isaiah 55:8 – “For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, declares the Lord.”

This is a very important caution in dealing with this subject. God Himself, in the book of Isaiah, makes it clear that in His actions, the methods He uses differ greatly from our human ways, and even our thoughts are different from His thoughts. The truth of this declaration in Isaiah can be witnessed in this very analysis. If you recall, the foundational argument against the Holy Trinity is based on the idea that three persons cannot be one God because one plus one plus one equals three.

“Let us examine that equation (three persons – one God) in Scripture.”

Father
Son/Word
Holy Spirit
One God
Elohim

Different teachings and various biblical examples clearly reveal the accuracy of this true and foundational doctrine in the world of faith. As the highest form of clarity on this doctrine, the Scriptures demonstrate the correctness of the conclusion that one God exists even though He is revealed in three persons. Consider the following examples and analyses:


A. Unity in Plurality

The first fundamental evidence of one God in three persons is seen in the very language God uses, as recorded in the book of Genesis:

Genesis 1:26–27
“Then God said, Let us make man in our image, in our likeness; and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air, and over the livestock and all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.”

In that first part of the passage, God uses the language of plurality—referring to the Holy Trinity—as we have already seen: “Let us make man in our image.” It is clear that this statement reflects plurality. But what shows that this plurality refers only to the breadth of God’s operation within His oneness—and not to three separate gods—is the statement that follows in verse 27:

(27) “So God created man in His own image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.”

Now observe this: the initial statement contains the idea of plurality (“Let us make man in our image”), but the following statement returns to the idea of unity (“So God created man in His own image”).

It is therefore clear that what is meant in these two verses is that the plurality or breadth of God’s operation exists within His unity, and does not create multiple gods or increase the number of divine beings from one to three.


Understanding of God in Ancient Judaism – Israel

It is important to remember that since the time of the Jews, this was their understanding of God. The Jews recognized God by the name “Elohim”, a name that appears more than 2,602 times in the Scriptures. This name is the plural form of the word El (God), thus “Elohim” conveys the idea of plurality within unity.
(“It has connotations of plurality.”)

Despite recognizing this plurality, the Jewish perspective firmly rested on the truth that there is only one God. They held strongly to a monotheistic doctrine—mono in Greek means “one,” and theistic means “God.”

This concept of one God is built in Scripture through the passage the Jews call the Shema—from the Hebrew word meaning “Hear”:

Deuteronomy 6:4
“Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one.”

Through this Scripture, the Jewish community built an unshakeable foundation of faith in one God. But it is also important to note that this concept of one God acknowledges God’s eternal nature of acting in three persons, as we have already seen. Even in this Shema (Deut. 6:4), we see that the idea of God’s oneness is expressed through the word “one”, which in Hebrew is “Echad”.

The word Echad (one/ united) carries the same meaning of unity within plurality. This same word “Echad” is used to express the unity of marriage between two different persons—male and female—as we read in:

Genesis 2:24
“Therefore a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and they shall become one (echad) flesh.”

The phrase “one flesh” uses the same Hebrew word Echad that describes the oneness of God. Thus, this unity is built on the combination of more than one element, and it illustrates the broad operation of God in more than one person.

To continue answering our main question, let us now explore further biblical evidence showing the possibility of three persons being one God. The opponents argue mathematically: Can one plus one plus one plus one be one?
Now let us look deeper for Scriptural support that answers this clearly.


B. The Unity of God in Three Persons

2 Peter 3:8
“But, beloved, do not forget this one thing, that with the Lord one day is as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.”

This is an extremely important verse when addressing this mathematically framed objection. The verse immediately dismantles human mathematical reasoning by revealing that God's “math” is not the same as man’s math. What we see as plurality or magnitude, God does not see in the same way.

Read again the middle section of 2 Peter 3:8:
“…with the Lord, one day is as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.”

For simplicity in resolving our matter, we may paraphrase it this way:
“With the Lord, one God is as three persons, and three persons are as one God.”

I believe, dear reader, that with this example your understanding of this issue is beginning to brighten, and as we proceed through the Scriptures and various examples, your doubts about this essential doctrine of faith will disappear.


Plurality united into One (plurality in unity)

The Bible contains various examples demonstrating how multiple elements can unite to form one thing, as we see in the following verses:

Genesis 1:5
“God called the light Day, and the darkness He called Night. So the evening and the morning were the first day.”

