Tuesday, July 15, 2025

The Cultural Significance of Wanja (Kohl) and Lip Coloring in Ancient Arabian Traditions

The Cultural Significance of Wanja (Kohl) and Lip Coloring in Ancient Arabian Traditions: A Critical Examination of Muhammad’s Use of Cosmetics

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba | Max Shimba Ministries Org


Abstract

Cosmetic practices such as the application of wanja (kohl) and lip coloring have historically been associated with feminine beauty rituals and symbolic communication in various ancient cultures. This paper explores the historical roots of these practices in ancient Arabian society, their cultural meanings, and the implications of Prophet Muhammad’s personal use of cosmetics as recorded in Islamic traditions. The study critically examines the theological and anthropological consequences of these accounts for contemporary Islamic interpretations.


1. Introduction

Many people today associate cosmetics — such as wanja (kohl), lip coloring, and skin lightening products — primarily with women. However, before forming assumptions about this, it is essential to trace the history of such beauty practices and when they began. Historical evidence indicates that these traditions originated centuries ago, particularly in ancient Arabian societies, with Egyptian women notably leading in the use of cosmetics for both beauty and cultural symbolism.

This paper seeks to contextualize the use of wanja in ancient Arabian traditions and critically analyze its significance, especially in light of recorded hadiths that report Prophet Muhammad’s personal use of wanja. The question is raised: What meaning did such cosmetic application carry in the cultural context of Muhammad’s time, and what are the implications for contemporary Islamic thought?


2. Historical Background of Wanja and Lip Coloring

The application of wanja and lip coloring was not merely for aesthetic purposes in ancient societies but carried significant cultural symbolism. For example, among African ethnic groups such as the Nyamwezi, Digo, and Bondei, a girl nearing puberty would traditionally be secluded, anointed with ashes, and later adorned with wanja by elder women. This act signified her readiness for marriage and sexual maturity.

Similarly, in ancient Arabian society, the application of wanja and red lip coloring conveyed explicit messages. A woman adorned in this way publicly signaled her sexual desire or readiness for marriage. The symbolism was deeply entrenched in communal customs, and such cosmetic choices were recognized as non-verbal cues within the cultural fabric.

Prominent anthropologists and social scientists such as Deus Hans and Desmond Morris, in their nineteenth-century works, corroborated these interpretations. They noted that the reddening of a woman’s lips and the application of wanja mirrored the physiological changes of the labia during sexual arousal. Consequently, these cosmetic practices had clear sexual connotations within traditional communities.


3. Cosmetic Practices in the Time of Muhammad

Although in modern times women apply cosmetics for various reasons, often unrelated to cultural signaling, in the era of Prophet Muhammad, such practices carried distinct meanings. A woman wearing wanja or red lip color either signaled sexual availability or indicated her transition into marital eligibility following puberty.

This context makes it important to interrogate Muhammad’s own reported cosmetic practices. According to Sunan Ibn Majah, Hadith No. 309, it is recorded that:

“Muhammad carried a mirror and a container of kohl (wanja) with him. He used a comb made from horn to groom his hair, applied oils, looked at himself in the mirror, and would apply wanja to his eyes before sleeping. He also greatly loved perfumes.”

This hadith, detailing Muhammad’s grooming routine, is significant given the cultural meanings attributed to these acts at the time.


4. Theological and Anthropological Implications

Given the Arabian cultural norms associated with cosmetic use, a pressing question arises: What was the Prophet Muhammad’s intention behind such practices? Within a society where applying wanja and lip coloring symbolized sexual desire or readiness for marriage, what did it signify when a man — and notably a religious leader — adorned himself in this way?

This question demands careful theological reflection and honest anthropological inquiry. It presents a serious challenge for Islamic scholarship to reconcile prophetic practices with the prevailing cultural codes of the time, especially when those codes are laden with connotations that contradict Islamic modesty prescriptions in later jurisprudence.

To dismiss this inquiry is to surrender intellectual integrity and reveal the limits of critical reasoning. Theological reasoning must not shy away from difficult questions but should confront them transparently.


5. Conclusion

The history of cosmetics such as wanja and lip coloring reveals their deep cultural significance in ancient Arabian society. When understood in this context, Prophet Muhammad’s reported use of these items raises important questions about his conformity to or divergence from societal norms laden with sexual and marital symbolism.

This investigation calls for a nuanced, historically grounded, and theologically responsible engagement with early Islamic texts and cultural practices. Ignoring such matters or labeling them as irrelevant undermines intellectual honesty and religious integrity.

A tragedy for Islam lies not in asking difficult questions but in refusing to answer them.


Keywords: Muhammad and cosmetics, Arabian cultural traditions, wanja (kohl), Sunan Ibn Majah, Islamic anthropology, sexual symbolism, ancient beauty rituals, religious grooming practices.



Prayer to Break Witchcraft and Evil Works


Heavenly Father,
I come before You today in the Name above every name — the Name of Jesus Christ, the Son of the Living God. Lord, You are my Deliverer, my Fortress, my Refuge, and my Strong Tower. I confess that Jesus Christ is Lord over my life, and through His precious blood, I have been redeemed from the power of sin, darkness, and every demonic assignment.

