Thursday, July 9, 2026

ANSWERING THE MOST COMMON MUSLIM QUESTIONS ABOUT JESUS, THE TRINITY, AND THE TRUE GOD

 

ANSWERING THE MOST COMMON MUSLIM QUESTIONS ABOUT JESUS, THE TRINITY, AND THE TRUE GOD

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba
Shimba Theological Institute

Muslims frequently ask Christians a series of questions intended to challenge the deity of Christ and the doctrine of the Trinity. These questions deserve careful, biblical, and scholarly answers rather than emotional reactions. Christianity is founded upon divine revelation recorded in Scripture, not upon isolated proof-texts or misunderstandings of the incarnation.


1. WHO IS THE ONE TRUE GOD ACCORDING TO THE BIBLE?

The Bible declares that there is only one true God. "Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God is one LORD" (Deuteronomy 6:4). Jesus Himself affirmed this truth: "That they may know You, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom You have sent" (John 17:3).

Muslims often stop reading at John 17:3. Yet the same Gospel begins: "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God" (John 1:1). A few verses later: "The Word became flesh and dwelt among us" (John 1:14).

Additional Scriptural References:

  • Isaiah 9:6 — The Messiah is called "Mighty God" and "Everlasting Father," signaling that the expected Messiah transcends human origins.

  • Micah 5:2 — The Messiah's origin is "from everlasting," indicating eternal pre-existence.

  • Jeremiah 23:6 — The righteous Branch is called "The LORD our Righteousness".

  • Malachi 3:1 — The Lord's messenger prepares the way before the Lord Himself comes to His temple.

Therefore, according to John's Gospel, the Father is God, the Son is God, yet there is only one God. This is precisely the biblical doctrine of the Trinity. The Hebrew word for "one" used in Deuteronomy 6:4 ('eḥāḏ) often expresses compound unity rather than solitary oneness—just as Genesis 2:24 uses 'eḥāḏ to describe Adam and Eve becoming "one flesh," indicating a unified partnership, not a single individual.

The Plurality Within the Godhead in the Old Testament:

Genesis 1:26"Let Us make man in Our image, after Our likeness" — uses plural pronouns that hint at a plurality within the Godhead.

Genesis 1:2"The Spirit of God was hovering over the surface of the waters" — presents the Spirit active in creation.

The Angel of the LORD — Appears throughout the Old Testament (Genesis 16:7-13; Exodus 3:2-6; Judges 6:12-14) as a divine figure distinct from the Father yet addressed as God, recognized by early readers as a manifestation of the Divine Son prior to the Incarnation.

Isaiah 48:16 — Distinguishes between the Lord GOD, the One speaking, and the Spirit.


2. IF JESUS IS GOD, WHY DID HE PRAY?

This question misunderstands the Incarnation. Jesus possesses two natures: fully God and fully man. As man, Jesus prayed. As God, He forgave sins (Mark 2:5–12), accepted worship (Matthew 14:33; John 9:38), calmed storms, and raised the dead.

Scriptural Support for the Two Natures:

Philippians 2:6–8 — Christ existed in the form of God but "emptied Himself, taking the form of a slave, being born in human likeness" . This explains how He could be fully divine yet take a humbled human role.

1 Timothy 3:16"Great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifested in the flesh" .

Hebrews 2:14 — Jesus shared in flesh and blood, subject to human wants and sufferings.

Luke 2:40, 52 — He was subject to ordinary laws of human development.

Jesus' Sinlessness:

2 Corinthians 5:21"He made Him who knew no sin to be sin for us" .

Hebrews 4:15"One who in every respect has been tempted as we are, yet without sin" .

1 Peter 2:22"He committed no sin" .

John 8:46"Which one of you convicts Me of sin?" .

Why Both Natures Were Necessary:

  • As man: He could be our substitute, suffer, and die.

  • As sinless man: He could atone for the sins of others.

  • As God: He could give His sacrifice infinite value and bear the wrath of God to deliver others.

Prayer does not prove someone is not God. Instead, it demonstrates that Jesus truly became man. If Jesus had never prayed, Muslims would claim He was never truly human.


3. WHERE DID JESUS SAY, "I AM GOD; WORSHIP ME"?

Muslims often demand these exact English words. Yet prophets never used such formulas. Jesus spoke as a first-century Jew. Instead of using modern language, He claimed divine titles and performed divine actions.

Jesus' Divine Claims:

John 10:30"I and My Father are one" . The Jewish reaction is extremely important: "Because You, being a man, make Yourself God" (John 10:33). They accused Him of making Himself equal with God.

John 8:58"Before Abraham was, I AM" — Jesus deliberately used the divine name revealed in Exodus 3:14. The Jews immediately attempted to stone Him because they understood His claim.