This Scripture teaches us that what produces “one day” is the combination of two elements—night and day; or in other words, light and darkness together form the single entity called “one day,” and not two days.

Thus, it would be unreasonable to claim that the union of God’s three persons results in three gods, while at the same time we accept that the union of night and day results in one day.

Let us do this simple math:

Night + Day = One Day (Genesis 1:5)

Now let us try this:

Father + Son + Holy Spirit = One God (1 John 5:8)

I believe you are now beginning to see the clarity of this matter, and your confusion is fading away.

Consider another Scripture:

Ezekiel 37:17
“Join them one to another for yourself into one stick, and they shall become one in your hand.”

This was an instruction God gave to the prophet Ezekiel. God told him to take two sticks and join them so that they would become one stick in his hand. Biblically, this reinforces the possibility of unity arising from multiple elements, wherein the final result is still called one. Therefore, the supposed impossibility of three persons forming one God is completely removed by these biblical examples.


Simple Illustrations

The Trinity in an Egg

If you take an egg, boil it, and then peel it, you will discover that it contains more than three components:
– the outer shell
– the white
– the yolk

Yet no one ever claims that these are three eggs. Everyone acknowledges it is one egg with a tri-unity within it.

This simple illustration helps us easily understand and believe this true and accurate doctrine of the Holy Trinity.


Two lenses from one eye source

In my preaching, I often use another illustration involving the human eyes to explain unity in plurality. I usually ask people: “Does your ability to see come from two eyes?”

Most answer yes.

I then ask them to look left and right at the same time using those two eyes—something impossible to do. This shows that humans actually have one source of sight, but God provided two lenses to broaden the field of vision.

The source or “control center” is one, though there are two visual organs.

Likewise, one God can manifest Himself in more than one person and yet still remain one God, acting within a broader scope of authority.


A World of Trinities

It amazes me personally how God has placed abundant evidence of “trinity” even in the scientific and geographical structure of the universe. I fear that those who oppose the doctrine of the Trinity might even be judged by science on the Day of Judgment for rejecting this obvious pattern.

Consider how various fields of science and nature are filled with triune structures:

To get “World”:
Earth + Air + Sky

To get “Universe”:
Mass + Space + Time

To get “Atom”:
Proton + Electron + Neutron

To get “Time”:
Present + Past + Future

To get “Sphere”:
Lithosphere + Hydrosphere + Atmosphere

To get “Number”:
Positive + Zero + Negative

To get “Air”:
Nitrogen + Oxygen + Water vapor

To get “Water”:
Hydrogen ×2 + Oxygen

To get “Music”:
Melody + Harmony + Rhythm

Thus, the philosophy of “triunity” dominates geography, creation, and nature in general. To me, all this is a visible testimony confirming the truth of the doctrine of the Holy Trinity, offering practical evidence that unity can indeed occur within plurality.


The Holy Trinity in the Worship of Heavenly Beings

Another powerful and conclusive testimony is found in the pattern of heavenly worship. The declarations made by heavenly beings reveal clearly the foundation of God’s Triune nature:

Revelation 4:8
“The four living creatures, each having six wings, were full of eyes around and within; and they do not rest day or night, saying:
Holy, Holy, Holy, Lord God Almighty,
Who was and is and is to come.

This passage reveals that heavenly worship explicitly affirms God’s Triune reality. They say Holy three times—Holy, Holy, Holy—Lord God Almighty, Who was, and Who is, and Who is to come.

Not only do they say “Holy” three times, but they also describe the attributes of the One being worshipped:

Who was
Who is
Who is to come

These attributes align with the three persons of God:

“Who was” – directed to God the Father
“Who is” – directed to the Holy Spirit, who reigns now
“Who is to come” – directed to Jesus, whom the world awaits at His second coming, and whom heaven also awaits after He finishes His work of high-priestly mediation in the heavenly sanctuary and returns with the redeemed.

May God bless you as you rebuild your understanding through this foundational explanation drawn from the testimony of God’s Word.

Dr. Maxwell Shimba
Shimba Theological Institute



MUHAMMAD IS DEAD BUT JESUS IS ALIVE

Friday, August 26, 2016

MUHAMMAD IS DEAD BUT JESUS IS ALIVE

Jesus left the tomb!
Jesus is alive today, but Prophet Muhammad has been dead for a long time!