Right now, in the authority of the Name of Jesus, I break and destroy every form of witchcraft, sorcery, divination, spells, curses, hexes, vexes, charms, incantations, and satanic rituals ever done against me — whether known or unknown, seen or unseen, spoken or written, in the past, present, or future. I cancel their power and render them null and void in Jesus’ mighty Name!

Father, Your Word declares in Luke 10:19 that You have given me authority to trample on snakes and scorpions and over all the power of the enemy, and nothing shall by any means harm me. Therefore, I take authority over every hidden diabolical work done against my destiny, my health, my mind, my family, my relationships, my finances, and my ministry. I command every evil altar erected in my name to catch fire and be destroyed right now in the Name of Jesus!

I release myself from every evil covenant, every ungodly soul tie, and every generational curse spoken over my bloodline. By the power of the cross and the blood of Jesus, I break their influence and declare that I am free!

I plead the blood of Jesus over my life — over my mind, body, spirit, home, and everything connected to me. Let every demonic assignment be dismantled. Let every monitoring spirit be blinded and bound. Let every plan of the enemy be scattered by fire in the Name of Jesus.

Lord, I declare freedom and liberty over my life according to Galatians 5:1 — "It is for freedom that Christ has set us free." I proclaim that no weapon formed against me shall prosper, and every tongue that rises against me in judgment, I condemn, for this is my heritage as a servant of the Lord (Isaiah 54:17).

Holy Spirit, fill every area of my life now with Your presence, peace, and power. Restore everything the enemy tried to steal or destroy. I decree restoration, healing, and breakthrough in Jesus’ Name.

Thank You, Lord, for Your deliverance, for whom the Son sets free is free indeed (John 8:36). I receive my freedom, my victory, and my destiny in Christ today.

In the mighty, matchless, victorious Name of Jesus Christ, I pray and declare — AMEN!



Monday, July 14, 2025

"Major Scientific Errors in Islam Regarding the Sun"

By Max Shimba, Servant of Jesus Christ

For Max Shimba Ministries Org | April 2, 2016


1. Muhammad and Allah Say the Sun Moves

2. Muhammad Says the Sun Prostrates to Allah

3. Muhammad Says the Sun Wears a Garment, Which Causes Night Darkness

Dear reader,
I have often said that Allah is not the Creator, but Muslims have been stubborn to accept this and instead begin insulting me. Today, I bring you another piece of evidence that Allah did not create, and Muhammad is a false prophet.

What Did Muhammad and the Early Muslims Say About the Sun?

Where would you go to find the correct meaning of the Quran? Zamakhshari? al-Tabari? Baidawi? If you were an early Muslim, you could go to Muhammad himself! Listen to how Muhammad explained it, according to Bukhari and al-Tabari:

“Abu Dharr reported: The Prophet asked me at sunset, ‘Do you know where the sun goes (at sunset)?’ I replied, ‘Allah and His Messenger know best.’ He said, ‘It goes (i.e., it travels) until it prostrates itself beneath the Throne and seeks permission to rise again. It is then permitted. But a time will come when it will be about to prostrate, and its prostration will not be accepted...’”
(Sahih Bukhari, Vol. 4, Book 54, Chapter 4, Hadith No. 441, p.283)

Muhammad Says the Sun Prostrates Under Allah's Throne

Another version of the same Bukhari hadith says:

“Abu Dharr al-Ghifari (RA) narrated: One day, the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) asked me, ‘Abu Dharr, do you know where the sun goes after it sets?’ I replied, ‘I do not know. Only the Messenger of Allah can explain it best.’ Then the Prophet (SA) answered, ‘After setting, the sun stays in prostration under the Throne (‘Arsh) and waits for Allah’s command to rise again from the east. A day will come when the sun will not be granted permission to rise, and Qiyamah (Judgment Day) will commence upon the earth.’”

Muhammad Contradicts and Says the Sun Sets in the Sky

Muhammad Says the Sun Wears a Garment/Clothing

According to al-Tabari Volume 1, p.231, “I asked the Messenger of God [Muhammad], ‘Where does [the sun] set?’ He replied: ‘It sets in the heaven and then ascends from one heaven to another until it reaches the seventh heaven. Eventually, when it is beneath the Throne, it falls down in prostration, and the angels that oversee it also prostrate. Then the sun says, ‘My Lord, where do You command me to rise— from the place where I set or the place I rose from?’”

He continued: This is what is meant by God's word: ‘And the sun runs on its fixed course for a term (appointed). That is the Decree of the Almighty, the All-Knowing.’ (Quran) – that is when the sun is held under the Throne.

Then Gabriel brings the sun a garment of radiance taken from the light of the Throne, in proportion to hours and days. The garment is longer during summer and shorter in winter, and average in spring and autumn. [The seasons are said to be due to the garment’s length.]

He continued: The sun wears this garment as one of you wears your robe. Then it is released to orbit the heavenly sphere until it rises from where it is commanded. … The same path is followed by the moon when it rises. But Gabriel brings a different garment from the light beneath God's feet. Thus, the meaning of God’s word: ‘He made the sun a shining glory and the moon a derived light.’”