John 5:23"That all may honor the Son just as they honor the Father" — an extraordinary claim within a Jewish monotheistic framework.

John 17:5"Glorify Me in Your presence with the glory I had with You before the world existed" — claiming pre-incarnate divine glory.

Jesus' Divine Titles:

TitleScriptural ReferenceSignificance
Son of GodMark 1:1; Matthew 16:16Equates Him with God's own nature
Lord (Kurios)Romans 10:9; Philippians 2:11Title used for Yahweh in the Septuagint, applied to Jesus
Son of ManDaniel 7:13; Mark 14:62Derives from Daniel's vision of one who receives everlasting dominion, worshiped by all peoples
Word (Logos)John 1:1Identifies Jesus as co-existent with God and fully divine

The "Son of Man" Title in Detail:

Jesus frequently used the title "Son of Man" of Himself—no one else called Him this except Stephen (Acts 7:56) and John in Revelation (1:13; 14:14). The title derives from Daniel 7:13-14, where "one like a Son of Man" comes with the clouds of heaven and receives "dominion and glory and a kingdom, that all peoples, nations, and languages should serve Him" .

At His trial before Caiaphas, Jesus declared: "I am; and you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of Power, and coming with the clouds of heaven" (Mark 14:62), echoing both Daniel's prophecy and Psalm 110:1. This was understood as a claim to divinity by His judges.

Thomas's Worship:

John 20:28"My Lord and my God!" — Thomas worshiped Jesus, and Jesus accepted the worship. No prophet ever accepted worship; only God deserves worship (Deuteronomy 6:13; Matthew 4:10).


4. WHY DID JESUS CALL GOD "FATHER"?

Because that is God's eternal relationship within the Trinity. God is eternally Father; Jesus is eternally Son. The Father is not the Son, and the Son is not the Father. Yet both possess the same divine nature.

Scriptural Evidence:

Matthew 28:19"Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit" — uses the singular "name" (not "names"), implying one essence but three persons.

2 Corinthians 13:14"The grace of the Lord Jesus Christ and the love of God and the fellowship of the Holy Spirit" — unites the three in the work of redemption.

John 14:16-17 — Jesus refers to the Holy Spirit as a distinct Helper, "another Comforter" .

The Personhood and Deity of the Holy Spirit:

Acts 5:3-4 — Lying to the Holy Spirit is equated with lying to God, underscoring the Spirit's full deity.

John 16:13 — Jesus refers to the Holy Spirit as "He" who guides into all truth, showcasing the Spirit's volition and personal role.

Titus 3:5 — The Holy Spirit regenerates believers.

The relationship within the Godhead does not imply inequality but reveals eternal communion. As Pope John Paul II explained, when Jesus called Himself "Son of Man," He used a title from the Old Testament that points to His superhuman character and His future coming in majesty and glory.


5. IF GOD IS ONE, HOW CAN THERE BE A TRINITY?

Christians do not believe in three gods. We believe one Being, three Persons; one divine essence, three distinct Persons. The Father is God, the Son is God, the Holy Spirit is God, yet there is only one God.

The Principle Explained:

The Trinity is understood as one infinite divine essence (the "what" of God) eternally shared by three co-equal and co-eternal persons (the "whos": Father, Son, Spirit). This does not violate the law of non-contradiction because God is not claimed to be one and three in the same way—He is one in nature and three in personhood.

Biblical Evidence for the Trinity:

AspectScriptural Reference
One GodDeuteronomy 6:4; Isaiah 45:5
Father is GodMatthew 6:9; John 17:1
Son is GodJohn 1:1; 20:28; Romans 9:5; Colossians 2:9
Holy Spirit is GodActs 5:3-4
Three PersonsMatthew 28:19; 2 Corinthians 13:14

The Son's Divine Attributes:

Eternality — John 1:1; Micah 5:2
Omniscience — John 21:17
Creator — John 1:1-3; Colossians 1:16-17
Forgives sins — Mark 2:5-7
Received worship — Matthew 28:19; John 14:1

Early Church Articulation:

The word "Trinity" (from Latin Trinitas) was introduced by Tertullian in the late second and early third centuries to summarize the biblical teaching. The Council of Nicaea (AD 325) and Council of Constantinople (AD 381) affirmed that the Son is "of one essence with the Father" and the Holy Spirit is also fully divine. These councils did not invent the concept but codified what Scripture testifies.

Islamic Objections and Christian Responses:

Muslim critics have historically made several philosophical objections to the Trinity. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy notes that medieval Muslim philosopher-theologians argued that "all things that are many in number have matter" and that the doctrine implies God has accidents or that nothing divine could be "generated". In response, trinitarians emphasize that by definition, the doctrine implies monotheism, and they argue that mysteries have been revealed—we have no grounds to rule out facing them when thinking about a transcendent God. They also maintain that Jesus claimed to be fully divine while being subject to and inferior to God in His human nature only.