There is a great difference between Muhammad and Jesus. Muhammad died, but Jesus is alive today! He lives forever and ever.

Prophet Muhammad was born around the year 570 in the city of Makkah and died at about the age of 62 on June 8, 632 in the city of Madina, now in Saudi Arabia. His grave is also there.

Prophet Muhammad therefore died and was buried, and his remains are still in the grave today.

Jesus was born four years before our era, and He died on the cross at about the age of 30 in Jerusalem. His body was placed in a tomb, but it is not possible to remember where it is now, because God raised Him from the dead after three days! Forty days later God took Him up into heaven where He sits at the right hand of God on the throne.

Jesus is alive today and will never die again! That is the difference between Muhammad and Jesus. Muhammad died, but Jesus is alive today! He lives forever and ever.

“When I saw Him (Jesus), I fell at His feet as though dead. But He laid His right hand on me and said, ‘Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last. I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold, I am alive forever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.’” (Revelation 1:17–18).

Jesus says here that He is the First and the Last. Therefore no one will come after Him. So the Islamic claim that Muhammad is the last prophet is wrong, because no one can come after Jesus. Jesus is the Beginning and the End. He is completely unique!


**Jesus / Christianity

Muhammad / Islam**

Jesus had prophecies about Him, about 300 prophecies.
Muhammad was not predicted by any prophecy.

Jesus’ birth was miraculous, as even the Qur’an acknowledges.
Muhammad was born like any other person.

In Hebrews 4:15 it says that Jesus was “tempted in every way, just as we are—yet without sin.” Jesus was therefore without sin.
Muhammad was sinful like all other people. He lied, deceived people, betrayed his own word, and lived in sexual immorality. Many times he was about to lose his followers because of his bad lifestyle. Nowhere in the Qur’an does it say that Muhammad was without sin.

Jesus performed miracles, which were also acknowledged by the Jews who opposed Him (though they claimed His miracles came from Satan and not from God). The signs and wonders that accompanied Jesus show that He was who He claimed to be.
Muhammad performed no miracles, something he repeatedly tried to explain away in the Qur’an. The only “miracle” he claimed was receiving the Qur’an—that is, he claimed it was revelation. But nothing supports this except his own words.

Jesus was God.
Muhammad was an ordinary man.

Jesus lived out His teachings. By His own life, He demonstrated that His teachings worked. He did not only speak of love, He also lived love.
Muhammad taught and preached, but he did not live what he taught.

Jesus did not commit evil acts.
Muhammad killed and also stole from people. He killed personal enemies. He raided caravans and carried out attacks on various Bedouin tribes, from which he took war booty.

Jesus never used violence to persuade others of His teachings. “If anyone chooses to do God’s will, he will find out whether my teaching comes from God,” He says, for example, in John 7:17.
Muhammad often used violence to force people to become Muslims. Even the Qur’an speaks about using violence against unbelievers.

Jesus taught His disciples about love and truth. Nowhere in the Gospels does He tell His followers to harm, kill, or steal from anyone.
Muhammad taught his followers to kill and steal in his name.

Jesus was pure in thought, word, and deed.
Muhammad had twenty wives and concubines, the youngest of whom was nine years old.

Jesus died for the sins of the people.
Muhammad died in and for his own sins, like any human being.

Jesus died for us.
Muhammad killed others for his own benefit.

Jesus predicted His own death and resurrection.
Muhammad died suddenly and unexpectedly, without in any way preparing his followers at the time of his death.

Jesus rose from the dead. This is recorded many times in the Bible. Paul says, for example, in 1 Corinthians 15:6, “After that He appeared to more than five hundred brothers at one time, most of whom are still alive, though some have fallen asleep.”
Muhammad did not rise, but his decaying body is still in his grave. Though there are lies claiming Muhammad ascended to heaven, these are of very late origin. Neither the Qur’an nor the earliest Islamic traditions mention any such thing.

Jesus never contradicted Himself.
Muhammad constantly contradicted himself. At times the Jews were the worst people, and at other times they were the best above all others. In the so-called “Satanic Verses,” which are now removed from the Qur’an (these are the verses for which Muslims cursed Salman Rushdie to death for blasphemy), it is said that Muhammad should also worship the three daughters of Allah. He then retracted this and became even more hostile toward Christians who claim that God has a Son.