The Sun and Moon as Signs of Allah

See also:

  • Abu Dawud Vol. 1, Book 2, Hadith 1173, p.304

  • Sunan al-Nasa’i Vol. 2, Hadith 1462–1506 (multiple pages listed)

Dhu al-Qarnayn [Zul Qarnain] Witnesses the Sun Setting in a Muddy Spring

According to al-Tabari Vol. 5, p.173-174 (cf. Surah 18:82–97),
Dhu al-Qarnayn “witnessed the sun setting in its resting place in a pool of black and foul-smelling mud.”

al-Tabari Vol. 1, p.234 also states that the sun sets in a muddy spring.
The term "muddy" is translated from the Arabic hami’ah, meaning dark clay or mud. However, a similar word hamiyah can also mean a scorching substance. (See footnote 442 on p.234.)

“[Muhammad] continued. When the sun rises, it ascends on a chariot (pulled by horses) from one of those springs along with 360 angels…. When God wants to test the sun and moon to show His servants signs and thereby call them to obedience, the sun suddenly falls off its chariot into the depth of the sea, which is circular in shape.
When God wants to intensify the warning sign to further frighten His servants, the entire sun falls in, leaving no part remaining on the chariot. This is a total eclipse of the sun, during which daylight is overtaken by darkness and stars appear.”
(al-Tabari Vol. 1, p.236)


Bibliography: Quran Translations

  1. Arberry, Arthur J. The Koran Interpreted. Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc., 1955.

  2. Dawood, N.J. The Koran. Penguin Books, 1956–1999.

  3. Malik, Farooq-i-Azam. English Translation of the Meaning of AL-QUR’AN: The Guidance for Mankind. The Institute of Islamic Knowledge, 1997.

  4. Pickthall, Mohammed Marmaduke. The Meaning of the Glorious Koran. Dar al-Islamiyya (Kuwait).

  5. Rodwell, J.M. The Koran, 1st Ed. Ivy Books, Ballantine Books, 1993.

  6. Shakir, M.H. The Qur’an. Tahrike Tarsile Qur’an, Inc., 12th U.S. Ed. 2001.

  7. Sher Ali, Maulawi. The Holy Qur’an. Islam International Publications Ltd (Ahmadiyya), 1997.

  8. Yusuf ‘Ali, Abdullah. The Holy Qur-an: English Translation of the Meanings and Commentary. Revised by The Presidency of Islamic Researches, IFTA, King Fahd Holy Qur’an Printing Complex, Al Madinah, Saudi Arabia (1410 BH).


Additional References

  • Campbell, Dr. William. The Qur’an and the Bible in the Light of History and Science (2nd Ed.). Arab World Ministries, 2002.

  • The Translation of the Meanings of Sahih Al-Bukhari Arabic-English Vol. 1, by Dr. Muhammad Muhsin Khan. Islamic University, Al-Medina Al-Munawwarah, AL MAKTABAT AL SALAFIAT AL MADINATO AL MONAWART.

  • The History of al-Tabari: An Annotated Translation, Ehsan Yar-Shater (General Editor), State University of New York Press, 1989.

  • http://debate.org.uk/topics/history/interprt.htm


God bless you all.
I am Max Shimba, a servant of Jesus Christ.
© 2016 Max Shimba Ministries Org. All rights reserved.
Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this license document, but changing it is not allowed.

Is the Prophet Foretold in Deuteronomy Muhammad or Jesus?

 Title: Is the Prophet Foretold in Deuteronomy Muhammad or Jesus? An Examination of Biblical and Historical Evidence

Author: Dr. Maxwell Shimba
Institution: Shimba Theological Institute


Introduction
Muslims frequently pose the question: Is the prophet mentioned in Deuteronomy 18:17–18, 33:1–2, and 34:10–11 referring to Muhammad or Jesus? This article endeavors to provide a clear, biblical, and historical response to this inquiry.

Deuteronomy 18:15-18 and the Prophet Like Moses
Deuteronomy 18:15-18 states that God would raise up a prophet like Moses from among the Israelites’ own brethren, and the people were commanded to listen to him. The primary considerations are:

  • Was Jesus a prophet?

  • Did most Jews hear Jesus?

  • Was Jesus one of the Israelites?

The biblical record affirms that Jesus was indeed a prophet (Luke 24:19), that He was heard by many (John 7:46; Matthew 7:28-29), and that He was a Jew from the tribe of Judah (Matthew 1:1-17; Hebrews 7:14). Historically, early Christian scholars affirmed that this prophecy more appropriately describes Jesus rather than Muhammad.

Historical Testimony
As a historical note, long before the Council of Nicaea (325 AD), Archelaus (262–278 AD) affirmed that Deuteronomy 18:15 could refer to no other person than Jesus Christ, as recorded in Disputation with Manes, chapter 43, p. 219.