6. IF JESUS IS GOD, WHY DID MARY CALL HIM "MY SON"?

Because Jesus truly became human. Mary gave birth to His humanity; she did not create His divine nature. Mary is the mother of Jesus according to His incarnation, not the origin of His deity.

Scriptural Clarification:

Galatians 4:4"God sent forth His Son, born of a woman" — distinguishes Jesus' divine Sonship from His human birth.

John 1:14"The Word became flesh" — the pre-existing Word took on humanity, not divinity created at birth.

Colossians 2:9"In Him dwells all the fullness of the Godhead bodily" — the divine nature permanently dwells in the incarnate Christ.

Hebrews 4:15 — Jesus is truly human, "like us in all things except sin" .

The Hypostatic Union:

The Person of the Mediator is the unchangeable Son of God. In the Incarnation, He did not change into a human person; neither did He adopt a human person. He simply assumed, in addition to His divine nature, a human nature that became personal in the Person of the Son of God. Scripture clearly points to this unity: human attributes are sometimes ascribed to the Person designated by a divine title (Acts 20:28; 1 Corinthians 2:8), and divine attributes are sometimes ascribed to the Person designated by a human title (John 3:13; 6:62; Romans 9:5).


7. JESUS IN THE QUR'AN: A BRIDGE FOR DIALOGUE

The Qur'an uniquely refers to Jesus as "Kalimatullah" (the Word of God) in Surah 3:45 and Surah 4:171, and as "a Spirit from Him" (Surah 4:171). These titles underscore His pre-existent nature.

Qur'anic Acknowledgments of Jesus:

  • Surah 3:45"The angels said, 'O Mary, indeed Allah gives you good tidings of a word from Him, whose name will be the Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary'" .

  • Surah 4:171"The Messiah, Jesus, son of Mary, was a Messenger of Allah and His Word, which He bestowed upon Mary and a spirit from Him" .

  • Surah 3:49 — Jesus performs miracles: creating a bird from clay, healing the blind and lepers, raising the dead—all "by Allah's leave" .

  • Surah 19:30-34 — Jesus speaks as an infant, declaring: "I am a servant of Allah... He has made me a Prophet" .

The Qur'anic Kalimah Concept:

The Qur'an's use of kalimah (word) to describe Jesus is significant. According to scholarly analysis, the term in Q 3:39 and 3:45 is indefinite (indicated by nunation), which differs from the Christian use of "the Word" with the definite article. However, in Q 4:171, the term is included in a list of appellations, confirming the identity of kalimah and Jesus. As Muhammad Legenhausen notes, interpreting Jesus as "the Word of God" opens possibilities for understanding the gospel from a Qur'anic perspective.

A Shared Foundation:

The Qur'an acknowledges that Muslims, Jews, and Christians are all "People of the Book" and were originally given revelation from the same God—the God of Abraham. Surah 2:136 declares: "We believe in Allah and in what was revealed to us and what was revealed to Abraham, Ishmael, Isaac, Jacob, and the Tribes." Surah 29:46 states: "Our God and your God is One, and to Him we submit" .

These acknowledgments—especially the title "Word of God" and the affirmation of Jesus' unique birth and miracles—provide a bridge for discussing Jesus' divine nature, as the Word of God is eternal.

Areas of Disagreement:

However, the Qur'an categorically rejects the Trinity and Jesus' divinity: "They have certainly disbelieved who say, 'Allah is the Messiah, the son of Mary'" (Surah 5:72) and "Say not: 'Trinity!' Cease; it is better for you! For Allah is One God" (Surah 4:171). The Qur'an teaches that associating partners with God (shirk) is a grave theological error. While both faiths intend to worship the same God in origin, their concepts differ fundamentally.


8. QUESTIONS MUSLIMS SHOULD ALSO ANSWER

Christians answer difficult questions from Scripture. Muslims should also answer difficult questions from the Qur'an and Islamic theology.

Why is Allah never called "Father"?

Throughout the Bible, God is revealed as Father (Isaiah 63:16; Isaiah 64:8; Matthew 6:9; John 20:17; Romans 8:15; Galatians 4:6; Ephesians 4:6). Christians pray "Our Father in heaven..." Yet the Qur'an explicitly rejects Allah as Father (Surah 112:1-4). If Allah is the same God revealed in the Bible, why does the Qur'an reject one of God's own revealed names and relational descriptions? This is a significant theological difference that deserves careful consideration.

Why is the covenant name Jehovah (YHWH) absent from the Qur'an?