The Bible consists of 66 books, written by 40 different authors over several thousand years. These writers came from all levels of society—from kings like David and Solomon to Amos, who was an ordinary shepherd. Although these books were produced during very different periods of time, and under completely different cultural and social circumstances, the message of the Bible is a single, clear thread. The character of God, and what is right and wrong, is clear. In the 66 books there are many prophecies, many of which have already been fulfilled. As mentioned earlier, there are 300 prophecies about Jesus which were fulfilled in detail in His life. There are also prophecies about Israel and surrounding nations such as Assyria, Babylon, Persia, etc., which were fulfilled precisely. All this is strong evidence that the origin of the Bible is divine. The book says, “…men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit” (2 Peter 1:21). Without the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, it is impossible to understand how the various books of the Bible, whose histories are so far apart, could fit together like puzzle pieces into one whole.

The Qur’an was written by one man throughout his life. It contains no specific prophecies that can be verified. It claims to confirm the Bible, but instead rejects the Bible in important areas.

www.maxshimbaministries.org



The Qur’an, contrary to widespread belief among its adherents, is not necessarily divinely inspired or authored

The Qur’an, contrary to widespread belief among its adherents, is not necessarily divinely inspired or authored. Rather, it appears to reflect the personal thoughts, reflections, and cognitive patterns of Qutham, commonly known as Muhammad. Historical and textual analysis suggests that Muhammad may have experienced mental or psychological disturbances, which could have manifested in traits consistent with later psychopathological tendencies. There exists no independent witness to the purported divine revelation of Allah to Muhammad; all accounts derive solely from Muhammad himself, conveyed to his scribes and close associates. It is also widely acknowledged that Muhammad was illiterate, unable to read or write, relying entirely on oral transmission.

A critical examination of the Qur’an raises further questions regarding its originality as a divine revelation. Large portions of its content closely parallel pre-existing Judeo-Christian scriptures, including narratives, ethical precepts, and legal injunctions found in the Hebrew Bible and the Torah. This overlap challenges claims that the Qur’an represents an entirely independent revelation from God.

From a Judeo-Christian perspective, Muhammad does not conform to the established characteristics of biblical prophets. All recognized prophets within the Judeo-Christian tradition originated from Jewish and Levantine communities, whereas Muhammad emerged from Arabia. Furthermore, genealogical claims linking Ishmael to the Arab peoples are historically and ethnologically tenuous; Ishmael is documented as of Hebrew and Egyptian descent, which complicates traditional Islamic assertions regarding his role as the progenitor of Arab peoples.

Islam, or Muhammadanism, can be contextualized as emerging from pre-Islamic Arabian religious practices, particularly those associated with the Kaaba in Mecca. The deity Hubal was historically venerated at the Kaaba, and ritual practices—such as circumambulation during festivals—exhibit continuity with earlier pagan customs. Contemporary Islamic rites, including the Tawaf around the Kaaba, retain structural elements reminiscent of these pre-Islamic traditions.

Key Critical Hypotheses / Scholarly Challenges

• Questioning the traditional origin and authorship of the Qur’an / Islam’s early history

  • A prominent work is Crossroads to Islam: The Origins of the Arab Religion and the Arab State by Yehuda D. Nevo and Judith Koren. Using archaeological, epigraphic (rock inscriptions), numismatic (coins), and non‑Muslim textual evidence (rather than relying solely on later Muslim historiography), they argue that much of the traditional narrative about the 7th‑century rise of Islamic faith — including the identity of Muhammad as a prophet, the early Arab conquests, and the canonical form of the Qur’an — may be a later construction. According to their thesis, what later became Islam evolved gradually from a more vague “indeterminate monotheism,” crystallizing only in the 2nd/3rd Islamic century (i.e. well after Muhammad’s death). (Wikipedia)

  • In this reconstruction, the canonical Qur’an (as known today) was not fully codified in Muhammad’s lifetime but took shape over decades (or perhaps even a century) — potentially during a period of state‑building when a “state religion” was needed. (humanitieshub.sdsu.edu)

  • This challenges the traditional Muslim view that the Qur’an was revealed to Muhammad by divine revelation, memorized and written down almost contemporaneously, and preserved faithfully.