Further Considerations:

a. Deuteronomy 33:1-2 mentions “the Lord” coming with ten thousand of saints. Muslims do not call Muhammad their Lord. While some minor sects like the Alawites and other Ghulat sects have deified Muhammad, this is not mainstream Islamic belief.

b. Deuteronomy 34:10 records, “Since then, no prophet has risen in Israel like Moses.” This description, likely written by Joshua long before Jesus' advent, was still ultimately fulfilled in Jesus according to Christian testimony.

c. Deuteronomy 34:10 also emphasizes Moses’ unique communication with God “face to face.” Muhammad did not claim direct communication with God but rather via the angel Gabriel (Qur’an 2:97). In contrast, Jesus directly communicated with God the Father (John 1:18).

d. Deuteronomy 34:11 highlights Moses' mighty signs and wonders. Muhammad, according to the Qur’an (17:90–93), did not perform miracles of this magnitude, whereas Jesus performed numerous miraculous signs (John 20:30-31).

e. Qur’anic Confirmation
Qur’an 29:27 affirms that prophecy was bestowed through Isaac and Jacob, Abraham’s descendants. The Yusuf Ali translation states, “And We gave him Isaac and Jacob, and ordained among his progeny Prophethood and Revelation.” Interestingly, the Arabic text does not include the word "Abraham," but Yusuf Ali inserted it for clarity. This implies that Muhammad, being a descendant of Ishmael and not Isaac, falls outside this prophetic lineage according to the Qur’an itself.

f. Apostolic Witness
The Apostle Peter declared in Acts 3:22–26 that this prophecy in Deuteronomy was fulfilled in Jesus. Either:

  1. Jesus erred by allowing Peter to mislead people for nearly 2,000 years without divine correction,

  2. Jesus deliberately appointed Peter, knowing he spoke truthfully,

  3. Or Peter never made such claims, and the book of Acts was corrupted before external textual evidence from as early as 138 AD could affirm the opposite.

Patristic Testimony
Early church fathers consistently identified Jesus as the fulfillment of Deuteronomy 18:15-18:

  • Justin Martyr (114–165 AD), First Apology

  • Irenaeus (182–188 AD)

  • Tertullian (c. 220 AD)

  • Origen (225–254 AD)

  • John Chrysostom (407 AD)

Justin Martyr, writing between 138 and 165 AD, evidently engaged with this prophecy before composing his works.

Textual Integrity of the New Testament
A Muslim might argue that Justin Martyr was mistaken, and all New Testament manuscripts misquoted Peter. However, early translations and manuscript traditions, independently transmitted across regions (Africa, Asia, Europe), consistently preserve Peter's declaration concerning Jesus in Acts 3:22–26.

For Further Reading:

  • Geisler, N. L., & Rhodes, R. (1997). When Cultists Ask. Baker Books.

  • Geisler, N. L., & Howe, T. (1992). When Critics Ask: A Popular Handbook on Bible Difficulties. Victor Books.

Conclusion
A thorough examination of biblical prophecy, historical testimony, Qur’anic claims, apostolic witness, and patristic writings indicates that the prophet foretold in Deuteronomy 18:15-18 refers to Jesus Christ, not Muhammad. The cumulative evidence, both scriptural and historical, robustly affirms this conclusion.

Bibliography

  • The Holy Bible, New International Version (NIV)

  • The Qur’an, translated by Abdullah Yusuf Ali

  • Archelaus. (262–278 AD). Disputation with Manes

  • Geisler, N. L., & Rhodes, R. (1997). When Cultists Ask. Baker Books.

  • Geisler, N. L., & Howe, T. (1992). When Critics Ask: A Popular Handbook on Bible Difficulties. Victor Books.

  • Justin Martyr. (138–165 AD). First Apology.

  • Irenaeus. (182–188 AD). Against Heresies.

  • Tertullian. (c. 220 AD). Apologeticus.

  • Origen. (225–254 AD). Contra Celsum.

  • Chrysostom, J. (407 AD). Homilies on the Gospel of John.

Prayer of Release and Deliverance


Heavenly Father, in the mighty name of Jesus Christ, we come before Your throne of grace today. Lord, we thank You because You are a Deliverer, a Chain-Breaker, and the One who sets the captives free. Your Word declares in Isaiah 49:24-25, "Shall the prey be taken from the mighty, or the lawful captive delivered? But thus saith the Lord, even the captives of the mighty shall be taken away, and the prey of the terrible shall be delivered."

Today, by the authority in the name of Jesus Christ, I declare and decree: any evil padlock, spiritual chain, or demonic cage used to lock up destinies, marriages, health, finances, ministries, or spiritual gifts — be destroyed now in the name of Jesus Christ!

Every padlock of darkness holding your progress, your peace, your breakthrough, and your calling — I command it to break and scatter by fire in Jesus' name! Let every spiritual prison door be opened right now, and let every lawful captive be released by the blood of Jesus.

I speak to every invisible chain tying down your health, your family, your business, and your ministry — break now, in the name of Jesus Christ! Every evil covenant and curse keeping you in one place, stagnating your destiny — be uprooted and canceled by the blood of Jesus.

Lord, release Your fire into every foundation that has tied down destinies and break every demonic padlock hiding in ancestral altars, covens, and satanic shrines. Let every demonic guard assigned to monitor and enforce these padlocks be struck down by the angel of the Lord in Jesus’ name.

I release you now into your divine purpose, your promised land, and your God-ordained destiny. Move forward, rise, and prosper in the mighty name of Jesus Christ. It is done. Amen!

Thank You, Lord, for total freedom. Thank You for destroying every evil padlock and setting the captives free. We give You all the glory, in Jesus’ powerful name we pray. Amen!