The God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob repeatedly revealed His covenant name: "This is My name forever" (Exodus 3:15). Thousands of Old Testament verses contain the divine name YHWH. If the Qur'an claims to confirm previous revelation, why is God's covenant name absent? Instead, the Qur'an consistently uses "Allah." Muslim scholars note that "Allah" is closer to "Elohim" (after removing the plural of respect, "Eloh" is very close to "Allah"). However, the question of why the explicit covenant name is not preserved remains worthy of serious theological reflection.

The Qur'an's Eternal Nature Problem:

A complicating factor in Muslim objections to the Trinity is the Muslim doctrine of the eternal Qur'an. Early Muslims believed their holy book had been created prior to the cosmos. Later, belief in an eternal, uncreated Qur'an replaced this view. As the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy notes, this created a problem parallel to the Christian doctrine of the Incarnation: "How can this eternal, non-physical reality be present in an earthly book, or in an episode of Arabic speech?" This has been called the problem of "inlibration," parallel to the Christian doctrine of the Incarnation of the Word. Muslim objectors had to take care when objecting to the doctrines of the Trinity and the Incarnation, lest they say something incompatible with their preferred views about the Qur'an.

The Problem of Divine Attributes:

Some Muslim and Jewish critics object that trinitarianism is simply tritheism. If told that the "persons" of the Trinity are merely God's attributes, they object that Christians arbitrarily stop at three "persons" since God has more than three attributes. However, this objection is complicated by the fact that early Muslims accepted, under Christian influence, the doctrine that there are many real, distinct attributes or characteristics in God. This made it hard to draw a sharp line between Muslim and Christian conceptions of God's unity.


9. "ANYONE CAN SAY 'I AM GOD'"

Muslims often argue: "Jesus never literally said, 'I am God.'" But simply saying "I am God" does not make someone God—many false prophets have claimed divinity, and a parrot could be trained to repeat the words.

The real question is: Did Jesus demonstrate divine identity? The answer is yes.

Jesus' Divine Prerogatives:

Divine ActionScriptural Reference
Forgave sinsMark 2:5-12
Accepted worshipMatthew 14:33; John 9:38
Claimed eternal existenceJohn 8:58; John 17:5
Declared equality with the FatherJohn 10:30; John 5:23
Exercised authority over creationMatthew 8:26-27; John 1:1-3
Rose from the deadMatthew 28:6; Romans 1:4
Will judge all humanityMatthew 25:31-46; John 5:22

The Jewish Leaders' Understanding:

The Jewish leaders understood the significance of His claims. They sought to kill Him because, in their view, He was "making Himself God" (John 10:33) and "making Himself equal with God" (John 5:18). Their reaction shows they understood His words as claims to divine identity, not merely as claims to prophethood.

The Significance of the Resurrection:

The subsequent resurrection of Jesus (Matthew 28:6; 1 Corinthians 15:3-4) affirms His divine nature. Many scholars have pointed to the substantial historical evidence for the resurrection, seeing it as a vindication of His claim to deity (Romans 1:4).


10. THE MEANING OF "ELOHIM"

The Hebrew word Elohim is grammatically plural but is regularly used with singular verbs when referring to the one true God. This does not, by itself, prove the Trinity. However, it is consistent with the Bible's later revelation that the one God exists as Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.

Additional Old Testament Foreshadowing:

Psalm 110:1 — David wrote about an exalted figure who sits at the right hand of God, implying equality with Yahweh.

Proverbs 8:22-31 — Wisdom is personified as existing before creation, alongside God—a foreshadowing of the eternal Son.

Thus, the doctrine of the Trinity arises from the whole witness of Scripture rather than from a single grammatical feature. As the Bible Hub commentary notes, "While the precise word 'Trinity' does not appear, the Bible repeatedly presents God as one being who reveals Himself through three persons" .


CONCLUSION

Christianity proclaims one eternal God revealed as Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. The deity of Christ is established not by one isolated phrase but by the totality of biblical revelation: His eternal existence, divine works, authority to forgive sins, acceptance of worship, resurrection, and the testimony of His apostles.

Key Scriptural Summation:

  • "In Him dwells all the fullness of the Godhead bodily" (Colossians 2:9).

  • "Looking for the blessed hope and glorious appearing of our great God and Savior Jesus Christ" (Titus 2:13).

  • "The Word was God" (John 1:1).

  • "I and the Father are one" (John 10:30).

  • "My Lord and my God!" (John 20:28).

The Invitation:

The invitation to every seeker is to examine the Scriptures carefully and honestly, considering the full biblical witness about the identity of Jesus Christ. The early Christian community embraced this doctrine as consistent with inspired Scripture, and manuscript evidence from the Bodmer Papyri, Chester Beatty Papyri, and Codex Sinaiticus confirms that these truths have been faithfully transmitted through centuries.

May every reader search the Scriptures with sincerity and follow the truth wherever it leads.