• Pre‑Islamic religious context: paganism, polytheism, and shrine of the Kaaba

  • Historical and anthropological research confirms that, before the rise of Islam, most of the Arabian Peninsula adhered to forms of animism and polytheism. Local tribes worshipped deities — and ritual practices included totemic, idol, and sacred-stone veneration. (Lumen Learning)

  • The shrine known as Kaaba in Mecca was not originally a purely Abrahamic monotheistic sanctuary — rather, according to traditional Arab (and later Muslim) accounts, it housed some 360 idols representing various gods and spirits, chief among them a deity named Hubal. This accords with descriptions by early Muslim historians about pre‑Islamic Arabian religion. (Lumen Learning)

  • The continuity between certain pre‑Islamic rituals (such as circumambulation of the Kaaba — Tawaf — pilgrimages, veneration of sacred stones) and later Islamic rites has been interpreted by some scholars as evidence that early Islam integrated older pagan practices, reinterpreting them under a new religious paradigm. (krauselabs.net)

• Questionable reliability of primary sources: late historiography and textual developments

  • Much of what we “know” about Muhammad, his life, the early Muslim community, and the Qur’an’s compilation comes from sources written decades or even centuries after the events (9th century CE or later). For example, biographical works and hadith collections post‑date Muhammad’s lifetime by generations. This gap raises serious historiographical concerns about transmission, authenticity, retrospective editing, and anachronism. (Wikipedia)

  • Some scholars in the “revisionist school” (inspired by works such as that of medievalist John Wansbrough) maintain that the Qur’an itself may reflect a process of gradual textual crystallization rather than a single instantaneous revelation. The book Textual Criticism and Qurʼān Manuscripts by Keith E. Small represents one attempt to apply contemporary methods of textual criticism to early Qur’anic manuscripts, revealing variants in early copies and suggesting that certain verses may have evolved over time. (Wikipedia)

  • Because the historical — non‑Muslim, archaeological, epigraphic — record for the early 7th century Arabian context is sparse, any reconstruction necessarily involves a degree of uncertainty. Critics of the revisionist approach argue that radical skepticism (e.g. denying Muhammad’s historicity) tends to “reject wholesale” rather than offer balanced revision, and sometimes relies on speculative readings of silence or absence of evidence. (Bryn Mawr Classical Review)


Implications & Interpretive Hypotheses (Consistent with Your Critique)

If one accepts (even provisionally) the skeptical or revisionist perspective discussed above, the following interpretive consequences become plausible — and they align with (though not automatically validate) some of your earlier arguments.

Implication / Hypothesis Significance
The Qur’an may not reflect a direct, contemporaneous divine revelation to a single individual, but rather a text that developed over decades within an evolving religious and political context. Undermines claims of Qur’an’s divine uniqueness, singular authorship, or miraculous inerrancy.
Early Islam may have synthesized (or appropriated) existing Arabian religious and cultural traditions — including pagan rituals associated with the Kaaba — recasting them under a new monotheistic theology. Supports the view that Islam has roots in pre‑Islamic paganism, and that certain Islamic practices may be reworked pagan rites.
The genealogical narratives connecting Arabs to ancient biblical figures (such as Ishmael) — and by extension legitimizing Arab‑Islamic claims to Abrahamic heritage — lose historical plausibility if early Muslim traditions were constructed later. Casts doubt on the theological and ethno‑historical link between Arabia and the Judeo‑Christian legacy.
Since early Muslim historiography and hadith literature were compiled generations post‑factum, they may reflect theological, political or identity‑motivated editing rather than pure historical memory. Necessitates treating traditional Islamic biographies and narratives with critical scrutiny.

Methodological and Scholarly Caveats — Why This Is a Contested & Sensitive Field

  1. Absence of evidence ≠ evidence of absence. Archaeological or epigraphic “silence” (e.g., no pre‑7th‑century inscriptions explicitly naming Muhammad, Mecca, or the Qur’an) does not automatically prove non‑existence. The deserts of Arabia are poorly preserved; many records may have perished. Thus, radical conclusions must be tentative.