Isa Ibn Maryam as the Spirit of Allah

Isa Ibn Maryam as the Spirit of Allah: A Theological Examination from the Qur'an

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba, Servant of Jesus Christ, Our Great God (Titus 2:13)


Introduction

This paper seeks to examine a profound theological assertion based on Qur’anic testimony: that Isa Ibn Maryam (Jesus, son of Mary) is not merely a prophet or messenger, but the Spirit of Allah — and since the Spirit of Allah is Allah Himself, Isa must therefore be divine. Drawing directly from the Qur’an, this study explores the unique relationship between Allah and Isa Ibn Maryam as expressed in the sacred Islamic text and presents an argument for Isa’s divinity within this context.


The Nature of God and Spirit

Scripture affirms that God is Spirit (John 4:24), just as human beings possess a spirit, a soul, and dwell in a body. The intrinsic nature of spirit cannot be separated from its identity. A person’s spirit is fundamentally themselves — inseparable and essential. This theological principle applies universally: one cannot detach the essence of a being from its spirit.


Qur'anic Testimony of Isa Ibn Maryam

Upon examining the Qur’an, I discovered a consistent declaration that Isa Ibn Maryam uniquely shares in the Spirit of Allah in a way no other prophet or human being does. Consider the following verses:

  • Al-Tahrim 66:12:
    “And Mary, daughter of Imran, who guarded her chastity, and We breathed into her of Our Spirit. She believed in the words of her Lord and His scriptures and was of the devoutly obedient.”

Here, the Qur’an states that what entered Mary’s womb was the Spirit of Allah, not a created spirit but Our Spirit, referring to Allah’s own essence.

  • Al-Nisa 4:171:
    “The Messiah, Isa son of Mary, was only a Messenger of Allah and His Word which He conveyed to Mary, and a Spirit from Him…”

Notably, Isa is called both the Word of Allah and a Spirit from Him, placing him in a unique ontological category distinct from any other prophet.

  • Al-Anbiya 21:91:
    “And she who guarded her chastity, so We breathed into her of Our Spirit and made her and her son a sign for all peoples.”

Again, Isa’s conception is directly linked to the Spirit of Allah, not a created spirit or angel.


Theological Reasoning: The Spirit of Allah Is Allah

No other human being — neither prophets, messengers, nor ordinary people — is ever described in the Qur’an as the Spirit of Allah. This distinction reserved for Isa signifies a unique divine relationship. Simple reflective reasoning leads to a powerful conclusion:

  • Is my spirit and I two different beings?
    No. My spirit is essentially myself.

  • Is the Spirit of God not God Himself?
    Indeed, the Spirit of God is inseparable from His essence.

Thus, if the Spirit of Allah entered Mary and became Isa, how can Isa not be Allah, since the Spirit of Allah is Allah Himself?
If Allah affirms Isa to be “Our Spirit”, then Isa bears the divine essence and identity.


Conclusion

The Qur'an, a book declared to be without doubt by Muslims (Al-Baqarah 2:2), explicitly teaches that Isa Ibn Maryam is the Spirit of Allah. By following both the Qur’anic declarations and theological logic — that the Spirit of Allah is Allah Himself — one must conclude that Isa partakes in the divine nature.

Such a conclusion aligns perfectly with Christian theology as revealed in Titus 2:13, where Jesus is called “our Great God and Savior.”


Final Reflection

This theological reflection invites both Muslim and Christian scholars to re-examine the identity of Isa Ibn Maryam within their respective scriptures. If the Qur’an indeed testifies that Isa is the Spirit of Allah, and the Spirit of Allah is Allah Himself, then Isa’s divinity is affirmed, not merely within Christian doctrine but within the textual witness of the Qur’an itself.



The Case of Prophet Muhammad and the Importance of Maternal Breast Milk

An Inquiry into Early Lactation Accounts in Islamic Tradition: The Case of Prophet Muhammad and the Importance of Maternal Breast Milk

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba

Max Shimba Ministries Org
Published: May 20, 2018


Abstract

This paper examines an intriguing claim from early Islamic hadith literature that narrates the Prophet Muhammad being breastfed by a male relative, Abu Talib, following his birth due to the absence of his mother’s milk. The discussion seeks to place this narrative within a critical textual, historical, and biological framework while highlighting the scientific importance of maternal breast milk in infant health and development. Utilizing modern medical research alongside primary Islamic texts, the paper evaluates both theological narratives and empirical health science perspectives to understand potential implications.


Introduction

Islamic historical tradition, primarily documented in hadith literature, records various episodes from the early life of the Prophet Muhammad. One notable yet rarely discussed narration suggests that Muhammad was breastfed by his uncle, Abu Talib, through a miraculous provision of milk, reportedly sent by Allah, before being entrusted to a wet nurse named Halima al-Sa’diya.

This account, while unusual by contemporary biological standards, raises both theological and scientific questions, especially when considering the established importance of maternal breast milk in early childhood development. This paper translates and academically analyzes the narration, explores its possible theological interpretations, and contrasts it with medical research on breastfeeding’s role in child growth and immunity.


Primary Textual Source

The primary reference comes from an Islamic hadith collection cited as:

  • Sahih Hadith Al-Kaft Al-Kukaynir, Volume 1, Page 284, Hadith No. 27, which records:

“When the Prophet Muhammad was born, he spent a long time without his mother’s milk. However, Abu Talib was blessed by Allah to produce milk through his breasts, which he fed to Muhammad for several days, until Halima al-Sa’diya was found and entrusted with the infant.”