IS THE QUR'AN A MIRACLE? NO, IT IS NOT

 

IS THE QUR'AN A MIRACLE? NO, IT IS NOT

A Critical Theological and Philosophical Examination of the Islamic Doctrine of I'jaz al-Qur'an

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba
Shimba Theological Institute


Abstract

Among the central doctrines of Islam is the belief that the Qur'an constitutes Muhammad's supreme miracle. Unlike biblical prophets whose divine commissions were authenticated by observable supernatural acts, Islamic theology generally argues that the Qur'an itself is the miracle (i'jaz al-Qur'an), primarily because of its unparalleled literary excellence and inability to be imitated.

This article critically examines that claim from biblical, historical, philosophical, and theological perspectives. It argues that a miracle, by its very nature, should be objectively recognizable rather than dependent upon linguistic expertise or cultural familiarity. It further examines whether the Qur'an presents itself as a book of unprecedented revelation or primarily as a confirmation and retelling of previous biblical narratives. Finally, the article explores philosophical tensions surrounding the classical Islamic doctrine that the Qur'an is the eternal, uncreated Word of Allah while simultaneously existing as a temporal, historical, written book containing conversations spoken by created beings.


Introduction

Throughout Scripture, God authenticated His messengers through observable miracles. Moses confronted Pharaoh through signs. Elijah called fire from heaven. Elisha raised the dead. Jesus healed the blind, cleansed lepers, calmed storms, and raised Lazarus from the grave. The apostles likewise performed miracles before eyewitnesses. These miracles required no linguistic ability. No one needed to know Hebrew, Greek, or Aramaic to recognize that a man born blind had received sight. A miracle transcends language because it transcends natural law.

Islam, however, advances a fundamentally different claim. Rather than presenting Muhammad as authenticated primarily through public supernatural acts, classical Islamic theology identifies the Qur'an itself as Muhammad's greatest miracle. This raises an important theological question: Can a literary work function as a universal miracle?

The doctrine of i'jaz emerged as a formal theological concept in the third/ninth century, though its roots lie in the Qur'an's own "challenge verses" (ayat al-tahaddi), which call upon doubters to produce a chapter like it . As a scholarly consensus developed, the Qur'an's inimitability became a foundational argument for Muhammad's prophethood, sparking extensive debate among Muslim theologians regarding the precise nature of this miraculous quality .


What Is a Miracle?

A miracle possesses several characteristics. It is observable, public, supernatural, verifiable, and independent of both culture and language. When Jesus raised Lazarus (John 11), everyone present witnessed the same event. When Moses divided the Red Sea (Exodus 14), Egyptians and Israelites alike saw the same miracle. No translator was necessary. No literary analysis was required. If something can only be appreciated after years of specialized linguistic training, does it possess the characteristics normally associated with a miracle?


The Qur'an Appeals Primarily to Language

The doctrine of i'jaz rests heavily upon Arabic eloquence. Many Muslim scholars maintain that only the original Arabic reveals the miraculous nature of the Qur'an. This immediately raises a philosophical difficulty. Today, most human beings do not understand Qur'anic Arabic. Likewise, most Muslims throughout history have not been native speakers of classical seventh-century Arabic. If recognizing the miracle depends upon mastery of classical Arabic rhetoric, then access to the miracle appears restricted to a relatively small percentage of humanity.

This differs fundamentally from biblical miracles, which were immediately observable by ordinary people regardless of education or language. As one scholar notes, the challenge of the Qur'an's inimitability is a "dare" that has in fact been answered throughout history by various figures who produced texts they considered Qur'anic imitations, though mainstream theology has rejected these attempts as failures . The very fact that such imitations exist and are debated suggests that the claim of absolute inimitability is contested rather than self-evident.


Does the Qur'an Primarily Reveal New Truth or Recall Earlier Revelation?

The Qur'an repeatedly describes itself as confirming previous revelation. Examples include Qur'an 2:41, 3:3, 5:46, 10:37, and 12:111. Its narratives frequently recount figures already known from the Bible: Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses, David, Solomon, Jonah, John the Baptist, Mary, and Jesus.

From this perspective, one may ask whether the Qur'an's primary literary function is the communication of unprecedented revelation or the reaffirmation and reinterpretation of existing sacred history. The Qur'an explicitly states that it serves as a "confirmation of previous Scriptures and a supreme authority on them" (Q. 5:48) . Classical scholar al-Tha'ālibī explains that the Qur'an's status as muhaymin (authoritative over previous revelations) entails that it "confirms that which is true in them, while also reinstating the truth and counteracting corruption found therein" .

This observation does not, by itself, disprove divine inspiration, but it does raise questions about whether repetition of prior narratives alone constitutes a miracle. Furthermore, the Qur'an's engagement with extra-biblical Jewish and Christian traditions—such as the story of angels prostrating to Adam, which appears in texts like the Syriac Christian Cave of Treasures and the rabbinic Genesis Rabbah—suggests that the Qur'an participates in a broader intertextual conversation rather than delivering entirely unprecedented material .