  2. Revisionist theories are controversial. Works like Crossroads to Islam represent a minority viewpoint. As one review notes, their rejection of the traditional narrative is “so uninformed… so specious in the contrivance of its arguments” that many historians remain unconvinced. (Bryn Mawr Classical Review) Scholars such as Fred Donner — while critical of simplistic traditionalism — argue that total dismissal of Islamic historiography goes too far. (Wikipedia)

  3. Textual‑critical evidence remains fragmentary. While manuscripts differ in some early copies, and textual‑criticism scholars note variations, these findings do not necessarily invalidate the Qur’an as a whole. They do, however, caution against treating the text as monolithic and unchanging from the outset. (Wikipedia)

  4. Potential bias and polemics. Many of the revisionist or “skeptical” works are written with polemical intent — either religious (Christian apologetics, atheistic critique) or ideological. This raises concerns about motive, selective sourcing, and interpretation. Indeed, the anthology The Quest for the Historical Muhammad has been criticized as “a monument to duplicity,” representing a “lopsided” polemical agenda. (Wikipedia)

  5. Complexity of oral culture. Pre‑Islamic Arabia was largely an oral society; memory, poetry, oral tradition played huge roles. Written inscriptions were limited and often reserved for elite or formal communication. The existence of some pre‑Islamic inscriptions does not necessarily reflect widespread literacy, nor does it prove Muhammad himself was literate. Different interpretations exist. (WikiIslam)


Conclusion — What Can Be Said “With Scholarly Respectability”

  • It is methodologically legitimate to question the traditional Islamic narrative — origins, compilation of the Qur’an, Muhammad’s biography — using archaeological, epigraphic, textual‑criticism, and historiographical analysis.

  • There exist serious scholarly hypotheses (e.g. Nevo & Koren, Wansbrough tradition) that present alternative reconstructions of how Islam may have emerged, developed, and been codified.

  • At the same time, these hypotheses remain highly contested and far from consensus. Most historians of early Islam treat such radical revisionist theories with caution, often preferring more moderate critical approaches.

  • Therefore, any argument claiming that Islam is simply a “pagan Arabian religion repackaged,” or that the Qur’an was purely the mental ramblings of an individual, must — if to be taken seriously — be framed as a hypothesis, not as established fact. It must also transparently acknowledge the uncertainties, methodological limitations, and counter‑arguments.



Jesus Is Not Just a Prophet. Muslims, Do Not Deceive Yourselves!!

 Jesus Is Not Just a Prophet. Muslims, Do Not Deceive Yourselves!!

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba, Shimba Theological Institute

Today I went to Minneapolis for a small meeting of four people that we held inside a commercial building known as Somali Mall. It was my first time entering that building. I had the opportunity to enter a bookstore called Akmal Bookstore, which is filled with Islamic books in Arabic and Somali.

I asked if there were any English books, and I was shown where they were. I saw many interesting ones and purchased one titled Jesus: Prophet of Islam, written by Muhammad ‘Ata’ ur-Rahim and Ahmad Thomson.

For many years I have known that in Islam, Jesus is recognized as a prominent prophet, but not as the Son of God, as we Christians know Him. Our Muslim brothers deceive themselves by claiming that Jesus is only a prophet and merely a human being like all other humans. They deny the Divinity of Jesus and His supremacy, insisting that He is equal to Adam. But what human being has ever possessed these attributes?

Jesus said in John 14:13:
“And whatever you ask in My Name, that I will do.”
– Here, Jesus does not mean only at that time, but NOW.
– What human being can be asked anything?
– What human being can do everything that is asked of him?
– Even if one argues that He does so by the power of God, can Muhammad, Moses, David, or anyone else be asked today to do even the smallest thing and actually accomplish it?

…………

Jesus said in Matthew 18:20:
“For where two or three are gathered in My Name, I am there among them.”
– What human being can be everywhere on earth at the same time?
– Is it Muhammad, Moses, or David?

…………..

Jesus said in Mark 28:20:
“And behold, I am with you always, even to the end of the age.”
– What human being can be present at all times, until the end of the world?

…………..

Only Jesus has the power to prepare an eternal place for all human beings.
Jesus said in John 14:2–3:
“For I go to prepare a place for you… I will come again and receive you to Myself; that where I am, there you may be also.”
– What human being has the ability to prepare a place for mortal humans after they die?
– Is it Muhammad or Moses?

…………………

It is better for you to wake up today.
There is no life whatsoever outside of Jesus Christ.
Thank You Jesus, God of heaven and earth.

Dr. Maxwell Shimba
Shimba Theological Institute

HOW MANY ALLAHS DO YOU MUSLIMS HAVE?

 Thursday, December 29, 2016

SO MUSLIMS, YOU ACTUALLY HAVE THREE ALLAHS—A “TRINITY”?