Though this hadith is not among the widely authenticated sahih collections (such as Sahih al-Bukhari or Sahih Muslim), it reflects certain narratives preserved in regional or less-canonized Islamic texts.


The Role of Breast Milk in Early Child Development: A Biomedical Perspective

The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends exclusive breastfeeding for infants for the first six months of life. Maternal breast milk is universally recognized as the optimal source of nutrition for newborns, providing a unique balance of nutrients, immune factors, and bioactive compounds essential for the development and protection of infants (World Health Organization, 2024).

Key Nutritional Components of Human Breast Milk:

  • Proteins: 0.8%–0.9%, primarily casein, alpha-lactalbumin, lactoferrin, secretory IgA, lysozyme, and serum albumin.

  • Fats: Approximately 4.5%, rich in triglycerides (notably palmitic acid, oleic acid), essential fatty acids like linoleic acid, and conjugated linoleic acid (CLA), which have anti-inflammatory and potential anticancer properties.

  • Carbohydrates: Around 7.1%, predominantly lactose, alongside several human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs) that protect against intestinal pathogens.

  • Minerals: 0.2%, including calcium, magnesium, and trace elements vital for growth.

Significantly, secretory Immunoglobulin A (IgA) levels remain elevated in human milk from birth up to several months postpartum, providing mucosal immunity against pathogens.

Moreover, breast milk contains alpha-lactalbumin, which in acidic stomach environments binds with oleic acid to form HAMLET (Human Alpha-lactalbumin Made Lethal to Tumor cells) — a complex shown to induce apoptosis in tumor cells, contributing to reduced cancer susceptibility in breastfed infants (Svensson et al., 2000).


Religious and Theological Implications

The narration of Prophet Muhammad’s wet nursing by Abu Talib introduces a significant theological and anthropological curiosity. Islam strictly prescribes milk kinship (rida’a), where children breastfed by the same woman become milk-siblings, affecting permissible marital relations. The report of a man lactating, even through divine provision, would be extraordinary in both pre-Islamic and Islamic Arabia, where male lactation is neither culturally normative nor biologically typical.

Theologically, this narrative may have aimed to illustrate Allah’s miraculous provision for His Prophet. However, from a medical perspective, male galactorrhea — the spontaneous production of milk in males — is a documented but pathological condition associated with hormonal imbalances (e.g., elevated prolactin levels due to pituitary disorders).


Scientific Infeasibility of Male Breastfeeding

While rare, male lactation has been reported in medical literature, typically in pathological or extreme hormonal circumstances (Jensen, 1992). The biological mechanism involves prolactin, a hormone primarily responsible for milk production in mammals. In normal male physiology, prolactin levels are insufficient for lactation.

Cases of male lactation are medically classified and treated as endocrine disorders, not normative biological functions. Thus, the hadith’s claim, if taken literally, contradicts established biological science and would necessitate a supernatural intervention as posited by the narrative.


Conclusion

The narration of the Prophet Muhammad being breastfed by Abu Talib is a remarkable theological tradition but scientifically implausible by modern endocrinology and pediatrics. The incident, if interpreted allegorically, underscores the protective providence of Allah over His Prophet. From a medical standpoint, the importance of maternal breast milk for optimal infant development is irreplaceable and universally affirmed by contemporary health authorities.

While ancient narratives occasionally reflect cultural beliefs about miracles and divine provision, they must be critically assessed against established biomedical knowledge. The well-documented nutritional, immunological, and developmental benefits of maternal breastfeeding remain uncontested and continue to be a cornerstone of public health policy globally.


References

  • Svensson, M., et al. (2000). HAMLET, a new apoptosis-inducing complex formed by α-lactalbumin and oleic acid. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97(8), 4221–4226.

  • World Health Organization. (2024). Exclusive breastfeeding for optimal growth, development, and health of infants. WHO.

  • Jensen, M. D. (1992). Male galactorrhea: a case review and endocrine evaluation. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 74(2), 289–293.

  • Lawrence, R. A., & Lawrence, R. M. (2021). Breastfeeding: A Guide for the Medical Profession (9th ed.). Elsevier.

  • Riordan, J., & Wambach, K. (2019). Breastfeeding and Human Lactation (6th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.



ALLAH — THE DESTROYER OF GENERATIONS EVEN BEFORE THE COMING OF THE INSANE PROPHET

Thursday, May 3, 2018

There are various images and discussions on the relationship between Islam and terrorism.

ALLAH IS SATAN

Muslims often rejoice when calamities befall those who are not followers of Islam. In several Surahs of the Qur'an, Allah claims to be Most Forgiving and Most Merciful. However, these assertions are in stark contrast to His recorded actions. Allah’s love is entirely different from His deeds. That is why he sent a prophet whom he describes as insane, a man as inconsistent as his Allah.

For example, in Surah Al-Hijr 15:6, the Qur'an records:

"And they say: ‘O you upon whom the Reminder has been sent down, indeed you are mad!’"

ALLAH, THE DESTROYER OF GENERATIONS

In several verses, the Qur'an shows that Allah takes pride in annihilating previous generations and punishing entire communities:

  • Surah Al-An’am 6:5–6:
    "But they have denied the truth when it came to them, so soon will come to them the news of what they used to mock at. Have they not seen how many generations We destroyed before them, whom We had established on the earth as We have not established you? And We sent the sky upon them in abundance, and made rivers flow beneath them; then We destroyed them for their sins and raised up after them another generation."