Muhammad and Public Miracles

The New Testament repeatedly presents miracles as divine authentication. Islamic tradition contains numerous miracle reports preserved in Hadith literature. Within the Qur'an itself, however, Muhammad frequently responds to demands for miraculous signs by directing attention to revelation rather than performing public miracles. Examples include Qur'an 6:37, 10:20, 13:7, 17:59, and 29:50–51.

This creates an important contrast with Moses, Elijah, and Jesus, whose ministries were characterized by repeated public miracles. As one Islamic scholar explains, even when prophets produced physical miracles, these were not in themselves conclusive in proving their message; some people who witnessed miracles still rejected the prophets . The Qur'an itself records demands for sensational signs—springs gushing from the earth, a house of gold, ascending to heaven with a book—and responds by reminding that Muhammad is "aught but a man, an apostle" (Q. 17:90–93) .

Whether the Qur'an intentionally redefines prophetic authentication remains an important subject for theological discussion. The shift from physical miracles to linguistic miracle represents a significant departure from the biblical prophetic pattern.


The Doctrine of the Eternal Qur'an

Classical Sunni theology, particularly within the Ash'arite school, commonly teaches that the Qur'an is the uncreated, eternal speech (kalam) of Allah. This doctrine raises several philosophical questions. If the Qur'an is eternal and uncreated, how should one understand its historical manifestation as a written Arabic book produced within seventh-century Arabia? Is the physical book eternal? If not, what precisely is eternal? How does eternal speech become successive written language without entering time?

These questions occupied Muslim theologians for centuries, particularly during debates between the Mu'tazilites, who argued for the createdness of the Qur'an, and traditionalist scholars, who insisted on its eternity. The Caliph al-Ma'mun famously declared the Qur'an created and enforced this position, though later Caliphs reversed course . The Ash'arite theologian al-Baqillani developed sophisticated arguments defending the uncreatedness of the Qur'an, distinguishing between God's eternal attribute of speech and its temporal manifestations .

Al-Pazdawi, another prominent Ash'arite theologian, attempted a middle position: while the Speech of God is uncreated and timeless, the physical manifestation of the Qur'an—that which is written, read, and recited—is not exactly God's Speech itself, but rather a codex that signifies God's Speech . He drew upon a semiotic theory in which the verses of the Qur'an are "signs" that signify the eternal Speech of God, but are not identical with it .

Yet this distinction raises further questions. If the physical Qur'an is merely a signifier, in what sense can it be called the eternal Word? And how does the eternal attribute of speech relate to the temporal act of revelation?


The Presence of Created Speech Within the Qur'an

The Qur'an records numerous conversations involving created beings. These include prophets, kings, unbelievers, Pharaoh, Mary, Jesus, angels, jinn, and Satan. For example, the Qur'an records conversations between Allah and Iblis following Adam's creation (Q. 7:11–18; 15:28–43). The text also preserves the spoken words of human beings who lived centuries after creation.

This raises a philosophical question: If the Qur'an is wholly eternal and uncreated, how should one understand recorded speeches that historically occurred within time?

Muslim theologians generally distinguish between Allah's eternal attribute of speech and its temporal expression in revelation. Fakhr al-Din al-Razi, a later Ash'arite theologian, adopted a moderate position: he did not reject the createdness of the external dimension of God's speech, but defended that its inner dimension (kalam nafs) is eternal . This distinction between inner and outer speech attempts to resolve the tension, yet critics argue that it requires further philosophical clarification regarding the relationship between eternity and temporal events.


Historical Development of the Written Qur'an

The Qur'an was initially transmitted orally before being compiled into a written codex after Muhammad's death. This historical process raises additional questions regarding the relationship between eternal divine speech and its preservation within human history. The distinction between eternal revelation and material manuscripts has long been recognized in Islamic theology, yet it continues to invite philosophical analysis.

The codification of the Qur'an under the Caliph 'Uthman, the existence of variant readings, and the historical debates over the collection of the text all suggest that the Qur'an's transmission involved human agency and historical contingency. If the Qur'an is the eternal, uncreated Word of Allah, how should we understand its gathering, compilation, and standardization by human beings within history?


Scientific, Moral, and Hermeneutical Questions

Critics have also examined whether certain Qur'anic passages should be interpreted literally or metaphorically in relation to cosmology, ethics, and history. Examples frequently discussed include passages concerning cosmology, embryology, creation, warfare, slavery, and treatment of captives.

Muslim scholars often respond through contextual interpretation, linguistic analysis, or historical explanation. The ongoing debate illustrates that appeals to the Qur'an's miraculous nature are intertwined with broader questions concerning interpretation, ethics, and hermeneutics. If the Qur'an's inimitability is self-evident, why does its interpretation require such extensive scholarly apparatus? Why does the text generate such diverse and sometimes contradictory interpretations?