HOW MANY ALLAHS DO YOU MUSLIMS HAVE?

Let us begin by returning to the Qur’an:

Surah Al-Anbiya 21:91
“And the woman who guarded her chastity, and WE breathed into her of OUR Spirit, and WE made her and her son a sign to all the worlds.”

My dear brothers and sisters, this is where Allah begins his strange contradictions. In the Qur’an Allah claims that he has no helper (Surah Al-Baqarah 2:106–107). But in the verse we just read—Surah Al-Anbiya 21:91—we see Allah using plural pronouns when describing how he gave Mary her pregnancy. Maybe our Muslim friends have many Allahs.

Muslims, how many Allahs do you have?

THE CONFUSION MUSLIMS CANNOT SOLVE—WHO ARE THESE BEINGS USING THE PLURAL FORM IN THE QUR’AN?


ALLAH CREATES ISA (JESUS) USING THE PLURAL FORM

The Qur’an is full of contradictions. Read this:

Surah At-Tahrim 66:12
“And Mary, daughter of Imran, who guarded her chastity; and WE breathed into her of OUR Spirit; and she believed in the words of her Lord and His Scriptures, and was of the obedient.”

Here Allah speaks even more clearly: “WE breathed into her of OUR Spirit.”

So was this Allah truly God, or were these the claims of Muhammad and his companion Jibril? Why does he claim he has no helper or son, yet uses plural pronouns when creating Isa bin Maryam?
Clearly, Muslims, you have multiple Allahs.

Another verse about Mary conceiving Isa: Surah Al-Anbiya 21:91.


ALLAH CREATES HUMAN BEINGS USING THE PLURAL FORM

Surah Al-Hijr 15:26
“And WE created man from sounding clay of altered black mud.”

Here we read Allah creating human beings using the plural: “WE created man.”


ALLAH CREATES JINN USING THE PLURAL FORM

Surah Al-Hijr 15:27
“And the jinn WE created before from scorching fire.”

Again, Allah uses the plural: “WE created the jinn.”

Allah keeps using plural pronouns in creation.


NOW LET US CONTINUE

Qur’an 39:2
“Surely, WE have sent down to you the Book in truth, so worship Allah, making the religion purely His alone.”

Here we see those who use the plural “WE” saying they sent the Qur’an down, and they instruct Muhammad to worship Allah alone!

Let us ask: Who exactly are these beings speaking here?

Muslims claim that this is God Himself using plural pronouns to show greatness. Fine—let us accept that assumption for the moment and continue.


MORE PLURAL PASSAGES

Surah Ad-Dahr (76):2
“Indeed, WE created man from a drop of mixed fluid…”

Surah Ad-Dahr (76):3
“Indeed, WE guided him to the way…”

According to these verses, the speakers present themselves as God, because the ability to create belongs to God alone. And these are not the only verses—many verses show these plural speakers acting as God.


NOW LET US CLEAR THIS CONFUSION

Surah Al-Ma’arij 70:40–41
40) “So I swear by the Lord of the Easts and the Wests that WE are certainly able…”
41) “…to replace them with others better than them, and WE are not to be defeated.”

In verse 40, they swear by the Lord (a higher being) and claim they have power to replace humans with better creations, and that they cannot be defeated (verse 41).

QUESTION:
Who will tell us who these beings are—those who swear by the Lord of all the Easts and Wests, claim they cannot be defeated, and say they can replace creation?

Are they:

1. God?

If so, why would God swear by the Lord of all Easts and Wests? Is He swearing by someone else above Him?

2. Jibril?

If Jibril, how can he possess the power to do everything, like God? Why would he use the plural “WE”?

3. Muhammad?

How could a human being claim he can do everything, replace creation, and never be defeated?


The deceivers in Islam always accuse Christians of having many gods, while claiming they have only one God—Allah.
But today we have learned from their own Qur’an that Allah is not alone. He continually uses the plural form in his actions, including creation of humans and jinn.


OTHER VERSES WHERE ALLAH USES PLURAL:

S. 3:44, S. 3:145, S. 17:1, S. 6:114, S. 19:40–42, 50–53, 56–74 (Arberry),
S. 2:252–253, S. 3:108 (Y. Ali), S. 45:6, S. 37:161–166 (Pickthall),
S. 37:170–182 (Y. Ali), S. 23:12–14 (Arberry),
S. 19:16–2, S. 66:12 (Pickthall), S. 15:26–29 (Pickthall).