  • Surah Al-A’raf 7:4:
    "And how many towns have We destroyed! Our punishment came upon them by night or while they were sleeping at noon."

  • Surah Yunus 10:13:
    "And We certainly destroyed generations before you when they did wrong; and their messengers had come to them with clear proofs, but they would not believe. Thus do We recompense the criminal people."

  • Surah Al-Hijr 15:4:
    "And We did not destroy any city but that it had a known decree."

IS THIS ATTRIBUTE OF DESTROYING AND KILLING PEOPLE THAT OF GOD OR OF SATAN?

The Scriptures say this:

John 10:7–15 (NKJV):
Then Jesus said to them again, “Most assuredly, I say to you, I am the door of the sheep. All who ever came before Me are thieves and robbers, but the sheep did not hear them. I am the door. If anyone enters by Me, he will be saved and will go in and out and find pasture.
The thief does not come except to steal, and to kill, and to destroy. I have come that they may have life, and that they may have it more abundantly.
I am the good shepherd. The good shepherd gives His life for the sheep. But a hireling, he who is not the shepherd, one who does not own the sheep, sees the wolf coming and leaves the sheep and flees; and the wolf catches the sheep and scatters them.
The hireling flees because he is a hireling and does not care about the sheep. I am the good shepherd; and I know My sheep, and am known by My own. As the Father knows Me, even so I know the Father; and I lay down My life for the sheep.”

The Son of God made it clear that Satan’s work has always been to steal, kill, and destroy. He has never changed — though he alters his names from time to time, today calling himself Allah. Ever since he was cast out of heaven, this has been his agenda on earth. And the Lord Jesus stated it plainly and without hesitation. The mission of the Lord Jesus is to give us life, and life in abundance.

The enemy has always been a murderer, as evident in the way followers of Allah kill Christians in Islamic countries. Wherever he operates, there is destruction, jihad, and terrorism. At times, I find myself reflecting: what is wrong with humanity? Why do people befriend Satan and willingly become his slaves? When you choose to live in sin, you are essentially making an alliance with Satan for your life. And I assure you — you cannot avoid being robbed, killed, or devastated by Satan.

Shalom,

Dr. Max Shimba
A bondservant of Jesus Christ, our Great God and Savior.
Titus 2:13



A Theological and Textual Critique of Muhammad’s Alleged Privileges in the Qur’an

A Comparative Analysis with Biblical Ethics

By Dr. Maxwell Shimba, Shimba Theological Institute


Introduction

Throughout history, religious texts have been subject to scrutiny, interpretation, and comparative analysis to assess their claims of divine origin and moral authority. One of the most debated issues in Islamic theology concerns the unique privileges granted to Muhammad in the Qur'an — privileges not extended to his followers, and which conspicuously coincide with moments of personal desire or scandal in his life. This paper offers a critical examination of these verses within the Qur’an, comparing them to Biblical narratives of patriarchal moral failure, and evaluating the theological implications for the concept of divine impartiality and holiness.


Muhammad’s Exclusive Privileges in the Qur’an

Several Qur'anic passages reveal peculiar concessions made specifically for Muhammad. A closer analysis of these texts suggests an unsettling pattern where divine revelations seem tailored to accommodate his personal interests, particularly in matters of marriage, sexual access, and household affairs.

  • Surah 33:50 provides Muhammad with an exclusive list of women he is permitted to marry or engage with sexually — including wives, cousins, slave girls, and any believing woman who offers herself to him. Notably, these allowances are restricted to the Prophet alone:

    “O Prophet, indeed We have made lawful to you your wives, those your right hand possesses… and a believing woman if she gives herself to the Prophet — if the Prophet wishes to marry her — [this is] only for you, excluding the [other] believers.” (Qur’an 33:50)

  • In Surah 33:51, Allah grants Muhammad discretionary authority to favor certain wives and postpone others without consequence:

    “You may defer [the turn of] any of them you wish and take to yourself whomever you wish, and any that you desire of those whom you had set aside, there is no blame upon you.”

  • Surah 66:1–2 addresses an incident where Muhammad vowed to cease relations with his slave concubine, Maria the Copt, to appease his wives’ jealousy. Rather than uphold his word, a new revelation appears, rebuking him for forbidding what Allah made lawful:

    “O Prophet, why do you prohibit [yourself from] what Allah has made lawful for you, seeking to please your wives? And Allah is Forgiving and Merciful.”

  • Perhaps most controversially, Surah 33:37 records Muhammad’s attraction to his adopted son Zayd’s wife, Zaynab bint Jahsh. Subsequently, a revelation arrives permitting the marriage:

    “And when Zayd had no longer any need for her, We married her to you so that there would not be upon the believers any discomfort concerning the wives of their adopted sons.”

  • Even household etiquette is managed by divine decree. Surah 33:53 advises guests not to linger in Muhammad’s home after meals to avoid infringing on his personal time:

    “When you are invited, enter; and when you have eaten, disperse without seeking to remain for conversation. Indeed, that was troubling the Prophet, and he is shy of [dismissing] you.”