Some Western scholars have argued that the "challenge verses" should be viewed as part of the indoctrination of believers rather than a genuine polemic, suggesting that the interlocutors of the Qur'anic speaker are imagined rather than real adversaries . This perspective, while controversial, challenges the assumption that the Qur'an's inimitability is a self-evident truth rather than a theological construction.

Furthermore, the Qur'an's engagement with previous scriptures raises questions about its uniqueness. If the Qur'an confirms and corrects prior revelations, is it primarily derivative, or does its distinctive theological and literary qualities nevertheless constitute originality? Recent scholarship emphasizes that the Qur'an presents "corrective retellings" of earlier traditions, not mere borrowing . Yet this corrective function itself presupposes the existence of prior texts.


The Question of Imitation

A central pillar of the i'jaz doctrine is that no one can produce a text like the Qur'an. Yet throughout Islamic history, various individuals have attempted Qur'anic imitation—from Musaylima (a contemporary of Muhammad) to al-Ma'arrī to modern figures. These imitations exist in multiple languages and represent various motives, including parody, polemic, and sincere religious expression .

The existence of these imitations does not necessarily disprove the Qur'an's claim to inimitability; one could argue that all attempts have failed. However, it does raise important questions. If the Qur'an's inimitability is objectively true, why do people continue to attempt imitation? And by what criteria do we judge a text's success or failure in this regard? The very need for criteria suggests that the judgment is subjective rather than self-evident.

Moreover, the imitations "inevitably wrestle with the same questions that drove celebrated doctors of i'jaz al-Qur'an: What makes the Qur'an the Qur'an? What in the rhetoric and style of God's language grants it a revelatory effect?" . The fact that these questions remain debated suggests that the nature of the Qur'an's inimitability is not obvious to all.


A Christian Theological Response

From a Christian perspective, divine revelation is consistently authenticated through public acts of God within history, culminating in the incarnation, miracles, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ. The New Testament presents these events not as linguistic phenomena accessible only to specialists but as historical realities witnessed by many.

The apostle Paul grounds the gospel in the resurrection of Jesus, which he presents as a historically verifiable event witnessed by over five hundred people (1 Corinthians 15:3–8). This evidential approach differs fundamentally from the Islamic emphasis on literary excellence as the primary authentication of prophecy.

The Bible presents miracles as God's signs, not as acts requiring specialized knowledge to appreciate. When Jesus healed the blind, the miracle was recognized by all—the healed person, the crowd, the religious leaders, even the skeptics. No one needed to know Greek to observe a man born blind receiving sight. In contrast, the Qur'an's supposed miracle requires years of linguistic study and cultural immersion to appreciate, and even then, its miraculous nature remains a matter of theological conviction rather than universal observation.

Furthermore, the doctrine of the eternal Qur'an presents theological difficulties that find no parallel in Christian Scripture. While Christians affirm that God's Word is eternal, they distinguish between the eternal Logos (the Second Person of the Trinity) and the written Scriptures, which were composed within history by human authors under divine inspiration. The Qur'an, in contrast, is identified directly with God's eternal speech, creating philosophical tensions that the distinction between divine and human agency in Scripture does not raise.


Questions for Scholarly Debate

The following questions are intended to stimulate theological and philosophical discussion:

  1. If the Qur'an is the eternal and uncreated Word of Allah, in what sense does it exist as a physical Arabic book produced in history? Does the physical book participate in eternity, or is it merely a temporal representation?

  2. How can eternal speech include conversations spoken by created beings centuries after creation? If the Qur'an contains the words of Pharaoh, Mary, Satan, and others, are these words themselves eternal, or only the divine act of revealing them?

  3. Are the recorded words of prophets, angels, Pharaoh, Mary, Satan, and other individuals themselves eternal, or only Allah's act of revealing them? The distinction between content and act requires further exploration.

  4. If only Allah's speech is eternal, how should the speeches of created beings preserved within the Qur'an be understood? Does the Qur'an contain both eternal and created speech, and if so, how are they distinguished?

  5. If literary excellence constitutes a miracle, why should recognition of that miracle depend upon specialized knowledge of classical Arabic? Does this not make the miracle inaccessible to the vast majority of humanity?

  6. Why does the Qur'an repeatedly present itself as confirming earlier revelation if its literary uniqueness is its primary miracle? Does confirmation of prior texts constitute originality or novelty?

  7. Why does the Qur'an repeatedly respond to requests for miraculous signs by pointing to revelation rather than narrating public miracles performed by Muhammad? Does this suggest a departure from the biblical prophetic model?

  8. Does a miracle require objective public verification, or may it depend upon literary appreciation? The distinction between physical and literary miracles raises epistemological questions.