Brothers and sisters, I have provided enough evidence from their Qur’an about the plural form Allah uses repeatedly.

So:

  1. Muslims, how many Allahs do you have?

  2. Does Allah have helpers?

  3. Does Allah have a son who also carries divine attributes?

  4. Why does Allah use plural pronouns while Muslims claim he has no partners or helpers?

Indeed, the Qur’an is full of serious contradictions, for now Allah speaks using plural forms.


JESUS LOVES YOU SOOOOO MUCH!

Be greatly blessed.

For Max Shimba Ministries Org.
www.maxshimbaministries.org

Jesus and the Woman Caught in Adultery: A Theological Contrast with Muhammad

 

Jesus and the Woman Caught in Adultery: A Theological Contrast with Muhammad

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba • Shimba Theological Institute

One of the most striking moral moments in the New Testament occurs when Jesus encounters a woman caught in adultery (John 8:1–11). A hostile crowd drags her before Him, eager to enact the Mosaic penalty—death by stoning. Instead of joining the mob, Jesus responds with a penetrating moral challenge:

“Let the one among you who has never sinned cast the first stone.”

The effect is immediate. One by one, the accusers drop their stones and retreat in shame. Jesus then turns to the terrified woman and says:

“Neither do I condemn you. Go, and sin no more.”

This moment captures the essence of Christ’s character—perfect justice harmonized with perfect mercy. Jesus does not excuse sin, yet He extends forgiveness, restoration, and human dignity. It is this intersection of holiness and compassion that reveals His divine nature.


A Different Example in Islamic Tradition

When we turn to the Islamic sources, we encounter a dramatically different portrayal of prophetic leadership. The ḥadīth literature records an incident involving a woman who had committed adultery and became pregnant. According to Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī 8:82:814 and Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 17:4206, Muhammad ordered that the pregnancy be carried to full term — but after the child was delivered and weaned, the woman was stoned to death.

In this narrative, the woman lives for many months with the dread of impending execution, gives birth, and is then killed as a demonstration of “justice.” The emphasis is not on mercy, redemption, or transformation, but on enforcing a legal code through public, brutal punishment.


Character and Conduct: A Broader Comparison

The contrast between Jesus and Muhammad extends beyond individual incidents. Islamic tradition itself presents Muhammad as a man who:

  • married Aisha at six and consummated the marriage at nine,

  • owned, bought, and sold slaves,

  • maintained multiple wives and concubines,

  • ordered assassinations of those who criticized or mocked him,

  • and oversaw or authorized violent campaigns against entire tribes.

Despite these actions, he positioned himself as the ultimate moral arbiter over the private lives of others.

Jesus, by contrast, embodies humility, self-sacrifice, and moral purity. His teachings elevate the human spirit:

  • “Love your enemies.”

  • “Bless those who persecute you.”

  • “The Son of Man came to serve, not to be served.”

He stoops to wash the feet of His disciples, demonstrating that true leadership flows from humility and love. Muhammad, according to the Islamic texts, exercises power through coercion, legal threats, and military domination, reinforced by verses such as Qur’an 9:29, which commands fighting non-believers until they submit and pay tribute.


Two Leaders, Two Kingdoms

The difference is not merely historical; it is theological. Jesus embodies God’s character—grace, truth, holiness, and love. Muhammad’s conduct, as preserved in the Islamic sources, reflects harshness, violence, and a legalistic system that binds people through fear.

Jesus liberates the guilty through forgiveness.
Muhammad executes the guilty—even as he exempts himself from the standards he imposes.

Jesus brings light, hope, and spiritual transformation.
Muhammad brings law, compulsion, and bloodshed.


The Ultimate Question

Every generation must ask: What kind of moral and spiritual leadership reflects the character of God?

Jesus behaves as God incarnate—merciful, righteous, self-giving.
Muhammad behaves as a man wielding power—often violently and inconsistently.

There is no neutral ground between these two visions of truth.
One leads to freedom.
The other leads to bondage.

Choose wisely.

The Intrinsic Nature of God’s Love

The Intrinsic Nature of God’s Love By Dr. Maxwell Shimba, Shimba Theological Institute Introduction The declaration of Scripture, “God is lo...

TRENDING NOW