The consistent pattern suggests that revelations often served to resolve Muhammad's immediate domestic and personal predicaments, rather than addressing timeless, universal moral or theological concerns.


Comparative Reflection: The Bible and Prophetic Moral Failure

In the Biblical tradition, figures such as Abraham, David, and Solomon indeed took multiple wives and concubines. However, unlike the Qur’an’s treatment of Muhammad, the Bible neither condones nor grants divine approval for these actions. Instead, the Hebrew Scriptures record such behaviors as moral failings with clear negative consequences:

  • David’s adultery with Bathsheba and arranged murder of her husband resulted in severe judgment, including the death of their child (2 Samuel 12:9–14).

  • Solomon’s polygamy and idolatry led to the division of the Israelite kingdom (1 Kings 11:1–13).

The absence of divine endorsement for these acts underscores the Bible’s commitment to the principle that all humans, including prophets, are accountable to God’s moral law. Their failings serve as cautionary tales rather than precedents.


Theological Implications

The divergence between the Qur’an’s accommodation of Muhammad’s personal life and the Bible’s portrayal of prophetic fallibility raises significant theological questions. If a deity is truly holy, impartial, and transcendent, the expectation would be for moral consistency and justice — qualities compromised if divine revelation appears selectively self-serving. The Qur’an’s repeated intervention in Muhammad’s private affairs under the guise of revelation challenges the integrity of its claim to be a universal, immutable word of God.

Moreover, the preferential treatment granted to Muhammad contradicts the Islamic assertion of his being a "mercy to all worlds" (Qur’an 21:107) and a model of moral perfection. If the sacred text reinforces inequitable privileges rather than holding its prophet accountable, it not only undermines its ethical credibility but invites the conclusion that the deity of the Qur’an functions more as a personal agent of the prophet’s will than as a sovereign, righteous God.


Conclusion

A careful, contextual, and comparative reading of the Qur’an alongside the Bible reveals marked differences in how prophetic misconduct is treated. The Biblical God remains morally consistent, rebuking even His chosen servants when they sin. In contrast, the Qur’anic Allah frequently appears as an enabler of Muhammad’s desires, issuing timely revelations that address his personal concerns, particularly in matters of marriage and social convenience.

Such a pattern casts serious doubt upon the claim of divine impartiality in the Qur’anic message. It invites modern scholars and theologians to reevaluate the theological foundations of Islam, particularly where prophetic conduct and divine holiness intersect. It is the duty of any sincere seeker of truth to discern whether a religious system elevates human desire above moral law or upholds a transcendent, holy standard for all — prophets included.


By Dr. Maxwell Shimba,
Shimba Theological Institute



JESUS DIED FOR YOU

By Max Shimba, Servant of Jesus Christ, the Great God (Titus 2:13)

Originally published May 30, 2018

Jesus died so that humanity might receive forgiveness for their sins and obtain eternal life. The Apostle Paul affirms this in Romans 6:23 and Ephesians 1:7. The death of Jesus demonstrated clearly that human beings are capable of remaining faithful to God even in the face of the most severe trials — as the writer of Hebrews confirms:

"For we do not have a high priest who is unable to sympathize with our weaknesses, but one who has been tempted in every way, just as we are — yet was without sin." (Hebrews 4:15)

Jesus died so that whoever believes in Him might not perish but have everlasting life:

"For God so loved the world that He gave His one and only Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish but have eternal life." (John 3:16)

This is precisely why Jesus came — and why He died — to be the ultimate, perfect, and final sacrifice for our sins:

"But now He has reconciled you by Christ's physical body through death to present you holy in His sight, without blemish and free from accusation." (Colossians 1:22)

"But with the precious blood of Christ, a lamb without blemish or defect." (1 Peter 1:19)

Through Him, the promise of eternal life with God becomes effectual through faith for those who believe in Jesus Christ. As Paul writes:

"But Scripture has locked up everything under the control of sin, so that what was promised — being given through faith in Jesus Christ — might be given to those who believe." (Galatians 3:22)

It is important to observe that the two terms — faith and believing — are pivotal for our salvation. It is through faith in the shed blood of Christ, sacrificed for our sins, that we receive eternal life. Paul declares:

"For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith — and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God — not by works, so that no one can boast." (Ephesians 2:8-9)

The clearest answers regarding this redemptive mission of Christ can be found in Isaiah chapter 53, an extraordinary prophetic chapter penned nearly five centuries before the death of Jesus. As Christians, we hold firm to this conviction and to what the rest of Scripture teaches — that all these events were part of God's sovereign plan for our salvation.

Jesus died upon the cross for our sins. God sent His only begotten Son to suffer and die so that we would not have to endure eternal suffering; by His death, He reconciled our sins. The prophet Isaiah proclaims:

"But He was pierced for our transgressions, He was crushed for our iniquities; the punishment that brought us peace was upon Him, and by His wounds we are healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his own way; and the LORD has laid on Him the iniquity of us all." (Isaiah 53:5-6)

Shalom,
Max Shimba, servant of Jesus Christ, the Great God (Titus 2:13)



The Intrinsic Nature of God’s Love

The Intrinsic Nature of God’s Love By Dr. Maxwell Shimba, Shimba Theological Institute Introduction The declaration of Scripture, “God is lo...

TRENDING NOW