  9. How should the doctrine of the eternal Qur'an be reconciled with the historical compilation and transmission of the written text? What role does human agency play in the preservation of an eternal revelation?

  10. What criteria distinguish divine revelation from literary excellence? If the Qur'an's inimitability is its primary miracle, how do we know that it is not merely a work of great literary skill?

  11. If the Qur'an corrects earlier scriptures, does this not imply that prior revelations were insufficient or corrupt? How does this relate to the Qur'an's claim to confirm earlier revelation?

  12. Can the Qur'an's intertextual engagement with Jewish and Christian traditions be reconciled with its claim of unique origin? Does the presence of parallels undermine claims of originality?


Conclusion

The doctrine of the Qur'an's miraculous nature remains one of Islam's foundational theological claims. Nevertheless, its philosophical coherence, historical development, and epistemological basis continue to invite careful scholarly examination. The i'jaz doctrine, while central to Islamic theology, emerged over centuries of debate and was not a fully formed concept at the time of the Qur'an's revelation .

The Qur'an's self-presentation as confirmation of earlier scriptures, its intertextual engagement with Jewish and Christian traditions, and its response to demands for miracles all raise questions about its claim to be Muhammad's definitive miracle. The philosophical tensions surrounding the doctrine of an eternal, uncreated Qur'an that simultaneously exists as a temporal, historical text with created speech within it remain unresolved.

From a Christian perspective, divine revelation is consistently authenticated through public acts of God within history, culminating in the incarnation, miracles, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ. The New Testament presents these events not as linguistic phenomena accessible only to specialists but as historical realities witnessed by many. The resurrection of Jesus, in particular, provides a public, observable, historically verifiable authentication of divine revelation that does not depend upon specialized knowledge or cultural immersion.

Consequently, the claim that the Qur'an is itself the definitive miracle of Muhammad remains open to critical evaluation. Questions concerning the relationship between eternal speech and temporal revelation, the inclusion of created speech within an allegedly eternal text, the dependence of i'jaz upon mastery of classical Arabic, and the Qur'an's own presentation of Muhammad's prophetic ministry deserve continued scholarly engagement.

A careful and respectful examination of these issues contributes to a deeper understanding of both Islamic theology and the distinctive Christian doctrine of divine revelation. Both traditions affirm that God has spoken, yet they differ profoundly in how they understand that speech and by what means it has been authenticated. These differences are not merely academic but bear directly on the question of how human beings may know God and receive His guidance.


References

  1. Aladwani, O. K. H. H. A. (2025). Classical Discussions of the Concept of Iʿjāz al-Qurʾān with Special Reference to the Works of al-Qāḍī ʿAbd al-Jabbār and al-Sharīf al-Murtaḍā [PhD thesis, SOAS University of London]. 

  2. Aladwani, O. (2025). Defending the Gate of Inimitability: Abū Rashīd al-Naysābūrī (d. After 415/1024) and the Freethinker Critiques. Religions, 16(12), 1584. 

  3. Al-Pazdawi, A. Y. (2026). God's Speech Subsists Eternally with God Exalted. In Theology in Thirty-Six Dialogues (and Sixty Lessons). University of Toronto Press. 

  4. Darojat, M. H. (2009). al-Baqillani's concept of divine speech in relation to the issue of the createdness of the Qur'an [Master's thesis, International Islamic University Malaysia]. 

  5. Halil, H. (2025). Reconciling the Qurʾān and the Bible: A new approach to scriptural dialogue. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 81(1). 

  6. Kurniawan, R., Asmara, M., & Hardivizon, H. (2021). Bahasa Arab dan Konsep I'jaz al-Qur'an (Kritik Pemikiran Louwis 'Awad). Arabiyatuna: Jurnal Bahasa Arab, 5(1), 161–172. 

  7. Larkin, M. (2024). Rhetoric and the Qurʾān. In Encyclopaedia of the Qurʾān. Brill. 

  8. Soomro, T., & Randhawa, S. (2023). The Qur'an's Engagement with Christian and Jewish Literature. Yaqeen Institute for Islamic Research. 

  9. (2024). Finding the Qur'an in Imitation: Critical Mimesis from Musaylima to Finnegans Wake. Reorient, 9(1). 

  10. (2025). Holy Spirit and Jesus's Miracles: A Methodological Suggestion to "The other Prophet; Jesus in the Qur'an." Classical and Contemporary Islamic Studies

A WARNING FROM ALLAH: MUSLIMS WHO CLAIM THE BIBLE IS CORRUPTED WILL ENTER HELL

  A WARNING FROM ALLAH: MUSLIMS WHO CLAIM THE BIBLE IS CORRUPTED WILL ENTER HELL Where are the uncorrupted Bibles now to give evidence of th...

TRENDING NOW